SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a 6-core AMD desktop processor with NVIDIA’s flagship 24 GB graphics card, creating a system that is heavily skewed toward GPU-bound workloads. The data shows a clear split between the CPU’s mid-range standing and the GPU’s top-tier capability, which defines what this build can and cannot do well.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 83rd percentile compared to all other CPU and GPU combinations in the database, indicating it outperforms roughly five out of every six recorded pairings.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8400F compare to its closest rival, the Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25,005, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7500F’s score of 24,964. This makes the two processors effectively identical in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 4090 features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. This is a defining characteristic for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 8400F has no integrated graphics (listed as "N/A"). A discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The GPU has a 450 W TDP and the suggested PSU rating is 850 W. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so the power supply recommendation is driven almost entirely by the graphics card.

Q: Is the measured FPS data real or estimated?

A: The data is measured. The `dataIsMeasured` field is set to true, meaning the frame rates listed for each game and resolution come from actual testing, not projections.

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F had a launch MSRP of $170.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25,005, placing it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24,964 (0.2% slower), while the Intel Core i7-11850H and i7-13620H trail closely at 24,935 and 24,911 respectively. On the other side, the AMD EPYC 9474F leads by a slim margin with a score of 25,103, a 0.4% advantage. This places the 8400F in a tight cluster where performance differences are negligible.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60,347, which puts it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a wider spread: the Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60,326 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140 (0.3% slower), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (2.9% slower). Interestingly, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% faster with a score of 61,896. The 4090’s percentile ranking is high, but the deltaPct values reveal that a few workstation-class GPUs are within striking distance in synthetic benchmarks.

In multi-threaded CPU tests, the 8400F scores 6,165 in 3dmark_max_threads and 20,851 in Cinebench R23 multicore. Single-thread performance is also respectable, with 951 in 3dmark_single_thread and 2,943 in Cinebench R23 singlecore. The combined picture is a system where the GPU outranks the CPU by 11 percentile points (88 vs 77). The overall build percentile is 83, which is closer to the CPU’s standing than the GPU’s, suggesting that the processor is the limiting factor in many scenarios.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data is available across a wide range of titles at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in most games: 359 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 427 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, and 461.2 FPS in Valorant. Heavier titles still perform well, with Cyberpunk 2077 hitting 96.7 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 reaching 100.1 FPS. The most demanding game in the dataset, Ark: Survival Ascended, manages 50.5 FPS at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, frame rates scale down predictably. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 238 FPS, Valorant stays high at 436.8 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 81.1 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended becomes borderline playable at 31 FPS. The 1440p results show that the GPU is still strong enough for competitive titles, but the CPU begins to show its limits in the most CPU-intensive games.

At 3840x2160, the resolution becomes the bottleneck. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 133 FPS, Valorant at 408 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 at 49.6 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 14.5 FPS, which is unplayable. The average FPS across all games is 213.7, and the pair ranks 137th out of 3,732 pairs by FPS, placing it in the top 3.7% of all recorded pairs. The data shows that 1080p and 1440p are the sweet spots, with 4K being viable only for less demanding titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This is a modern platform that supports current DDR5 memory standards.

The GPU has a TDP of 450 W and the suggested PSU is 850 W. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so the power supply headroom is more than sufficient for the processor. The GPU is listed as end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, so a future upgrade would involve replacing the graphics card. The CPU is still active in production, meaning it remains a current product.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a newer model when the need arises, as the platform itself (AM5, DDR5, PCIe 4.0) is not the limiting factor. The CPU’s 65 W TDP leaves ample thermal and power headroom for a more power-hungry processor in the same socket, should the user want to move to a higher-core-count Ryzen later. However, the data suggests the current CPU is well-matched to the platform’s capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap between the CPU (77th) and GPU (88th) is 11 points, indicating an imbalance. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at 1080p, the 8400F is the limiting factor. For example, Valorant at 1080p hits 461.2 FPS, but the GPU’s massive compute resources are not fully utilized at that resolution. The CPU’s single-thread score of 951 in 3dmark and 3,685 in Passmark single-thread determines the ceiling in these games.

In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming or rendering workloads, the RTX 4090 is the constraining component. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows this clearly: Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 96.7 FPS to 49.6 FPS, a 51% reduction that is typical of GPU-limited performance. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 6,165 in 3dmark_max_threads is more than enough to feed the GPU at higher resolutions.

The pair’s rank of 137 out of 3,732 pairs by FPS confirms that, on average, the GPU is doing most of the heavy lifting. The bottleneck analysis shows that for maximum frame rates in competitive shooters, the CPU will hold back the GPU. For visually demanding single-player games and creative workloads, the GPU is the dominant factor, and the CPU is rarely the limiting component.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is based on the AD102 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process from TSMC. It contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The GPU has 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores. Clock speeds are 2235 MHz base and 2520 MHz boost, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

Memory capacity is 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. This is a critical asset for 4K textures and large datasets. The pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating strong compute capability for both gaming and professional tasks.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are impressive: 9,223 in 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, 255,416 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 271,631 in Geekbench Vulkan. Passmark G3D score is 38,194, and GPU compute is 26,613. These numbers place it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores make it exceptionally well-suited for ray tracing and DLSS workloads, though the data provided does not include specific RT benchmark scores. The 24 GB VRAM ensures that memory capacity will not be a constraint in any current game or rendering application.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, making it a power-efficient desktop part.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel operation and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes and has no integrated graphics. It is socketed on AM5 and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark scores show a balanced profile: 20,851 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2,943 in singlecore. Passmark scores include 24,389 for multithread and 3,685 for single-thread. Data compression scores 288,158, encryption scores 16,646, and floating-point math scores 46,217. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25,005, placing it at the 77th percentile. For real workloads, this translates to strong performance in everyday tasks and moderate capability in heavily threaded applications. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for gaming and light productivity but will lag behind higher-core-count processors in video rendering or 3D simulation.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining a mid-range 6-core CPU with a flagship 24 GB GPU. The CPU is a Zen 4 (Phoenix) part on the AM5 platform, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4090. The combined percentile is 83, which reflects the GPU’s high standing (88th percentile) being dragged down slightly by the CPU’s more modest 77th percentile.

The overall tier is high-end for gaming, particularly at 1080p and 1440p, where the average FPS across games is 213.7. The pair ranks 137th out of 3,732 pairs, putting it in the top 4% of all recorded pairings. However, this is not a balanced workstation build. The CPU is the weak link for multi-threaded productivity, while the GPU is one of the most powerful consumer cards ever made. The build is best characterized as a gaming-first system with the GPU as the centerpiece.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates will find this build ideal. The measured FPS shows 359 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 427 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege at 1080p, which exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors. At 1440p, competitive titles still exceed 200 FPS, and demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 run above 80 FPS. 4K gaming is possible but limited to less demanding titles, as evidenced by the 49.6 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 3840x2160.

Content creators who work primarily with GPU-accelerated applications will benefit from the 24 GB VRAM and 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores make this a capable machine for 3D rendering and AI workloads, though the CPU will bottleneck heavily threaded CPU-side tasks like video encoding or physics simulations.

Developers working on game engines or GPU compute will appreciate the Vulkan score of 271,631 and OpenCL score of 255,416. The 24 GB memory capacity allows for large dataset manipulation without swapping. Students and small business users who need a fast GPU for visualization but do not require high CPU core counts will find this build sufficient, provided their workloads are GPU-centric. For users who need balanced CPU and GPU performance for tasks like software compilation or heavy multitasking, this pairing is less suitable due to the CPU’s 6-core limitation.