SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

This desktop build pairs AMD's 6-core Zen 4 processor with NVIDIA's flagship-tier Ada Lovelace GPU, landing at the 82nd percentile overall among all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU holds the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system that is strongly biased toward graphics-heavy workloads rather than multi-threaded compute tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The measured frame rates at 1080p are exceptional across competitive titles. Counter-Strike 2 delivers 325 FPS, Valorant reaches 463 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 386 FPS at 1920x1080. These figures comfortably exceed the refresh rates of even the fastest gaming monitors available. The pair's average FPS across all tested games is 194.8, placing it at rank 312 out of 3732 tracked pairs (top 8.4%).

Streaming: The RTX 4080's 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-based enhancements. The CPU's single-thread score of 951 in 3DMark and 2943 in Cinebench R23 ensure that game logic and streaming overhead can be handled simultaneously. At 1440p, games like Call of Duty: Warzone run at 128 FPS, leaving headroom for software encoding if needed.

Video editing: The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with 716.8 GB/s bandwidth accelerates timeline rendering and effects processing. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 24389 and data compression score of 288158 handle project file operations and export pipelines efficiently. The 12-thread configuration provides adequate parallelism for mainstream editing software without the cost of higher-core workstation chips.

3D rendering: The GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 761.5 GTexel/s texture rate make it the dominant rendering engine in this pairing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 supports viewport interactivity and scene preparation, but the GPU will significantly outperform the CPU in final-frame rendering tasks. For GPU-accelerated renderers, this is a well-balanced combination.

Software development: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and PassMark single-thread score of 3685 provide responsive compilation of single-file projects. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration handles parallel builds competently, though the 16 MB shared L3 cache means larger codebases may see some cache pressure. The GPU's compute capabilities accelerate shader compilation and machine learning development workflows.

Student and office work: The 65W TDP CPU keeps power consumption modest for daily productivity tasks. The PassMark data encryption score of 16646 and extended instructions score of 22175 handle document processing and spreadsheet calculations efficiently. This system is massively overprovisioned for office work, but the headroom ensures no task ever feels sluggish, and the platform supports future upgrades.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC's 5nm process, packing 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die. Its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory operates across a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth—sufficient for 4K texture streaming and large AI model inference. The memory clock runs at 1400 MHz with 22.4 Gbps effective throughput.

The GPU contains 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. Clock speeds are 2205 MHz base and 2505 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s. The 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for DLSS upscaling, ray-traced lighting, and AI-accelerated workloads.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a PassMark G3D score of 34457 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739 and Vulkan score of 263779 indicate strong compute throughput for rendering applications. The GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 54247. Its nearest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER, which scores only 0.1% higher, making this effectively a tie at the top of the 4080 tier.

The 320W TDP requires a 700W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. The triple-slot cooler measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, demanding a spacious case with good airflow. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups up to 4K resolution.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface—matching bandwidth for current graphics workloads.

The 65W TDP of the CPU leaves substantial thermal and power headroom within the AM5 platform. The GPU's 320W TDP and 700W suggested PSU mean the power supply must accommodate the combined load. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count AM5 CPU, as the socket and memory standard remain current. The platform's DDR5 support ensures memory upgrades are possible without changing the motherboard.

The CPU's 4nm process and 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die demonstrate AMD's efficiency focus. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the 4.20 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost clocks already provide strong single-thread performance. The 16 MB shared L3 cache is smaller than some desktop Ryzen parts, reflecting the Phoenix chiplet design's target at mainstream rather than enthusiast workloads.

The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with its successor (GeForce 50 series) already released. This means the RTX 4080 will not receive future architectural updates, but its current performance tier remains competitive. Users looking for a platform with longevity should consider whether the AM5 socket's continued support aligns with their upgrade timeline.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p: The measured FPS data shows this system excels at high-refresh gaming. At 1080p, esports titles run at 300+ FPS, while AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 hit 94 FPS. At 1440p, the system maintains playable frame rates across nearly all titles, with Control at 102 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 65 FPS.

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists benefit from the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth. The 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates renders, while the CPU's 12 threads handle timeline operations. The PassMark GPU compute score of 20671 confirms strong compute acceleration for effects and filters.

Software developers: The CPU's balanced single-thread and multi-thread scores support both compilation and interactive debugging. The GPU's tensor cores enable local machine learning experimentation. The 77th CPU percentile means this processor outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs, providing ample headroom for development toolchains.

Students and professionals: The 65W TDP keeps electricity costs modest for daily use. The system handles office productivity, data analysis, and light programming without breaking a sweat. The AM5 platform's DDR5 support ensures compatibility with current memory standards for years to come.

Small business workstations: The combination of fast storage via PCIe Gen 4, 16 GB GDDR6X for graphics acceleration, and 12 CPU threads handles CAD, visualization, and database workloads. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6567 indicates strong DX12 performance for professional 3D applications.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It uses TSMC's 4nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the 65W TDP reflects an efficiency-focused design.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth through the dual-channel DDR5 interface. The integrated graphics are marked as N/A, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory—which this build provides in abundance.

Benchmark results show the CPU scoring 951 in 3DMark single-thread and 6165 in 3DMark max threads. Cinebench R23 scores are 2943 single-core and 20851 multi-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 24389, single-thread of 3685, and physics score of 1332. Data compression hits 288158, while floating-point math reaches 46217 and integer math 74021.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25005, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which scores 24964 with a delta of just 0.2%—effectively identical performance. The Intel Core i7-11850H and i7-13620H are also close, at 0.3% and 0.4% deltas respectively. The AMD EPYC 9474F trails by 0.4%.

For real workloads, the 4.70 GHz boost clock provides snappy single-thread responsiveness for applications that rely on one or two cores. The 12 threads handle multi-threaded tasks competently, though the 16 MB L3 cache limits performance in cache-sensitive workloads compared to larger desktop chips. This is a mainstream processor that punches near its weight class but does not match high-core-count workstation CPUs.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data covers 51 games across three resolutions, all at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance in competitive titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 717 FPS, Valorant 463 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege 386 FPS. Even demanding AAA games run smoothly, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 94 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 87 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the system maintains high frame rates. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 215 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 128 FPS, and Control at 102 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 71 FPS, while Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 30 FPS—still playable but indicating the game is particularly heavy. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 95 FPS, showing good optimization.

At 3840x2160, the system remains viable for most games. Valorant achieves 407 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 hits 120 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 108 FPS. AAA titles see significant reductions: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 47 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 43 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 16 FPS. The Medium runs at 45 FPS, and Control at 69 FPS.

The average FPS across all games is 194.8, with the pair ranking 312 out of 3732 tracked pairs—placing this system in the top 8.4% of all CPU+GPU combinations by gaming performance. The data is measured rather than estimated, providing confidence in these figures. For 4K gaming, users may need to adjust settings or enable DLSS for the most demanding titles, but at 1080p and 1440p, this system delivers outstanding results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile create a system that is GPU-bound in most gaming scenarios. At 1080p, some esports titles show CPU limitations—Valorant at 463 FPS and CS:GO at 717 FPS are likely CPU-capped, as the GPU could render even higher frame rates if the CPU could feed it faster.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows frame rate drops of 25-40% across most games, and from 1440p to 4K drops of 40-55%. This pattern indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (288158 PassMark score) and encryption (16646), the CPU is the sole performer. The GPU's 20671 compute score handles parallel math tasks, but single-threaded operations remain CPU-limited. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1874 suggests some games that rely heavily on two or four threads will see CPU constraints.

The balanced picture is that this system excels at GPU-intensive tasks—gaming at high resolutions, rendering, and compute—while remaining competent in CPU-bound tasks without excelling. The 0.2% delta to the Ryzen 5 7500F shows the CPU is well-matched to its class, while the GPU's 0.1% delta to the RTX 4080 SUPER confirms it operates at the top of its tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, meaning this system outperforms 82% of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005 on average, just 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24964) and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth with 22.4 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with caveats. Measured frame rates at 3840x2160 show 108 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 120 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, and 47 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. The most demanding games may require settings adjustments.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F uses Zen 4 architecture (codename Phoenix) on TSMC's 4nm process, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 700W, which accounts for the CPU's 65W TDP and the GPU's 320W TDP combined with other system components.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 scores 54247 on average, just 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080 SUPER's 54209—a statistically negligible difference.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks relative to its multi-threaded performance. The 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2943 are strong for a 6-core chip. The multi-thread scores—3DMark max threads of 6165 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20851—are respectable but not class-leading.

The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: floating-point math at 46217 and integer math at 74021 are solid for productivity. Data compression at 288158 indicates strong archive handling, while random string sorting at 34604 shows efficient memory operations. The encryption score of 16646 is modest, reflecting the lack of dedicated crypto acceleration.

The GPU's benchmarks demonstrate its high-end positioning. The PassMark G3D score of 34457 and 3DMark Steel Nomad of 6567 confirm strong DX12 performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 263779 and OpenCL of 214739 show excellent compute versatility. The PassMark GPU compute score of 20671 indicates robust parallel processing.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25005 places it at the 77th percentile, with rivals within 0.4%—this is a tightly competitive segment where the 8400F holds its own. The GPU's average of 54247 at the 86th percentile shows more differentiation, with the nearest rival (RTX 4080 SUPER) virtually tied and the next competitors (AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, RX 6750 GRE, and Radeon 8060S) trailing by 1.1% to 2.7%.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing AMD's mainstream Ryzen 5 8400F with NVIDIA's high-end RTX 4080. The CPU represents AMD's 8000 series on the AM5 platform, while the GPU is part of the GeForce 40-series based on Ada Lovelace architecture. The combination sits at the 82nd overall percentile, indicating a system that outperforms the vast majority of tracked configurations.

The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads at 4.70 GHz boost provide solid mainstream performance, while the GPU's 9728 shading units and 16 GB GDDR6X deliver high-end graphics capability. The 65W CPU TDP and 320W GPU TDP create a power profile that requires a 700W PSU but remains manageable for a desktop system.

The pair ranks 312 out of 3732 tracked pairs by average FPS, with an average of 194.8 FPS across all tested games. This places the system in the top 8.4% for gaming performance. The data is measured, providing reliable expectations for real-world usage.

This build is best characterized as a gaming-first system with strong content creation capabilities. The GPU significantly outperforms the CPU in relative terms (86th vs 77th percentile), making it ideal for graphics-intensive workloads. Users seeking balanced multi-threaded compute performance may want a higher-core CPU, but for gaming, streaming, and GPU-accelerated rendering, this configuration delivers exceptional results.