SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop configuration that combines a 6-core Zen 4 processor with a high-end Ada Lovelace graphics card. This pairing targets a combined percentile rank of 81, indicating it sits above the vast majority of tested hardware configurations. The CPU is a 65 W part on the AM5 platform, while the GPU is a 285 W card designed for 1440p and 4K gaming, supported by a substantial 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU die contains 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² area, resulting in a transistor density of 121.8M / mm². The card operates with a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with memory running at an effective 21 Gbps. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory is connected via a 192-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

The GPU's compute resources are substantial: 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation processors. For ray tracing and AI workloads, the card features 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The theoretical performance figures are notable, with FP32 and FP16 compute both rated at 40.09 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio for these precision formats. Pixel rate is 208.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 626.4 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results place the RTX 4070 Ti in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 44795, which puts it in close competition with several other cards. The data shows a 0.8% performance deficit compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, a 1.3% deficit versus the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, and a 1.7% deficit against the Intel Arc A730M. Conversely, it holds a 1.6% advantage over the NVIDIA RTX A6000. These narrow deltas indicate that the RTX 4070 Ti performs in a tightly contested tier, where the differences between these specific rivals are minimal.

In terms of API support, the card is fully equipped for modern titles, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 port and three DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. Power delivery is handled by a single 16-pin connector, and the card's TDP is rated at 285 W, with a suggested PSU of 600 W. For rendering workloads, the combination of 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores suggests strong performance in ray-traced scenes and DLSS-enhanced tasks, though specific frame rate data for those features is not provided. The GPU's G3D score of 31624 and compute score of 18396 in Passmark underline its capability for both graphics and compute-heavy applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the Ryzen 5 8400F and RTX 4070 Ti build?

A: The build holds a combinedPercentile of 81, indicating it outperforms 81% of all tested configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25005, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7500F's average score of 24964, making the performance difference negligible.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070 Ti?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, achieved through 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 8400F include integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field for the Ryzen 5 8400F is listed as "N/A", meaning it requires a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 4070 Ti?

A: The launch MSRP of the RTX 4070 Ti is 799 USD.

Q: How many RT cores does the RTX 4070 Ti have?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 60 RT cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing calculations.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Ryzen 5 8400F?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, up from a base clock of 4.20 GHz.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The CPU operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support is limited to DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU does not support ECC memory. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The processor is socketed on AMD Socket AM5 and has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. It was released on 2024-03-31 with a launch MSRP of $170.

Benchmark results show the CPU in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The average benchmark score is 25005. In multi-threaded tests, the CPU scores 20851 in Cinebench R23, 8757 in Cinebench R20, and 2101 in Cinebench R15. Single-thread scores are 2943 in Cinebench R23, 1236 in R20, and 296 in R15. 3DMark tests show a progression from 1874 in the 2-thread test to 6091 in the 16-thread test, with a max-thread score of 6165. Passmark scores include 24389 for multithread, 3685 for single thread, 74021 for integer math, and 46217 for floating point math.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 8400F is virtually identical in performance. It is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i7-11850H, and 0.4% faster than the Intel Core i7-13620H. It is 0.4% slower than the AMD EPYC 9474F, which is a server-class processor. These small deltas mean that in real-world workloads, the differences between these CPUs would be imperceptible. The data suggests a strong all-rounder for desktop tasks, with the 6-core/12-thread configuration handling modern workloads efficiently, and the high single-thread score of 2943 in Cinebench R23 indicating solid responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream desktop socket for AMD processors. The Ryzen 5 8400F supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and NVMe storage. The RTX 4070 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which matches the CPU's capabilities.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, while the GPU's TDP is 285 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 600 W, which provides headroom for the entire system. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector. The physical dimensions of the GPU are 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width, making it a dual-slot card. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking to extract additional performance.

For a sensible next upgrade, the AM5 socket offers a clear path forward. Users could consider a higher-core-count processor within the same socket and platform, as the memory support and PCIe lanes would remain compatible. The GPU, being end-of-life, has a successor in the GeForce 50 series, but the current card's performance percentile of 84 suggests it remains a strong option. The 600 W PSU recommendation provides sufficient headroom for the current components, and would likely accommodate a similarly-powerful future GPU without requiring a PSU change, though this depends on the specific power requirements of any new card.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balanced nature of this build is evident from the percentile data. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 84th percentile, and the combined percentile is 81. This suggests the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU, but the gap is not enormous. In gaming workloads, the bottleneck will shift depending on resolution.

At 1920x1080, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more relevant. The Ryzen 5 8400F's single-thread score of 2943 in Cinebench R23 is respectable, and the data shows high frame rates in many titles at this resolution. For example, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 297.4 FPS, and Valorant at 463 FPS. These high frame rates suggest the GPU has headroom, and the CPU is capable of feeding it.

At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. At 3840x2160, frame rates drop significantly across all titles. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 46 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 37.1 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 11.9 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K, as the resolution demands more pixel-pushing power than the CPU's influence on frame rate. The average FPS across all games is 187.7, but this figure masks the wide variation between esports titles and AAA games. The pair's rank of 460 out of 3861 pairs shows it is in the top 12% of tested configurations, which indicates a well-matched pairing where neither component is severely underpowered relative to the other.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets a specific set of users based on its measured performance. For gamers at 1920x1080, the build delivers exceptionally high frame rates in competitive titles, with figures like 660.6 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and 463 FPS in Valorant. This makes it suitable for esports enthusiasts who require high refresh rates. At 2560x1440, the build remains strong, with most titles exceeding 60 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 65.6 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 126 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for the RTX 4070 Ti, balancing visual fidelity with high frame rates.

For 4K gaming, the build is playable but not ideal for every title. Games like Minecraft run at 97 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 74 FPS, but demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (46 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (37.1 FPS) will require settings adjustments or upscaling technologies. Content creators will benefit from the GPU's compute capabilities, with Passmark GPU compute scores of 18396 and OpenCL scores of 176953, suggesting solid performance in rendering tasks. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads handle multitasking well, with a Passmark multithread score of 24389.

Software developers and students will appreciate the platform's modern features, including DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4. The CPU's performance in data encryption (Passmark score of 16646) and compression (288158) indicates capability in productivity workloads. Small business workstations could utilize this build for tasks that require both CPU and GPU acceleration, given the balanced nature of the components. The 65 W CPU TDP also means lower cooling requirements for the processor, though the GPU's 285 W TDP requires adequate case airflow.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25005, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24964, a difference of 0.2%. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935 (0.3% behind), and the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911 (0.4% behind). The AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103, which is 0.4% ahead. These results show the Ryzen 5 8400F sits in a tightly packed group where no clear winner exists.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 44795, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile at 45152 (0.8% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45384 (1.3% ahead), and the Intel Arc A730M at 45592 (1.7% ahead). The NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075, which is 1.6% behind. The GPU's performance is solidly in the upper tier, with a Passmark G3D score of 31624 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024.

The combined picture shows a build with a combinedPercentile of 81. The CPU's 77th percentile is slightly below the GPU's 84th, but the pairing works well together. The average FPS across all games is 187.7, and the pair ranks 460th out of 3861 tested pairs. This indicates the combination is better than the vast majority of tested configurations, and the performance gap between the CPU and GPU is not large enough to create a significant bottleneck in most scenarios. The data confirms a high-performing desktop build.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor on the AM5 socket, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 7680 shading units. The combinedPercentile of 81 places this build in the top 20% of all tested configurations, indicating a high overall tier of performance.

The CPU's percentile rank of 77 and the GPU's percentile rank of 84 are both strong individually. The build class is explicitly "desktop", confirming it is a stationary workstation or gaming rig. The components are well-matched in terms of their performance tier, with the GPU having a slight edge. The CPU's 65 W TDP makes it power-efficient, while the GPU's 285 W TDP is typical for its class. This is a mid-to-high-end desktop build that leverages the benefits of the AM5 platform, including DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4, to deliver a balanced and capable system.

Gaming Performance

The gaming data is based on measured FPS at ultra settings across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the build delivers exceptional performance in esports titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 660.6 FPS, Valorant hits 463 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 354 FPS. Even demanding titles run well, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 88.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 80.9 FPS. The only game that struggles is Ark: Survival Ascended at 45.2 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong for most titles. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 126 FPS, Control at 94 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 at 65.6 FPS. Esports titles still maintain high frame rates, with Counter-Strike 2 at 194.9 FPS and Valorant at 439 FPS. More demanding games like Red Dead Redemption 2 (62.7 FPS) and Ark: Survival Ascended (29.1 FPS) show the GPU's limits at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, 4K gaming is playable in many titles but demanding ones require compromises. Minecraft runs at 97 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 74 FPS, and Doom at 78.3 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 46 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 37.1 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is nearly unplayable at 11.9 FPS. The average FPS across all games at all resolutions is 187.7, but this figure is heavily skewed by the high frame rates of esports titles. The data shows that 1440p is the optimal resolution for this build, balancing visual quality with high frame rates across a wide variety of game types.