SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM pairing represents a desktop build that combines a modern 6-core Zen 4 processor with an entry-level Ampere graphics card. This configuration targets a specific segment of the market where CPU headroom is prioritized over raw GPU throughput, and the benchmark data confirms a system that is well-suited for high-refresh competitive gaming at lower resolutions while remaining capable for general productivity tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is built on the Zen 4 architecture using the Phoenix codename, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node. This 6-core, 12-thread processor operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip features a 16 MB shared L3 cache, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 KB of L1 per core, totaling 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Memory support is limited to DDR5, running in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU.

Benchmark data reveals a processor with strong single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread scaling. The 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943 indicate excellent responsiveness for lightly-threaded workloads. The multi-threaded results show a predictable scaling pattern: the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6091 is very close to the max-thread score of 6165, suggesting that the 6-core/12-thread configuration is fully utilized and that additional threads would not provide significant gains. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 places this processor in a competitive position, as evidenced by its 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs.

The Passmark suite further characterizes the CPU's workload-specific strengths. The integer math score of 74021 and floating-point math score of 46217 demonstrate solid arithmetic capability, while the extended instructions score of 22175 highlights a meaningful advantage for workloads that utilize modern SIMD instruction sets. Data compression performance is particularly strong at 288158, and data encryption scores 16646. The prime number finding score of 89 is notably low, indicating this chip is not optimized for that specific type of integer workload. The average benchmark score of 25005 places it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-11850H, and 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-13620H, showing that it sits in a tightly contested performance bracket.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25005 places it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24964 with a delta of 0.2%, the Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935 with a delta of 0.3%, and the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911 with a delta of 0.4%. On the higher side, the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103, a delta of -0.4% from the 8400F. This tight clustering means the 8400F is statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in aggregate performance, and real-world differences will be workload-dependent.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, presents a different performance profile. Its average benchmark score of 15199 places it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs, a significantly lower position than the CPU's 77th percentile. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 15171 (0.2% delta), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (-0.5% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283 (-0.5% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 at 15290 (-0.6% delta). This places the RTX 3050 OEM in a crowded mid-range tier where performance differences are minimal.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 67, reflecting the imbalance between the strong CPU and the more modest GPU. The overall picture is a system where the processor is capable of feeding a more powerful graphics card, but the GPU limits the total system performance in graphics-intensive scenarios. This is a classic CPU-first build where the processor will remain relevant longer than the graphics card.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 57th percentile creates a 20-point gap that manifests in GPU-bound workloads. In gaming scenarios, this means the RTX 3050 OEM will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and graphical settings, while the CPU will have significant headroom at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this analysis. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 demonstrates substantial processing power that will not be fully utilized in most gaming scenarios, where the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 becomes the performance ceiling. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 58 and DirectX 11 score of 86 indicate that the graphics card is designed for mainstream gaming but will struggle with demanding titles at maximum settings.

In CPU-bound workloads such as physics calculations, the Passmark physics score of 1332 shows adequate performance, but the GPU's compute capabilities will not meaningfully accelerate these tasks. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like rendering with DirectX 12, the CPU has ample headroom to handle driver overhead and game logic without becoming a constraint. The result is a system where upgrading the GPU would yield significant performance gains without requiring a CPU change, but upgrading the CPU would provide minimal benefit for gaming while the current GPU remains installed.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores and must be treated as approximations rather than definitive results.

Based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and its 57th percentile ranking, this system is estimated to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p resolution for most esports and competitive titles, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943) will help maintain high minimum frame rates. For graphically demanding AAA games, the RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance at higher settings, and users should expect to lower graphical presets to achieve smooth gameplay.

The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 58 suggests that modern API-based titles will run at lower performance levels than older DirectX 11 titles, which score 86. This indicates that the card is better suited for established game engines rather than current-generation releases. The CPU's ability to maintain high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios (such as large multiplayer battles) will be a benefit, but the GPU will prevent the system from reaching very high frame rates in most situations. For competitive gaming at 1080p with reduced settings, this pairing is estimated to provide a satisfying experience, but it is not designed for high-refresh 1440p gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943) is sufficient for high-refresh competitive gaming, but the GPU's 57th percentile ranking and DirectX 11 score of 86 will limit achievable frame rates in most titles. This system is estimated to handle esports at 1080p with high refresh rates, but demanding games will require settings reductions.

Streaming: The 6-core, 12-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 provides enough processing power for software encoding while gaming, though the GPU's limited compute performance (Passmark GPU compute score of 5779) means hardware encoding via NVIDIA's NVENC is the preferred option. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for streaming at 1080p.

Video Editing: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (3DMark max-thread score of 6165) and data compression score of 288158 make this system capable for 1080p video editing and rendering. The GPU can accelerate effects and exports, but its 57th percentile ranking means longer render times than with higher-tier cards.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 provides solid performance for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS offers moderate acceleration for GPU-accelerated renderers. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's 77th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 3685) make this system well-suited for compilation, code analysis, and development workflows. The 16 MB L3 cache and DDR5 memory support provide responsive multitasking.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and efficient 4 nm process make this an economical system for productivity tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 24389 and integer math score of 74021 indicate fast spreadsheet and document processing, while the GPU is sufficient for basic graphical tasks and dual-monitor setups.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA106 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1515 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

The GPU contains 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output processors. It includes 18 RT cores for ray tracing and 72 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads. The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 8.087 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The card consumes 130 W and requires a 300 W suggested PSU, with a single 8-pin power connector.

Benchmark results show a GPU that sits at the 57th percentile, with a Passmark G3D score of 11857. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 indicate moderate compute capability. The DirectX 12 score of 58 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 86, suggesting that the card performs relatively better in older APIs. The Passmark GPU compute score of 5779 is modest, indicating limited compute throughput for tasks like rendering or machine learning. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming but will be a constraint at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for desktop users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The Ryzen 5 8400F's 77th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for gamers who play competitive titles at 1080p with high refresh rates, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943) will provide consistent frame pacing. The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile ranking means users should expect to play at medium to high settings in modern games, but the card is adequate for esports and less demanding titles.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks such as video encoding, software compilation, or productivity applications will find the 6-core, 12-thread configuration (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851) well-suited for their needs. The GPU provides basic acceleration for effects and preview rendering, but it is not the primary driver of performance. Software developers will benefit from the CPU's 77th percentile ranking and fast single-thread performance for compilation tasks. Students and small business users will appreciate the 65 W TDP and efficient architecture for daily office work, where the CPU's integer math score of 74021 ensures responsive application performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The 65 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP, combined with a suggested PSU of 300 W, provide significant headroom for future upgrades.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking and 3DMark max-thread score of 6165 indicate substantial headroom for a more powerful graphics card. Upgrading to a GPU with a higher Passmark G3D score than the current 11857 would provide immediate gaming performance gains, as the CPU would be able to feed a faster card without becoming a bottleneck. The AM5 platform also supports future CPU upgrades within the same socket, allowing users to increase core counts or clock speeds without changing the motherboard or memory.

The platform's PCIe Gen 4 support and DDR5 memory provide a modern foundation, and the 300 W suggested PSU leaves room for moderate GPU upgrades. For more substantial upgrades, users would need to consider a higher-capacity PSU, but the current configuration is well-balanced for its intended use case.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F ranks at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7500F's average score of 24964.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM ranks at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15199.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and the GPU's suggested PSU requirement?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 130 W with a suggested PSU rating of 300 W.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, creating a system that sits at the 67th combined percentile. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor on the AM5 socket with a 65 W TDP, ranking at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, ranking at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. The significant gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles defines this system's character: it is a CPU-first build where the processor provides substantial headroom for future GPU upgrades, but the current graphics card limits overall system performance in graphics-intensive workloads. This is a desktop configuration suited for users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks and are willing to accept moderate gaming performance at 1080p resolution.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds