SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070

This desktop build pairs a 6-core Zen 4 processor with a 16 GB RDNA 4 graphics card, landing at the 73rd percentile overall. The CPU scores 25,005 average benchmark points (77th percentile), while the GPU averages 23,877 points (69th percentile). Across 55 measured games at ultra settings, this combination produces an average of 155.2 FPS, ranking 1069th out of 3732 tracked pairs.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8400F compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25,005 on average, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24,964), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935), and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911). It trails the AMD EPYC 9474F (25,103) by 0.4%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance position relative to similar cards?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 averages 23,877 benchmark points. It sits 0.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (23,736) and 1.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile (23,628). However, it trails the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (24,063) by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (24,170) by 1.2%.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160 ultra settings, the pair delivers playable frame rates in many titles: 109.4 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 88.5 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 60.5 FPS in Assetto Corsa, and 53.7 FPS in Control. Heavier titles drop lower—Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 37.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 33.5 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11.7 FPS.

Q: What memory and platform does this CPU require?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform with dual-channel DDR5 memory support and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. It provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for high-refresh gaming?

A: The GPU dominates most workloads, but the CPU's 77th percentile (vs. GPU's 69th) means the processor has more headroom. In esports titles like Valorant, the pair hits 463.7 FPS at 1080p, indicating the CPU can feed high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 951 in 3DMark and 3,685 in Passmark supports this.

Q: What is the power supply requirement?

A: The GPU has a 220 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 550 W. The CPU's TDP is 65 W. The GPU uses two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot form factor.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 8400F has no integrated graphics (N/A). A discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile of 73 places this build comfortably above the median system. The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,005 puts it at the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU's 23,877 average sits at the 69th percentile among all graphics cards. The gap between these two percentiles—8 points—indicates the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing.

In 3DMark multi-threaded tests, the CPU scales from 1,874 points with 2 threads to 6,091 with 16 threads, and peaks at 6,165 with max threads. The jump from 8 threads (5,275) to 16 threads (6,091) shows a 15.5% gain, while going from 4 threads (3,563) to 8 threads shows a 48% improvement. Single-thread performance sits at 951 points.

Cinebench results follow a similar pattern: R23 multi-core hits 20,851 points versus 2,943 single-core. The ratio of 7.1x between multi and single-core performance reflects the 6-core/12-thread configuration. Passmark integer math scores 74,021, floating-point math 46,217, and extended instructions 22,175, showing strong ALU and FPU throughput for a desktop processor in this class.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,290. Geekbench OpenCL reports 131,539 and Vulkan 58,705, indicating solid compute capability. Passmark G3D scores 25,381 with GPU compute at 14,737. The DirectX 11 score of 281 versus DirectX 12's 74 suggests the card's DX12 driver path may not be fully optimized, but real-world game tests tell a more complete story.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 9070 packs 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The GPU has 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units, producing a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s.

Compute performance reaches 36.13 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The card includes 56 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not specified. Base clock is 1330 MHz, boost clock 2520 MHz, and game clock 2070 MHz. This is a 4 nm TSMC chip with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die.

In the Passmark G3D benchmark, the RX 9070 scores 25,381, putting it at the 69th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, scores 24,170—meaning the RX 9070 is 1.2% behind that older card in average score. The 0.6% lead over the GTX TITAN Z (23,736) and 1.1% over the RTX 3080 Mobile (23,628) indicates this GPU performs in the upper-midrange tier.

For rendering workloads, the 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles complex shading and compute shaders effectively. The 16 GB frame buffer is substantial for high-resolution texture workloads, and the 644.6 GB/s bandwidth supports heavy data movement. The 56 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported titles, though the 69th percentile suggests it won't dominate RT-heavy scenes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 8400F uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. This means the motherboard must support PCIe 5.0 to fully utilize the GPU's bus interface, though PCIe 4.0 would still function.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP combine for 285 W of component power draw. The suggested PSU of 550 W leaves headroom for drives, fans, and motherboard components. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and a dual-slot cooler.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier AM5 CPU, since the socket supports the current generation. The 8400F's 77th percentile CPU score means there's room to move up within the platform. The GPU, at the 69th percentile, could also be upgraded later, but the PCIe 5.0 x16 slot ensures future cards won't be bandwidth-limited.

The platform's 4 nm process for both CPU and GPU keeps power efficiency reasonable. The CPU's 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die and the GPU's 53,900 million on 357 mm² both come from TSMC's 4 nm node. This pairing should run cool with a capable air cooler, though no specific cooler requirements are listed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 77th percentile versus the GPU's 69th percentile indicates a slight CPU advantage in raw compute headroom. In practice, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions. The measured FPS scaling supports this: at 1080p, the pair averages 155.2 FPS across games; at 1440p, that drops to around 100-130 FPS in most titles; at 4K, many games fall below 60 FPS.

The CPU's single-thread performance (3,685 Passmark, 951 3DMark) is strong enough to drive high frame rates in esports titles. Valorant hits 463.7 FPS at 1080p and still manages 370.8 FPS at 4K, showing the CPU is not a bottleneck there. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 241.2 FPS at 1080p, while CS:GO reaches 528.9 FPS.

In CPU-heavy titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator, the 8400F's 6 cores/12 threads deliver 87 FPS at 1080p and 47.6 FPS at 4K. The 3DMark max-threads score of 6,165 indicates the CPU can handle 12 threads effectively, but the 16-thread score of 6,091 shows diminishing returns beyond 12 threads.

For synthetic workloads, the CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 24,389 versus the GPU's G3D score of 25,381 shows they're closely matched in raw throughput. The GPU's compute score of 14,737 in Passmark GPU Compute is lower than the CPU's integer math score of 74,021, but these measure different workloads.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p ultra settings will find this build well-suited. At 1080p, the pair delivers over 100 FPS in most titles (143.3 FPS in Warzone, 140.1 FPS in Assetto Corsa, 115 FPS in Fortnite). At 1440p, frame rates remain playable: 130.1 FPS in Warzone, 77.8 FPS in Control, 73 FPS in Fortnite. Competitive players will appreciate the high refresh rates in esports titles—463.7 FPS in Valorant and 288.1 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege X at 1080p.

Content creators working with CPU-bound tasks will benefit from the 8400F's multithreaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,851 and Passmark data compression score of 288,158 indicate solid productivity capability. The 16 GB GPU memory supports large texture sets and GPU-accelerated rendering.

Software developers will find the 6-core/12-thread configuration adequate for compilation tasks. The Passmark extended instructions score of 22,175 shows good SIMD support. The 4 nm process keeps power consumption moderate, making it suitable for sustained workloads.

Students and small business users building a workstation will appreciate the AM5 platform's longevity. The DDR5 memory support provides headroom for future upgrades. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM handles large datasets in visualization and simulation software.

The build is less suited for 4K gaming at ultra settings in demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 37.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 33.5 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at just 11.7 FPS at 4K. Users targeting 4K should consider a higher-tier GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It runs at 4.20 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost, with a 65 W TDP. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. This 16 MB L3 is modest compared to some desktop parts, but the 4.70 GHz boost clock helps mitigate latency. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, though ECC memory is not available.

The 3DMark scores show scaling from 1,874 (2 threads) to 6,165 (max threads). The difference between 16-thread (6,091) and max-thread (6,165) scores is minimal, indicating the 12-thread configuration is fully utilized. Single-thread performance of 951 points is respectable for the 77th percentile.

Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20,851 positions this CPU well for rendering tasks. The single-core score of 2,943 suggests responsive day-to-day performance. Passmark tests show strong integer math (74,021) and floating-point math (46,217), with data encryption at 16,646 and random string sorting at 34,604.

The 8400F's closest rival, the Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24,964—just 0.2% behind. This indicates the 8400F is essentially performance-equivalent to its sibling, making the choice between them a matter of availability and price rather than capability. The 0.4% lead over the i7-13620H shows it competes well with Intel's 13th-gen mobile parts despite being a desktop chip.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (8000 series, Zen 4 Phoenix architecture) with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 (Radeon RX 9000 series, RDNA 4.0 Navi 48). The CPU was released on March 31, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $170. The GPU followed on March 5, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 549 USD.

The combined percentile of 73 places this system in the upper-midrange tier. The CPU's 77th percentile is higher than the GPU's 69th percentile, meaning the graphics card is the performance ceiling for most workloads. The average FPS across 55 games is 155.2, with a pair rank of 1069 out of 3732 tracked combinations—putting it in the top 29% of tested pairs.

The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate for modern gaming and productivity, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 provide strong rasterization and compute performance. The 4 nm process for both components keeps power requirements moderate, with a 550 W suggested PSU.

This pairing makes sense as a balanced 1080p and 1440p gaming rig with productivity capabilities. The AM5 platform offers upgrade headroom, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 GPU interface ensures forward compatibility. The 73rd combined percentile reflects a system that handles most games at high settings but won't dominate at 4K.

Gaming Performance

All figures below are measured at ultra settings across three resolutions. The data is measured, not estimated, with 55 games tested.

Esports and Competitive Titles: Valorant leads at 463.7 FPS (1080p), 439.6 FPS (1440p), and 370.8 FPS (4K). Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 528.9 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 214.8 FPS at 4K. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 241.2 FPS (1080p) and 88.5 FPS (4K). Rainbow Six Siege X reaches 288.1 FPS at 1080p and 99.6 FPS at 4K. These results show the CPU's single-thread strength keeps frame rates high.

AAA Single-Player Titles: Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 143.3 FPS (1080p), 130.1 FPS (1440p), and 109.4 FPS (4K). Control delivers 100.7 FPS (1080p), 77.8 FPS (1440p), and 53.7 FPS (4K). Cyberpunk 2077 is more demanding: 72.8 FPS (1080p), 53.2 FPS (1440p), and 37.3 FPS (4K). Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 63.2 FPS (1080p), 45.9 FPS (1440p), and 33.5 FPS (4K).

Open-World and Survival: Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 87 FPS (1080p), 70.9 FPS (1440p), and 47.6 FPS (4K). Rust achieves 93.4 FPS (1080p), 64.7 FPS (1440p), and 35.3 FPS (4K). Ark: Survival Ascended is the most demanding title: 33.2 FPS (1080p), 20.5 FPS (1440p), and 11.7 FPS (4K). Palworld runs at 109.9 FPS (1080p) and 40.5 FPS (4K).

Lighter and Indie Titles: Minecraft: Java Edition runs at 235 FPS (1080p), 148.7 FPS (1440p), and 78.4 FPS (4K). Roblox achieves 309.7 FPS (1080p) and 115.6 FPS (4K). Dave The Diver hits 201.9 FPS (1080p) and 101.6 FPS (4K). Barony runs at 200.2 FPS (1080p) and 69.3 FPS (4K).

Performance Summary: At 1080p, most games exceed 100 FPS, with only Ark: Survival Ascended (33.2), The Medium (50), and Red Dead Redemption 2 (63.2) falling below. At 1440p, the majority stay above 60 FPS, though Ark (20.5), Cyberpunk (53.2), and Red Dead (45.9) struggle. At 4K, only lighter titles maintain 60+ FPS; demanding AAA games fall into the 30-50 FPS range. The 16 GB VRAM prevents memory-related stuttering, but raw GPU throughput limits 4K performance in heavy titles.