SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT pairing presents a balanced desktop configuration, though the data reveals which component governs performance at different resolutions. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25005 places it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s average benchmark score of 22549 sits at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. This percentile gap suggests the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card in raw compute, but the measured frame rates across games indicate the GPU becomes the primary constraint as resolution climbs.

At 1920x1080, the pair averages 137.7 frames per second across all tested games, ranking 1444th out of 3732 pairs. The 1080p results show many titles exceeding 100 FPS — Counter-Strike 2 hits 214.1, Valorant reaches 463.1, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 254 — which indicates the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at this resolution. However, the bottleneck shifts when looking at more demanding titles: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 62.7 FPS at 1080p, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 56.2 FPS, suggesting the GPU’s rasterization limits emerge even at lower resolutions in heavy scenes.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS declines across the board, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 47.7, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39.7, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 19.2. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is not uniform — lighter esports titles like Valorant only drop from 463.1 to 413.2 (a 10.8% reduction), while heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 fall from 62.7 to 47.7 (a 23.9% reduction). This pattern confirms the GPU becomes more influential at higher resolutions, as the frame rate penalties grow with pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the bottleneck is unambiguously the GPU. Cyberpunk 2077 manages 31.4 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 7.5, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 28. The CPU’s multi-threaded strength — evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 — cannot compensate for the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s being saturated by 4K pixel workloads. The 12 GB VRAM buffer also becomes relevant here, as several titles at 4K ultra approach or exceed this capacity.

The 3DMark thread scaling data provides further insight into CPU headroom. The 8400F scores 1874 with 2 threads, 3563 with 4 threads, 5275 with 8 threads, and 6165 with max threads. The scaling from 8 to max threads (6165 vs 5275) is only 16.9%, indicating diminishing returns beyond 8 threads in this workload. This suggests that for gaming, where most titles use fewer threads, the CPU is not the limiting factor — the GPU is. The PassMark single-thread score of 3685, which is competitive with the nearest rivals (AMD Ryzen 5 7500F at 0.2% delta, Intel Core i7-11850H at 0.3% delta), confirms the per-core performance is sufficient for gaming workloads.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) provides a comprehensive picture of gaming performance across 53 titles and three resolutions. At 1920x1080 with ultra settings, the pair delivers strong results in esports and competitive titles. Valorant leads at 463.1 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 472, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 254. These numbers indicate the pairing is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors, particularly for players targeting 240 Hz or 360 Hz displays.

For triple-A titles at 1080p, the results are more varied. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 144 FPS, which is excellent for a competitive shooter. Assetto Corsa hits 127 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 reaches 214.1. However, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (62.7 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (56.2 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (29.4 FPS) show that ultra settings at 1080p can push the GPU to its limits. The Medium is particularly demanding at 42.6 FPS, while Microsoft Flight Simulator manages 77 FPS, suggesting the GPU handles moderately demanding simulators adequately.

At 2560x1440, the performance profile shifts. Esports titles remain playable: Valorant at 413.2, Rainbow Six Siege at 167, and Counter-Strike 2 at 139.7. Competitive shooters like Call of Duty: Warzone still deliver 128 FPS, which is above the 120 Hz threshold. However, triple-A titles require compromises. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 47.7, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39.7, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 19.2. The 1440p results suggest that players targeting 60 FPS in demanding titles will need to lower settings below ultra, while those playing lighter titles can enjoy high frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Only a handful of titles exceed 60 FPS: Valorant at 330.6, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 192, Roblox at 104.8, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 108. Most triple-A games fall below 50 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 31.4, Control at 47.4, and The Medium at 28.1. Ark: Survival Ascended is effectively unplayable at 7.5 FPS. The 4K data indicates this pairing is not suited for 4K ultra gaming, though it can handle lighter titles and older games at reduced settings.

The pair rank of 1444 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 137.7 across games, places this configuration in the top 38.7% of all tested pairs. This ranking reflects the GPU’s mid-range positioning, as the CPU’s 77th percentile suggests more headroom than the GPU’s 67th percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a clear upgrade path within the same motherboard. The socket supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the platform can accommodate a future GPU upgrade without changing the motherboard, as long as the new card uses PCIe 4.0 or earlier.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, and the GPU’s 245 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 550 W indicates the overall system power requirement is moderate. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, so any upgrade should verify the power supply has these connectors available. The 550 W suggested PSU provides headroom for the current configuration, but a more powerful GPU would likely require a higher-capacity power supply.

Memory support is limited to DDR5, which means users upgrading from older platforms must purchase new RAM. The dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the CPU’s Zen 4 architecture, but users seeking maximum performance should populate both channels. The lack of ECC memory support (eccMemory is false) is worth noting for workstation users who require error correction.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has headroom based on its 77th percentile ranking. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface will not bottleneck a higher-end GPU, and the AM5 platform supports future CPU upgrades within the same socket. However, users should note that the 8400F’s 20 PCIe lanes (CPU only) may limit configurations with multiple NVMe drives or other PCIe devices.

The GPU’s dimensions (267 mm length, 135 mm height, 50 mm width) and dual-slot design mean most mid-tower cases will accommodate it. The 2x 8-pin power connectors and 245 W TDP require a power supply with adequate PCIe power cables. The display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C) provide modern connectivity options.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, this pairing delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles — Valorant at 463.1 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 214.1 FPS — making it suitable for 240 Hz or 360 Hz monitors. At 1440p, it maintains high refresh rates in lighter titles (Valorant at 413.2, Rainbow Six Siege at 167), but triple-A games will require settings adjustments to hit 144 Hz.

Streaming: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851, provide sufficient headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 24389 indicates the CPU can handle concurrent workloads, though dedicated encoding hardware would be preferable for high-bitrate streams.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851) and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 138383 provide solid compute for video editing. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines, and the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 35.17 TFLOPS accelerates effects and rendering. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth may limit 4K multi-stream editing.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide capable rendering performance for a mid-range card. The CPU’s 20851 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles scene preparation and physics. However, the 12 GB VRAM may limit very large scenes, and the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking places it below high-end rendering cards.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3685, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943) is competitive with rivals, ensuring responsive compilation and code navigation. The 16 MB L3 cache and 6 cores handle typical development workloads, while the DDR5 memory bandwidth benefits large builds.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP and modest power requirements make this an efficient workstation. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, and the GPU is overkill for office tasks but provides headroom for occasional creative work. The lack of integrated graphics means the GPU is always active, which increases idle power draw compared to systems with iGPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite reveals a well-rounded processor. In 3DMark tests, it scores 951 in single-thread, 3563 in 4-thread, 5275 in 8-thread, and 6165 in max-thread tests. The scaling from 4 to 8 threads (5275 vs 3563) is 48.0%, while 8 to max threads (6165 vs 5275) is only 16.9%, indicating the 6-core/12-thread configuration provides diminishing returns beyond 8 threads in this benchmark.

In Cinebench, the R23 multi-core score of 20851 and single-core score of 2943 show strong performance. The R20 multi-core score of 8757 and R15 multi-core score of 2101 are consistent with the R23 results. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 24389, single-thread score of 3685, integer math at 74021, floating-point math at 46217, and extended instructions at 22175. Data compression scores 288158, while data encryption scores 16646. The find prime numbers test scores 89, which is notably lower than other PassMark scores, suggesting this specific workload is not a strength.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25005 places it at the 77th percentile, with a 0.2% delta from the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24964), 0.3% from the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935), 0.4% from the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911), and -0.4% from the AMD EPYC 9474F (25103). This puts the 8400F in a tight cluster with these rivals, meaning real-world differences are negligible.

The GPU’s benchmarks show a PassMark G3D score of 22547 and GPU compute score of 12912. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3316. Geekbench results show OpenCL at 138383 and Vulkan at 46443. The DirectX tests in PassMark show DirectX 11 at 232, DirectX 12 at 79, DirectX 10 at 119, and DirectX 9 at 294. The G2D score is 1161.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22549 places it at the 67th percentile, with a 0.5% delta from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22435), -0.8% from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile (22729), -1.5% from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895), and 1.7% from the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (22170). This places the 7700 XT in a competitive segment, trading blows with these mobile and older desktop cards.

The combined percentile of 72 and the pair rank of 1444 out of 3732 (top 38.7%) indicate this configuration is above average but not top-tier. The CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms, which means the GPU is the primary upgrade target for improved gaming performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pair averages 137.7 FPS across all tested games, ranking 1444th out of 3732 pairs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8400F compare to its nearest rival, the Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25005, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7500F’s 24964. This difference is negligible in real-world performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 8400F does not support ECC memory (eccMemory is false).

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 7700 XT is 550 W, and the GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors.

Q: What is the CPU’s process node and architecture?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename) on a 4 nm TSMC process node, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?

A: The RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 22549, which is 1.5% lower than the RTX 2080’s 22895.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers at 1920x1080 who prioritize high frame rates in competitive titles. The measured FPS at 1080p shows Valorant at 463.1, Counter-Strike 2 at 214.1, and Rainbow Six Siege at 254, making this an excellent choice for esports enthusiasts with 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors. For 1440p gaming, the pairing is suitable for players who accept medium-to-high settings in triple-A titles, as ultra settings drop below 60 FPS in demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (47.7) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (39.7).

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851) and the GPU’s compute capabilities (OpenCL score of 138383). The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for most editing workloads, though 4K timelines may strain the GPU’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Developers seeking a responsive workstation will appreciate the CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3685) and the AM5 platform’s upgradeability. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs manageable, while the GPU’s 245 W TDP is typical for a mid-range card.

Students and office workers who occasionally game or create content will find this pairing overqualified for basic tasks but capable of handling any workload thrown at it. The lack of integrated graphics means the GPU is always active, so idle power draw is higher than systems with iGPUs, but the performance headroom justifies this for users who multitask or run demanding applications.

Small business workstations requiring reliable performance for CAD, simulation, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking and the GPU’s compute throughput. The AM5 socket allows future CPU upgrades without changing motherboards, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface supports current and near-future expansion cards.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass is desktop) combining the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename), manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. The GPU is a Radeon RX 7000 series card using the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 5 nm process.

The combined percentile of 72 indicates this pairing performs better than 72% of all tested configurations, while the pair rank of 1444 out of 3732 places it in the upper-middle range. The CPU’s 77th percentile and GPU’s 67th percentile show that the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card. The average FPS of 137.7 across games at 1080p confirms this is a capable gaming configuration for high-refresh-rate monitors.

The CPU has a launch MSRP of $170, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 449 USD, providing a combined launch price that targets the mid-range market. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 245 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 550 W, indicate moderate power requirements suitable for standard mid-tower builds.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor from the 8000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W. The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5, supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). It has no integrated graphics (N/A) and does not support ECC memory. The multiplier is unlocked, and the part number is 100-000001591.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. There is no vCache3d option. The CPU’s benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: 3DMark max threads score of 6165, Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851, and PassMark multithread score of 24389. Single-threaded performance is also competitive, with 3DMark single-thread at 951, Cinebench R23 single-core at 2943, and PassMark single-thread at 3685.

The PassMark suite reveals specific workload characteristics. Integer math scores 74021, floating-point math scores 46217, and extended instructions score 22175. Data compression scores 288158, while data encryption scores 16646. The find prime numbers score of 89 is notably low, suggesting this CPU is not optimized for prime-number-finding workloads. Random string sorting scores 34604, and physics scores 1332.

The average benchmark score of 25005 places the 8400F at the 77th percentile, meaning it outperforms 77% of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Ryzen 5 7500F (24964, 0.2% delta), Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, 0.3% delta), Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, 0.4% delta), and AMD EPYC 9474F (25103, -0.4% delta). This indicates the 8400F is a well-balanced mid-range CPU with no significant weakness relative to its competitors.

For real workloads, the 6-core/12-thread configuration handles modern games and productivity applications effectively. The 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 support provide adequate memory bandwidth for most tasks, though the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is on the lower end for AM5 processors. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which could extract additional performance, though the 4.70 GHz boost clock is already respectable.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is a Radeon RX 7000 series graphics card using the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture (codename Wheat Nas). It is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node, with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

The clock speeds are 1435 MHz base, 2544 MHz boost, and 2171 MHz game clock. Memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 raster output units, and 54 ray tracing cores. It does not have tensor cores (null). The pixel rate is 244.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 549.5 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 35.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The TDP is 245 W, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU and 2x 8-pin power connectors. The card is dual-slot, measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and provides display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. The supported APIs include DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 22547 and GPU compute score of 12912. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3316. Geekbench results are 138383 for OpenCL and 46443 for Vulkan. PassMark DirectX tests show DirectX 11 at 232, DirectX 12 at 79, DirectX 10 at 119, and DirectX 9 at 294. The G2D score is 1161.

The average benchmark score of 22549 places the GPU at the 67th percentile, meaning it outperforms 67% of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22435, 0.5% delta), RTX 4060 Mobile (22729, -0.8% delta), RTX 2080 (22895, -1.5% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 (22170, 1.7% delta). This places the 7700 XT in a competitive position, roughly equivalent to these cards in average benchmark scores.

For rendering workloads, the 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide solid mid-range compute. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high textures, but 4K ultra settings may exceed this capacity in some titles. The 54 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 79 suggests DirectX 12 performance is a relative weakness. The RDNA 3.0 architecture’s 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio is notable for compute applications that can utilize FP16 precision.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds