SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1080p gaming and capable 1440p performance. The CPU, a 6-core Zen 4 part on the AM5 platform, sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, based on RDNA 3.0 with 16 GB of VRAM, places at the 58th percentile. Together, this build achieves a combined percentile of 68 and an average of 125 FPS across the tested game suite at ultra settings.

FAQ

Q: What kind of performance does the Ryzen 5 8400F offer in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU scores 20,851 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6,165 in 3DMark max threads. This places it at the 77th percentile overall, with an average benchmark score of 25,005. It sits within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and the Intel Core i7-13620H, indicating strong mid-range multi-core capability.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7700 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This is a substantial memory configuration that supports high-resolution textures and demanding workloads.

Q: Is the RX 7700 a significant upgrade over older cards like the R9 370X?

A: Yes. The RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15,852, while the R9 370X scores 15,862, a delta of only -0.1%. Despite the similar average score, the RX 7700 is a modern RDNA 3.0 card with 16 GB VRAM and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, whereas the R9 370X is an older architecture. The benchmark data shows they perform nearly identically on average, but the feature set differs greatly.

Q: What is the power requirement for this GPU?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 has a TDP of 200 W, and AMD suggests a 550 W power supply for the system. It requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot form factor.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 8400F has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: What memory type does this build use?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the release timeline for these components?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F launched on March 31, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $170. The Radeon RX 7700 was released later, on September 17, 2025.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which uses the Ryzen 5 8400F. This is a desktop-class CPU based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The platform supports DDR5 memory exclusively, running in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is more than sufficient for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and a fast NVMe SSD. The 65 W TDP of the CPU is modest, meaning most AM5 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling will handle it easily.

For the GPU, the suggested PSU is 550 W, which is a reasonable headroom figure for this class of hardware. The card draws up to 200 W under load. A quality 550 W unit is the minimum, but a 650 W or 750 W PSU would offer more headroom for future upgrades or overclocking. The GPU is dual-slot and 267 mm long, so case compatibility is straightforward for most mid-tower chassis.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count Ryzen 7000 or 8000 series CPU, as the AM5 socket is designed to support multiple generations. Since the CPU is unlocked, a user could also invest in a better cooler and push the clocks higher before replacing anything. For the GPU, the RX 7700 is already a modern card, so the next step would be moving to a higher-tier Radeon RX 7000 series model if more 4K performance is desired. The PCIe 4.0 x16 slot ensures that any current or near-future GPU will not be bottlenecked by the interface.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 8400F delivers a balanced single and multi-threaded profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 2,943 single-core and 20,851 multi-core. The single-thread score is strong for gaming and lightly-threaded tasks, while the multi-core score indicates solid productivity capability. In 3DMark, the CPU progresses from 1,874 in the 2-thread test to 6,165 in the max-thread test, showing good scaling up to its 12 threads. PassMark results reinforce this, with a multi-thread score of 24,389 and a single-thread score of 3,685. The data compression score of 288,158 and encryption score of 16,646 suggest strong performance for archive management and security tasks.

The CPU holds a percentile rank of 77 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25,005. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24,964, +0.2%), the Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935, +0.3%), and the Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911, +0.4%). This places the 8400F squarely in the upper-mid-range tier, trading blows with mobile and desktop chips from previous generations. It is slightly ahead of the EPYC 9474F (25,103, -0.4%), which is a server-class chip, highlighting the 8400F's efficiency.

The Radeon RX 7700 shows a different performance character. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,865, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 106,028. In PassMark, it scores 20,974 in G3D and 10,963 in GPU compute. The GPU's percentile rank is 58, with an average benchmark score of 15,852. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862, -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16,014, -1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16,129, -1.7%). The RX 7700 is effectively at parity with the older R9 370X in raw average score, but it is slightly behind the newer RX 9060 and the RTX 3060 Ti.

Combining these, the build's average FPS across games is 125 at ultra settings, with a pair rank of 1,795 out of 3,732 pairs. This places it at the 68th combined percentile, meaning it outperforms more than two-thirds of all tested CPU+GPU pairings.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is marked as measured rather than estimated, shows a clear pattern for this build. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports titles. Valorant runs at 447 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 431 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 195 FPS. These numbers are far beyond the refresh rate of most monitors, making the build ideal for competitive play.

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance is still strong. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 144 FPS, Doom at 145 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 115 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077, a notoriously demanding game, runs at 58 FPS, which is playable but not high-refresh. Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 52 FPS. Heavier titles like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 28 FPS at 1080p, indicating that some games will require settings adjustments.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably. Valorant still hits 381 FPS, and CS:GO manages 297 FPS. Warzone runs at 128 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 129 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 43 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS. The Medium runs at 34 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 18 FPS, showing that 1440p ultra settings are too much for the most demanding titles.

At 3840x2160, 4K gaming is possible but limited to less demanding games. Valorant runs at 305 FPS, Roblox at 95 FPS, and CS:GO at 175 FPS. Warzone manages 108 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 28 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 9 FPS. The data indicates that this build is primarily a 1080p high-refresh machine, with acceptable 1440p performance for many games, and 4K only for esports or older titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and are comfortable with medium-to-high settings at 1440p. The esports-focused player will benefit from the extremely high FPS in Valorant, CS:GO, and Rainbow Six Siege. The 16 GB of VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth make it a solid choice for modded Minecraft (192 FPS at 1080p) or games with heavy texture packs.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,851 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 106,028 useful for acceleration. The 6-core, 12-thread CPU is adequate for streaming while gaming, though it is not a top-tier workstation chip. Software developers compiling code will benefit from the strong PassMark integer math score of 74,021.

Students and small business users building a single workstation will appreciate the balance. The CPU's 77th percentile rank means it handles office productivity, spreadsheet calculations, and light database work without issue. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM allows for large datasets in GPU-accelerated applications. For a general-purpose desktop that can game at high refresh rates and handle professional workloads, this is a capable combination, provided the user understands its limitations at 4K ultra settings.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. Clock speeds are a 1,900 MHz base, 2,041 MHz game clock, and 2,459 MHz boost. The memory clock runs at 2,438 MHz, translating to 19.5 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus provides 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a significant amount of VRAM for the card's class, allowing for high-resolution textures and large compute workloads. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

The card has 40 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, providing modern connectivity for high-refresh monitors.

Benchmark performance shows a G3D score of 20,974 and a GPU compute score of 10,963 in PassMark. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,865. The 58th percentile rank indicates it is a mid-range GPU. The nearest rival data shows it is nearly identical to the R9 370X (15,862 vs 15,852), but that comparison is misleading due to the age difference. More relevantly, it is 1% behind the RX 9060 and 1.7% behind the RTX 3060 Ti. For rendering tasks, the FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS is strong, and the 16 GB VRAM allows for larger scenes than cards with 8 GB.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, boosting to 4.70 GHz. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It is part of the 8000 series, which is notable for integrating the Zen 4 architecture into a more accessible price bracket. The TDP is a modest 65 W, making it easy to cool. It has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. It does not have integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark results show a strong single-thread performance of 2,943 in Cinebench R23 and 951 in 3DMark single thread. Multi-thread performance is 20,851 in Cinebench R23 and 6,165 in 3DMark max threads. PassMark scores include 74,021 in integer math, 46,217 in floating point math, and 28,158 in data compression. The 77th percentile rank confirms its position above the average CPU.

Real-world workloads will see this CPU handle most tasks with ease. The single-thread speed is excellent for gaming and everyday applications. The 12 threads are sufficient for video editing, 3D modeling, and compiling code, though not as fast as higher-core-count parts. The data compression and encryption scores are strong for file archiving and secure communications. The 65 W TDP means it generates less heat than higher-end chips, allowing for quieter cooling solutions.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the AMD Radeon RX 7700. The CPU is a 6-core Zen 4 part, and the GPU is a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 card. The combined percentile for this pairing is 68, meaning it outperforms 68% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The CPU is at the 77th percentile, which is higher than the GPU's 58th percentile. This indicates the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU when compared to their respective peer groups. The average FPS across all tested games at ultra settings is 125, which is a strong figure for 1080p gaming. The pair rank of 1,795 out of 3,732 places it in the upper half of all pairings.

This build represents a balanced mid-range desktop solution. It is not an enthusiast-tier setup, but it offers solid performance for the majority of gaming and productivity tasks. The 16 GB of VRAM is a future-proofing feature, while the 6-core CPU is adequate for current games. The overall tier, based on the 68th percentile, is upper-mid-range. It is a system that can handle 1080p ultra on most games and 1440p with settings adjustments, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of users.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals an interesting balance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 77th percentile is noticeably higher than the GPU's 58th percentile. This suggests that, in synthetic benchmarks, the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming, the bottleneck will shift depending on the title and resolution.

At 1080p in esports titles, the CPU is the primary driver. In Valorant, the 447 FPS at 1080p is likely limited by the CPU's single-thread speed, as the GPU has headroom. The same applies to CS:GO at 431 FPS. These frame rates are so high that the CPU is the limiting factor. In contrast, at 4K in a game like Cyberpunk 2077 (28 FPS), the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as the resolution demands far more pixel throughput than the CPU can feed.

For most AAA titles at 1080p, the balance is even. In Call of Duty: Warzone, the 144 FPS at 1080p scales down to 108 FPS at 4K, which is a reasonable drop. The GPU's 58th percentile and the CPU's 77th percentile mean that neither component is drastically underpowered for the other. However, the pair rank of 1,795 out of 3,732 and average FPS of 125 suggest that the GPU is the more limiting factor in the average game.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. In games like Fortnite, the 94 FPS at 1080p drops to 60 FPS at 1440p and 31 FPS at 4K. This is a typical GPU-bound scaling pattern. In contrast, a CPU-bound game like Valorant only drops from 447 FPS at 1080p to 381 FPS at 1440p and 305 FPS at 4K, showing that the GPU is not the limiting factor even at 4K. The bottleneck analysis shows that for 1080p high-refresh gaming, the CPU is sufficient, and the GPU is the component that will need upgrading for higher resolutions or more demanding settings.