SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 pairing represents a mid-range desktop configuration built around AMD’s current AM5 platform. The 6-core Zen 4 processor and the 8 GB RDNA 3 graphics card combine to deliver a balanced 1080p gaming experience, with benchmark data showing a combined percentile of 67 across all tested configurations. The measured FPS figures across dozens of titles provide a clear picture of what this system can achieve at various resolutions, and the component-level scores offer insight into its productivity capabilities.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The data for this build is measured, not estimated, and it includes ultra-settings FPS figures for 56 games at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the pairing demonstrates strong performance in competitive and esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 156 FPS, Valorant reaches 357 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 185 FPS. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 345.8 FPS, and Roblox runs at 201 FPS. These figures indicate that the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors in fast-paced shooters.

Moving to more demanding AAA titles at 1080p, the results show a clear drop but remain playable. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 144 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 94.2 FPS, and Minecraft at 153 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 is the notable outlier at 46 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 42 FPS. The system handles most games at 1080p ultra with playable frame rates, though the most graphically intensive titles will require settings adjustments for smoother gameplay.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. Valorant still achieves 305 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 103 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 128 FPS. However, AAA titles begin to struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 34 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 31 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 14 FPS. Many games fall into the 40-60 FPS range at this resolution, including Control at 49.3 FPS and Palworld at 50 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system is generally not viable for modern AAA gaming. Most titles fall below 30 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 23 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 8 FPS. Less demanding titles remain playable, such as Valorant at 243 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 108 FPS. The overall average FPS across all tested games is 104.2 FPS, which places this pairing at rank 2521 out of 3732 pairs.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 67, meaning this build outperforms 67% of all tested CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8400F compare to its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25005, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F’s score of 24964. It also edges out the Intel Core i7-11850H by 0.3% and the Intel Core i7-13620H by 0.4%.

Q: What is the RX 7600’s performance position relative to other GPUs?

A: The RX 7600 sits at the 57th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15171. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores 15199, which is a 0.2% difference.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: For most modern AAA titles, no. At 3840x2160, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 23 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 8 FPS. Only lighter titles like Valorant (243 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (108 FPS) remain playable.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F scores 951 in the 3dmark_single_thread test and 3685 in passmark_single_thread. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 2943.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 8400F has no integrated graphics (N/A). A discrete GPU is required for any display output.

Q: What memory type does this CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build excels at 1080p. The measured FPS in esports titles is outstanding: Valorant at 357 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 345.8 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 185 FPS. These figures easily exceed 144 Hz refresh rates, and even 240 Hz in the case of Valorant. At 1440p, the system still delivers competitive frame rates, with Valorant at 305 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 103 FPS.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 12 threads. The Ryzen 5 8400F scores 20851 in Cinebench R23 multicore, and the 3dmark_max_threads score of 6165 indicates solid multi-threaded headroom for encoding while gaming. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration provides enough parallelism for concurrent game and stream encoding workloads, though the lack of integrated graphics means all encoding must happen on the CPU or GPU.

Video editing is a viable workload for this system. The CPU’s passmark_multithread score of 24389 and floating point math score of 46217 suggest capable performance in rendering timelines. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute assist with GPU-accelerated effects. However, the 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth may limit the most demanding 4K editing projects.

3D rendering workloads will be primarily GPU-bound. The RX 7600’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2310 places it at the 57th percentile, which is adequate for moderate rendering tasks. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8757 shows it can handle geometry and physics calculations, but the GPU will be the bottleneck for final frame renders.

Software development is a strong suit for this CPU. The high single-thread score of 2943 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensures responsive compilation, while the passmark_data_compression score of 288158 helps with large codebase operations. The 12 threads handle parallel builds effectively, and the 4 nm process keeps power consumption low at 65 W TDP.

Student and office work presents no challenges for this build. The passmark_single_thread score of 3685 handles everyday applications with ease, and the GPU is vastly overkill for productivity tasks. The system is compact at 204 mm GPU length and 178 mm² CPU die size, making it suitable for smaller desk setups.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p with high refresh rates are the primary audience. The measured FPS in competitive titles exceeds 300 FPS in Valorant and 150 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, making this ideal for esports-focused players. For 1440p gaming, the system remains capable for most titles, though AAA games will require medium-high settings rather than ultra.

Content creators who work primarily in 1080p video editing and light 3D rendering will find this build adequate. The CPU’s 20851 Cinebench R23 score supports efficient timeline editing, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM handles moderate effects and renders. The 57th percentile GPU ranking indicates this is not a professional-grade rendering workstation.

Developers seeking a fast compilation machine will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and 12 threads. The 65 W TDP allows for lower power draw during long coding sessions, and the AM5 platform supports future CPU upgrades.

Students and small business users building a versatile desktop will appreciate the balance. The system handles office productivity, web browsing, and light gaming without breaking a sweat. The 67th combined percentile means it outperforms the majority of existing systems while remaining a sensible mid-range choice.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It operates at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boosts up to 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. This is a desktop part with a market segment of Desktop and production status of Active, released on 2024-03-31.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and does not support ECC memory. Notably, there is no integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark results show a well-rounded performer. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 951 is modest, but the passmark_single_thread score of 3685 is stronger. Multi-threaded performance is where this chip shines: Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 20851, and passmark_multithread scores 24389. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 6165 closely matches the 16-thread score of 6091, indicating efficient scaling.

The CPU sits at the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24964 (0.2% slower). The Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.4% slower at 24911, while the AMD EPYC 9474F is 0.4% faster at 25103. This places the 8400F in a tight cluster of mid-range performers.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 RT cores for ray tracing. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. It has a TDP of 165 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The card is dual-slot, measures 204 mm in length, and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Compute performance is respectable for the class. FP32 throughput is 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 21.75 TFLOPS as well (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. In 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, the GPU scores 2310, while passmark_g3d reaches 16634 and passmark_gpu_compute scores 8790.

The GPU’s percentile is 57, with an average benchmark score of 15171. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores 15199 (0.2% faster). The AMD Radeon 680M is 0.7% faster at 15270, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560X is 0.6% slower at 15082. This indicates the RX 7600 performs near the middle of the GPU distribution.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s exact scores paint a picture of a strong mid-range processor. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2101 multicore and 296 single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 8757 multicore and 1236 single-core, while R23 reaches 20851 multicore and 2943 single-core. PassMark tests show 24389 in multithread and 3685 in single-thread, with data encryption at 16646 and extended instructions at 22175.

The GPU’s scores are more varied. In Geekbench, OpenCL reaches 88051 and Vulkan hits 34401. PassMark DirectX tests show 226 in DX9, 172 in DX11, 84 in DX10, and 58 in DX12. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2310 is the primary modern gaming metric. The passmark_g2d score of 984 indicates modest 2D performance.

The combined picture is a system at the 67th percentile, with the CPU at the 77th percentile and GPU at the 57th percentile. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, providing more headroom relative to its peers. The pair’s average FPS across games is 104.2, with a rank of 2521 out of 3732 pairs. This suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) combining the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the AMD Radeon RX 7600. The CPU is from the 8000 series with Zen 4 Phoenix architecture, while the GPU is from the Radeon RX 7000 series with RDNA 3.0. Both components are currently in Active production status.

The overall tier of this pairing is mid-range. The combined percentile of 67 indicates it outperforms two-thirds of all tested systems. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking places it above most processors, while the GPU’s 57th percentile is closer to the median. This creates a system that is CPU-strong and GPU-adequate for its class.

The build targets 1080p gaming as its primary strength, with strong 1440p capability in less demanding titles. It is not designed for 4K gaming, as the data clearly shows most AAA titles falling below 30 FPS at that resolution. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus limit high-resolution texture workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear CPU-heavy balance. With the CPU at the 77th percentile and GPU at the 57th percentile, the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most gaming workloads. This is evident in the FPS scaling: at 1080p, the system achieves high frame rates in esports titles but drops significantly in AAA games, indicating GPU limits.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. In Cyberpunk 2077, FPS drops from 46 at 1080p to 34 at 1440p to 23 at 4K. This proportional decline matches GPU-bound behavior. Conversely, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that frame times remain consistent even in CPU-intensive titles like Valorant, which maintains 357 FPS at 1080p.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component. The 20851 Cinebench R23 score and 24389 passmark_multithread score show ample processing headroom. The GPU’s 57th percentile means it will bottleneck 3D rendering and compute tasks, but for gaming, the pairing is reasonably balanced, with the GPU limiting only the most demanding titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which provides a clear upgrade path. The 8000 series processor supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the platform offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool, and the GPU’s suggested PSU of 450 W leaves headroom for future upgrades.

Memory support is DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The platform does not support ECC memory. The PCIe Gen 4 interface on the CPU is current-gen, though the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 connection, which is sufficient for the RX 7600’s bandwidth requirements.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The 77th percentile CPU can drive higher-tier graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. The AM5 socket also allows for future CPU upgrades within the same platform, and the 450 W PSU suggestion provides room for a GPU with slightly higher power draw. The system’s DDR5 memory support ensures compatibility with future AM5 processors.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds