SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 form a desktop pairing built around a modern AM5 platform and a proven last-generation graphics core. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part on the 4 nm process, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It sits in the 8000 series and uses the AMD Socket AM5, supporting dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The GPU is a Radeon RX 6000 series part based on RDNA 2.0, using the Navi 23 chip on a 7 nm process. This is a balanced mainstream combination, where the CPU’s strong multi-threaded throughput meets a GPU that handles 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming. The data shows a combined percentile of 70, placing this build above most other pairings in the database.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It operates at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and can boost up to 4.70 GHz, which is a solid frequency range for both single-threaded and lightly-threaded tasks. The processor is manufactured on a 4 nm process from TSMC, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. This transistor density contributes to its efficiency, though the 65 W TDP is the official power envelope.

In benchmark terms, the CPU delivers a balanced profile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 points indicates strong parallel processing capability for a 6-core chip, while the single-core score of 2943 points confirms its ability to handle lightly-threaded workloads like older games or everyday applications. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 951 points in single-thread to 6165 points at max threads, with a notable jump from 2 threads (1874) to 4 threads (3563), demonstrating that the architecture scales well with additional cores. The Passmark multithread score of 24389 and single-thread score of 3685 reinforce this pattern.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 8400F is positioned within a very tight cluster. It is only 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H. It trails the AMD EPYC 9474F by 0.4%, which is a server-class chip, making this a remarkably competitive segment. The average benchmark score of 25005 places this CPU in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. For real workloads, this translates to fast compilation times, responsive video editing, and smooth multitasking, though it is not a top-tier content creation monster.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 8400F and the RX 6600 is characteristic of a well-matched mainstream build. The CPU’s performance is not the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, as it sits in the 77th percentile for all CPUs. The GPU, however, is in the 63rd percentile, making it the more likely constraint in graphics-intensive tasks. The data supports this: at 1920x1080, the average FPS across games is 95.2, but this drops significantly at higher resolutions, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck when pixel count increases.

The pair’s rank by FPS is 2878 out of 3732 pairs, which places it in the lower-middle tier of the database, yet the average FPS of 95.2 suggests that this is still a capable gaming system for competitive and moderately demanding titles. The bottleneck shifts depend on the workload. In CPU-heavy games like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the processor’s strong single-thread score of 2943 in Cinebench R23 helps maintain high frame rates. In GPU-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2, the RX 6600’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors, as the frame rates drop below 45 FPS at 1080p. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for the GPU, which uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so there is no interface bottleneck.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is an RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU based on the Navi 23 chip, fabricated on a 7 nm process from TSMC. It has 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1626 MHz, with a game clock of 2044 MHz and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

The compute units are configured with 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. This results in a pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.928 TFLOPS, while FP16 is 17.86 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The ray tracing hardware includes 28 RT cores, which is modest by current standards. There are no tensor cores, as this is not an AI-focused part. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark terms, the RX 6600 scores 15096 in Passmark G3D, which positions it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 19036. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 67623 and OpenCL score of 28850 show that it handles compute tasks reasonably well, but the Passmark GPU compute score of 6554 suggests that heavy compute workloads are not its strength. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is essentially tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0% delta), only 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, and 0.3% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K20m. It leads the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation by 0.4%. For rendering, this GPU is capable of 1080p gaming at high settings and can handle 1440p in less demanding titles, but its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will limit texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution rendering.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance compared to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F scores 2943 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 20851 in multi-core. The ratio of about 7.1:1 indicates that the processor scales well with threads, but its single-core score is strong enough for responsive everyday use and older games.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 6600 has 28 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. However, its ray tracing performance is modest, as evidenced by its 63rd percentile ranking, so it is not ideal for heavy RT workloads at high resolutions.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it enough for modern games?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming in most titles, but the measured FPS in games like Cyberpunk 2077 (43.5 FPS at 1080p) shows that high-ultra settings can push the limits.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. This is a modern platform choice that allows for high-speed memory, which benefits the CPU’s overall performance.

Q: How does this build compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F is 0.2% ahead of the Ryzen 5 7500F in average benchmark score, making them effectively equivalent in CPU performance. The choice between them would come down to other factors like availability and platform features.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is a desktop build, as indicated by the build class. The CPU is an AM5 socket part, and the GPU is a dual-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25005, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24964, putting the 8400F just 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.4% behind, and the AMD EPYC 9474F is 0.4% ahead. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19036, placing it in the 63rd percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, scores 19030, a 0% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is 0.1% ahead. The combined percentile for this pairing is 70, and the pair ranks 2878 out of 3732 by FPS, with an average FPS of 95.2 across games.

The combined picture is that of a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking means it will not hold back most games, while the GPU’s 63rd percentile means it is the limiting factor in demanding titles. This is not a flaw; it is a balanced pairing for 1080p gaming where the CPU provides headroom for background tasks or streaming. The data shows that in games like Valorant, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance allows the GPU to run at 327.5 FPS at 1080p, but in games like Cyberpunk 2077, the GPU’s limits are clear at 43.5 FPS.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings shows a clear resolution scaling pattern. At 1920x1080, the build handles competitive and esports titles exceptionally well. Valorant runs at 327.5 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 314 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X at 170.4 FPS. These numbers confirm that the pairing is excellent for high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors in lighter games. Minecraft also runs well at 141.8 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 141.9 FPS.

For more graphically demanding titles, the performance drops but remains playable. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 43.5 FPS at 1080p, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 37.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 22.7 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. Control runs at 56.4 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 86 FPS. At 2560x1440, the GPU’s limitations become more apparent. Valorant still runs at 276.4 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 31.9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 31 FPS. At 3840x2160, only the lightest games remain playable, with Valorant at 221.4 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 109.8 FPS, but most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS. The data indicates that this is a 1080p gaming build, with 1440p possible for esports and older titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build excels at 1080p esports. Valorant at 327.5 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 140.8 FPS mean that a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor can be fully utilized in these titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2943 in Cinebench R23 supports high frame rates in CPU-bound games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a Passmark multithread score of 24389, can handle streaming encoding at 1080p while gaming, though the GPU’s lack of dedicated encoder hardware may require using CPU encoding, which could impact game performance slightly.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 and Passmark data compression score of 288158 indicate that the CPU can handle 1080p video editing timelines and rendering. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for effects and previews, but 4K editing will be slower.

3D rendering: The CPU is capable for CPU-based rendering, with a Passmark floating-point math score of 46217. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.928 TFLOPS is modest, so GPU-based rendering in Blender or similar will be slower than higher-tier cards.

Software development: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, with a Passmark find prime numbers score of 89, indicate decent compilation times. The single-thread score of 3685 in Passmark ensures fast code editor responsiveness.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU’s high single-thread performance and the GPU’s capable 2D performance (Passmark G2D score of 889) mean that spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing are extremely fluid. The 65 W CPU TDP and 132 W GPU TDP also keep power consumption reasonable for a desk setup.

Build Overview

This is a desktop pairing consisting of an AMD Ryzen 5 8400F CPU and an AMD Radeon RX 6600 GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part on the AM5 socket, with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz and a 65 W TDP. The GPU is an RDNA 2.0 part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 132 W TDP. The combined percentile of 70 places this build above the majority of systems in the database, though the pair’s rank of 2878 out of 3732 by FPS indicates that it is not a top-tier gaming machine. The CPU is the stronger component, sitting in the 77th percentile, while the GPU is in the 63rd percentile. This is a mainstream desktop build designed for 1080p gaming and general productivity, with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades. The platform uses DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4, making it a modern foundation, though the GPU’s end-of-life production status suggests that it is a budget-oriented component.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for gamers who play at 1920x1080 resolution and prioritize high frame rates in competitive titles. The data shows that Valorant and Counter-Strike 2 run at over 140 FPS at 1080p, making this a great choice for esports enthusiasts. It is not suited for 4K gaming, as most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS at that resolution. Content creators who work with 1080p video or light 3D rendering will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance adequate, with the GPU accelerating effects and previews. Software developers will appreciate the fast single-thread performance and compile times, while students and office workers will find the system more than capable for all standard productivity tasks. Small business workstations that need a reliable, modern platform for data processing and document work would also benefit, though the GPU is unnecessary for such tasks. Gamers looking to play the latest AAA titles at high settings will need to lower settings or resolution, as Cyberpunk 2077 only hits 43.5 FPS at 1080p ultra. This is a build for value-conscious users who want a solid 1080p experience with a strong CPU backbone.