SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

33,668 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop configuration pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile GPU. The data in this analysis is derived entirely from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the relative CPU and GPU strengths, not direct frame-rate measurements.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU pairing, so no specific frame rates can be cited for any game or resolution. All FPS expectations here are estimates inferred from the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 19587 places it at the 73rd percentile among all GPUs, indicating a strong performer. For 1080p gaming, this suggests the RTX 4070 Mobile should handle most titles at high settings comfortably, given its average benchmark score of 27435 is statistically tied with the desktop AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct of 0).

At 1440p, the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer become more relevant. The 128-bit bus width is a potential constraint, but the Ada Lovelace architecture’s efficiency likely compensates. The GPU’s FP32 compute of 15.62 TFLOPS indicates solid raw throughput. For 4K gaming, the 8 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor for the most demanding textures, but the 73rd percentile position suggests playable performance in less VRAM-intensive titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 289 in Cinebench R15 and 3907 in PassMark single-thread indicates it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, even at high refresh rates.

The lack of measured FPS data means these estimates should be treated as directional. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern game APIs. The data suggests a machine well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming and capable 1440p performance, with 4K being a compromise on settings due to VRAM capacity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33668, placing it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, positioning it above the majority of processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, scores 33667, a deltaPct of 0, meaning the two are effectively identical in average performance. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is 0.4% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is 0.2% ahead, showing the 7645HX competes with a wide range of desktop and mobile parts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 27435, placing it at the 73rd percentile. This is a solid but not top-tier position. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, scores 27425, a deltaPct of 0. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is just 0.5% ahead, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 is 1.5% behind. The combined percentile for this build is 79, indicating a system that performs well above average overall.

The combined picture shows a balanced pairing. The CPU is stronger relative to its competition than the GPU is to its own, suggesting the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. The CPU’s 84th percentile versus the GPU’s 73rd percentile implies that in CPU-bound tasks, this system will outperform many others, while in GPU-bound tasks, it will be good but not exceptional. The data indicates a system that excels in productivity and general compute, with gaming performance being strong but not class-leading.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a transistor count of 6,570 million on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 4.00 GHz, boosting to 5.00 GHz. This high boost clock is reflected in the single-thread scores: 1809 in Cinebench R23 and 2657 in Geekbench. These scores indicate excellent responsiveness for lightly-threaded workloads like web browsing, office applications, and legacy games.

The multi-threaded performance is equally notable. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13985 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 11586 demonstrate strong parallel processing capability for a 6-core mobile part. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26476 reinforces this. The 32 MB shared L3 cache and 1 MB per-core L2 cache help maintain high throughput in data-intensive tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 302256 and encryption score of 17900 indicate the CPU handles archival and security workloads efficiently.

The 45 W TDP is a key consideration. This is a high-power mobile processor, suggesting it is designed for larger laptops with robust cooling solutions. The memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is present. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 lanes (CPU only) offers substantial bandwidth for future storage and GPU expansion. The 5 nm process and Zen 4 architecture deliver a strong balance of performance and efficiency, though the 45 W TDP indicates it is not an ultra-low-power part.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU’s 73rd percentile and the CPU’s 84th percentile combine to support high-refresh 1080p gaming. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3907 in PassMark ensures minimal bottleneck in esports titles, while the GPU’s FP32 performance of 15.62 TFLOPS can drive high frame rates in less demanding games. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p high textures.

Streaming: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13985, provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s NVENC implementation (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) would offload encoding, but the data shows the CPU alone can handle the multi-threaded encoding workload based on its PassMark multi-thread score of 26476.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance, evidenced by the Geekbench multi-core score of 11586, handles timeline scrubbing and export tasks well. The GPU’s 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM accelerate effects and rendering. The combined percentile of 79 suggests a capable system for 1080p and light 4K editing.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13985 is competitive for a mobile part, handling CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores (from the FACT PACK) support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI denoising. The PassMark GPU compute score of 8399 indicates moderate compute capability for GPU rendering.

Software Development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2657 in Geekbench ensures fast compilation of single files. The multi-thread score of 11586 accelerates full builds. The 32 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth help with large codebases. The PassMark integer math score of 77432 is strong for general algorithmic work.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s high single-thread performance (1809 in Cinebench R23 single-core) makes everyday tasks feel snappy. The 84th percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth multitasking. The system is more powerful than needed for this use case, but the efficiency of the 5 nm process means battery life can still be reasonable despite the 45 W CPU TDP.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is based on the AD106 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The chip contains 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz.

The GPU’s compute resources are substantial: 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. The FP32 performance is 15.62 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s. The 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores are the key hardware for ray tracing and DLSS, respectively. The PassMark G3D score of 19587 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 demonstrate strong general compute performance.

The 73rd percentile ranking shows this is a good, but not flagship, mobile GPU. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, is statistically identical in average score. The RTX 3090, a desktop behemoth, is only 0.5% ahead, which is remarkable for a mobile part. However, the 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM are clear limitations. The bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the capacity may be insufficient for 4K textures. The TDP of 115 W indicates this is a high-power mobile GPU, requiring adequate cooling. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for the GPU’s bandwidth needs.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p and smooth 1440p gaming. The CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 73rd percentile ensure a balanced experience in most titles. Gamers at 4K should look elsewhere, as the 8 GB VRAM is a hard limit. Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will find the combined CPU multi-core (13985 Cinebench R23) and GPU compute (8399 PassMark) performance adequate for intermediate workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s strong integer math score (77432) and single-thread speed (3907 PassMark). Students and office workers get an overkill system, but the responsiveness will be excellent. Small business workstations that handle data analysis or virtualization will benefit from the 12 threads and ECC memory support. The CPU’s data encryption score of 17900 is a niche advantage for security-focused workloads. This is not a budget build; it is a performance-oriented laptop configuration.

The GPU’s near-parity with the RTX 3090 (deltaPct of -0.5) in average score makes this a compelling choice for mobile gaming enthusiasts. The CPU’s parity with the Ryzen 7 8840HS (deltaPct of 0) means this is a modern, well-rounded platform. Anyone needing a desktop-class experience in a laptop form factor should consider this build.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX has an average benchmark score of 33668, which is exactly equal to the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (deltaPct of 0). It is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to a desktop card?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile’s average benchmark score is 27435, which is statistically tied with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct of 0). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is only 0.5% ahead, showing the mobile GPU is remarkably close to a high-end desktop card.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The memory is clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the CPU’s process node and architecture?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, using the Zen 4 architecture (codename Dragon Range). It has 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 79. This places it well above average, but not in the top tier of all systems.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its TDP is 45 W.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. The CPU is a 45 W, 6-core Zen 4 part, while the GPU is a 115 W Ada Lovelace chip with 8 GB VRAM. The combined percentile is 79, indicating a system that outperforms roughly 79% of all tested configurations. The CPU’s 84th percentile is notably higher than the GPU’s 73rd percentile, showing a processor-first design.

The CPU targets high single-thread and multi-thread performance for its class. The GPU offers desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor, nearly matching the RTX 3090 in average score. This pairing is designed for users who need strong performance in both productivity and gaming. The 5 nm process for both chips indicates a focus on efficiency, though the high TDPs suggest a larger chassis with robust cooling.

The data shows a system with a clear identity: a high-performance mobile workstation and gaming rig. It is not an ultraportable or budget device. The 79th combined percentile places it in the upper-middle echelon, making it a versatile choice for demanding users. The benchmark scores indicate a system that can handle most tasks with ease, but it is not the absolute fastest available.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals an asymmetrical balance. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile, while the GPU is at the 73rd percentile. This 11-point gap suggests the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation or data compression (PassMark score of 302256), the processor will perform exceptionally well, and the GPU will not be the limiting factor.

In gaming, the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck. The 73rd percentile and the 8 GB VRAM limit will constrain performance in graphically intense scenes. The CPU’s high single-thread score (3907 in PassMark) ensures it can feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU’s lower relative percentile means it will reach its limits first in GPU-bound titles. The deltaPct of 0 with the RX 6700 XT shows the GPU is a known quantity; it is good, but not great.

The FPS scaling, while not measured, can be inferred. The CPU’s strength means frame rates will scale well with GPU load up to the point where the GPU is saturated. At 1080p, the CPU may be the limiting factor in very light games, but at 1440p and above, the GPU’s 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will be the primary constraints. The 115 W GPU TDP versus the 45 W CPU TDP indicates the GPU will be the dominant power draw and heat source, potentially causing thermal throttling in poorly designed laptops, which would further bottleneck the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, a mobile-specific socket. This limits the CPU upgrade path to other FL1 parts, which are unlikely to offer a significant generational leap. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Upgrading from the standard configuration would involve increasing capacity, not bandwidth, as the controller is already maxed out.

The GPU is an integrated part of the laptop (slotWidth: "IGP"), meaning it is soldered and not upgradeable. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 28 lanes for the CPU, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This means future external GPU enclosures would be limited by the x8 link, though this is unlikely to be a practical upgrade path for a laptop. The system has no suggested PSU, as it is mobile.

The most sensible next upgrade is the memory. The 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and DDR5 support mean adding more RAM will help with multitasking and large datasets. The storage is another upgrade path, as the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU support the fastest NVMe drives. The CPU’s 45 W TDP and the GPU’s 115 W TDP suggest the laptop has a total power budget of around 160 W for the core components. There is no headroom for overclocking, as the CPU’s multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). The platform is mature and well-supported, but the upgrade path is limited to memory and storage.