SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

33,668 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX and AMD Radeon 740M pairing represents a specific configuration within the laptop market, combining a high-performance mobile processor with an integrated graphics solution. This analysis examines the benchmark data for this combination, focusing on the CPU's substantial processing capabilities and the GPU's more modest rendering performance. The data shows a system where the processor is clearly the dominant component, with the integrated graphics serving as a capable but secondary element. The combined percentile of 69 places this pairing above the majority of all tested systems, though the performance profile is heavily skewed toward CPU-intensive tasks rather than graphical workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX is a six-core, twelve-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Dragon Range codename for high-performance mobile platforms. It operates from a base clock of 4.00 GHz up to a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 45 W TDP. The chip is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process node, containing 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. Cache architecture includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 through a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, with ECC support available. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results indicate strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13985 points demonstrates significant parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 1809 reflects efficient single-thread execution. Geekbench scores of 11586 multi-core and 2657 single-core corroborate this balanced performance profile. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 26476 and a single-thread score of 3907, with the integer math score of 77432 and floating-point math score of 48798 indicating robust computational throughput for both integer and floating-point workloads. The processor achieves an 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs tested, placing it above the vast majority of processors in the database.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7645HX shows a nearly identical average benchmark score of 33668, matching the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS at a delta of 0%. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT by 0.2% and leads both the AMD Ryzen 5 240 and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H by 0.4%. These negligible differences suggest that the 7645HX sits in a performance tier where the top contenders are all within a fraction of a percent of each other, making the choice between them essentially performance-neutral for most applications. For real workloads, this means the processor delivers consistent high-end mobile performance capable of handling demanding productivity tasks, content creation, and moderate parallel workloads without significant bottlenecks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically the Phoenix2 chip. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process node from TSMC, containing 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, with memory being system shared, meaning the bandwidth and capacity are dependent on the system's DDR5 configuration. The graphics core features 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 render output units. For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, the GPU includes 4 ray tracing cores, though it has no dedicated tensor cores. The pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 2.867 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The TDP is 45 W, with a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and no power connectors required. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results for the Radeon 740M show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and a Vulkan score of 15568. These figures place the GPU at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, indicating it performs slightly above the median. The average benchmark score of 12870 places it in close competition with several older discrete GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 with a delta of 0.2% above, the AMD Radeon Pro 455 at 0.3% above, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 at 0.3% above, while the AMD Radeon RX 580 leads by 0.4%. This positioning suggests the integrated graphics solution delivers performance comparable to mid-range discrete graphics cards from previous generations, which is notable for an IGP. For rendering tasks, the 740M can handle light 3D workloads, basic video encoding, and general graphical acceleration, but the absence of dedicated tensor cores and the limited 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput indicate that heavy rendering, complex ray tracing, or GPU-accelerated AI workloads will be constrained by the graphics subsystem.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is defined by a strong processor and a modest integrated graphics solution. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13985 and single-core score of 1809 indicate strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance respectively. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11586 and single-core score of 2657 reinforce this assessment. On the GPU side, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568 demonstrate competent, though not exceptional, graphics compute capability.

The CPU's 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU's 53rd percentile among all GPUs. This disparity underscores the unbalanced nature of the pairing, where the processor is clearly the performance leader. The combined percentile of 69 reflects the overall system position, dragged down by the GPU's more modest standing. In practical terms, the system will excel in CPU-bound applications such as software compilation, spreadsheet analysis, data processing, and multi-threaded productivity tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 302256 and data encryption score of 17900 indicate strong performance in these specific workloads. The extended instructions score of 22969 suggests good SIMD and vector processing capability. For GPU-bound tasks, the system will perform adequately for everyday use, but users seeking high-end gaming or professional rendering will find the graphics subsystem lacking relative to the CPU's capability.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1809 and Geekbench single-core score of 2657, will not be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios. The integrated Radeon 740M, with its 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 53rd percentile ranking, will instead determine playable settings and resolutions.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, the system is estimated to handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium to high settings, potentially achieving 60 FPS in less demanding games. For more graphically intensive AAA titles, the expectation is lower performance, likely requiring reduced resolutions or lower graphical presets to maintain playable frame rates. The Vulkan score of 15568 suggests that games using modern graphics APIs will perform relatively better than those relying on older APIs. The system shared memory configuration means that the GPU performance is dependent on the system's DDR5 bandwidth, so systems with faster memory will see better gaming performance. Users should not expect high-refresh-rate gaming at high settings for modern titles, but the system can serve as a competent entry-level gaming machine for less demanding games.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates a CPU-bound system where the processor is the dominant component. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 53rd percentile creates a significant imbalance in favor of the processor. In CPU-intensive workloads such as multi-threaded rendering, code compilation, or data processing, the system will perform at a high level, with the CPU delivering performance comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS and other top rivals. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13985 places the processor well above the median, ensuring that CPU-bound tasks are handled efficiently.

Conversely, GPU-bound workloads will be limited by the Radeon 740M. The GPU's 53rd percentile ranking indicates that it performs only slightly above the median, and its nearest rivals include older discrete GPUs like the GTX 590 and Radeon Pro 455. In gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, the graphics subsystem will be the bottleneck, preventing the CPU from being fully utilized. The FPS scaling in games will be constrained by the GPU's 2.867 TFLOPS throughput and 256 shading units. For a balanced system, one would expect the CPU and GPU percentiles to be closer, but here the difference is 31 percentile points. This means that for most gaming scenarios, the CPU will be waiting on the GPU, and the system's overall performance in games will be determined by the integrated graphics rather than the powerful processor.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX ranks at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, placing it above the vast majority of processors in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7645HX has an average benchmark score of 33668, matching the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS with a delta of 0%, trailing the Ryzen 9 3900XT by 0.2%, and leading the Ryzen 5 240 and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H by 0.4%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon 740M ranks at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 12870.

Q: Does the Radeon 740M have ray tracing capabilities?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 4 ray tracing cores, though the overall FP32 performance of 2.867 TFLOPS limits the practical use of ray tracing in demanding games.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, with ECC support available.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 69, indicating it performs better than the majority of systems but is held back by the GPU's lower ranking.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is not the ideal choice. The Radeon 740M's 53rd percentile ranking and limited FP32 throughput mean that achieving high frame rates at high settings in modern titles will be difficult. Users can expect playable performance in esports and older games, but not the high-refresh experience that the CPU's strong single-thread performance might suggest possible.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The CPU's robust multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13985, can handle encoding workloads effectively. However, the GPU's limited resources mean that GPU-accelerated encoding and rendering effects will be constrained. The system can handle streaming with CPU-based encoding, but the overall quality and performance will depend on the specific games being streamed.

Video editing benefits from the CPU's strong performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11586 and PassMark floating-point math score of 48798 indicate good capability for video encoding and processing tasks. The GPU can assist with some effects and previews, but the CPU will carry most of the workload. For 3D rendering, the CPU's 84th percentile ranking makes it well-suited for CPU-based rendering engines, though GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the 740M's modest 2.867 TFLOPS.

Software development is a strong use case for this system. The CPU's high single-thread performance and multi-threaded capability are excellent for code compilation, testing, and running development environments. The PassMark integer math score of 77432 and data compression score of 302256 support this assessment. For student and office work, the system is more than adequate. The CPU handles productivity applications with ease, and the integrated GPU supports basic graphical needs for presentations, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The system's overall 69th percentile ranking ensures it will handle typical academic and office workloads without issue.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX processor with the AMD Radeon 740M integrated graphics in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor from the 7000 series, designed for high-performance mobile computing with a 45 W TDP. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 integrated graphics solution with 256 shading units and a 45 W TDP. The combined system ranks at the 69th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 53rd percentile. This configuration represents a laptop where the processing power is significantly stronger than the graphics capability, making it suited for productivity and CPU-intensive tasks rather than high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's performance rivals top mobile processors, while the GPU sits at a mid-range level comparable to older discrete graphics cards.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium to low settings in less demanding titles will find the system adequate, but those seeking high-refresh or high-quality gaming experiences should look elsewhere. Content creators focusing on CPU-based rendering, video encoding, or software development will benefit from the processor's strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 scores of 13985 multi-core and 1809 single-core indicate a capable workstation for these tasks.

Developers and programmers will appreciate the CPU's performance in compilation and testing scenarios, with the PassMark integer math score of 77432 and data encryption score of 17900 supporting secure and efficient development workflows. Students and small business users will find the system more than capable for everyday tasks, office applications, and research. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking and responsive performance for productivity workloads. However, users requiring significant GPU compute for tasks like machine learning, complex 3D rendering, or modern gaming at high settings should consider a system with a discrete graphics solution, as the Radeon 740M will be the limiting factor in these scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the mobile Dragon Range platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for compatible devices. Since this is a laptop build, the upgrade path is generally more limited compared to desktop systems. The primary upgrade consideration is the system's memory configuration, as the GPU uses system shared memory, meaning faster DDR5 memory can improve both CPU and GPU performance.

The CPU's 45 W TDP and the GPU's 45 W TDP give a combined thermal design power of 90 W for these components, which is manageable for most laptop cooling solutions. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the low power draw of the integrated GPU means no additional power connectors are required. For a sensible next upgrade, users should consider increasing memory capacity and speed, as this directly benefits the integrated GPU's performance. A future laptop with a discrete GPU paired with a similar or more powerful CPU would represent a significant upgrade for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, while the current system's CPU performance is already at a high level that will remain relevant for several years.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds