SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7640U

25,485 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and AMD Radeon RX 7600M combination represents a mobile platform built around AMD’s Zen 4 and RDNA 3.0 architectures, respectively. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the GPU packs 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The data for this exact pairing contains no measured frame rates — the FACT PACK includes no measuredFps rows — so all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct observations.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 15 W TDP that marks it as an ultra-low-power mobile part. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU integrates a Radeon 760M graphics solution, though the system pairs it with a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25485. In Cinebench R23, it scores 17936 in multi-core and 2532 in single-core. The multi-core result is strong for a 15 W part, reflecting the efficiency of Zen 4’s 4 nm process. Single-core performance of 2532 points indicates solid responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications. Geekbench scores of 8595 multi-core and 2127 single-core corroborate this pattern: the chip handles parallel workloads well while maintaining competitive single-threaded speed.

The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 21115, with integer math at 70483 and floating-point math at 41093. Data compression scores 240032, while encryption hits 14954. Extended instructions score 17019, and random string sorting reaches 29382. Find prime numbers scores 74, physics 1169, and single-thread performance is 3524. These numbers paint a picture of a processor that is balanced across integer, floating-point, and memory-intensive operations, though the prime number score suggests it is not optimized for that specific workload.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7640U is essentially neck-and-neck. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has an average score of 25517, just 0.1% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446, 0.2% lower. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER is 0.2% higher at 25530, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U is 0.2% lower at 25432. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 7640U performs on par with those parts despite its lower TDP, which speaks to the efficiency of the Phoenix design.

For real workloads, the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 17936 indicates that the CPU can handle video encoding, compilation, and other parallel tasks competently for a mobile chip. The single-core score of 2532 ensures that web browsing, office applications, and general system responsiveness remain snappy. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for most laptop workloads, though it is not exceptional compared to higher-power desktop platforms.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks show a processor that punches above its power class. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 1807, with single-core at 255. Cinebench R20 scores are 7533 multi-core and 1063 single-core. These results, alongside the R23 figures, demonstrate consistent scaling across different Cinebench versions. The Geekbench scores of 8595 multi-core and 2127 single-core align with the Cinebench data, confirming that the 7640U delivers strong performance across different benchmark suites.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7600M, scores 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63830 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at 63842 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63693 (0.1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64212 (0.7% higher). The GPU’s average benchmark score is 63775, matching its single OpenCL result.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 84, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms the vast majority of laptop configurations. The CPU’s 78th percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile together suggest that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the CPU is solid but not top-tier. This imbalance is important for understanding workload distribution: the GPU will handle graphics-intensive tasks with relative ease, while the CPU may become the limiting factor in highly parallel compute scenarios that are not GPU-accelerated.

Interpreting the combined picture, this system is well-suited for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, given the GPU’s high percentile ranking. The CPU’s lower percentile means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most tasks, but in CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or heavy multitasking, the 7640U’s 6 cores may be a constraint compared to higher-core-count rivals.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The system is a laptop, so the entire platform is fixed. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel operation and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is rare for mobile parts. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, offering ample bandwidth for the discrete graphics card.

The GPU has a TDP of 90 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 15 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of roughly 105 W. The suggested PSU field is null in the data, so no specific power supply recommendation is available, but the modest TDPs suggest that a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. The GPU is listed as “IGP” slot width with no power connectors, indicating it is a mobile chip soldered to the board.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU rather than the CPU. The GPU sits at the 89th percentile, already high, but the CPU at the 78th percentile has closer rivals — the Ryzen 7 7840U is only 0.2% faster. However, since the socket is FP8 and the platform is a laptop, neither component is user-replaceable. The practical upgrade path is limited to external GPU enclosures if the laptop supports them, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU suggests internal bandwidth is already maximized. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on the GPU is adequate for current games at 1080p, and the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for that resolution.

Memory upgrades are the most feasible path, given DDR5 support and dual-channel operation. Increasing memory capacity would benefit multitasking and large datasets, though the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed characteristic. The lack of a launch MSRP for either component means no pricing information is available, but the active production status for both parts ensures availability.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who need a balanced laptop for gaming and productivity without sacrificing portability. The CPU’s 78th percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile make it suitable for gamers at 1080p resolution, where the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle high settings. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are enough for most games, which typically use fewer threads, but the single-core score of 2532 in Cinebench R23 ensures that CPU-bound titles remain playable.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 17936 useful, though not class-leading. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 63775 indicates strong compute capability for GPU-accelerated effects in editing software. Developers compiling code will benefit from the multithread score of 21115 in PassMark, though the 6-core limit means large builds will take longer than on higher-core parts.

Students and office workers are well-served by the single-thread score of 3524 in PassMark, which ensures smooth performance in web browsers, word processors, and spreadsheet applications. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database queries will appreciate the ECC memory support and the data encryption score of 14954, which indicates capable AES acceleration. The 15 W CPU TDP and 90 W GPU TDP keep power consumption manageable, making this a viable option for portable workstations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM suggest it can push high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles, though no measured FPS data exists for this pairing. The CPU’s single-core score of 2532 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads can handle encoding at lower bitrates, while the GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides headroom for hardware encode offload. The combined percentile of 84 indicates the system can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming at 1080p, though CPU-intensive titles may require reduced settings.

Video editing: The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 17936 accelerates export times, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 63775 speeds up effects and color grading. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 1080p timelines but may strain with 4K multi-stream edits.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) provide substantial compute for renderers that support GPU acceleration. The CPU’s 17936 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 handles CPU-based renderers competently, though 6 cores limit scalability.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 70483 indicates strong performance for compilation and data processing. The 12 threads handle parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 3524 ensures fast IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The single-core Geekbench score of 2127 and PassMark single-thread score of 3524 ensure fluid performance in productivity suites. The 15 W CPU TDP contributes to long battery life, though the GPU’s 90 W TDP reduces endurance under load.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU’s 89th percentile and OpenCL score of 63775 suggest it is competitive with desktop GPUs from a few years ago, while the CPU’s 78th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck in most titles.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern games, though VRAM-heavy titles may approach the 8 GB limit. The 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance translates to playable frame rates in most AAA games, with esports titles likely exceeding 60 FPS. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2532 means that games relying heavily on a single thread will still run smoothly, while the 6 cores handle background tasks without impacting frame pacing.

At 1440p, the GPU would begin to struggle with ultra settings, but the 89th percentile ranking suggests it can manage high settings at that resolution. The 128-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, so resolutions above 1080p will see diminishing returns. No specific game-by-game FPS figures are available, so these expectations are qualitative framings of the benchmark data rather than precise predictions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles differ notably: the CPU sits at the 78th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 89th. This delta means the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, so in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. However, the CPU’s lower percentile indicates that in CPU-bound scenarios — such as physics simulations, AI inference on the CPU, or heavily-threaded productivity tasks — the Ryzen 5 7640U will limit performance.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this. At 1080p, the GPU’s high percentile suggests it can deliver high frame rates, but the CPU’s 6 cores may cap frame rates in games that use more than 6 threads. The single-core score of 2532 in Cinebench R23 is strong, so lightly threaded games will not be CPU-limited. In contrast, the PassMark multithread score of 21115 is moderate, so games that scale well across 8 or more threads will see a CPU bottleneck.

For compute workloads, the GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) vastly exceed the CPU’s floating-point capacity, so GPU-accelerated tasks will be GPU-bound. The CPU’s 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared with the GPU, which may create contention in memory-intensive tasks. Overall, the system is well-balanced for gaming at 1080p, but the CPU becomes the limiting factor in multi-threaded non-GPU workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 84, meaning this system outperforms 84% of all laptop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7640U compare to the Ryzen 7 7840U in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7640U has an average score of 25485, while the Ryzen 7 7840U scores 25432, making the 7640U 0.2% faster.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7640U supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for mobile processors.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU has a 15 W TDP, yet it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17936, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP?

A: The RX 7600M has an OpenCL score of 63775, while the RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830, making the RX 7600M 0.1% slower.

Q: Are there any measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing, so all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and uses the Navi 33 chip fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores, which is notable for AI workloads, but the RDNA 3.0 architecture provides dedicated ray tracing hardware.

Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective. The GPU’s base clock is 1500 MHz, with a boost clock of 2410 MHz and a game clock of 2070 MHz. Pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 17.27 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU has a 90 W TDP and uses PCIe 4.0 x16 for the bus interface.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the GPU scores 63775, placing it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, scores 63830, a 0.1% difference, indicating the RX 7600M is essentially on par with that desktop card. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63842 (0.1% higher), while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693 (0.1% lower). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 0.7% higher at 64212.

For rendering workloads, the 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance is substantial for a mobile GPU, allowing for real-time previews in 3D software and accelerated final renders in GPU-based engines. The FP16 performance of 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1) benefits AI inference and certain compute tasks, though the lack of tensor cores means it relies on shader-based compute. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures and moderate 4K workloads, but the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit high-resolution texture streaming.

The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is supported by DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The API support is comprehensive, covering modern gaming and professional applications. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms the majority of GPUs in the database, including many desktop parts, making it a strong choice for a laptop GPU. The 90 W TDP is modest for the performance level, indicating good efficiency from the RDNA 3.0 architecture on the 6 nm process.