SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7640U

25,485 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and AMD Radeon 860M form a mobile processor-plus-integrated-graphics pairing aimed at thin-and-light laptops. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 part, while the GPU is a next-generation RDNA 3.5 integrated solution. This combination targets the 75th percentile of all tested laptop builds, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of portable PCs while remaining firmly in the integrated-graphics class. The data shows a platform designed for balanced everyday computing, productivity, and entry-level gaming without a discrete graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is built on the TSMC 4 nm process node, with a die size of 178 mm² containing 25,000 million transistors. It belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. The processor has 6 physical cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a maximum boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a mobile-market segment chip, released on 2023-05-02, and remains in active production. The 15 W TDP immediately signals an ultra-low-power design intended for fanless or quiet-cooled laptops.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that punches above its power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 17,936 in multi-core and 2,532 in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly telling: it is only 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, both of which are higher-tier processors in the nearest rivals list. This suggests the 7640U delivers near-desktop-class multi-threaded throughput in a 15 W package, a result of the efficient Zen 4 architecture. The single-core score of 2,532 in R23 is strong for a low-power mobile chip, indicating responsive everyday application performance. In Geekbench, the multicore score of 8,595 and single-core score of 2,127 reinforce this interpretation, with the multicore result placing it within 0.2% of the Ryzen 7 7840U.

The PassMark suite adds nuance for specific workloads. The multithread score of 21,115 shows solid parallel performance, while integer math scores 70,483 and floating-point math scores 41,093. Data encryption scores 14,954, and data compression scores 240,032. The physics test yields 1,169, and find prime numbers scores 74. These figures indicate a processor well-suited for compilation, spreadsheet calculations, and light scientific computing, though the low TDP caps sustained all-core workloads. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth from dual-channel DDR5 support is a critical enabler, as the CPU and GPU share this memory pool. The CPU's 78th percentile rank among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25,485, places it in the upper quartile of all processors tested, a remarkable achievement for a 15 W mobile part.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,485 places it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 scores 25,517 (a 0.1% difference), the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25,446 (0.2% ahead of the 7640U), and the Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25,530 (0.2% behind). This clustering means the 7640U is statistically tied with these competitors, despite the Ryzen 7 parts having more cores in some cases. The data shows that in real-world aggregate benchmarks, the 7640U's efficiency allows it to match or exceed chips with higher nominal core counts.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon 860M, achieves an average benchmark score of 26,401, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (score 26,421, 0.1% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (score 26,331, 0.3% behind). This is a striking juxtaposition: an integrated GPU matching a low-end discrete GPU and coming within 0.3% of a modern discrete RTX-class part. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 75, indicating that the whole system outperforms three-quarters of all tested laptop configurations. The data confirms a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outstrips the other, though the GPU's 72nd percentile versus the CPU's 78th percentile suggests the CPU is the stronger relative performer.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on the same TSMC 4 nm process as the CPU. It is part of the Krackan Point chip generation, with the GPU generation listed as Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile). The GPU operates with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. Critically, it includes 8 ray-tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, a feature typically found in discrete GPUs. The tensor core count is null, meaning no dedicated AI acceleration hardware is present, though the RDNA 3.5 architecture supports shader-based AI operations.

Memory is entirely system-shared, with the GPU drawing from the same DDR5 pool as the CPU. The memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," and bandwidth is "System Dependent," meaning performance scales with the laptop's RAM configuration. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The GPU's TDP is 15 W, shared with the CPU in the same package, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs and feature sets like ray tracing and mesh shaders.

In Geekbench compute tests, the GPU scores 22,759 in OpenCL and 30,043 in Vulkan. The Vulkan score is notably higher, indicating strong driver optimization for modern graphics APIs. The average benchmark score of 26,401 places it at the 72nd percentile, and its nearest rivals are revealing. It is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, a discrete mobile GPU, and 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, a current-generation discrete part. The data shows that the Radeon 860M delivers discrete-class compute performance in an integrated form factor, making it suitable for light rendering, photo editing, and 1080p gaming at medium settings. However, the shared memory architecture means performance is highly dependent on the system's RAM speed and capacity, and the 48.00 GPixel/s fill rate will limit high-resolution rendering.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is designed for laptop builders and buyers seeking a single, efficient solution for portable productivity. The CPU's 78th percentile rank and strong multi-core scores make it ideal for students and professionals who run office suites, web browsers, and coding IDEs. The 15 W TDP means long battery life, a critical feature for on-the-go use. The data shows that the processor can handle compilation workloads, as evidenced by the 21,115 PassMark multithread score and 70,483 integer math score, making it suitable for software developers who need to build projects without a discrete GPU. The 16 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support rapid data access for such tasks.

Content creators working with photos and light video will benefit from the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Radeon 860M's 72nd percentile rank means it can accelerate effects in applications like Photoshop or DaVinci Resolve, and the Vulkan score of 30,043 suggests smooth GPU-accelerated previews. The inclusion of 8 ray-tracing cores, while not powerful enough for heavy ray-traced rendering, enables basic real-time ray tracing in supported games and 3D applications. Small business workstations that handle spreadsheets, databases, and video conferencing will find this pairing more than sufficient, with the CPU's data compression score of 240,032 indicating rapid file handling.

Gamers are a secondary but valid audience. The GPU's proximity to the MX550 in benchmark scores suggests capable 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings, particularly in esports titles. The CPU's single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,127, ensures that game logic and physics calculations are not bottlenecked. However, the lack of measured FPS data means buyers should temper expectations for AAA titles. The 15 W total package TDP means this is not a gaming powerhouse, but rather a capable all-rounder that can handle occasional gaming sessions. The build targets users who prioritize portability and efficiency over raw graphical performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing with the CPU as the slightly stronger component. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile, a 6-point gap that suggests the processor has a small performance headroom over the graphics solution. In CPU-bound workloads, such as multi-threaded rendering or code compilation, the 7640U will be the primary driver, and the GPU will be largely idle. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,936 indicates that the CPU can handle sustained loads, but the 15 W TDP means it will eventually throttle under extended all-core stress, potentially limiting throughput in long render tasks.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming or GPU-accelerated effects, the Radeon 860M becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's system-shared memory architecture means it competes with the CPU for bandwidth, and the absence of dedicated VRAM means texture loading and frame buffering are constrained by the system's DDR5 speed. The GPU's 16 ROPs and 48.00 GPixel/s fill rate are modest, capping resolution scaling. Benchmark results show the GPU's average score of 26,401 is only 0.1% behind the MX550, indicating that in graphics-heavy tasks, the integrated solution will perform like a low-end discrete GPU, which is a hard ceiling.

The combined percentile of 75 suggests that neither component drags the system down significantly. However, the CPU's 78th percentile versus the GPU's 72nd percentile implies that in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the first to reach its limits, particularly at higher resolutions. Conversely, in CPU-heavy productivity tasks, the processor will be the star, with the GPU providing modest acceleration. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a shared resource, and the data shows that memory-bound workloads will see the most significant impact from this shared architecture. For users who push both components simultaneously, such as gaming while streaming, the system will likely throttle due to the combined 15 W power budget.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data clearly indicates that the Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU with discrete-class compute performance, but gaming FPS will vary significantly based on the specific game, resolution, and settings. The GPU's 72nd percentile rank and proximity to the MX550 (0.1% behind) suggest that 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings is achievable in most titles. Esports games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-light and GPU-moderate, should see playable frame rates given the CPU's strong single-core score of 2,532 in Cinebench R23.

For AAA titles, the estimates are more conservative. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16 ROPs will limit detail settings and resolution. At 1080p with low settings, frame rates in the 30-60 FPS range are plausible for well-optimized games, but demanding titles may struggle to maintain 30 FPS. The 8 ray-tracing cores provide some headroom for ray-traced effects, but the low fill rate will likely force users to disable ray tracing for playable performance. At 1440p, the estimates drop significantly, with most games requiring low settings or upscaling to achieve playable frame rates, and some titles may be unplayable due to the memory bandwidth constraints.

The Vulkan score of 30,043 is encouraging, as it suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based games, which are often well-optimized for AMD hardware. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for modern game engines, and the 16 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory latency. However, the shared memory pool means that system RAM speed is a critical factor; laptops with slower DDR5 will see reduced gaming performance. The data does not provide specific FPS figures, so these estimates should be treated as directional. Users seeking consistent 60 FPS gameplay in modern titles should look for a laptop with a discrete GPU, but for casual or older titles, this pairing is viable.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-only socket designed for thin-and-light laptops. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The memory is not upgradeable in the traditional sense, as it is typically soldered on the laptop motherboard, but the platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer mobile chip. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures, though the integrated GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 connection.

The 15 W TDP for both the CPU and GPU suggests that the platform's power delivery is designed for efficiency, not headroom for upgrades. The GPU has a 15 W TDP and no power connectors, confirming that it is an IGP with no ability to add a discrete GPU internally. The suggested PSU is null, reinforcing that this is a laptop platform where the power supply is integrated. The production status for both components is active, meaning they are currently available in the market. The CPU was released on 2023-05-02, and the GPU on 2025-02-28, indicating a platform that pairs an older CPU with a newer GPU.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is limited to external peripherals. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes support an external GPU enclosure, which could dramatically improve gaming and rendering performance, though this is a significant investment. More realistically, upgrading the system's RAM to the maximum supported speed and capacity would improve both CPU and GPU performance, as the GPU relies entirely on system memory. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is a hard limit, so faster RAM than the platform supports would yield no benefit. The platform also supports Wi-Fi and NVMe storage upgrades, which are the most practical improvements for everyday use. Given the 15 W TDP, there is no meaningful CPU upgrade path within the same socket, as higher-TDP chips would require a different cooling solution.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 15 W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with 512 shading units and 8 ray-tracing cores, also at 15 W. The combined percentile for this pairing is 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all tested laptop builds. The CPU's individual percentile is 78, and the GPU's is 72, indicating a slight CPU bias in overall performance. The average benchmark scores are 25,485 for the CPU and 26,401 for the GPU, with the CPU's nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 (0.1% behind) and the GPU's nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (0.1% ahead).

The platform is defined by its efficiency. The 15 W TDP for both components, combined with the 4 nm process node, makes this one of the most power-efficient pairings available. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,936 is remarkable for a 15 W chip, and the GPU's proximity to discrete GPUs in benchmark scores redefines what integrated graphics can achieve. The build is not a gaming machine, but it is a highly capable productivity laptop that can handle light gaming. The data shows a system that is well-balanced for its class, with the CPU having a slight edge in relative performance. This is a mainstream laptop configuration for users who prioritize battery life and portability, with the understanding that the GPU is a capable but not high-end graphics solution.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in multi-core performance?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 7640U scores 17,936, which is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 860M has 8 dedicated ray-tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile rank?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 26,401, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the total power draw of the CPU and GPU combined?

A: Both the CPU and GPU have a TDP of 15 W each, totaling 30 W for the combined package.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for gaming performance?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination; all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7640U

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds