SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

30,390 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

This laptop pairing combines a 6-core Zen 4 mobile processor with an Ada Lovelace flagship-class GPU, landing at the 81st percentile across all tracked CPU/GPU combinations. The data shows a system built for high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious content creation, though the CPU's 35W TDP class means it will lean on the RTX 4080 Mobile for the heaviest lifting. Benchmark results indicate a capable, balanced mobile workstation with a clear performance ceiling defined by its processor.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the AD104 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die. The GPU runs at a 1290 MHz base clock with a 1665 MHz boost, paired with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. That configuration yields 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, a figure that positions the card well for high-resolution texture streaming and large scene buffers in modern titles.

The memory subsystem is complemented by 80 ROPs and 232 TMUs, delivering a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s. Raw compute throughput sits at 24.72 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating strong general-purpose math performance. The RTX 4080 Mobile includes 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, hardware that accelerates ray-traced lighting and DLSS-based upscaling respectively. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility confirm the GPU is ready for current and near-future graphics workloads.

In benchmark testing, the GPU scores 159575 in Geekbench OpenCL and 145807 in Geekbench Vulkan. Passmark results show a G3D score of 24926 and a GPU compute score of 11191. The DirectX 12 Passmark score of 96 and DirectX 11 score of 244 reflect the card's ability to handle modern graphics APIs efficiently. The GPU sits at the 81st percentile among all tracked GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38135. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, which trails by 0.4%, and the RTX 5080 Mobile, which leads by 0.6%. The RTX 4070 sits 1.3% behind, while the Tesla P4 is also 1.3% behind. These deltas are narrow, indicating the RTX 4080 Mobile occupies a competitive tier where small score differences translate to meaningful performance gaps in real workloads.

For rendering, the combination of 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth allows for complex scenes with high-resolution textures without constant swapping. The 58 RT cores accelerate ray-traced reflections and shadows, while the 232 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides ample compute for 3D rendering software that leverages GPU acceleration.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined system percentile ranks at 81 out of 100, placing it in the upper quintile of all tracked builds. The CPU alone achieves an average benchmark score of 30390, also at the 81st percentile among all processors. The GPU's average benchmark score of 38135 similarly reaches the 81st percentile among all graphics cards. This alignment in percentile positions suggests a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12554 and singlecore score of 1715.5 show strong multithreaded throughput for a 35W mobile chip. Geekbench results of 10389 multicore and 2093 singlecore reinforce this picture. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 dwarfs the CPU's multicore score in raw compute, as expected for a dedicated graphics processor. Passmark GPU compute at 11191 further demonstrates the GPU's numerical muscle.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the CPU's average score of 30390 puts it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U and 0.1% behind the Intel Core i9-11980HK. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T sits 0.3% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U trails by 0.4%. These differences are small enough that real-world performance will vary by workload rather than raw score. The GPU's 38135 average score places it 0.4% ahead of the MX570, 0.6% behind the RTX 5080 Mobile, and 1.3% ahead of both the RTX 4070 and Tesla P4.

The combined picture shows a laptop that excels in GPU-bound tasks. The CPU provides adequate single-thread performance for gaming and responsive general use, while the GPU delivers high frame rates at demanding settings. In CPU-bound scenarios, the Ryzen 5 7640HS will be the limiting factor, but its 12 threads and Zen 4 architecture handle most productivity workloads competently.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It uses TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock runs at 4.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, impressive figures for a 35W TDP mobile chip. The socket is AMD FP8, and the processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This layout provides each core with quick access to frequently used data while allowing all cores to share the larger L3 pool. The integrated Radeon 760M graphics provide a fallback display output, though the dedicated RTX 4080 Mobile handles all demanding graphics work.

Benchmark results show the CPU's capabilities across different workloads. Cinebench R23 multicore at 12554 and singlecore at 1715.5 indicate balanced performance. Geekbench scores of 10389 multicore and 2093 singlecore align with these results. Passmark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math at 73284, floating point math at 45220, and extended instructions at 20556. Data compression scores 269524, while data encryption hits 15867. The processor finds prime numbers at a rate of 77, and random string sorting runs at 31654. Multithread score sits at 22979, with physics at 1155 and single-thread at 3654.

These numbers suggest the CPU handles productivity software well. The multicore scores indicate strong performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. Single-thread performance at 3654 in Passmark ensures snappy response in everyday tasks and gaming. The 4 nm process and Zen 4 architecture deliver efficiency, keeping the 35W TDP manageable in a laptop chassis. The 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs places this chip above most mainstream mobile processors, though below high-core-count desktop parts.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The near-identical percentile rankings for CPU (81) and GPU (81) suggest balanced overall performance, but workload-specific analysis reveals where each component takes the lead. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions and settings, the RTX 4080 Mobile will be the primary performance driver. Its 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle the heavy lifting, while the CPU's 6 cores provide sufficient support for game logic and physics.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as competitive gaming at lower resolutions or software compilation, the Ryzen 5 7640HS becomes the limiting factor. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12554 is respectable but far below what high-core-count desktop CPUs achieve. The 12 threads handle moderate multitasking but will struggle with heavily threaded workloads that scale beyond 12 threads. The 35W TDP also limits sustained all-core boost clocks compared to higher-power mobile chips.

The memory bandwidth figures illustrate the potential bottleneck. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s DDR5 bandwidth is adequate for its compute capabilities, while the GPU's 432.0 GB/s GDDR6 bandwidth is roughly 4.8 times higher. In workloads that stream large datasets, the GPU can feed its compute units faster than the CPU can process the results. This asymmetry favors GPU-accelerated tasks like rendering and machine learning inference.

The FPS scaling in gaming depends on which component saturates first. At 1080p with high frame rates, the CPU's single-thread performance (3654 Passmark, 1715.5 Cinebench R23 singlecore) will cap frame rates in less demanding titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's rendering throughput becomes the bottleneck, and the CPU has enough headroom to keep up. The 12 GB VRAM ensures texture-heavy scenes load without stutter, but the CPU's memory bandwidth limits how quickly game assets can be streamed from system memory.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop pairing targets users who need high GPU performance in a mobile form factor without requiring extreme CPU multithreading. The 81st percentile GPU ranking makes it suitable for gamers who want high frame rates at 1440p with ray tracing enabled. The 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game assets, while the 58 RT cores accelerate ray-traced effects.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated software will benefit from the RTX 4080 Mobile's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute. Video editors using GPU-accelerated effects and 3D artists rendering with CUDA-based engines will see strong performance. The CPU's 12 threads and Zen 4 architecture handle timeline scrubbing and scene management adequately, while the GPU does the heavy rendering work.

Software developers targeting GPU compute workloads will find the tensor cores useful for AI inference and training small models. The 232 tensor cores accelerate frameworks that leverage NVIDIA's ecosystem. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads compile code sufficiently quickly, with Passmark integer math at 73284 indicating solid number-crunching ability.

Students and professionals who need a portable workstation for coursework or office tasks will find the performance more than adequate. The CPU's single-core score of 3654 in Passmark ensures responsive spreadsheet and document work. The integrated Radeon 760M provides power efficiency for light tasks, while the dedicated GPU handles occasional rendering or gaming sessions. Small business workstations that occasionally need to render videos or run GPU-accelerated analytics will benefit from this pairing.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080 Mobile's G3D score of 24926 and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput deliver high frame rates at 1440p in most titles. The 12 GB VRAM prevents texture pop-in, while the 58 RT cores enable ray-traced effects. The CPU's 1715.5 Cinebench R23 singlecore score keeps frame pacing smooth in less demanding titles, though competitive shooters at 1080p may see CPU limits.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder handles video encoding without taxing the CPU, as evidenced by the strong GPU compute score of 11191. The CPU's 12 threads manage game logic and streaming software simultaneously, though the 35W TDP means sustained all-core loads will reduce boost clocks.

Video editing: The GPU's OpenCL score of 159575 accelerates effects and color grading in editing software. The CPU's multicore score of 12554 in Cinebench R23 handles timeline scrubbing and proxy generation. Export times benefit from GPU acceleration, with the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth moving video frames quickly.

3D rendering: The GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 58 RT cores accelerate both raster and ray-traced rendering. The 12 GB VRAM holds complex scenes, while the CPU's 6 cores handle scene preparation and geometry processing. The GPU's Passmark compute score of 11191 indicates strong numerical throughput for render engines.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 73284 and extended instructions score of 20556 indicate solid compilation performance. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the GPU's compute capability accelerates machine learning experiments. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth moves data quickly during testing.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3654 in Passmark ensures responsive daily use. The 12 GB GPU VRAM is irrelevant for office tasks, but the integrated Radeon 760M provides efficient display output. The 35W TDP allows for long battery life during lectures or meetings, with the dedicated GPU activating only when needed.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking and Passmark G3D score of 24926 suggest strong performance at 1440p ultra settings in most titles. The 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for modern games.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance may limit frame rates in esports titles where high FPS is critical. The Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 1715.5 indicates the CPU can sustain high frame rates, but the 6-core design means background tasks could cause dips. The GPU's 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate ensures no rendering bottleneck at this resolution.

At 1440p, the balance shifts to the GPU, which has enough compute to push high frame rates with ray tracing enabled. The 58 RT cores handle ray-traced lighting, while the 232 tensor cores enable DLSS upscaling to boost performance further. The 12 GB VRAM accommodates high-resolution textures without exceeding memory capacity.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most scenes, but the 24.72 TFLOPS compute may struggle with maximum settings in demanding titles. DLSS will be essential for playable frame rates at this resolution, leveraging the tensor cores to reconstruct lower-resolution renders.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing AMD's Ryzen 5 7640HS with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor on TSMC's 4 nm node, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace flagship mobile part on TSMC's 5 nm node. The combined percentile of 81 places this system in the upper quintile of all tracked builds, indicating strong overall performance.

The pairing sits at an interesting tier. The GPU is clearly the dominant component, ranking at the 81st percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 38135. The CPU also ranks at the 81st percentile but with an average score of 30390, reflecting the lower absolute performance of mobile processors. This combination targets users who prioritize graphics performance over CPU multithreading, making it ideal for gaming and GPU-accelerated creative work rather than heavy CPU rendering.

The 35W CPU TDP and 110W GPU TDP suggest a system that balances performance with portability. The CPU's 4 nm process and Zen 4 architecture deliver efficiency, while the GPU's 5 nm process enables high performance within a mobile power envelope. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 16 MB L3 cache provide ample working space for modern applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system ranks at the 81st percentile among all tracked builds, with both the CPU and GPU individually also at the 81st percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7640HS compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 30390 is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, 0.1% behind the Intel Core i9-11980HK, 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this system support ray tracing and DLSS?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 58 RT cores for ray tracing and 232 tensor cores for DLSS, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses Zen 4 architecture (codename Phoenix) on TSMC's 4 nm process, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 64 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.