SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + AMD Radeon RX 6600S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
87%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

30,390 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600S

10,629 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, featuring the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix codename. It belongs to AMD's 7000 series and operates with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The processor has a 35 W TDP, positioning it as an efficient yet capable option for thin-and-light laptops. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling a die size of 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,554 points places this CPU in the 81st percentile among all processors. This means it outperforms roughly four-fifths of the CPUs in the benchmark database, a strong result for a 35 W mobile part. The single-core Cinebench R23 result of 1,715.5 points reinforces the architecture's efficiency, as Zen 4's IPC improvements deliver competitive single-thread performance despite the modest power envelope. Geekbench scores of 10,389 (multicore) and 2,093 (singlecore) corroborate these findings, showing balanced scaling across different benchmark methodologies.

The PassMark suite provides workload-specific insights. The multithread score of 22,979 and single-thread score of 3,654 indicate solid general-purpose performance. Data compression reaches 269,524, while data encryption hits 15,867, suggesting the AES instructions handle cryptographic tasks efficiently. Floating-point math scores 45,220, integer math scores 73,284, and extended instructions (typically AVX-512 or similar) score 20,556. The physics score of 1,155 and prime number finding score of 77 are lower, reflecting the CPU's mobile-oriented design where sustained heavy compute may be thermally limited. Random string sorting at 31,654 completes the picture of a well-rounded mobile processor.

The nearest rivals contextualize these numbers. The AMD Ryzen 7 7736U scores 30,364 on average, a mere 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 5 7640HS's 30,390 average. The Intel Core i9-11980HK is 0.1% higher at 30,422, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T sits 0.3% above and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U is 0.4% below. This clustering within a 0.7% band shows that the 7640HS delivers performance comparable to both older high-end Intel parts and newer mid-range AMD options, despite having fewer cores than some rivals. The data indicates that clock speed and architecture efficiency compensate for the core count disadvantage.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS?

A: The average benchmark score is 30,390, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, scores 30,364, which is 0.1% lower.

Q: How does the single-core performance compare to the multi-core performance?

A: The single-core Cinebench R23 score is 1,715.5, while the multi-core score is 12,554. This represents a roughly 7.3x scaling factor across six cores, which is reasonable given the 12 threads and the thermal constraints of a 35 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). This is sufficient for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage in a laptop configuration.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked. This is typical for mobile processors, where power and thermal headroom are limited, and the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is already optimized for the chassis.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7640HS compare to the Intel Core i9-11980HK?

A: The Ryzen 5 7640HS has an average score of 30,390, which is 0.1% lower than the i9-11980HK's 30,422. Despite the Intel part being a higher-tier product from an earlier generation, the performance difference is negligible.

Q: What integrated graphics does this CPU include?

A: The CPU includes the Radeon 760M integrated graphics. This provides a fallback display output and basic GPU acceleration when the discrete Radeon RX 6600S is not in use.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Ryzen 5 7640HS with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 6 cores provides sufficient single-thread performance for high-refresh gaming. The 81st percentile CPU ranking ensures that the processor will not bottleneck modern game engines in most titles, though the GPU (49th percentile) will likely cap frame rates. Single-core Cinebench R23 of 1,715.5 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for games that rely on a primary simulation thread.

Streaming: The 12 threads and 16 MB of L3 cache handle concurrent encoding and gameplay reasonably well. The PassMark data encryption score of 15,867 and extended instructions score of 20,556 suggest that hardware-accelerated encoding and overlay processing will proceed without severe frame drops, though the overall system bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s may limit simultaneous heavy tasks.

Video Editing: Multi-core Cinebench R23 of 12,554 and Geekbench multicore of 10,389 indicate that timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks will complete in acceptable time for a mobile workstation. The floating-point math score of 45,220 supports color grading and filter operations, while the 4 nm process node keeps power draw contained during long render sessions.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1,978 show that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D is feasible for hobbyist or previsualization work. However, GPU-based rendering would leverage the Radeon RX 6600S's 7.168 TFLOPS FP32 performance, making the CPU a secondary contributor.

Software Development: The PassMark integer math score of 73,284 and random string sorting of 31,654 indicate strong performance for code compilation, unit testing, and data structure manipulation. The dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth supports large build caches and virtual machines, while the 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and Office Work: The single-thread PassMark score of 3,654 ensures snappy response in word processors, spreadsheets, and web browsers. The 35 W TDP contributes to long battery life, and the integrated Radeon 760M provides a low-power graphics path for everyday tasks, preserving the discrete GPU for demanding applications.

Who Should Build It

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS combined with the AMD Radeon RX 6600S targets users who need a balanced laptop for mixed workloads. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find the GPU's 49th percentile ranking adequate for esports and older AAA titles, while the CPU's 81st percentile ensures no processor-induced stutter. Content creators editing 1080p video or doing light 3D work will benefit from the CPU's multi-core scores, though the 4 GB VRAM on the GPU limits texture-heavy projects. Developers compiling code and running containers will appreciate the 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache, which keep build times reasonable. Students and office workers in small business environments will find the combination overkill for basic tasks but useful for occasional data analysis or presentation rendering. The laptop form factor (build class: laptop) means this is not a DIY build but a pre-configured system purchase, so "building" here refers to selecting a laptop with this hardware pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 65 for this CPU+GPU pairing indicates an imbalanced configuration. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile, while the GPU sits at the 49th percentile, meaning the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-bound workloads. In gaming, the Radeon RX 6600S will cap frame rates well before the Ryzen 5 7640HS reaches its limits, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput matters more than CPU logic. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 M275X, scores 10,582 (0.4% lower), while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 10,690 (0.6% higher) — these are older parts, underscoring the RX 6600S's modest standing.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression (269,524), or physics simulation (1,155), the CPU will dominate, and the GPU will sit idle. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between CPU and GPU, which could become a limiting factor in mixed workloads where both units access memory simultaneously. The GPU's 224.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth (from its 128-bit bus and 14 Gbps GDDR6) helps, but the system-level constraint remains. For balanced performance, users should expect the GPU to be the constraining component in gaming, while the CPU leads in productivity tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600S is a mobile GPU based on the Navi 23 chip, built on TSMC's 7 nm process with RDNA 2.0 architecture. It features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds are 1700 MHz base, 1881 MHz game, and 2000 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The FP32 compute throughput is 7.168 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 14.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

In benchmark results, the GPU scores 12,649 in PassMark G3D, placing it in the 49th percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 66,435, indicating solid compute capability for OpenCL-accelerated applications. However, the DirectX scores are mixed: DirectX 9 scores 176, DirectX 10 scores 81, DirectX 11 scores 105, and DirectX 12 scores 56. The low DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 suggests that the GPU may not fully leverage modern API features, possibly due to driver maturity or architectural limitations. The PassMark GPU compute score of 4,879 and G2D score of 647 round out the profile.

The nearest rivals contextualize this performance. The AMD Radeon R9 M275X is 0.4% lower at 10,582, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti is 0.6% higher at 10,690, the NVIDIA Quadro K2200 is 1.2% higher at 10,761, and the AMD Radeon RX 550X is 1.4% lower at 10,481. These are all older or lower-tier parts, meaning the RX 6600S competes with hardware from several generations ago. The ray tracing cores (28) provide hardware acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) features, but the modest compute throughput will limit ray-traced performance. The GPU's 80 W TDP is reasonable for a laptop, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the 4 GB VRAM.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded. The GPU, likewise, is an integrated part of the laptop's design (slot width: IGP, power connectors: none) and is not user-replaceable. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving additional lanes for storage or other peripherals.

The suggested PSU is not specified, but the CPU TDP of 35 W and GPU TDP of 80 W together suggest a total system draw that a typical laptop power adapter can handle. The GPU is end-of-life (production status: End-of-life, release date 2022-01-03), meaning no new units are being manufactured, but the CPU remains active. For a sensible next upgrade, users would need to replace the entire laptop, as neither the CPU nor GPU is modular. Memory and storage are the only likely upgradeable components, with dual-channel DDR5 allowing for capacity increases. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes support fast NVMe SSDs, so a storage upgrade is feasible.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 mobile CPU) with the AMD Radeon RX 6600S (a 4 GB RDNA 2 mobile GPU). The build class is laptop, meaning this is a factory-configured system, not a DIY desktop. The combined percentile is 65, indicating that this configuration outperforms roughly two-thirds of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database, but it is not a high-end setup. The CPU is the stronger component (81st percentile) while the GPU lags (49th percentile), creating a CPU-heavy balance. This is a mid-tier laptop configuration suitable for mainstream gaming at 1080p, productivity, and content creation, but it will not excel at 1440p or 4K gaming or heavy 3D rendering.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 30,390, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U at 30,364 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i9-11980HK at 30,422 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T at 30,468 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U at 30,254 (0.4% lower). This suggests the 7640HS delivers performance equivalent to a range of alternatives from both AMD and Intel, making it a safe choice for CPU-bound tasks. The GPU's average benchmark score is 10,629, placing it in the 49th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 M275X at 10,582 (0.4% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti at 10,690 (0.6% higher), the NVIDIA Quadro K2200 at 10,761 (1.2% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 550X at 10,481 (1.4% lower).

The combined picture shows a CPU that is well above average and a GPU that is slightly below average. The combined percentile of 65 reflects this disparity, indicating that the system's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU. In CPU-heavy applications, this build will perform in the top 20% of systems, while in GPU-heavy applications, it will perform around the median. Users should align their workload expectations accordingly.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12,649 (49th percentile) suggests that at 1080p with ultra settings, most modern games will run at 30-50 FPS, while esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends may reach 60-100 FPS due to lower GPU demands. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 singlecore of 1,715.5) ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, but the GPU's modest compute (7.168 TFLOPS FP32) and 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality and resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU will likely struggle, with FPS dropping to 20-35 in AAA titles, as the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM become insufficient for high-resolution textures. At 1080p with medium settings, the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 105 suggests playable frame rates in most titles, but the low DirectX 12 score of 56 indicates that newer games using DX12 may perform worse than expected. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support, but the overall performance is too low for playable ray-traced frame rates in demanding titles. For a 1080p gaming laptop with medium-to-high settings, this pairing is adequate, but it is not a high-refresh or high-resolution solution.