SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

30,390 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis covers the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS paired with the AMD Radeon 860M in a laptop-class build. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile of all CPUs, the GPU at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, and the combined pair at the 77th percentile. The processor is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 mobile part on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the graphics side is an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU with 512 shader units and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU that is stronger relative to its own field than the GPU is to its field. The Ryzen 5 7640HS has an average benchmark score of 30390 and a percentile of 81, while the Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401 and a percentile of 72. In CPU-bound workloads, the processor should be the dominant component; in GPU-bound workloads, the graphics core is the more likely limiter.

The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score is 3654, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1715.5. Those are strong numbers for a mobile 6-core part. The GPU’s OpenCL score is 22759 and its Vulkan score is 30043, but its raw pixel throughput is 48.00 GPixel/s and its FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS. For high-refresh gaming, the GPU is the expected cap because the CPU has enough single-thread headroom to feed it. For heavily multithreaded tasks, the CPU is the component doing most of the work.

Because there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, the balance picture is drawn from the benchmark scores rather than from game averages. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, with a 5.00 GHz boost, give it a clear advantage in productivity, while the GPU’s 512 shading units and 15 W TDP define the graphics ceiling. The practical takeaway: this pairing will feel CPU-fast in everyday work and GPU-limited in demanding graphics loads.

FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS?

A: It is a 7000-series mobile CPU with 6 cores, 12 threads, a 4.30 GHz base clock, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, a 35 W TDP, Zen 4 architecture, and a 4 nm TSMC process. It uses AMD Socket FP8.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU average score is 30390. The nearest listed rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U with an average score of 30364 and a deltaPct of 0.1. The Intel Core i9-11980HK averages 30422 with a deltaPct of -0.1, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T averages 30468 with a deltaPct of -0.3, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U averages 30254 with a deltaPct of 0.4. This puts the 7640HS inside a tight cluster.

Q: What are the GPU’s benchmark scores?

A: The Radeon 860M scores 22759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30043 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 26401. The nearest listed rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at 26421 with a deltaPct of -0.1, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 at 26331 with a deltaPct of 0.3, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26553 with a deltaPct of -0.6, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 at 26683 with a deltaPct of -1.1.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this pairing?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all FPS statements in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC memory support. The GPU uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: The Radeon 860M has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The benchmark data does not include a dedicated ray-tracing score.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The multiplier is listed as not unlocked, so the CPU is not designed for user overclocking.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on Zen 4 (Phoenix) architecture. It is manufactured by AMD on a 4 nm TSMC process, with 25,000 million transistors and a die size of 178 mm². The cache layout is 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC memory.

The benchmark results indicate a well-balanced mobile CPU. Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12554, and single-core is 1715.5. Geekbench multicore is 10364, and single-core is 2093. PassMark multithread is 22979, and single-thread is 3654. These numbers place the CPU at the 81st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30390.

The nearest rival data reinforces that the 7640HS is in a crowded performance band. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, 0.1% behind the Intel Core i9-11980HK, 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U. For real workloads, that means the CPU will be indistinguishable from these peers in many multithreaded tasks, while its 12 threads and high boost clock keep it responsive in single-threaded and lightly threaded applications.

The CPU also includes integrated Radeon 760M graphics, while this build is paired with the separate Radeon 860M. The CPU’s 4.30 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost are high for a 35 W mobile chip, and the 12 threads give it enough parallelism for streaming and productivity work. The locked multiplier means no overclocking, but the stock frequency headroom is already strong.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming

Estimated from the benchmark scores, the CPU’s single-thread PassMark of 3654 is strong enough to drive high-refresh gaming in CPU-light titles. The GPU, however, is the limiting side: it sits at the 72nd percentile and has 3.072 TFLOPS FP32. The Vulkan score of 30043 is healthy, but the GPU’s 512 shader units and 16 ROPs set a modest pixel budget. Builders should expect the GPU, not the CPU, to be the bottleneck in high-refresh scenarios.

Streaming

The 12-thread CPU, with a PassMark multithread score of 22979 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12554, can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads better than a lower-core chip. The GPU adds Vulkan and OpenCL compute resources, but the CPU’s 6 cores are the main asset for streaming. The 35 W TDP also makes this a plausible chip for a compact laptop that runs all day while streaming.

Video Editing

The CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 10389 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 22759 both contribute to video editing. Timeline rendering and preview effects can use the CPU’s 12 threads, while GPU-accelerated effects can use the Radeon 860M’s RDNA 3.5 cores. The system memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is the shared channel for both CPU and GPU, which matters when working with high-resolution media.

3D Rendering

Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12554 and the GPU’s Vulkan score of 30043 indicate a hybrid workload. CPU-based rendering will be the stronger side, given the CPU’s 81st percentile and the GPU’s 72nd percentile. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 is modest for offline rendering, so the CPU should be the primary render engine. The 12 threads will scale reasonably in CPU renderers.

Software Development

The CPU’s single-thread PassMark of 3654 and multithread score of 22979 make it a good match for code compilation, test runners, and virtual machines. The dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes provide a responsive platform for local builds. The 6-core/12-thread count is enough for most developer workloads without draining battery too quickly.

Student and Office Work

With a 35 W TDP, 12 threads, and integrated graphics, this is a practical laptop chip for office productivity. The CPU’s single-thread performance keeps applications snappy, and the integrated Radeon 860M handles desktop compositing and light media tasks. The ECC memory support also gives it a reliability angle for small workstations.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 7640HS has an average benchmark score of 30390, putting it at the 81st percentile. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12554, single-core 1715.5; Geekbench multicore 10364, single-core 2093; PassMark multithread 22979, single-thread 3654. The Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401, at the 72nd percentile, with Geekbench OpenCL 22759 and Vulkan 30043.

The combined picture is a laptop pairing that is more CPU-heavy than GPU-heavy. The CPU is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, 0.1% behind the Intel Core i9-11980HK, 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U. The GPU is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA MX 550, 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, and 1.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000.

These are not measured FPS numbers. They are benchmark scores that estimate the relative performance of the CPU and GPU. In a combined system, the CPU will handle compute-heavy tasks, while the GPU will handle graphics. The 77th combined percentile reflects the stronger CPU and the weaker GPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is a 4 nm integrated GPU from AMD, using RDNA 3.5 architecture and the Krackan Point chip. It is built for the Strix Point Mobile generation and released on 2025-02-28. It is an integrated graphics processor with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The GPU’s memory is system shared, with no dedicated VRAM. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as system dependent. That means the GPU uses the same DDR5 memory as the CPU, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is the ceiling for both. The GPU clocks are 600 MHz base and 3000 MHz boost.

Internally, the GPU has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, and 8 RT cores. Its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS. FP16 is also 3.072 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 22759 in OpenCL and 30043 in Vulkan. The Vulkan score is notably higher than the OpenCL score, which suggests the GPU scales well with modern compute APIs. The 72nd percentile and 26401 average place it close to the NVIDIA MX 550, RTX 5060, RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, and RTX A4000. For rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS and 96.00 GTexel/s are modest, but the GPU is clearly capable of light to moderate graphics work.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built for AMD Socket FP8, and the platform supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory. The CPU has a PCIe Gen 4 connection with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU TDP is 35 W, the GPU TDP is 15 W, and no suggested PSU is listed. The GPU has no power connectors, which is expected for an integrated part.

Because the GPU uses system shared memory, the most sensible upgrade lever is the memory configuration. Increasing DDR5 capacity directly increases the memory pool available to both the CPU and the GPU. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is fixed by the platform, so faster memory would not necessarily change that number. The CPU is not unlocked, so CPU overclocking is not a viable path.

The integrated GPU cannot be swapped, and the laptop class means the socket is not a general-purpose upgrade path. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide bandwidth for CPU-attached devices, which is the practical expansion route. For users who need more graphics headroom, the realistic upgrade is a different platform or a discrete GPU solution.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS with the AMD Radeon 860M in a laptop class. The combined percentile is 77, with the CPU at 81 and the GPU at 72. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 mobile processor, and the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics core with 512 shaders. It is a CPU-leaning build, where the processor provides the majority of compute and the GPU handles graphics and GPU-accelerated tasks.

The lack of measured FPS data means the overall performance tier is based on benchmark averages. The CPU’s 30390 average and the GPU’s 26401 average place this pair in the upper-middle of the database. It is not a high-end discrete GPU system, but it is a capable integrated-graphics laptop platform for a wide range of work.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at high refresh rates on a laptop will find the CPU strong but the GPU limited. The CPU’s single-thread PassMark of 3654 is enough for CPU-bound games, but the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 48.00 GPixel/s will cap high-refresh graphics. Builders who want a high-refresh gaming laptop should expect GPU-bound performance.

Content creators who work with video and 3D rendering will get more from the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12554 and Geekbench multicore score of 10389 make this a capable mobile CPU. The GPU’s OpenCL 22759 and Vulkan 30043 add acceleration for GPU-backed effects.

Software developers will appreciate the 12 threads, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and single-thread 3654. Build times and code analysis benefit from the multithread score of 22979, while the ECC memory support makes it a plausible option for small business workstations that need data integrity.

Students and office workers get a 35 W mobile CPU with 12 threads and integrated graphics. The CPU’s 3654 single-thread PassMark makes day-to-day apps responsive, and the GPU handles desktop acceleration without a discrete card. Small business workstations can rely on the ECC memory support and the low TDP for continuous use.

The data does not show a measured FPS for this exact pair, so every scenario above is an estimate from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The CPU is the stronger half, the GPU is the weaker half, and the combined 77th percentile puts this build in a solid mid-tier laptop range.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming

Streaming

Video Editing

3D Rendering

Software Development

Student and Office Work

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds