SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D

24,728 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation pairing is a desktop configuration built on the modern AMD Socket AM5 platform. The CPU, part of the 7000 series with a Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael), runs on a 5 nm process from TSMC. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The processor also supports ECC memory and features integrated Radeon Graphics. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, a standard interface for this class of card. Regarding power, the CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 130 W TDP and a suggested PSU rating of 300 W, indicating a system that does not require an extreme power supply. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not a primary feature. A sensible next upgrade path would involve leveraging the AM5 socket's longevity, potentially moving to a higher-core-count Ryzen processor in the future, while the GPU's single-slot design and 16-pin connector keep it compatible with a wide range of chassis.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data points to a strong pairing. The CPU scores 944 in the 3dmark_single_thread test and 1840 in the 3dmark_2_threads test, indicating solid per-core performance. The GPU, with a 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs, provides ample graphics horsepower. While no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, the CPU's 3DMark multi-thread scores (5906 for 16 threads and 5956 for max threads) suggest it can feed frames efficiently, making this a capable setup for high-refresh gaming at various resolutions. The 96 MB of shared L3 cache on the CPU is particularly beneficial for gaming workloads.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's multi-threading capabilities. The processor scores 25855 in Passmark multithread and 21758 in Cinebench R23 multicore, showing strong parallel processing power. This allows for simultaneous encoding and gameplay. The GPU also features dedicated tensor cores (192) and RT cores (48), which can accelerate encoding tasks and AI-driven enhancements, though the specific streaming performance is an estimate. The combination of a 6-core, 12-thread CPU and a high-end workstation GPU ensures smooth streaming sessions, provided the software is optimized for these architectures.

Video editing is a scenario where both components shine. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21758 indicates efficient rendering of video timelines and effects. The GPU's 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth are substantial for handling large 4K or even 8K video files, previews, and effects. Its FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. The data suggests a system that handles video editing with responsiveness, though the lack of measured FPS means the exact timeline scrubbing speed is inferred from these benchmark scores.

3D rendering workloads are heavily reliant on both CPU and GPU. The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 73804 and floating point math score of 44289 show strong processing capabilities for physics and geometry calculations. The GPU, with its 6144 shading units and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance, is excellent for render engines that utilize CUDA cores. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 further supports its compute power. This pairing can handle complex 3D scenes, with the CPU managing scene data and the GPU accelerating the actual render passes.

Software development benefits from the CPU's balanced performance. The Passmark data compression score of 281665 and encryption score of 16237 indicate fast compilation and data handling. The single-thread score of 3605 ensures quick response in code editors and IDEs. For developers, the 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The GPU is less critical here but provides a smooth experience for UI rendering and any GPU-accelerated development tools. This is a solid workstation for coding, testing, and running virtual machines, with the CPU's 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirming its overall capability.

Student and office work is more than adequately served by this hardware. The CPU's single-thread performance (944 in 3dmark_single_thread) ensures snappy application launches, while the 6 cores handle multitasking across office suites, web browsers with many tabs, and communication tools. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but its low 130 W TDP does not make the system prohibitively power-hungry. The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU also provides a fallback, though the discrete GPU will handle any light graphics tasks with ease. This is a high-end setup for academic work, offering performance far beyond what is required for standard tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture and the Raphael codename. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 4.10 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy is notable: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a massive 96 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is a key feature, likely contributing to its strong gaming and data-heavy workload performance. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory. It provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 21758, while the single-core score is 3071. In 3DMark, the max threads score is 5956, and the single-thread score is 944. The Passmark multithread score is 25855, with a single-thread score of 3605. These numbers suggest a processor that has a slight edge in multi-threaded tasks over its single-threaded performance, but both are solid. The data compression score of 281665 is particularly high, indicating excellent performance in tasks that involve packing and unpacking data. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24728, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D, with a delta of 0.1%. It is 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX and 0.6% slower than the Intel Core 5 210H, but 0.6% faster than the Intel Core i5-12450HX. This places it in a competitive mid-range to upper-mid-range tier.

The 96 MB L3 cache is a standout feature. In real workloads, this large cache helps reduce memory latency, which can significantly improve performance in games and applications that access the same data repeatedly. The processor's TDP of 65 W is efficient, making it easy to cool. Its launch MSRP is $299. The architecture supports modern instruction sets, as evidenced by the Passmark extended instructions score of 21108. Overall, this CPU is a balanced performer, with a specific strength in data manipulation and a feature set geared toward gaming and productivity.

Who Should Build It

This hardware combination targets users who need both high-end workstation graphics and strong CPU performance. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions would benefit, as the GPU (95th percentile) is capable of high frame rates, and the CPU's single-thread score of 944 in 3DMark ensures it won't bottleneck at these resolutions. Content creators, including video editors and 3D artists, are a primary audience. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance are ideal for rendering and effects, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21758 handles encoding and scene processing. Software developers would appreciate the CPU's high data compression score of 281665 for faster builds and the 12 threads for parallel compilation tasks.

Students in engineering or computer science fields would find this system capable for simulations and heavy multitasking, though it exceeds typical student needs. Small business workstations that require GPU acceleration for tasks like CAD, data visualization, or AI inference would benefit from the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's features, including its tensor cores. The CPU's ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity in professional environments. The build class is desktop, indicating a stationary workstation. The combined percentile of 86 places this system in the upper echelon of performance, suitable for professionals who cannot afford downtime due to hardware limitations. It is not a budget-oriented build; it is a performance-oriented one.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU leans toward the GPU being the more dominant component in terms of overall performance. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs is higher than the CPU's 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs. This suggests that in many scenarios, the GPU will be the primary performance driver. For gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (944 in 3DMark) is strong enough to support high frame rates, but at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU could become a bottleneck in certain CPU-intensive titles, as it is relatively weaker than the GPU. At higher resolutions (1440p and above), the GPU becomes the limiting factor, which is a more balanced situation for frame rates.

In compute workloads, the bottleneck shifts. For tasks like 3D rendering, the CPU's 6 cores (12 threads) might limit performance in scenes that require massive geometry processing, despite its strong scores. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS is substantial, but the CPU must feed it data. The Passmark integer math score of 73804 indicates good processing power, but a higher-core-count CPU would provide more headroom. The 96 MB of L3 cache helps mitigate CPU bottlenecks by reducing memory access times. The data shows an FPS scaling pattern where the GPU is more often the limiter at high resolutions, while the CPU's performance is sufficient but not overly abundant. The suggested PSU of 300 W indicates a system with low power draw, meaning other components are unlikely to be a bottleneck. Overall, this is a well-matched pair, but users pushing for maximum FPS at 1080p should be aware of the CPU's limits.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, confirming this. Based on the CPU's strong single-thread score of 944 in 3DMark and the GPU's high percentile, this system is expected to deliver high frame rates in modern games. At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU could be a limiting factor in some titles, given its 6-core configuration, but the large L3 cache should help. The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for any game at this resolution, suggesting the CPU is the more likely constraint.

At 1440p, the system is likely well-balanced. The GPU's performance (146593 in Geekbench OpenCL) can handle the increased resolution and detail, while the CPU manages to keep up. Frame rates are expected to be high, possibly exceeding 60 FPS in most titles and reaching into the triple digits in less demanding games. At 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation card, not a gaming card, but its 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 64 ROPs suggest it can handle 4K gaming, though maybe not at the highest refresh rates. The CPU's performance is less relevant at this resolution. In summary, the estimates point to a system that is excellent for 1440p gaming, good for 1080p, and capable at 4K, with the understanding that these are projections, not measured results.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores paint a picture of a capable mid-range processor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 21758, and the single-core score is 3071. The 3DMark max threads score is 5956. The Passmark multithread score is 25855. The average benchmark score is 24728, placing the CPU in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D, has a nearly identical average score of 24709, with a delta of 0.1%. The GPU's benchmarks are more impressive. It scores 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan. The average benchmark score is 135218, placing the GPU in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135230 with a delta of 0%, indicating a dead heat in performance.

The combined picture is a system with a strong GPU and a solid CPU. The GPU's 95th percentile is a standout, indicating top-tier performance relative to all other GPUs. The CPU's 77th percentile is respectable but not elite. The combined percentile of 86 reflects the overall strength of the pairing. The data shows that the GPU is the more powerful component relative to its peers, and the CPU is a competent partner. The Passmark data compression score of 281665 for the CPU suggests it excels in specific tasks, but the overall CPU performance is in line with its rivals. The GPU's scores, particularly the OpenCL result, indicate high compute capability, making this a strong system for both gaming and professional applications.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop system combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D CPU and the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, while the GPU is a workstation-class card from the GeForce 40-series. The system targets a performance tier that is above average, as indicated by the combined percentile of 86. The CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 95th percentile show that the GPU is the primary driver of this high ranking. This pairing is for users who need professional-grade graphics acceleration without sacrificing CPU performance. The build class is desktop, suggesting a stationary setup. The overall tier is upper-mid-range to high-end, given the GPU's exceptional standing and the CPU's solid mid-range performance. The system is designed for workloads where GPU compute is paramount, but it is also well-suited for gaming. It represents a balanced investment in both processing and graphics capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D uses the AMD Socket AM5.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has a large L3 cache of 96 MB (shared).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a memory bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile rank among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 95th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination; all FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD104 chip. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1500 MHz, with a boost clock of 2175 MHz, and the memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). It features 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The GPU is equipped with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. Its pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1).

The GPU's benchmark scores are strong. It scores 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan. The average benchmark score is 135218, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA A10M, which has a score of 135230 and a delta of 0%, showing they are performance equals. The GPU has a TDP of 130 W and is a single-slot card with a 16-pin power connector. It has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. For rendering workloads, the 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is substantial, and the 20 GB of VRAM is ample for large scenes and textures. The tensor cores accelerate AI-based rendering features, such as denoising and upscaling. The data indicates a GPU that is not just for gaming but is a serious compute accelerator, with performance that rivals other top-tier workstation cards.