SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D

24,728 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 form a desktop pairing built around a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, combined with a 40-series GPU that delivers 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The CPU’s benchmark profile shows a clear split between strong multi-threaded throughput and modest single-thread results, while the GPU’s scores place it in the 61st percentile among all graphics cards. The combined percentile for this build is 69, indicating a system that sits comfortably above the median for both components. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data, and since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming performance discussion is framed as estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D is built on the Zen 4 (Raphael) architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, with the chip containing 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The processor features 6 cores and 12 threads, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 96 MB L3 cache—a configuration that heavily favors cache-sensitive workloads. Memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Benchmark results reveal the processor’s scaling behavior. In 3DMark tests, the single-thread score is 944, while the 2-thread score reaches 1840, indicating near-linear scaling at low thread counts. The 4-thread score of 3498 and 8-thread score of 5215 show diminishing returns as threads increase, with the 16-thread score of 5906 and max-thread score of 5956 confirming that the 12-thread ceiling is approached but not exceeded. Cinebench results reinforce this pattern: the R23 multi-core score of 21758 is over 7 times the single-core score of 3071, but the gap between the 8-thread and max-thread 3DMark scores suggests the CPU is not fully saturated beyond 8 threads.

PassMark integer math scores 73,804, while floating-point math scores 44,289, and extended instructions hit 21,108. Data compression scores 281,665, which is notably strong relative to the processor’s other integer workloads, likely benefiting from the large L3 cache. The multi-thread PassMark score of 25,855 and single-thread score of 3,605 place the CPU at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24,728. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D, scores 24,709, a difference of only 0.1%, meaning the 7600X3D is statistically tied with that 8-core part. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24,822 (-0.4%) and the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24,872 (-0.6%), both slightly ahead, while the Intel Core i5-12450HX trails at 24,576 (+0.6% for the 7600X3D). This places the CPU in a competitive mid-range tier where the 96 MB L3 cache compensates for fewer cores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU depends heavily on workload type. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 61st percentile suggests the processor is the stronger component in synthetic benchmark terms. However, the CPU’s 6-core/12-thread configuration with a 4.70 GHz boost clock is well-suited to feeding a GPU that sits mid-tier. In lightly threaded tasks, the 3DMark single-thread score of 944 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,605 indicate the CPU can drive high frame rates without stalling, while the GPU’s passmark G3D score of 19,545 becomes the limiting factor for overall graphical throughput.

The 8-thread 3DMark score of 5,215 versus the 16-thread score of 5,906 shows that the CPU retains headroom beyond 8 threads, which matters for games using multiple background threads. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth and 128-bit bus width is a potential bottleneck in texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions, but the CPU’s 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is not the limiting factor there. The CPU’s data compression score of 281,665 and encryption score of 16,237 suggest it can handle asset decompression and streaming workloads that might otherwise stall the GPU, but the GPU’s compute score of 9,213 in PassMark indicates it will be the constraint in compute-heavy rendering tasks.

The percentile gap of 16 points (77 for CPU, 61 for GPU) implies that for most gaming scenarios, the RTX 4060 will be the component that determines maximum visual quality settings, while the CPU’s cache and clock speeds will determine minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenes. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this intermediate balance: the system is not GPU-starved, but the GPU is the more likely candidate for upgrades rather than the CPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24,728, placing it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its best multi-threaded result comes from Cinebench R23 with a score of 21,758, while the 3DMark max-thread score of 5,956 and PassMark multi-thread score of 25,855 provide consistent multi-core figures. Single-thread performance is led by PassMark at 3,605 and Cinebench R23 at 3,071, with the 3DMark single-thread score of 944 being the lowest relative result. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 5700X3D, is essentially identical at 24,709 (0.1% difference), meaning the 6-core 7600X3D matches an 8-core part in average score, evidence of the X3D cache advantage.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17,639, placing it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its strongest result is the PassMark G3D score of 19,545, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 95,057 and Vulkan at 48,643. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,302 is a moderate result for modern API workloads. The GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17,666 (-0.2%), a legacy part that is essentially tied in average score, while the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17,588 (+0.3%) and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17,551 (+0.5%). This suggests the RTX 4060’s average score is within a narrow band of older and integrated GPUs, though its high G3D score of 19,545 indicates it excels in traditional 3D workloads.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its rivals in multi-threaded work while the GPU sits in a crowded mid-range field. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 2,906 and floating-point score of 44,289 indicate strong simulation and physics capability, which pairs with the GPU’s 236.2 GTexel/s texture rate to handle particle effects and complex scenes. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS is modest compared to higher-tier cards, but the CPU’s data compression score of 281,665 ensures that scene loading and asset streaming do not become CPU-side bottlenecks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking and GPU’s 61st percentile ranking suggest that at 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles, as the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,605 and 8-thread score of 5,215 are sufficient to drive high frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will become more significant constraints, with the 128-bit bus limiting memory bandwidth for high-resolution textures.

The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 76 and DirectX 11 score of 175 indicate that modern API titles will perform relatively better than legacy DirectX 9 or 10 titles, which score 236 and 103 respectively. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,302 provides a baseline for DX12 gaming performance, suggesting that frame rates in demanding modern titles will be moderate. The CPU’s L3 cache of 96 MB is particularly beneficial for game physics and AI calculations, which often have cache-resident workloads, and the PassMark physics score of 2,906 supports this.

For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance should allow frame rates well above 144 Hz in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU’s G3D score of 19,545 will cap maximum FPS in GPU-bound scenes. For AAA titles at 1440p, frame rates will likely be in the 60-90 FPS range with medium-high settings, while 4K is not recommended given the GPU’s memory bandwidth and 8 GB capacity. Ray tracing workloads, supported by 24 RT cores, will see performance drops consistent with the GPU’s mid-tier position, and DLSS would be required for playable frame rates in RT-heavy titles.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600X3D compare to the Ryzen 7 5700X3D in average benchmark score?

A: The 7600X3D scores 24,728, which is 0.1% higher than the 5700X3D’s 24,709, making them statistically identical despite the 7600X3D having 2 fewer cores.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread performance?

A: In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 3,071 and the multi-core score is 21,758, a ratio of approximately 1:7, indicating strong scaling across its 6 cores/12 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 17 Gbps.

Q: How does the GPU’s percentile ranking compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU is at the 61st percentile with an average score of 17,639, while the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17,666 (-0.2%), the Radeon 780M scores 17,588 (+0.3%), and the Radeon Pro 560 scores 17,551 (+0.5%).

Q: What is the CPU’s cache configuration?

A: The CPU has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 96 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 96 MB of L3 for the entire chip.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 69, reflecting the CPU’s 77th percentile position and the GPU’s 61st percentile position.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute throughput?

A: The GPU delivers 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 also at 15.11 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD107 chip, using a 5 nm TSMC process that integrates 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs, with 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores. It operates at a base clock of 1,830 MHz and boosts to 2,460 MHz, with memory running at 2,125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is arranged on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and the GPU is rated for a 115 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Benchmark scores show the GPU’s strengths and weaknesses. The PassMark G3D score of 19,545 is the highest 3D result, indicating solid traditional rasterization performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 95,057 shows good compute capability. The Vulkan score of 48,643 is lower relative to OpenCL, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,302 is a moderate result for modern APIs. The PassMark DirectX scores are notably low (DX9: 236, DX10: 103, DX11: 175, DX12: 76), which suggests that legacy API performance is weaker than the G3D score implies, while the G2D score of 1,037 indicates limited 2D workload capability.

The GPU’s pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s provide a texture-to-pixel ratio of 2:1, which is balanced for 1080p and 1440p rendering. The 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest for the 40-series lineup, and the 8 GB VRAM with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will be a constraint at high resolutions and with high-resolution texture packs. The 96 tensor cores enable DLSS acceleration, which can mitigate the bandwidth limitation in practice, while the 24 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability that will require DLSS or reduced settings for acceptable frame rates. The GPU’s average score of 17,639 and 61st percentile ranking place it in a competitive mid-range field, with nearest rivals being legacy and integrated parts from AMD.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rates, where the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,605 and the GPU’s G3D score of 19,545 combine for strong performance in esports and moderate performance in AAA titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,758 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 95,057, though the 8 GB VRAM will limit large scene rendering. Software developers compiling code will find the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 25,855 and data compression score of 281,665 useful, while the 6-core/12-thread configuration handles parallel builds effectively.

Students and office workers will find the system overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the 65 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP make it an efficient desktop for daily use. Small business workstations requiring moderate compute for data processing will leverage the CPU’s encryption score of 16,237 and integer math score of 73,804, while the GPU’s compute score of 9,213 supports CUDA-accelerated applications. The build is less suitable for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing workloads, given the GPU’s memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity, but it excels as a balanced mid-range desktop for gaming at 1080p/1440p and general professional use.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 96 MB L3 cache, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 69 indicates the build sits above the median for both components, with the CPU at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile. This is a mid-range desktop configuration that prioritizes cache-heavy CPU workloads and balanced 1080p gaming, rather than extreme multi-core or high-end GPU performance. The CPU’s average score of 24,728 and the GPU’s average score of 17,639 combine to a system that outperforms the majority of desktop PCs in synthetic benchmarks, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its peers.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with ECC capability. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The 65 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP result in a suggested PSU of 300 W, leaving headroom for minor upgrades without a PSU change. The GPU is marked as end-of-life production status with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, and its predecessor in the GeForce 30 series, but the CPU remains in active production.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking is stronger than the GPU’s 61st percentile. Upgrading to a GPU with more VRAM or higher bandwidth would address the 8 GB and 272.0 GB/s constraints observed in the current part. The CPU’s socket AM5 platform supports future processor upgrades within the same generation, and the 65 W TDP means cooling requirements are modest. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is a potential limitation for future GPU upgrades, as newer cards may require PCIe 4.0 x16 for full bandwidth, but for the current RTX 4060, the interface is sufficient. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s for the CPU is fixed by the dual-channel DDR5 setup, so any memory upgrade would require a platform change.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,605 and 8-thread score of 5,215 provide ample headroom for frame rates above 144 Hz in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s G3D score of 19,545 ensures playable frame rates in GPU-bound games, though the 8 GB VRAM limits texture quality in newer titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 6-core/12-thread configuration with a PassMark multi-thread score of 25,855 can handle encoding workloads alongside gaming, while the GPU’s NVENC (implied by the 96 tensor cores and 24 RT cores) offloads video encoding, but the 65 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP keep power draw reasonable for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,758 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 95,057 supports GPU-accelerated effects, but the 8 GB VRAM will limit preview quality for large 4K projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s PassMark floating-point score of 44,289 and the GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 provide dual compute paths for rendering, with the CPU handling geometry and the GPU handling rasterization, though the 8 GB VRAM restricts scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s data compression score of 281,665 and integer math score of 73,804 speed up compilation and code analysis, while the 6-core/12-thread layout supports parallel build tools, and the 96 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses for large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,605 handles document processing and spreadsheets with ease, while the GPU’s G2D score of 1,037 provides adequate 2D acceleration for productivity apps, and the 65 W CPU TDP makes the system energy-efficient for all-day use.