SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

27,636 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This benchmark analysis examines the pairing of an AMD Ryzen 5 7600X processor with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 graphics card. The combination represents a high-performance desktop build, with the CPU ranking at the 79th percentile against all processors and the GPU at the 88th percentile against all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 84. The data shows a system capable of exceptional frame rates across a wide variety of titles, though the performance characteristics reveal a significant imbalance that favors the GPU. The following analysis interprets the synthetic benchmarks and measured game performance to define the strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases for this configuration.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC, containing 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 4.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Cache is organized as 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. The memory controller supports dual-channel DDR5 with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor itself.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates strong single-thread performance with a 3dmark single-thread score of 1060 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1965. Multi-threaded performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15236 and a 3dmark max-threads score of 6845. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 27636, placing it at the 79th percentile. Its closest rivals, based on average score, include the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, which both have an average score of 27578, a delta of 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores slightly higher at 27712, a delta of -0.3%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, a delta of 0.4%. These figures indicate that the 7600X is competitive with, and essentially equivalent to, these other mid-range processors in aggregate performance.

The architectural strengths of the Zen 4 design are evident in the higher-frequency single-core results. For real-world workloads, the 3dmark 2-thread score of 2028 and the 4-thread score of 3796 suggest that applications with light thread counts will see excellent responsiveness. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2517 and single-core score of 314 double down on this, showing a balanced scaling from single to multi-threaded tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 4135 further confirms the CPU's ability to handle latency-sensitive tasks, while the multithread score of 28390 shows it can handle more intensive parallel workloads, such as rendering or encoding, without becoming a major bottleneck. The Passmark integer math score of 84749 and floating-point math score of 51025 provide context for productivity tasks, indicating a capable processor for general compute.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing is comprehensive, with results across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions for numerous games. The data is measured, not estimated, providing a direct view of real-world performance.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers very high frame rates in most titles. For example, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 793 FPS, Valorant at 520.4 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 427 FPS. Esports titles achieve triple-digit to high triple-digit frame rates, with Counter-Strike 2 at 363 FPS and Roblox at 466.8 FPS. Heavier titles also run smoothly, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 107.3 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 96 FPS. The most demanding game in the dataset, Ark: Survival Ascended, still manages 50.7 FPS at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. Valorant drops to 489.5 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive to 546 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is at 280 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 78.6 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 72 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended dips to 34.9 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is noticeable but not severe, with most games maintaining playable to excellent frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily taxed. Valorant still runs high at 454.6 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 131.5 FPS. However, more demanding titles see significant reductions. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 53.4 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 48 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 16.6 FPS. The average FPS across all games for this pairing is 220.1, placing the pair at the 95th percentile out of 3732 pairs.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing shows a clear imbalance, with the GPU being the dominant component. The CPU is at the 79th percentile, while the GPU is at the 88th percentile. The combined percentile is 84. In gaming workloads, the RTX 4090 is designed to push massive frame rates, and at lower resolutions like 1080p, the Ryzen 5 7600X may limit the maximum FPS achievable in some lighter titles. For instance, in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system hits 793 FPS at 1080p, which is extremely high, but this could be a CPU ceiling for that title.

As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the load shifts to the GPU, and the CPU becomes less of a limiting factor. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a consistent drop for each game, which is typical of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS goes from 107.3 to 78.6 to 53.4, a clear GPU-bound pattern. The CPU's performance is still sufficient to feed the GPU at these resolutions, as seen in the high frame rates across many titles.

For non-gaming workloads, the CPU's 6-core configuration can be a limiting factor. Benchmarks like Cinebench R23 multicore at 15236 are good, but for heavily threaded tasks like 3D rendering, a CPU with more cores would be faster. However, the CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Passmark single-thread score of 4135, ensures that tasks like software compilation or office productivity remain responsive. The bottleneck is workload-dependent: the GPU is the primary constraint in gaming, while the CPU's core count is the constraint in heavily parallel CPU-bound tasks.

Who Should Build It

This system is for users who prioritize gaming performance above all else and are willing to accept a CPU that is slightly below the performance class of the GPU. It is ideal for gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions who want to play the latest titles at ultra settings with high frame rates. The data shows that at 1440p, the system can run most games well above 60 FPS, and at 4K, many can still hit 60 FPS or higher, with a few exceptions.

It is also a suitable platform for content creators who work primarily with GPU-accelerated applications. Video editing, 3D rendering with CUDA, and AI workloads will benefit from the RTX 4090's 24 GB of VRAM and massive compute power. The CPU's 12 threads are sufficient for handling the UI and basic tasks while the GPU does the heavy lifting.

Software developers who work on code that is not highly parallel will see good performance from the 7600X's single-thread capabilities. Students and small business workstations that require a fast, responsive system for general productivity will find this build to be more than adequate, though the GPU is overkill for such tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is the primary use case. At 1080p, the system pushes over 400 FPS in Valorant and over 360 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, making it perfect for 360Hz monitors. At 1440p, frame rates remain high enough for 240Hz displays in esports titles, with Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 280 FPS.

Streaming: The RTX 4090 can handle the encoding load, and the CPU has enough headroom for the game and streaming software. The 3dmark 8-thread score of 5715 indicates solid multi-threading, which helps with the overhead of streaming.

Video Editing: The GPU's 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth and strong compute performance will accelerate rendering and effects. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15236 provides enough processing power for timeline scrubbing and preview rendering.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed scenario. The GPU is extremely powerful for CUDA-accelerated renderers. However, for CPU-based rendering, the 6-core CPU will be a bottleneck compared to higher-core-count options. The Passmark physics score of 1824 is modest, indicating that complex physics simulations might not be the strongest point.

Software Development: The CPU's fast single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2603, makes compilation and code analysis responsive. The 32 MB of L3 cache also helps with frequently accessed data.

Student and Office Work: This build is vastly overpowered for basic tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. However, it will be extremely fast and responsive. The Passmark data compression score of 317862 shows strong performance for file archiving and extraction, which is a common office task.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is based on the AD102 chip and the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, with a transistor density of 125.3M / mm². The base clock is 2235 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The memory subsystem is formidable, with 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. The card includes 16384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. It has 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI-based tasks like DLSS. The pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1).

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU achieves a 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 255416, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 271631. The Passmark G3D score is 38194, and the GPU compute score is 26613. The average benchmark score is 60347, placing the GPU at the 88th percentile. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the Intel Arc Pro A60 with a score of 60326 (0.0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 with 60140 (0.3% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with 61896 (-2.5% delta). These rivals are all professional or workstation-oriented cards, which highlights the RTX 4090's position as a top-tier consumer product.

For rendering, the 24 GB of VRAM is a key asset, allowing for large textures and complex scenes without running out of memory. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the compute units quickly. The high FP32 and FP16 performance makes it a monster for GPU compute tasks, including scientific simulation and machine learning inference. The 128 RT cores provide significant acceleration for ray-traced graphics, and the 512 tensor cores are essential for AI-powered features.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance ranking of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The pair ranks at the 95th percentile out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 220.1.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600X has an average benchmark score of 27636, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, and 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800. It is 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s.

Q: Is this system good for 4K gaming?

A: Yes, for most games. At 3840x2160, it achieves over 100 FPS in titles like Call of Duty: Warzone (122.1 FPS) and Overpower (109.6 FPS), but can drop to around 50 FPS in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (53.4 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (48 FPS).

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 105 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 450 W, with a suggested PSU of 850 W.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI?

A: Yes, it has 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a mid-range, high-frequency CPU with the most powerful consumer GPU available. The Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core Zen 4 processor, and the RTX 4090 is an Ada Lovelace flagship. The combined percentile of the pair is 84, indicating it is in the top 16% of all possible CPU+GPU combinations. The system is a gaming powerhouse, but the CPU's 6-core limit means it is not the ultimate choice for heavily threaded CPU workloads. It is a class-defining pairing for high-resolution gaming, where the GPU's massive memory and compute resources are fully utilized.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27636, placing it at the 79th percentile. Its key scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15236 and a single-core score of 1965, and a Geekbench multicore score of 13858 with a single-core score of 2603. The GPU's average benchmark score is 60347, at the 88th percentile. Its key scores include a 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 271631, and a Passmark G3D score of 38194. The combined picture is one of a system with a strong CPU that is outclassed by its GPU. The GPU is a top-12% performer, while the CPU is a top-21% performer. This results in a system that will be GPU-bound in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU has a TDP of 105 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 450 W, with a suggested PSU of 850 W. This suggests that the power supply has headroom for the current components. The CPU's multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the 6-core Ryzen 5 7600X with a higher-core-count processor on the same AM5 socket, as the platform supports future Zen generations. This would improve heavily threaded CPU performance while retaining the same motherboard and memory. For the GPU, the RTX 4090 is at the top of its class, and an upgrade would only be necessary for future generations. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU is fully supported by the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The platform has no immediate bottleneck in terms of I/O, but the CPU's core count is the most likely component to necessitate an upgrade for productivity-focused users.