SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

27,636 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X sits on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the foundation for AMD's 7000 series and beyond. This socket supports DDR5 memory exclusively, and the CPU features a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, which is a significant headroom for current and next-generation storage and expansion cards. The CPU itself is a 5 nm part fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 71 mm² and 6,570 million transistors.

For memory, the platform's support for DDR5 is a key consideration. The 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth is a measurable figure that directly impacts data-intensive workloads, though the platform's dual-channel configuration means that populating two modules is advisable for optimal performance. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a feature that small business workstations and data-sensitive environments may value, as it provides a layer of error correction not typically found on consumer desktop platforms.

The power delivery requirements are moderate. The CPU has a TDP of 105 W, which is a number that system builders can use to select an appropriate cooling solution. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, has a TDP of 320 W, and the suggested PSU for the whole system is 700 W. This is a clear guideline for power supply selection, ensuring that the system has enough headroom for transient power spikes from the GPU without over-provisioning to the point of diminishing returns. The GPU also uses a single 16-pin power connector, which modern power supplies with ATX 3.0 support will handle directly.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would be to move to a higher-core-count CPU within the same AM5 socket, as the platform's longevity is a key feature. The data shows that the Ryzen 5 7600X performs within a narrow band of its nearest rivals, so the upgrade would be for additional cores rather than a massive single-thread gain. The GPU, being already end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, is not a future-proofing concern for this build; the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means that a future GPU upgrade would not be bottlenecked by the bus interface.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration, and how does it affect multitasking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X has 6 cores and 12 threads. This configuration is sufficient for multitasking, and the benchmark data shows a multithread score of 28,390 in PassMark and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,236, indicating solid parallel performance for a six-core part.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 features 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. This hardware is designed for real-time ray tracing and AI-driven features, such as DLSS, which is supported by the Ada Lovelace architecture.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU, and why is it important?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, achieved through 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. This high bandwidth is crucial for feeding the 9,728 shading units at high resolutions, which the benchmark scores reflect in demanding titles.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, which means it is overclockable. The base clock is 4.70 GHz and the boost clock is 5.30 GHz, but users with adequate cooling can push beyond these figures, subject to silicon lottery and thermal limits.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 83, which places it in the top tier of desktop systems. The CPU's percentile is 79, and the GPU's percentile is 86, indicating that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers.

Q: What is the FPS ranking of this CPU+GPU pair among all tested pairs?

A: The pair ranks 273rd out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 199.1. This places the build in the top 7.3% of all tested pairings, which is a strong showing for high-refresh gaming.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $299, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. These figures represent the original release pricing and do not reflect current market values.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which is a high frequency range that contributes to its strong single-thread performance. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. This layout is designed to reduce memory latency and improve performance in workloads that benefit from large, fast caches.

Benchmark results show that the CPU's single-thread performance is a standout feature. In Cinebench R23, it scores 1,965 points in single-core, and in Geekbench, it scores 2,603 in single-core. These numbers are indicative of strong performance in lightly-threaded tasks such as gaming and everyday application responsiveness. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,060 reinforces this, as does the PassMark single-thread score of 4,135.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads deliver respectable results, but it is not a heavy multi-threading monster. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,236 and the Geekbench multicore score of 13,858 show that it can handle content creation tasks, but it will lag behind higher-core-count parts in rendering. The PassMark multithread score of 28,390 puts it in a competitive position with its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and the Intel Core i5-12600K, both of which have an average score of 27,578 and a delta of 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is slightly ahead with a score of 27,712 and a delta of -0.3%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is slightly behind with a score of 27,535 and a delta of 0.4%. This indicates that the 7600X is effectively a peer of these CPUs, with performance differences that are within 0.4% of each other.

The CPU's 5 nm process node and 6,570 million transistors contribute to its efficiency and performance. The 105 W TDP is a moderate power draw, and the benchmark data shows that it can sustain high clocks under load. The PassMark data compression score of 317,862 and the floating point math score of 51,025 indicate that the CPU is well-suited for scientific and analytical workloads that rely on these operations.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize high-refresh gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads over CPU-bound multi-threading. The data shows that the CPU's single-thread performance is excellent, and the GPU's raw power is exceptional, making this a system for enthusiasts and professionals who demand top-tier frame rates.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit the most. At 2560x1440, the system delivers over 100 FPS in most titles, with games like Call of Duty: Warzone hitting 143 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 hitting 215 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system still produces playable frame rates, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 47 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, though these are lower than the high-refresh targets. Esports gamers will find the 1080p performance exceptional, with Valorant hitting 518 FPS and CS:GO hitting 717 FPS.

Content creators who work in video editing and 3D rendering will find the GPU to be a powerhouse. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 214,739 and Vulkan score of 263,779 indicate that the GPU is highly capable for compute tasks. The CPU's 6 cores, however, will be a limiting factor in heavily CPU-bound rendering workloads, where a higher-core-count processor would be more suitable. For hybrid workflows that involve gaming and light content creation, this build is a strong choice.

Software developers who work with large codebases will appreciate the CPU's fast single-thread performance, which speeds up compilation times for single-threaded build steps. The 32 MB of L3 cache and high memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s also help in data-heavy development tasks. Students and small business workstations that run office applications and web browsing will find this system to be overkill, but the ECC memory support and fast storage options via PCIe Gen 5 make it a future-proof investment for more demanding tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a system that excels in both CPU and GPU performance, with the GPU being the stronger of the two components. The CPU has a percentile rank of 79 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27,636. The GPU has a percentile rank of 86 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,247. The combined percentile for the build is 83, which places it in the top tier of desktop systems.

In CPU-specific benchmarks, the 3DMark tests show a scaling from 2,028 for 2 threads to 6,879 for 16 threads, with a max thread score of 6,845. The single-thread score of 1,060 is a strong figure, and the 4-thread score of 3,796 indicates that the CPU scales well with additional threads up to a point. The Cinebench R15 scores are 314 for single-core and 2,517 for multicore, which are consistent with the R23 scores. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 28,390 and a single-thread score of 4,135, with notable sub-scores in integer math (84,749) and floating point math (51,025).

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,567. The Geekbench scores are 214,739 for OpenCL and 263,779 for Vulkan, which are very high and indicate strong compute capability. The PassMark G3D score is 34,457, and the GPU compute score is 20,671. The DirectX 11 score is 314, DirectX 12 is 132, DirectX 10 is 204, and DirectX 9 is 370. The G2D score is 1,239, which is a measure of 2D graphics performance.

The FPS data across 50 games shows an average FPS of 199.1 across all games, with a pair rank of 273 out of 3,732 pairs. This is a strong performance, but the variance is notable. Esports titles like Valorant (518 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (717 FPS at 1080p) are extremely high, while demanding single-player titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (96 FPS at 1080p) and Ark: Survival Ascended (47 FPS at 1080p) are lower but still playable. The GPU's percentile of 86 is higher than the CPU's 79, indicating that the GPU is the primary driver of this system's gaming performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is a high-end desktop GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, with a chip designator of AD103. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a die size of 379 mm². The GPU has a transistor density of 121.1M per mm², which is a measure of the manufacturing complexity.

The memory subsystem is a highlight. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The memory clock is 1400 MHz, which translates to 22.4 Gbps effective. This high bandwidth is essential for feeding the GPU's 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The GPU also has 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads.

The clock speeds are high, with a base clock of 2205 MHz and a boost clock of 2505 MHz. This results in a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 48.74 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 48.74 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. These figures indicate that the GPU is capable of both traditional rasterization and compute-heavy tasks.

In benchmark scores, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 34,457 and GPU compute score of 20,671 show strong performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 214,739 and Vulkan score of 263,779 are particularly high, indicating that the GPU excels in compute workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 is a modern benchmark that shows good DX12 performance.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all within a narrow band. The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average score of 54,209 with a delta of 0.1%, meaning the 4080 is essentially equal to the SUPER. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X has a score of 54,828 with a delta of -1.1%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has a score of 55,698 with a delta of -2.6%. The AMD Radeon 8060S has a score of 55,757 with a delta of -2.7%. This data shows that the RTX 4080 is slightly behind these rivals in average score, but the differences are minimal, and the 4080's features like ray tracing and DLSS may provide tangible benefits in real-world scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is built for high-refresh gaming, particularly at 1080p and 1440p. At 1080p, the data shows frame rates of 518 FPS in Valorant, 386 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, and 325 FPS in Counter-Strike 2. At 1440p, the system still delivers high frame rates, with 215 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 143 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. These numbers support a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor for esports titles.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder, which is part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, is not explicitly benchmarked, but the 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores suggest that AI-accelerated features are available. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for streaming at 1080p, though a higher-core-count CPU would provide more headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The high single-thread performance helps maintain stable frame times.

Video editing: The GPU's compute scores are high, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 214,739 and a Vulkan score of 263,779. The 16 GB of VRAM is ample for 4K video editing and effects work. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,236 and PassMark multithread score of 28,390 indicate that it can handle video encoding, but it may not be the fastest option for long render times.

3D rendering: In GPU-based renderers, the RTX 4080 is a strong performer. The FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS and the PassMark GPU compute score of 20,671 indicate that it can handle complex scenes. The CPU's 6 cores, however, are a bottleneck in CPU-based rendering, where the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,236 is moderate compared to higher-core-count parts.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread performance is excellent, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,603 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,135. This speeds up compilation and code analysis. The 32 MB of L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth help with large project files. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity in long-running builds.

Student and office work: This system is overpowered for typical office tasks, but the fast single-thread performance ensures snappy application responsiveness. The 16 GB of VRAM is unused in most office scenarios, but the system's overall speed means no waiting for spreadsheets or browsers. The 105 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP mean the system is not the most energy-efficient for office use, but it is capable.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part from the 7000 series, and the GPU is a high-end Ada Lovelace part. The combined percentile of 83 places this system in the top tier of desktop builds, meaning it outperforms 83% of all tested configurations.

The CPU's percentile of 79 and the GPU's percentile of 86 show that the GPU is the more powerful component relative to its peers. The GPU's average benchmark score of 54,247 is nearly double the CPU's average score of 27,636, which is expected given the different roles of these components. The combined performance is a good balance for gaming, where the GPU is the primary driver, and for compute workloads, where the GPU's high FP32 and tensor performance are valuable.

The build class is desktop, which means it is designed for a stationary workstation or gaming rig. The GPU is a triple-slot card with a length of 310 mm, a height of 140 mm, and a width of 61 mm, so case compatibility is a consideration. The power requirements are a 700 W PSU, which is a specific guideline for system builders.

The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, but this does not diminish its current performance. The CPU is still in active production, indicating that there is a viable upgrade path within the AM5 platform. Overall, this is a high-performance desktop build that excels in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the GPU in most workloads. The GPU's percentile of 86 is higher than the CPU's percentile of 79, and the FPS data shows that the GPU is the primary determinant of gaming performance. In games that are GPU-bound, such as Cyberpunk 2077 (96 FPS at 1080p) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (87 FPS at 1080p), the CPU is not the limiting factor. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high resolutions and texture-heavy scenes.

The CPU becomes the bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios. In esports titles at 1080p, the frame rates are extremely high, but the CPU's single-thread performance is the limiting factor in achieving the absolute maximum. For example, Valorant hits 518 FPS at 1080p, which is high, but a CPU with a higher single-thread score might push higher. The CPU's 6 cores also become a bottleneck in heavily multi-threaded workloads, such as CPU-based rendering, where the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,236 is the ceiling.

The FPS scaling across resolutions shows this dynamic. In Call of Duty: Warzone, the FPS drops from 161 at 1080p to 143 at 1440p to 121 at 4K, showing that the GPU is still capable at 4K, but the CPU's performance is the constant factor. In Ark: Survival Ascended, the FPS drops from 47 at 1080p to 30 at 1440p to 16 at 4K, which is a GPU-bound scenario where the GPU's performance is the main limitation.

The pair rank of 273 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 199.1, indicates that this is a well-balanced system for its performance tier. The CPU is not so weak that it holds back the GPU in most games, and the GPU is not so strong that it is wasted on the CPU's capabilities. The bottleneck is situational: the GPU limits performance at 4K and in ray-traced titles, while the CPU limits performance in esports at 1080p and in CPU-bound multi-threaded tasks. For a general-purpose high-performance desktop, this balance is acceptable, but users with specific workloads should consider whether the CPU or GPU is the more critical component for their use case.