SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

26,324 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 80th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations. This is a system built around a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 processor and an Ada Lovelace graphics card, with measured frame rate data across 53 games indicating a strong focus on high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, while also offering credible compute performance for content creation. The data shows a balanced pairing where the CPU provides a solid single-thread foundation and the GPU handles the bulk of rendering work, with the benchmark scores and FPS figures painting a clear picture of its capabilities and limits.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. Fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, the chip contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, and includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

Benchmark results show the processor’s strengths. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 1852, while the multi-core score reaches 12735. This indicates a strong single-thread performance that benefits everyday responsiveness and gaming, while the multi-core score is respectable for a 6-core part. In Geekbench, the single-core score is 2521 and the multi-core score is 13413. The 3DMark results show scaling from 999 in single-thread to 1938 in 2-thread, 3686 in 4-thread, 5508 in 8-thread, and 6499 in 16-thread, with max threads at 6503. This scaling pattern shows that the processor gains performance steadily as more threads are utilized, though the gains taper off beyond 8 threads, which is expected for a 6-core/12-thread design.

The PassMark suite provides additional context. The multithread score is 27058, while the single-thread score is 3910. Integer math scores 80581, floating point math scores 48107, and extended instructions score 23071. Data compression scores 304942, and data encryption scores 17704. Random string sorting scores 35904, find prime numbers scores 200, and physics scores 1776. The average benchmark score is 26324, placing the CPU at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7600 is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900KF, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, while being 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS. In real workloads, the single-core performance will make everyday tasks feel snappy, and the multi-core results indicate it can handle moderate multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or compilation, though it will not match higher-core-count parts in heavily parallel tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 7600 and the RTX 4070 is evident from the benchmark scores and FPS data. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1852 in Cinebench R23 is strong for gaming, where frame rates often depend on per-core performance. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 37648 places it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, which is slightly higher than the CPU’s 78th percentile position. This suggests the GPU is the primary driver of high-end gaming performance, but the CPU is not a weak link.

Looking at measured FPS across games, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all games is 161.5, with many titles exceeding 200 FPS, such as Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 562.7 FPS and Valorant at 490.1 FPS. In these scenarios, the CPU is often the limiting factor, as the GPU has headroom to render more frames than the processor can feed. This is typical for esports titles at lower resolutions. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops but remains high, with titles like Call of Duty: Warzone at 137.7 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 166.5 FPS. Here, the GPU begins to take on more of the load, but the CPU still keeps up. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with many titles falling below 60 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 38.5 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 34.1 FPS. In these cases, the CPU has ample headroom, and the GPU is limiting performance.

The percentile data confirms this balance. The CPU is at the 78th percentile, while the GPU is at the 81st percentile, and the combined percentile is 80. This indicates a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The pair rank by FPS is 915 out of 3732 pairs, which places it in the top quarter, with an average FPS across games of 161.5. The data shows that for most workloads, the system is balanced, with the CPU handling single-threaded tasks well and the GPU providing strong rendering throughput. In multi-threaded CPU workloads, the 6-core design may be a limit, but for gaming and general use, the balance is appropriate.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistent with a mid-range desktop processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735 and single-core score of 1852 show a strong performance for its class. The Geekbench multi-core score of 13413 and single-core score of 2521 further confirm this. The 3DMark results show a scaling pattern from 999 in single-thread to 6503 in max threads, indicating that the processor can utilize its 12 threads effectively for multi-threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 27058 and single-thread score of 3910 place it well within the range of capable desktop CPUs. The average benchmark score of 26324 and its 78th percentile ranking show that it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database, with nearest rivals being within a 0.5% delta.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are equally telling. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 3854. In Geekbench OpenCL, the score is 154858, and in Vulkan, it is 174152. The PassMark G3D score is 26927, with G2D at 1164. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 139, 244, and 103 respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 320. The GPU compute score is 14720. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 37648, placing it at the 81st percentile. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at a 0.1% delta, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 0.4%, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 at 1.3%, while it is 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile.

The combined picture is a system that performs well above average. The CPU’s 78th percentile and the GPU’s 81st percentile combine to an 80th percentile overall, indicating that this pairing is better than most in the database. In gaming, the measured FPS shows an average of 161.5 across all games, with many titles hitting high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. For productivity, the CPU’s multi-core scores are sufficient for most tasks, and the GPU’s compute scores support rendering and other GPU-accelerated workloads.

Who Should Build It

The data indicates this build is suited for gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p. Measured FPS at 1920x1080 shows many titles above 200 FPS, such as Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 562.7 and Valorant at 490.1, making it ideal for competitive gaming. At 2560x1440, the average FPS remains high, with titles like Call of Duty: Warzone at 137.7 and Fortnite at 76.3, which supports high-refresh monitors at this resolution. For 4K gaming, the GPU becomes the limit, with many titles falling below 60 FPS, so this build is not optimal for 4K ultra settings.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735 and Geekbench multi-core score of 13413 indicate it can handle video editing and 3D rendering tasks, though not at the level of higher-core-count processors. The GPU’s compute score of 14720 in PassMark and OpenCL score of 154858 support GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Adobe Premiere. Software developers will find the CPU’s single-thread performance adequate for compilation and the 12 threads useful for parallel builds. Students and small business users will find the system responsive for office work, with the integrated Radeon Graphics providing a fallback, though the dedicated GPU is more than sufficient for most productivity tasks.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured rather than estimated, shows strong performance across a wide range of games. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all games is 161.5, with many titles exceeding 150 FPS. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leads at 562.7 FPS, followed by Valorant at 490.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 302 FPS. Heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 72.7 FPS, which is playable but not at high refresh rates. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops, but many titles remain above 60 FPS, such as Call of Duty: Warzone at 137.7 and Control at 77.6. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the limit, with most titles falling below 60 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 38.5 and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 34.1.

The pair rank by FPS is 915 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 25% of all CPU+GPU combinations. The average FPS across games is 161.5, which is high. For esports titles, this build excels at 1080p and 1440p, providing frame rates well above 144 Hz. For triple-A titles, it delivers smooth 60+ FPS at 1440p in most cases, but struggles at 4K. The data shows that for a gamer with a 1080p or 1440p high-refresh monitor, this is a capable pairing, while those targeting 4K will need to lower settings or rely on upscaling.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is 80, meaning it outperforms 80% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900KF, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, while being 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s and a memory clock of 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games?

A: The average FPS across all games is 161.5, with the pair ranking 915 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread score in Cinebench R23?

A: The single-core score in Cinebench R23 is 1852, which is strong for gaming and everyday tasks.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 37648, placing it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W and uses the AMD Socket AM5, with memory support for DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is excellent at 1080p and 1440p. Measured FPS at 1080p shows many titles above 200 FPS, such as Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 562.7 and Valorant at 490.1, making it ideal for competitive play. At 1440p, the average FPS remains high, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 137.7 and Counter-Strike 2 at 166.5, supporting 144 Hz monitors.

For streaming, the CPU’s 12 threads can handle encoding workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735. The GPU’s NVENC encoder, part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, would offload streaming tasks, though specifics of the encoder are not in the data. The system’s high FPS at 1080p leaves headroom for streaming while gaming.

For video editing, the CPU’s multi-core performance is adequate, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 13413 and a PassMark multithread score of 27058. The GPU’s compute score of 14720 and OpenCL score of 154858 support GPU-accelerated effects and rendering, making it capable for 1080p and 1440p editing.

For 3D rendering, the CPU performs well in single-threaded tasks, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1852, but multi-core rendering will be limited by the 6-core design. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 46 RT cores support real-time ray tracing and GPU rendering, though specific renderer scores are not in the data.

For software development, the CPU’s single-thread score of 2521 in Geekbench ensures fast compilation for many tasks, while the 12 threads allow for parallel builds. The system’s 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large datasets, and the ECC memory support is a bonus for stability.

For student and office work, the system is overkill but responsive. The CPU’s single-thread performance makes everyday tasks fast, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback if the GPU is not needed. The 65 W TDP means the system is efficient, and the measured FPS is irrelevant for office use, but the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3910 indicates quick application loading.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture, and the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, based on Ada Lovelace. The combined percentile is 80, placing it in the top 20% of all CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU is at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The pair rank by FPS is 915 out of 3732, with an average FPS across games of 161.5. The system is designed for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with the GPU providing strong rendering performance and the CPU offering solid single-thread and moderate multi-thread capabilities. It is a balanced pairing where the GPU is slightly stronger, but the CPU does not bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is based on the AD104 chip, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, which support ray tracing and DLSS respectively. The clock speeds are a base of 1920 MHz and a boost of 2475 MHz, with a memory clock of 1313 MHz, resulting in 21 Gbps effective. The memory is 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s, and the FP32 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1).

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 3854 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 154858 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 174152 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark scores show G3D at 26927, G2D at 1164, and GPU compute at 14720. DirectX scores are 139 for DX10, 244 for DX11, 103 for DX12, and 320 for DX9. The average benchmark score is 37648, placing it at the 81st percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at a 0.1% delta, and it is 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. For rendering, the RT cores support ray-traced workloads, and the tensor cores support AI-based features. The GPU’s compute performance is strong for a mid-range card, making it suitable for GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, though the 12 GB VRAM may limit the largest datasets.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes. The memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, with a TDP of 200 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The GPU has a 16-pin power connector and is dual-slot, with dimensions of 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform supports newer Ryzen processors on the AM5 socket, though specific models are not listed in the data. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs and NVMe drives can take advantage of the bandwidth. The 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for a higher-core-count CPU, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking the current chip. The GPU’s suggested PSU of 550 W means the system can accommodate a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 65 W TDP is low. The memory support for DDR5 means users can upgrade to higher-capacity or faster kits, though the current bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is adequate. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, so a future upgrade would be to a newer generation, but the platform is current. The 12 GB VRAM may be a limit for future games at 4K, but for 1080p and 1440p, it is sufficient.