SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

26,324 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT pairing represents a well-balanced desktop configuration that sits in the 73rd combined percentile of all systems, indicating solid mid-to-upper tier performance. The data shows a CPU that leads its direct rivals in multi-threaded workloads while the GPU delivers class-competitive rasterization, though the overall system is better suited for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming than for 4K ultra settings in the most demanding titles.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors across a 346 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz. Memory configuration consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory subsystem is sufficient for high-resolution textures at 1440p, though the 192-bit bus width can become a limiting factor at 4K in VRAM-heavy titles.

The compute configuration includes 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, translating to a pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 35.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 1:1 ratio. The GPU features 54 ray-tracing cores, but no dedicated tensor cores are listed, meaning AI-accelerated workloads rely on the standard compute units. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and Vulkan 1.4 API compliance ensure modern rendering features are available, though ray tracing performance is not the primary strength of this card.

Benchmark results place the RX 7700 XT in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22549. The PassMark G3D score of 22547 and GPU compute score of 12912 indicate strong rasterization performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383 shows significant compute headroom. The card trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 by 1.5% in average score, sits 0.8% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile, and leads the RTX 5060 Mobile by 0.5% and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 by 1.7%. This places the RX 7700 XT in direct competition with previous-generation high-end cards and current mid-range offerings, with the data showing it trades blows within a narrow 2% band across all nearest rivals.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 35.17 TFLOPS provides substantial raw compute for 3D rendering tasks, while the 12 GB VRAM is adequate for most scene complexities at 1080p and 1440p. The lack of tensor cores means the GPU does not accelerate AI-based rendering features like denoising or DLSS-style upscaling through dedicated hardware, instead relying on standard compute paths. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is competitive for the class, though the 192-bit bus limits memory-intensive operations compared to wider-bus competitors.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 achieves an average benchmark score of 26324, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. The single-thread performance is strong, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1852, while multi-threaded results show the 6-core/12-thread configuration scaling well: 3DMark max threads score of 6503, Cinebench R23 multicore of 12735, and Geekbench multicore of 13413. PassMark results reinforce this, with multithread score of 27058 and single-thread of 3910.

The CPU's nearest rivals show a tight competitive field. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 26274, which is 0.2% behind the 7600, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS at 26402 is 0.3% ahead. The Intel Core i9-11900KF at 26212 trails by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U at 26187 is 0.5% behind. This clustering within half a percent indicates the 7600 delivers performance comparable to higher-tier laptop processors and a previous-generation desktop i9, which is notable for a 6-core desktop part.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 22549 places it in the 67th percentile, with the PassMark G3D score of 22547 serving as the primary gaming metric. The combined percentile for the system is 73, reflecting that the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms to their respective fields. The pair ranks 1533rd out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games, with an average of 135.3 FPS, which puts it slightly above the median of tested configurations.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is competent but not exceptional. This creates a configuration that can handle high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K in demanding titles. The benchmark data indicates the CPU has headroom to support a more powerful GPU if the user chooses to upgrade later, while the current GPU pair is sufficient for mainstream gaming targets.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The data is measured, with actual FPS figures recorded across 48 games at three resolutions. At 1920x1080 with ultra settings, the system delivers strong esports performance: Counter-Strike 2 hits 210.9 FPS, Valorant reaches 490 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 469.2 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X runs at 250.4 FPS, while Roblox reaches 273.4 FPS and Minecraft hits 211 FPS. These results confirm the pairing is excellent for competitive gaming at 1080p.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the results are more varied. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 152 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 126.2 FPS, and Ready Or Not at 169.1 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077, one of the most demanding games, manages 63 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 achieves 57 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 77 FPS, and Control reaches 89 FPS. The most demanding title tested, Ark: Survival Ascended, drops to 28.3 FPS at 1080p, indicating that some games will strain the GPU even at the lowest common resolution.

At 2560x1440, the system maintains playable frame rates in most titles but shows clear scaling. Valorant still hits 418 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 142.5 FPS, and CS:GO reaches 321.8 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone stays high at 135 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 47 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 43 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 22.9 FPS. The Medium runs at 38 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 62 FPS. The 1440p results show the system is suitable for high-refresh gaming in competitive titles and 60+ FPS in most AAA games, but demanding titles require setting adjustments.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles in modern AAA titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 31 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11.4 FPS. The Medium hits 30 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 46 FPS. However, esports titles remain playable: Valorant reaches 334 FPS, CS:GO at 188.5 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 81.6 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 115 FPS, and Overpower runs at 63 FPS. The 4K data clearly indicates the RX 7700 XT with 12 GB VRAM is not a 4K gaming card for demanding titles, though lighter and competitive games remain playable.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU's 78th percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile indicates the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. In CPU-bound scenarios like esports and light-load games, the Ryzen 5 7600 ensures high frame rates: the data shows Valorant at 490 FPS at 1080p and 418 FPS at 1440p, which far exceeds the GPU's rasterization limits in most cases. The single-thread score of 999 in 3DMark and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1852 support the CPU's ability to drive high frame rates in lightly threaded games.

In GPU-bound scenarios, the RX 7700 XT becomes the limiting factor. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average reduction of roughly 35-40% across games, while 1440p to 4K shows another 40-50% drop. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 goes from 63 FPS at 1080p to 47 FPS at 1440p to 31 FPS at 4K, which is a classic GPU-limited scaling pattern. The CPU has headroom in these situations, as evidenced by the fact that the same CPU can produce 490 FPS in Valorant, proving it is not the constraint in heavy graphical workloads.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. For CPU-intensive games like Counter-Strike 2, the CPU maintains 210.9 FPS at 1080p, but the GPU limits scaling to 142.5 FPS at 1440p and 81.6 FPS at 4K. In contrast, for GPU-intensive titles like Ark: Survival Ascended, the CPU is never the issue, as the GPU drops to 28.3 FPS at 1080p. The data suggests the system is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where neither component excessively limits the other, but at 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck in demanding titles, while in esports, the CPU ensures the GPU is the primary limiter.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system sits in the 73rd combined percentile of all configurations, with the CPU at the 78th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile.

Q: How does the RX 7700 XT compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 22549, which is 0.5% ahead of the RTX 5060 Mobile, 0.8% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile, 1.5% behind the RTX 2080, and 1.7% ahead of the RX 5700.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pair?

A: The pair averages 135.3 FPS across all games tested, ranking 1533rd out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, esports titles like Valorant hit 334 FPS, but demanding AAA games struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 31 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11.4 FPS, so 4K is only viable for lighter titles.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the RX 7700 XT provide?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600 compare to the Intel Core i9-11900KF?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 scores 26324 on average, which is 0.4% ahead of the i9-11900KF's 26212 score.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12735 and a single-core score of 1852.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p and 1440p performance over 4K capability. The data shows 1080p frame rates above 200 FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 (210.9 FPS) and Valorant (490 FPS), making it ideal for competitive players. At 1440p, the system maintains 135+ FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 142.5 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, which suits gamers with 144Hz monitors.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance useful, given the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12735 and PassMark multithread score of 27058. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 35.17 TFLOPS provides compute acceleration for rendering tasks, though the 12 GB VRAM limits very large scene sizes.

Software developers and students benefit from the CPU's single-thread strength (Geekbench single-core of 2521) and the system's overall responsiveness. The 65W TDP of the CPU and 245W TDP of the GPU make this a manageable desktop build for a home office or small business workstation, where the CPU's 78th percentile ranking ensures smooth compilation and multitasking performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system delivers 210.9 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 490 FPS in Valorant, easily driving 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, frame rates remain high at 142.5 FPS and 418 FPS respectively, making this an excellent choice for competitive gaming.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU with a PassMark multithread score of 27058 can handle encoding overhead while gaming, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means no AI-accelerated encoding features. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM provides headroom for game capture at 1080p.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12735 and Geekbench multicore of 13413 indicate solid rendering performance for 1080p and 1440p video projects. The GPU's OpenCL score of 138383 accelerates effects and exports, though 4K editing may strain the 12 GB VRAM.

3D rendering: The GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides substantial compute for 3D rendering workloads. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports texture-heavy scenes, but the 192-bit bus limits very large assets.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 999 in 3DMark and 1852 in Cinebench R23 single-core handles compilation and IDE responsiveness well. The 32 MB shared L3 cache aids in code execution.

Student and office work: The CPU's 78th percentile ranking and the system's 73rd combined percentile ensure snappy performance for productivity applications, with the integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU providing a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 processor with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT graphics card. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 (Raphael) part on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 (Navi 32) card with a 245W TDP and dual-slot cooler. The system's 73rd combined percentile places it in the upper-mid tier of all configurations, with the CPU at the 78th percentile outperforming the GPU's 67th percentile.

The pairing is designed for mainstream desktop gaming and productivity, with the CPU providing strong single-thread and multi-thread performance for its class, while the GPU delivers competitive rasterization at 1080p and 1440p. The 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth position the GPU for current-generation gaming, but the 192-bit bus and lack of tensor cores limit its suitability for 4K ultra settings and AI-accelerated workloads. The system requires a 550W power supply and uses PCIe 4.0 x16 for the GPU, with the CPU supporting PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and the CPU has a 65W TDP. Memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, along with ECC memory support. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3.

The benchmark scores indicate strong real-world performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12735 and Geekbench multicore of 13413 show that the 6-core configuration handles multi-threaded workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering competently. The 3DMark max threads score of 6503 reinforces this, while the 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1852 demonstrate excellent single-thread responsiveness for gaming and general applications.

The PassMark results provide granular insight into workload-specific performance. Integer math score of 80581 and floating point math of 48107 indicate strong computational throughput, while data encryption at 17704 and data compression at 304942 show solid performance for security and storage tasks. Extended instructions score of 23071 supports modern SIMD workloads. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking places it ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.2% lead) and Intel Core i9-11900KF (0.4% lead), showing that this desktop 6-core part outperforms a previous-generation 8-core desktop i9 in average benchmarks. The 5 nm process and 65W TDP make it power-efficient, while the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking headroom for users who want to push performance further.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds