SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

26,324 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-middle tier of the benchmark database. The processor, built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael), is a 6-core, 12-thread part with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This is a 5 nm TSMC part with a transistor count of 6,570 million on a 71 mm² die. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26,324, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms more than three-quarters of the processors tracked in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (average score 26,274, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (26,402, -0.3%), the Intel Core i9-11900KF (26,212, 0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (26,187, 0.5%). The deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the 7600 is the statistical equal of these other chips in aggregate performance.

The graphics card, an AMD Radeon RX 7700, is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip (codenamed Wheat Nas). It carries 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15,852, placing it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862, -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16,014, -1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15,679, 1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16,129, -1.7%). The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 68, and the pair ranks 1,788th out of 3,732 tracked pairs by average FPS across all games, with an average of 125.4 FPS. This is a measured data set, as indicated by the `dataIsMeasured` flag being true.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Ryzen 5 7600 is a six-core, twelve-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The base clock is 3.80 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz, which is a substantial frequency headroom for a 65 W TDP part. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation reliability. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache.

In single-threaded workloads, the 7600 scores 999 in 3DMark's single-thread test, 1,852 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 2,521 in Geekbench single-core. These scores reflect strong per-core performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded tasks like legacy applications and many game engines. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,938 indicates that even with just two threads, the chip can handle a significant portion of its full multi-threaded capability. Scaling from 2 threads to 4 threads nearly doubles the score to 3,686, and the 8-thread score of 5,508 shows continued scaling, though with diminishing returns (the 4-thread to 8-thread increase is only about 49%, which is less than the 100% ideal scaling). The max-thread score of 6,503 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score of 6,499, suggesting that the additional threads beyond 12 (which the CPU doesn't have) would not add much, and that the 12-thread configuration is efficiently utilized.

For multi-threaded productivity, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,735 and the Geekbench multicore score of 13,413 place the chip in a competitive position. The Passmark multithread score of 27,058 further confirms this. The chip's performance in specific Passmark subtests is informative: integer math scores 80,581, floating-point math scores 48,107, and extended instructions score 23,071. The data compression score of 304,942 and data encryption score of 17,704 show that the CPU is capable in these areas, though the encryption score is modest relative to the integer score. The physics score of 1,776 in Passmark is a lower number but is a dedicated subtest that often does not scale perfectly with other workloads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 7600 is essentially tied with the Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.2% higher), the Ryzen 7 7435HS (0.3% lower), the Core i9-11900KF (0.4% higher), and the Ryzen 5 8540U (0.5% higher). This means that in average aggregate performance, the 7600 is indistinguishable from a high-end laptop chip from the previous generation and a desktop Core i9 from the same era. However, the 7600 does this with a 65 W TDP, which is significantly lower than the typical power draw of a Core i9-11900KF, making it a far more efficient choice for sustained workloads. The single-thread and low-thread-count scores are particularly strong, suggesting that the chip will excel in tasks where per-core performance is the bottleneck, such as in older games or in applications with poor multi-threading.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 5 7600 and the RX 7700 can be inferred from the combined percentile of 68, which sits between the CPU’s 78th percentile and the GPU’s 58th percentile. This suggests that the GPU is the more limiting component in most gaming scenarios, as its percentile is notably lower. The CPU is capable of feeding the GPU in most cases, but the GPU will likely be the first to reach its performance ceiling in graphically intensive titles.

Looking at the measured FPS data, we can see this balance in action. In lighter, CPU-bound titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the 1080p ultra score is 431 FPS, which is extremely high. The GPU is clearly not the bottleneck here, as the frame rate is far above typical display refresh rates. Similarly, Valorant at 1080p ultra hits 447 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 195 FPS. These numbers indicate that the CPU is the primary driver of performance in these esports titles, and the GPU has plenty of headroom.

In contrast, in GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the 1080p ultra score is 58 FPS, dropping to 28 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p in Cyberpunk is a 26% drop (58 to 43), and from 1440p to 4K is a 35% drop (43 to 28). This steep drop-off is characteristic of a GPU bottleneck, where increasing resolution puts more pressure on the rasterization and shading units. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20,974 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865 indicate its raw rendering capability, and these scores are modest relative to the CPU’s percentile position.

The pair’s rank of 1,788 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 125.4, further illustrates that this is a mid-to-upper tier combination. The fact that the CPU’s percentile (78) is 20 points higher than the GPU’s (58) suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will not limit the GPU, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the GPU will cap the frame rate. For example, in Red Dead Redemption 2, the 1080p ultra score is 52 FPS, which is a demanding title, and the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Conversely, in Roblox at 252 FPS at 1080p, the GPU is not stressed, and the CPU handles the game logic and draw calls. This asymmetry is the hallmark of a well-balanced pairing for high-refresh 1080p gaming, where the CPU is never the bottleneck, and the GPU provides playable frame rates in most titles.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26,324, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong showing, indicating that the 7600 outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15,852, placing it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. This is a more modest position, meaning that roughly 42% of GPUs are faster. The combined percentile for the pair is 68, reflecting the fact that the GPU drags the overall position down from the CPU’s level.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the 7600 scores 12,735 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1,852 in single-core. These numbers suggest that the chip is well-suited for both multi-threaded rendering tasks and responsive single-threaded applications. The Passmark multithread score of 27,058 and single-thread score of 3,910 confirm this balanced profile. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,499 and max-thread score of 6,503 show that the chip is fully utilizing its 12 threads efficiently.

For the GPU, the Passmark G3D score of 20,974 is the headline number, indicating strong DirectX performance. The DirectX 11 score of 186 and DirectX 12 score of 96 are specific subtest scores, with the DirectX 12 score being notably higher, suggesting good modern API utilization. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106,028 is a strong compute result, indicating that the GPU is capable of general-purpose compute tasks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865 is a modern benchmark, and this number positions the GPU as a solid performer for current games.

The combined picture is that of a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative terms. The 20-point gap in percentiles (78 vs 58) means that the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming, while the GPU will often dictate the maximum frame rate in demanding titles. This is not necessarily a bad thing, as it means the system is less likely to experience stutters or frame-time spikes from a maxed-out CPU. However, it also means that the GPU is the component to upgrade first if higher frame rates are desired.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The measured performance data indicates that this pairing suits a specific set of users. Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh-rate displays are a primary audience. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 999, Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,852) ensures that esports titles run at extremely high frame rates, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hitting 431 FPS and Valorant hitting 447 FPS at 1080p ultra. For AAA titles, the GPU can still deliver playable frame rates, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 58 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52 FPS at 1080p ultra.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance adequate. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,735 and Geekbench multicore score of 13,413 are solid for tasks like video encoding and photo editing. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and its compute performance (Geekbench OpenCL score of 106,028) make it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support OpenCL, though the 58th percentile GPU position means it is not a high-end compute part.

Software developers and students will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance and its 65 W TDP, which allows for lower-power, quieter systems. The ECC memory support is a specific feature that appeals to users who require data integrity in their workflows, such as small business workstations running databases or financial modeling. The CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 17,704 and data compression score of 304,942 indicate that it can handle these types of workloads without issue.

Small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for compilation, office suites, and light virtualization will find this pairing more than capable. The CPU’s 78th percentile position means it is faster than most other CPUs in the database, and the GPU, while not top-tier, provides enough graphical power for any office application that uses hardware acceleration. The combination of ECC memory support and a 65 W TDP makes it a low-maintenance option for always-on systems.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The data provided is measured, not estimated, and it covers a wide range of titles at three resolutions: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160, all at ultra settings. The average FPS across all games is 125.4, which is a strong figure, but the variance between games is significant.

At 1080p, the system shines in esports and older titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 431 FPS, Valorant hits 447 FPS, and Roblox runs at 252 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is at 232 FPS, and To The Core is at 196 FPS. These titles are CPU-bound, and the Ryzen 5 7600’s strong single-thread performance is on full display. For more demanding AAA titles at 1080p, the system still delivers playable frame rates: Cyberpunk 2077 at 58 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 28 FPS. The latter is a particularly heavy title, and the 28 FPS result shows that this pairing struggles with the most demanding games at ultra settings.

At 1440p, the frame rates drop as expected. Valorant still runs at a very high 381 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 is at 129 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is at 135 FPS, which is excellent for a competitive shooter. However, AAA titles begin to show the GPU’s limitations. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 43 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 18 FPS, which is barely playable. The Medium is at 34 FPS, and Control is at 61 FPS. This indicates that 1440p ultra is not a comfortable zone for the most demanding games, though many titles remain playable.

At 4K, the system is clearly GPU-bound, and the results show a significant drop. Valorant is still playable at 305 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is at 175 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is at 115 FPS, which is surprisingly good, but many other titles fall below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 is at 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 is at 26 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended is at 9 FPS, which is not playable. The average FPS at 4K is much lower than at 1080p, and the 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU is not enough to overcome the raw compute limitations at this resolution. The data shows that 4K ultra is only viable for esports titles or lighter games.

FAQ

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600?

A: The launch MSRP is $229.

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score and percentile rank?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26,324, and it is in the 78th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the Radeon RX 7700 have?

A: The RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the combined percentile of the CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the pair is 68.

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all games is 125.4.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average score of 26,324, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 9 6900HX’s score of 26,274.

Q: What is the GPU’s score in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?

A: The GPU scores 2,865 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the pairing excels, with esports titles like Valorant (447 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (431 FPS) running at incredibly high frame rates. Even more demanding titles like Call of Duty: Warzone hit 152 FPS, making this a top-tier 1080p high-refresh setup. The CPU’s strong single-thread score (999 in 3DMark) ensures that even the most CPU-intensive game engines are fed properly.

Streaming: The CPU has 12 threads and scores 12,735 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which provides enough headroom for game streaming at 1080p while playing a game. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is also beneficial for local recording, though the GPU’s 58th percentile position means that encoding at high bitrates might impact in-game performance in the most demanding titles.

Video editing: The CPU’s multicore performance (Geekbench multicore of 13,413) is sufficient for 1080p and some 1440p video editing. The GPU’s compute score (Geekbench OpenCL of 106,028) can accelerate effects and rendering in OpenCL-supported applications, making the workflow smoother than using the CPU alone.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,735 indicates that CPU-based rendering will be reasonably fast for a 6-core part. GPU-based rendering with the RX 7700 is possible, given its 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance, but the 58th percentile GPU position means it will not compete with higher-end cards in render farms.

Software development: The high single-thread score (3,910 in Passmark single-thread) and 12 threads make compilation and code analysis responsive. The 65 W TDP allows for quieter, cooler operation during long builds. The ECC memory support is a plus for developers running critical services.

Student and office work: The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 27,058 handles multitasking with ease, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a basic display output, though the discrete GPU is far more capable for any graphical work. The low TDP of 65 W makes this an energy-efficient choice for a workstation that runs all day.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the `buildClass` of "desktop". It combines a 6-core, 12-thread AMD Ryzen 5 7600 CPU with a 16 GB AMD Radeon RX 7700 GPU. The CPU is a 5 nm Zen 4 part that sits in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, making it a high-end mainstream processor. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 part that sits in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, which is a solid mid-range position. The combined percentile of 68 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all tracked PC builds.

The pair ranks 1,788th out of 3,732 pairs by average FPS, with an average of 125.4 FPS across all games. This ranking indicates that it is faster than more than half of all tracked systems. The CPU’s performance is the standout feature, while the GPU is adequate but not exceptional. This is a system that is well-suited for 1080p gaming at high refresh rates and for productivity tasks that benefit from a strong CPU. It is not a top-tier 4K gaming rig, nor is it a professional-grade rendering workstation, but it is a versatile and balanced desktop configuration.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and uses the Navi 32 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The base clock is 1900 MHz, the game clock is 2041 MHz, and the boost clock is 2459 MHz. The memory clock is 2438 MHz, which translates to 19.5 Gbps effective. The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It also features 40 ray tracing cores, though it has no dedicated tensor cores, as it is an AMD part.

The GPU’s pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is also 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1). These numbers indicate that the GPU is capable of substantial compute throughput, which is reflected in its Geekbench OpenCL score of 106,028. The Passmark G3D score of 20,974 is a strong result, placing it in the 58th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865 is a modern benchmark result that shows its capability in DirectX 12 titles.

For rendering, the 16 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing large textures and complex scenes to be loaded without exceeding memory capacity. This is particularly important for 4K textures and for GPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or DaVinci Resolve. The bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s is sufficient to feed the 2560 shading units, and the 40 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, though the performance in ray-traced titles will be modest given the GPU’s overall 58th percentile position. The FP32 and FP16 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS is the raw compute power available for non-graphics tasks, making it a reasonable choice for light compute workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU is mounted on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a current-generation socket that supports DDR5 memory. The Ryzen 5 7600 supports dual-channel DDR5 with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory, which is a feature not found on all consumer platforms. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface for the latest GPUs and NVMe SSDs. The GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward-compatible and will not be a bottleneck for this card.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 200 W. The suggested PSU for this system is 550 W, which provides adequate headroom for these components. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors, so the PSU must have these available. The system’s total power draw is well within the 550 W specification, but a higher-wattage PSU would allow for future upgrades to more power-hungry components.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU. Since the CPU sits at the 78th percentile and the GPU at the 58th, the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming. Upgrading to a GPU with a higher average benchmark score would directly improve gaming performance, especially at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where the current GPU struggles in demanding titles. The CPU’s 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and the motherboard’s support for this interface mean that a new GPU would have full bandwidth available.

Another upgrade path would be to add more memory. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5, and the system’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is a factor in some CPU-bound workloads. Adding more RAM would benefit multitasking and content creation, though the current configuration is already adequate for most tasks. The platform’s support for ECC memory also allows for a future upgrade to ECC modules, which is a niche feature that some workstation users require. The AM5 socket has a clear upgrade path to newer Ryzen processors, so a future CPU upgrade is also possible, but the current 7600 is already strong enough to avoid being a bottleneck for most applications.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

AMD Radeon RX 7700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds