SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

26,324 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a desktop pairing built around a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 processor and an RDNA 2 graphics card with 8 GB of VRAM. The CPU scores in the 78th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 70th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined system in the 74th percentile overall. The measured average frame rate across the tested game suite is 102.6 FPS at 1080p ultra settings, which positions this build as a solid high-refresh 1080p machine with reasonable 1440p capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-matched pairing where neither component consistently dominates the other, though the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and workload type. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread strength (3dmark single-thread score of 999) and the GPU’s raw throughput (10.60 TFLOPS FP32) combine to produce frame rates that are often CPU-limited in lighter esports titles. For example, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 343 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant reaches 353.2 FPS — figures that far exceed what the GPU alone would cap at in heavier scenes, indicating the processor is feeding frames efficiently.

At 1440p, the balance tips toward the GPU. The frame rate drop from 1080p to 1440p across the game list averages roughly 30-40%, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario where the RX 6600 XT’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 2048 shading units become the limiting factor. In Cyberpunk 2077, the 1080p score of 45.9 FPS drops to 36.1 FPS at 1440p, a 21% reduction that reflects the GPU struggling with the increased pixel load rather than the CPU stalling.

At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The 6600 XT’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus show their limits, with demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended falling to 5.2 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 18.9 FPS. The CPU’s 3dmark max-thread score of 6503 is more than sufficient to keep up; the frame rates are purely a function of the graphics card’s pixel and texture throughput (165.7 GPixel/s and 331.4 GTexel/s respectively).

For multi-threaded workloads, the CPU is the limiting factor. The Ryzen 5 7600’s 6 cores and 12 threads produce a cinebench r23 multicore score of 12735, which is competitive but not exceptional — the nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, scores 26274 on average, a 0.2% delta that shows the 7600 holds its own despite having fewer cores. Data encryption (17704 on passmark) and integer math (80581) are solid, but they are not workstation-class numbers. The GPU’s compute score of 7520 on passmark gpu_compute indicates that for GPU-accelerated tasks, the graphics card will take over as the primary compute engine.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26324, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the data set include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (avg score 26274, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (avg 26402, delta -0.3%), and the Intel Core i9-11900KF (avg 26212, delta 0.4%). This means the 7600 is statistically tied with these parts — the deltas are all under 1% — despite the 6900HX being a laptop chip with a different power envelope.

In single-thread performance, the 7600 posts a 3dmark single-thread score of 999 and a geekbench single-core score of 2521. The cinebench r23 single-core score of 1852 is strong for a 65W TDP part, which is notable given the 5.10 GHz boost clock. The passmark single-thread score of 3910 confirms that this processor will not hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 24442, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (avg 24277, delta 0.7%), the Intel Arc A350M (avg 24647, delta -0.8%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (avg 24170, delta 1.1%). The RTX 2080 SUPER being a near-rival with only a 1.1% delta is remarkable, as that card historically targeted higher resolutions with more VRAM and bandwidth — the 6600 XT matches its average score through efficient RDNA 2 architecture.

The combined picture from these scores is a system that excels at 1080p gaming and handles 1440p with adjustments. The pairRankByFps data shows this build ranks 2605 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 102.6 across all tested games. That places it in the upper half of all CPU+GPU combinations, but not in the top tier — the 70th percentile GPU and 78th percentile CPU both indicate mid-to-upper-midrange positioning.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7600 fast enough for the RX 6600 XT?

A: Yes. The CPU’s 3dmark single-thread score of 999 and max-thread score of 6503 are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at 1080p and 1440p. Evidence shows esports titles like Valorant reaching 353.2 FPS at 1080p, which requires strong single-thread performance.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 smoothly?

A: At 1080p ultra, the measured frame rate is 45.9 FPS, which is playable but not high-refresh. At 1440p ultra it drops to 36.1 FPS. For smoother performance, you would need to lower settings or resolution, as the 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth limit the GPU in this title.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6600 XT have and is it enough?

A: The card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. This is sufficient for 1080p ultra in most titles, but games like Ark: Survival Ascended (5.2 FPS at 4K) and Cyberpunk 2077 (24 FPS at 4K) show that 4K is not viable. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is the limiting factor.

Q: What is the CPU’s power draw?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has a TDP of 65W, which is modest for a 6-core part. This low power draw allows for a capable air cooler and keeps system heat manageable, though the exact cooler requirements are not specified in the data.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7600 supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This makes it suitable for workstation builds where data integrity is important.

Q: Is the RX 6600 XT good for 1440p gaming?

A: It depends on the game. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 132.8 FPS at 1440p ultra, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 121 FPS. However, demanding single-player titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 (28.8 FPS) and Control (49.5 FPS) show that 1440p ultra is not consistently achievable.

Q: How does this pairing compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX and Intel Core i9-11900KF in average score. The GPU is within 1.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER. This means the build performs similarly to those parts, despite the 7600 having fewer cores than the 6900HX and the 6600 XT having less VRAM than the 2080 SUPER.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh play. The measured data shows 353.2 FPS in Valorant and 343 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p, making it ideal for competitive shooters where frame rate matters more than resolution. The 70th percentile GPU and 78th percentile CPU mean that most esports and older AAA titles will exceed 100 FPS at 1080p ultra.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or software compilation will find the Ryzen 5 7600 adequate but not exceptional. The cinebench r23 multicore score of 12735 and passmark multithread score of 27058 are mid-range figures — capable of handling 1080p video editing or light 3D rendering, but not large-scale multi-hour exports. The GPU’s 7520 passmark gpu_compute score does provide acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers and students will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and ECC memory support. The passmark data compression score of 304942 and integer math score of 80581 indicate solid performance for code compilation and data processing. The 65W TDP means a small form factor build with a capable air cooler is feasible.

Small business workstations that need a balance of office productivity and occasional graphics work will find this pairing reasonable. The 8 GB VRAM handles dual monitor setups and moderate CAD work, while the CPU’s 6 cores manage spreadsheets and databases without issue. The build class is desktop, so it can be configured as a traditional tower workstation.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system excels. The data shows Counter-Strike 2 at 156.8 FPS, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 184 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 153.1 FPS — all measured at 1080p ultra. These numbers indicate that 144Hz monitors will be fully utilized in most competitive titles.

Streaming and content creation at 1080p is feasible. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads handle encoding workloads, with a passmark multithread score of 27058. The GPU’s 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 provides enough compute for rendering overlays or encoding via the GPU, though simultaneous gaming and streaming may require lower in-game settings.

Video editing in 1080p is smooth, with the CPU’s cinebench r23 multicore score of 12735 and geekbench multicore score of 13413 providing adequate processing power. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU handles preview rendering and effects. 4K editing would strain the system, as the data shows 4K gaming performance is weak.

3D rendering in Blender or similar applications will be GPU-limited. The RX 6600 XT’s 32 RT cores and 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 offer mid-range performance, with the passmark gpu_compute score of 7520 indicating it can handle moderate scenes. The CPU’s 6 cores will render previews but longer final renders will take time.

Software development is a strong suit. The CPU’s passmark integer math score of 80581 and data compression score of 304942 accelerate code compilation and package management. The 32 MB shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. ECC memory support is an added benefit for long-running build processes.

Student and office work is more than adequately handled. The CPU’s geekbench single-core score of 2521 ensures snappy application launches, and the 65W TDP keeps the system quiet under typical loads. The GPU’s 912 passmark g2d score handles 2D desktop acceleration efficiently.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data covers a wide range of titles at three resolutions. At 1920x1080 ultra, the system achieves 100+ FPS in most games. Valorant leads with 353.2 FPS, followed by CS:GO at 343 FPS, Roblox at 200.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 184 FPS. These are esports-level figures that will satisfy competitive players.

At 2560x1440 ultra, performance drops but remains playable in many titles. Valorant still hits 302.5 FPS, CS:GO 236 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone 132.8 FPS. However, heavier games struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 36.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 16.5 FPS. This is not a 1440p high-refresh machine for AAA titles.

At 3840x2160 ultra, the system is not viable for modern gaming. The highest score is Valorant at 237.8 FPS, but most games fall below 40 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 5.2 FPS, The Medium to 24.2 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 to 24 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are the primary constraints at this resolution.

The average FPS across all tested games is 102.6 at 1080p, which places the pair rank at 2605 out of 3732 pairs. This is a strong result for a mid-range build, confirming that 1080p is the sweet spot.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT uses the Navi 23 chip on a 7 nm process from TSMC, packing 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, with a base clock of 1968 MHz, game clock of 2359 MHz, and boost clock of 2589 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

The 32 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, though the 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance means ray tracing will be a luxury at playable frame rates. The GPU is DirectX 12 Ultimate compliant (12_2), supports Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s and texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores indicate the GPU is in the 70th percentile. The 3dmark steel nomad dx12 score of 1804 is modest, while passmark g3d score of 16461 and passmark gpu_compute of 7520 show balanced performance. The geekbench scores are notable: metal 88720, opencl 80503, and vulkan 72417 — these suggest strong compute capability for its class.

The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, has an average score of 24170, only 1.1% lower. This means the 6600 XT, despite having 8 GB VRAM versus the 2080 SUPER’s larger memory pool, matches its average benchmark performance. The GTX 1630 is 0.7% slower, making the 6600 XT a clear step above entry-level.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining an AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with an AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part on the AM5 socket with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 2 design with 8 GB VRAM and a 160W TDP. The combined percentile ranking is 74th, placing it solidly in the mid-to-upper-midrange tier of desktop systems.

The CPU’s 78th percentile and GPU’s 70th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a balanced pairing. The system’s average FPS of 102.6 across games puts it in the upper half of all tested pairs (2605 out of 3732). This is not a high-end enthusiast build, but it is a capable 1080p gaming rig that can handle 1440p with settings adjustments.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is designed for a traditional tower case with the AM5 socket motherboard and a PCIe 4.0 x8 GPU interface. The GPU is dual-slot, 190 mm long, and requires a 450W power supply with a single 8-pin connector. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, providing modern connectivity.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, operates at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz. The die size is 71 mm² with 6,570 million transistors, and the TDP is 65W.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU has integrated Radeon Graphics, making it a fallback for troubleshooting without a discrete GPU. It is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark results show a strong single-thread performer. The 3dmark single-thread score of 999 and geekbench single-core score of 2521 are high for a 65W part. The cinebench r23 single-core score of 1852 is particularly impressive, indicating excellent IPC efficiency. The passmark single-thread score of 3910 confirms this.

Multi-thread performance is adequate but not class-leading. The cinebench r23 multicore score of 12735 and geekbench multicore score of 13413 are mid-range figures. The passmark multithread score of 27058 and 3dmark max-thread score of 6503 show that 6 cores/12 threads handle moderate workloads but will lag behind 8-core or 16-core parts in heavily threaded tasks. The CPU’s 78th percentile ranking reflects this balance of strong single-thread and adequate multi-thread performance.