SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7545U + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7545U

26,849 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U and AMD Radeon 860M form a compact, power-efficient laptop pairing built on AMD’s latest mobile architectures. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 4 nm TSMC process, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with 512 shading units. Together they target thin-and-light systems where balanced performance and low power draw matter more than raw frame rates. This analysis draws exclusively on benchmark data to explain what this combination delivers, where it sits against rivals, and who should consider building around it.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7545U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, using the Phoenix2 codename. It operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boosts up to 4.90 GHz, which is a wide frequency range that allows the chip to stay efficient at idle and stretch when workloads demand it. The 4 nm TSMC process, with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, contributes to a 28 W TDP — a figure that places this CPU firmly in the mobile efficiency class rather than high-performance desktop territory.

Cache structure is generous for a 6-core mobile part: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 pool. This arrangement helps with latency-sensitive tasks like gaming and database queries, where repeated data access benefits from larger shared caches. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, yielding 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth — sufficient for feeding six Zen 4 cores without obvious starvation. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual in the mobile segment and relevant for error-sensitive professional workloads.

Benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a strong mid-range mobile CPU. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 17253, while single-core reaches 2435. These numbers indicate that the 7545U can handle heavily threaded compilation or rendering tasks reasonably well, while its single-thread performance is competitive with many desktop parts from a generation ago. The Passmark multithread score of 20298 and single-thread score of 3673 reinforce this — this is not a budget chip that struggles with everyday responsiveness.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26849, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7545U is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-1370P (26900, -0.2% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26936, -0.3% delta). It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT (26748, +0.4%) and the AMD EPYC 9554 (26743, +0.4%). This means the 7545U sits in a crowded performance band where a few percent either way decides the ranking — real-world differences will come down to cooling and power delivery rather than architectural superiority.

Data encryption and compression scores are notable: Passmark encryption hits 14202, while compression reaches 238345. These translate to snappy file archiving and secure communication overhead. Floating-point math at 36754 and integer math at 60206 suggest solid number-crunching ability for spreadsheets, scientific scripts, and financial modeling. The physics score of 1057 and extended instructions score of 17865 indicate that the CPU can handle simulation workloads and modern instruction sets without significant penalties.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the CPU and GPU are intentionally matched for balanced mobile workloads, but the data reveals where each component takes the lead. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking against all CPUs is higher than the GPU’s 72nd percentile, suggesting the processor is slightly more capable relative to its own market than the integrated graphics are relative to theirs. This means for most productivity tasks — compilation, office suites, data analysis — the CPU will finish its work before the GPU becomes a limiting factor.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26401, which is within 1.7% of the CPU’s 26849 average. This near-equality indicates that neither component will consistently dominate the other in mixed workloads. For gaming, the GPU is typically the bottleneck, as frame rendering depends entirely on the Radeon 860M’s 512 shading units and 16 ROPs. The CPU has enough single-thread headroom (2435 in Cinebench R23 single-core) to feed the GPU without causing frame drops in most titles, but at higher resolutions or with demanding effects, the GPU will saturate first.

Memory bandwidth is a shared resource that affects both components. The dual-channel DDR5 bus at 89.6 GB/s serves the CPU’s cache misses and the GPU’s framebuffer. Since the Radeon 860M uses system shared memory, its effective bandwidth is “System Dependent” — meaning the same memory that feeds the CPU also feeds the GPU. This creates a potential contention point: heavy CPU memory traffic can reduce GPU performance and vice versa. In practice, the balanced benchmark scores suggest this contention is manageable for typical workloads.

The combined percentile is 76, which places this pairing in the upper-middle tier of all laptop builds. The CPU’s TDP of 28 W and GPU’s TDP of 15 W sum to 43 W of sustained thermal load, not counting the rest of the system. This low power envelope means cooling solutions can be modest, and the bottleneck in sustained workloads is more likely to be thermal throttling than raw component limits — a factor that benchmark scores alone cannot capture.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 7545U delivers its strongest results in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 17253, which represents a 79th percentile position among all CPUs. The single-core score of 2435 is equally important for everyday responsiveness, as most applications still rely on one or two threads for UI interaction and scripting. Passmark single-thread at 3673 confirms this strength, while the multithread score of 20298 shows that the chip scales well across its six cores.

The Radeon 860M achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Vulkan score of 30043. The Vulkan result is notably higher, suggesting the RDNA 3.5 architecture is well-optimized for modern graphics APIs that use compute shaders efficiently. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26401, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331, +0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, -0.6%), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (26683, -1.1%). This is a remarkable result for an integrated GPU — it trades blows with dedicated entry-level graphics cards and even some older desktop parts.

The combined picture shows a system that is stronger on the CPU side by a narrow margin. The CPU’s average score of 26849 is 1.7% higher than the GPU’s 26401, a difference that would be imperceptible in real use. The 76th combined percentile indicates that this laptop build outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tracked configurations, which is respectable for a thin-and-light system. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed later are estimates derived from these benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7545U compare to the Intel Core i7-1370P?

A: The 7545U’s average benchmark score is 26849, while the i7-1370P scores 26900. The delta is -0.2%, meaning the Intel part is marginally faster but within measurement noise. In real workloads, expect near-identical performance.

Q: Is the Radeon 860M suitable for modern gaming?

A: Based on its benchmark scores, the 860M performs at the level of the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and even matches the RTX 5060 within 0.3%. This suggests it can handle esports titles and older AAA games at low-to-medium settings, but not demanding new releases at high detail.

Q: Does this CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7545U supports ECC memory. This is rare for a mobile CPU and benefits workloads where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or scientific computing.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth available to the CPU and GPU?

A: The dual-channel DDR5 bus provides 89.6 GB/s, shared between the CPU and the integrated GPU. The GPU’s effective bandwidth is listed as “System Dependent,” meaning it varies based on memory configuration and system load.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2435, while multi-core is 17253. The ratio suggests good scaling across six cores, with single-thread performance strong enough for daily tasks and multi-thread performance sufficient for compilation or rendering.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop processor?

A: The market segment is Mobile, and the build class is laptop. The socket is AMD Socket FP7, which is a BGA package designed for laptops, not socketed desktop boards.

Q: What is the GPU’s boost clock and shading unit count?

A: The Radeon 860M boosts to 3000 MHz and has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so the following frame rates are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The Radeon 860M’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 and OpenCL score of 22759 indicate a GPU that performs near the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is a known entry-level gaming chip.

At 1080p with ultra settings, expect playable frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, where the CPU’s strong single-thread score (2435 in Cinebench R23) will keep frame times consistent. For older AAA games from the PS4 era, medium settings at 1080p should produce 30-60 FPS depending on the title’s optimization. The 16 ROPs and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are limiting factors — they cap fill rate and raw shader throughput, respectively.

At 1440p, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern titles even at low settings, as the pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s becomes the bottleneck. The 8 RT cores are present, but ray tracing at playable frame rates is unrealistic given the overall performance level; rasterized rendering is the practical path. The CPU’s 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth helps in memory-bound scenarios, but the shared system memory means GPU bandwidth is not dedicated and can be stolen by CPU threads.

The combined 76th percentile ranking suggests this laptop will handle gaming better than most integrated-graphics systems, but it is not a dedicated gaming machine. Users seeking high-refresh esports play at 1080p will find acceptable performance, while those wanting AAA titles at high settings should look to discrete GPUs.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Krackan Point chip design. It is manufactured on the same 4 nm TSMC process as the CPU, which helps keep power consumption low — the GPU has a 15 W TDP, making it suitable for thin laptops without active cooling for the graphics die. The GPU boosts to 3000 MHz from a 600 MHz base, a five-fold frequency range that allows it to idle at minimal power and ramp up for demanding frames.

Memory is system shared, meaning the GPU draws from the same DDR5 pool as the CPU. The bus width and bandwidth are listed as “System Dependent,” so performance will vary based on the laptop’s memory configuration — dual-channel memory is essential to approach the 89.6 GB/s theoretical limit. The GPU has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, which are modest numbers but typical for an IGP. Texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s and pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, figures that support 1080p gaming at medium settings.

Compute performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio — this means the GPU does not have dedicated half-precision acceleration, but it can handle FP16 workloads at the same rate as FP32. The 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the overall performance level limits practical RT use. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and APIs.

Benchmark results show the 860M at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 26401. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.1%), which is a discrete entry-level GPU, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331, +0.3%), which is a much more powerful desktop part — the 860M matches it in these specific benchmarks, though this is likely due to the benchmark’s compute focus rather than gaming performance. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 is particularly strong, indicating good driver optimization for modern APIs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7545U uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a BGA package soldered to the motherboard — it cannot be swapped for a different CPU. This means the processor is the endpoint of its platform; upgrades are limited to memory, storage, and the laptop itself. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, which is sufficient for a single NVMe SSD and a discrete GPU in an external enclosure, though the latter is not a practical upgrade path for most users.

Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with ECC capability. Upgrading from single-channel to dual-channel memory would significantly improve both CPU and GPU performance, as the integrated GPU depends on shared memory bandwidth. The 89.6 GB/s figure assumes dual-channel operation; single-channel would halve this, causing noticeable frame rate drops and slower CPU memory-bound operations. The memory bus is the primary upgrade lever available to users.

The GPU’s TDP is 15 W, and the CPU is 28 W, totaling 43 W. No suggested PSU is listed because this is an IGP with no additional power connectors — it draws power from the motherboard. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface for the GPU is a standard configuration for IGPs and does not limit performance. No upgrade to the GPU is possible within the same platform; users seeking more graphics power must move to a laptop with a discrete GPU.

The production status for both components is Active, meaning they are current products. The CPU was released on 2023-11-01, while the GPU followed on 2025-02-28. This staggered release suggests the platform is mature, and system builders can expect stable drivers and BIOS support. The CPU’s multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is not available.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U with the AMD Radeon 860M in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 4.90 GHz boost clock and 28 W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 IGP with 512 shading units and a 15 W TDP. Together, they represent a balanced mobile platform where the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers (79th percentile) than the GPU (72nd percentile).

The combined percentile is 76, which places this configuration in the upper-middle tier of all tracked laptop builds. This is not a flagship system — it lacks the high-end discrete GPUs found in gaming laptops — but it outperforms the majority of thin-and-light machines, which typically rely on weaker IGPs. The CPU’s benchmark scores are competitive with the Intel Core i7-1370P and AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, while the GPU matches the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, making this a capable all-rounder for productivity and light gaming.

The build class is explicitly laptop, and the low combined TDP of 43 W enables slim chassis designs with passive GPU cooling. The absence of a dedicated GPU means the system runs quieter and cooler than gaming laptops, at the cost of graphics headroom. This is a machine for users who need a portable workstation with respectable compute performance and occasional gaming capability, not for enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience for the Ryzen 5 7545U and Radeon 860M pairing is mobile professionals who need a balanced laptop for daily work and light entertainment. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores (17253 in Cinebench R23) make it suitable for software developers who compile code, students running data analysis scripts, and small business owners handling spreadsheets and databases. The ECC memory support adds credibility for financial or scientific workloads where data integrity is non-negotiable.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations will find this build acceptable for esports titles, where the GPU’s Vulkan performance (30043) and the CPU’s single-thread strength (2435 in R23) ensure smooth frame delivery. However, the 16 ROPs and 3.072 TFLOPS limit AAA gaming to low-to-medium settings. Content creators working with photos and 1080p video will benefit from the CPU’s 6 cores and the GPU’s hardware-accelerated encoding, though 4K rendering will be slow.

The 76th combined percentile makes this a sensible choice for students who need a reliable laptop for lectures, research, and casual gaming without breaking thermal or power budgets. Small business workstations that run office suites, accounting software, or light CAD will see responsive performance from the 4.90 GHz boost clock. The lack of measured gaming FPS data means those seeking a dedicated gaming laptop should look elsewhere, but for everyone else, this pairing offers a strong balance of compute and graphics capability in a portable form factor.