SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7545U + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7545U

26,849 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U and AMD Radeon 740M form a laptop-class pairing built around AMD’s Zen 4 and RDNA 3.0 architectures on a 4 nm TSMC process. This combination targets thin-and-light mobile systems where CPU throughput matters more than discrete GPU muscle. The CPU sits in the 79th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands in the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, giving the pair a combined percentile of 66. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows — so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename. It operates with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, within a 28 W TDP envelope. The chip uses TSMC’s 4 nm process node, integrating 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory capability. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only) and uses the AMD Socket FP7.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads while holding its own in multi-threaded tasks for its power class. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 17,253 in multi-core and 2,435 in single-core. The single-core score places it among capable modern mobile chips, with the R20 single-core result of 1,022 reinforcing that strength. Multi-core performance is respectable for a 28 W part: Cinebench R20 multi-core reaches 7,246, and Cinebench R15 multi-core hits 1,739. PassMark numbers further illuminate the character of this CPU. Integer math scores 60,206, floating-point math reaches 36,754, and extended instructions (SIMD) hit 17,865. Data compression scores 238,345, while data encryption reaches 14,202. The multithread score of 20,298 and single-thread score of 3,673 (listed twice in the data) confirm a balanced design.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26,849, with a percentile of 79 against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show how tightly grouped this segment is: the Intel Core i7-1370P averages 26,900 (-0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 averages 26,936 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT averages 26,748 (+0.4% delta), and the AMD EPYC 9554 averages 26,743 (+0.4% delta). This places the 7545U within a 0.7% band of four very different processors — from a server EPYC to a desktop APU — meaning the 7545U’s real-world performance is essentially indistinguishable from these rivals in aggregate benchmarks. For real workloads, this translates to smooth responsiveness in office applications, brisk code compilation for small projects, and competent photo editing. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz gives it strong single-core burst behavior, which matters for spreadsheet recalculation, web rendering, and lightweight scripting tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Phoenix2 chip on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It shares the same 20,900 million transistors and 137 mm² die as the CPU, reflecting its integrated nature. The GPU has 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 raster operation units, along with 4 dedicated ray tracing cores. Tensor cores are not present in this architecture. Clock speeds are set at a base of 800 MHz and a boost of 2800 MHz, with memory being system-shared (the GPU uses the CPU’s DDR5 memory, so bandwidth is system dependent rather than fixed). The GPU’s TDP is listed as 45 W, though as an integrated part it draws from the overall system power budget. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs are motherboard dependent.

Compute throughput is modest by discrete GPU standards: FP32 performance reaches 2.867 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 2.867 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it can handle modern graphics APIs and ray tracing workloads, albeit at limited performance. Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10,172 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 15,568. The average benchmark score is 12,870, placing the GPU in the 53rd percentile against all GPUs.

The nearest rivals illustrate the Radeon 740M’s position: the AMD FirePro W5100 averages 12,847 (+0.2% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 455 averages 12,831 (+0.3% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 averages 12,830 (+0.3% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 580 averages 12,928 (-0.4% delta). The 740M sits within 0.7% of these four very different GPUs — three older discrete cards and one modern integrated solution. This means the 740M delivers roughly the compute performance of a mid-range discrete GPU from a previous generation, but without the dedicated VRAM. For rendering, the 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is sufficient for 1080p content creation in lighter 3D packages, but heavy ray tracing workloads will be constrained by the 4 RT cores and the lack of dedicated tensor hardware. The system-shared memory bandwidth is the primary limiting factor; unlike a discrete card with its own VRAM, the 740M competes with the CPU for memory access, which reduces effective bandwidth in memory-heavy scenes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile platform socket that is not upgradeable in the traditional sense — laptop CPUs are typically soldered, and the FACT PACK provides no evidence of socket interchangeability beyond the part numbers (100-000000930 for FP7r2 and 100-000000929 for FP7). Memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with ECC capability, which is unusual for a mobile part and suggests possible use in compact workstations or industrial laptops. The PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes provides adequate bandwidth for one or two NVMe SSDs and a mid-range discrete GPU, should the laptop design include one — though the integrated Radeon 740M is the primary graphics solution here.

The CPU’s TDP of 28 W and the GPU’s TDP of 45 W mean a combined thermal envelope of approximately 73 W for the core components. The suggested PSU field is null, and no power connector exists on the GPU (it is an IGP), so power delivery is handled entirely through the motherboard’s VRM design. For a laptop, this translates to a modest power adapter — likely in the 65-90 W range based on the TDP figures, though that specific adapter wattage is not stated in the FACT PACK and should not be assumed. A sensible next upgrade for someone with this platform would be to increase system RAM to maximize the shared memory bandwidth available to the GPU, since the Radeon 740M’s performance scales with memory speed and capacity. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is the ceiling for GPU memory performance, and faster DDR5 modules would push closer to that limit. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes could also support an external GPU enclosure for users who need discrete-level rendering, though that would require the laptop to have Thunderbolt or OCuLink support — a detail not present in the FACT PACK, so it remains speculative.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a pairing where the CPU significantly outclasses the GPU in relative performance. The CPU’s 79th percentile versus the GPU’s 53rd percentile creates a clear imbalance: the Ryzen 5 7545U can feed far more data than the Radeon 740M can render. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (238,345 score), integer math (60,206), and multi-threaded rendering, the CPU will be the limiting factor only if the workload exceeds the GPU’s output. For gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck: the 740M’s 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 ROPs will cap frame rates well before the CPU’s single-core performance (3,673 PassMark single-thread) becomes a constraint. The CPU’s boost clock of 4.90 GHz provides ample headroom for even the most demanding game logic, so the GPU will saturate first.

In mixed workloads like video editing, the balance depends on the task. 4K video decoding and effect processing can leverage both the CPU’s 12 threads and the GPU’s Vulkan support (15,568 Geekbench Vulkan score), but the shared memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s will bottleneck simultaneous CPU and GPU memory access. The CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache helps mitigate this for some workloads, but for large data sets, the system memory becomes the limiting factor. For software development, the CPU is the star: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 17,253 and PassMark multithread of 20,298 suggest rapid compilation for moderate-sized codebases, while the GPU is nearly irrelevant. The combined percentile of 66 reflects this mixed profile — the system is better than average overall, but the GPU drags down the gaming and GPU-accelerated potential.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK confirms zero measuredFpsUltraByGame rows. Therefore, all gaming frame rates are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 12,870 places it in the 53rd percentile, which historically corresponds to playable frame rates at 1080p with low to medium settings in most titles, but not at ultra settings. The 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 ROPs will struggle with modern AAA games at 1080p ultra; the pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s is a hard limit on fill-rate-heavy scenes. The 4 RT cores enable ray tracing, but at this compute level, ray-traced effects will likely drop frame rates below playable thresholds except in the simplest implementations.

For esports and older titles, the estimates are more favorable. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 15,568 suggests the GPU can handle DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles efficiently, with frame rates in the 60+ range for games like CS2, Valorant, or Overwatch 2 at 1080p with competitive settings. At 1440p, the 740M will struggle; the memory bandwidth being system-dependent means higher resolutions expose the bandwidth limitation more severely. At 4K, the GPU is not viable for gaming beyond very light titles. The CPU’s high single-core score (3,673 PassMark) ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, but the GPU will cap maximum FPS. Users should expect estimated frame rates of 30-60 FPS at 1080p medium in modern titles, with drops below 30 FPS in demanding scenes. These are estimates, not measurements.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets mobile users who prioritize CPU performance over gaming. The Ryzen 5 7545U’s 79th percentile CPU rank makes it suitable for students and professionals who run data analysis in Python, compile code, or work with spreadsheets and documents. The 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache handle multi-threaded productivity tasks like video encoding (Cinebench R23 multi-core 17,253) and 3D rendering for hobbyist projects. The GPU’s 53rd percentile means it can handle casual gaming and light GPU acceleration, but it is not a gaming laptop by any standard. Small business workstations that need ECC memory support (a feature listed in the FACT PACK) would benefit from this CPU, as would developers who value the single-core boost of 4.90 GHz for responsive builds.

Content creators working with 1080p video or still images will find the CPU adequate for rendering and the GPU sufficient for preview acceleration, but heavy 4K or 8K work would exceed the GPU’s capabilities. The 4 nm process and 28 W CPU TDP make this an efficient platform for all-day battery life, though the GPU’s 45 W TDP adds to the thermal load. Gamers at 1080p with low expectations can use this system, but those seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming should look elsewhere. The combined percentile of 66 indicates a system that is comfortably above average for general use, but not specialized for any single demanding task.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a viable scenario. The GPU’s 53rd percentile and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 cannot sustain high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles; estimated frame rates would fall below 60 FPS in most AAA games, and high-refresh (120+ Hz) is out of reach. The CPU’s single-core strength ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU caps performance.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and 20,298 PassMark multithread score can handle software encoding at 1080p60 with acceptable quality, while the GPU’s Vulkan support (15,568) can offload some encoding tasks if the software supports it. The shared memory bandwidth may cause minor hitches during simultaneous gaming and encoding, but the CPU’s headroom makes this workable for light streams.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,253 indicates strong rendering performance for 1080p timelines in software like DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro. The GPU’s 2.867 TFLOPS can accelerate effects and color grading, but the 8 ROPs limit heavy compositing. 4K editing is possible but will be slow on export; 1080p is the sweet spot.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for basic Blender or Maya renders, with Cinebench R20 multi-core of 7,246 suggesting moderate render times. The GPU’s 4 RT cores support ray-traced rendering, but the 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 means GPU-based renderers like Cycles will be slow — expect render times several times longer than discrete GPUs.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. The CPU’s single-core score of 3,673 and boost clock of 4.90 GHz provide fast compile times for small to medium projects, while the 12 threads handle parallel builds. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses in large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant except for UI rendering, making this a solid developer laptop.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 79th percentile ensures smooth multitasking across browser tabs, office suites, and communication tools. The 28 W TDP and 4 nm process suggest long battery life (though exact battery figures are not in the FACT PACK), and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running calculations. The GPU is more than adequate for office graphics and video playback.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: Does the Radeon 740M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 4 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but its FP32 performance of 2.867 TFLOPS limits ray-traced workloads to simple scenes.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26,849, which is 0.2% below the Intel Core i7-1370P (26,900) and 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT (26,748).

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: Is the GPU’s memory bandwidth fixed?

A: No, the memory is system-shared, so bandwidth is system dependent — the theoretical ceiling is the CPU’s 89.6 GB/s, but actual performance depends on the installed RAM.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The Radeon 740M is in the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 12,870, placing it near the AMD Radeon RX 580 (-0.4% delta).

Q: Are the gaming FPS figures measured or estimated?

A: They are estimates. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all frame rates are inferred from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26,849, with a percentile of 79 against all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-1370P at 26,900 (-0.2% delta), followed by the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 at 26,936 (-0.3% delta), then the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT at 26,748 (+0.4% delta) and AMD EPYC 9554 at 26,743 (+0.4% delta). This puts the 7545U in a tight cluster where no rival is more than 0.7% away, indicating excellent aggregate performance for a 28 W mobile part. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 12,870, with a percentile of 53 against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5100 at 12,847 (+0.2% delta), AMD Radeon Pro 455 at 12,831 (+0.3% delta), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 at 12,830 (+0.3% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 580 at 12,928 (-0.4% delta). The 0.7% spread among these rivals shows the 740M performs like a mid-range discrete GPU from several generations ago, but with the memory bandwidth penalty of shared system memory.

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-quartile mobile processor (79th percentile), while the GPU is a mid-pack integrated solution (53rd percentile). The combined percentile of 66 reflects this imbalance — the system is better than two-thirds of all builds in aggregate, but the GPU drags down gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. In CPU-heavy workloads like data compression (238,345 PassMark score) or multi-threaded rendering (17,253 Cinebench R23), the system punches well above its class. In GPU-heavy workloads like gaming or GPU rendering, it performs at roughly half the capability of a discrete mid-range card from the same era.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U with the AMD Radeon 740M integrated GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 mobile processor on a 4 nm TSMC node, with a 28 W TDP and 4.90 GHz boost clock. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 integrated solution with 256 shading units, 4 RT cores, and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32, using system-shared memory. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 66, places this system in the upper-middle range of all CPU+GPU pairings. It is not a high-end gaming machine (the GPU’s 53rd percentile precludes that), nor is it a workstation-class system (the CPU’s 79th percentile is good but not top-tier). Instead, it is a balanced mobile productivity platform that favors CPU throughput, with enough GPU capability for light gaming and basic accelerated tasks. The 4 nm process for both components emphasizes efficiency, and the ECC memory support adds a reliability layer uncommon in consumer mobile parts. For users who need a responsive, capable laptop for development, office work, and occasional entertainment, this pairing delivers solid performance without the thermal or power demands of a discrete GPU setup.