SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

22,791 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile pairing represents a high-tier laptop configuration, sitting at the 75th percentile overall. This combination pairs a power-efficient 6-core Zen 3+ processor with a robust Ada Lovelace discrete GPU, creating a system geared toward serious gaming and creative work in a mobile form factor. The data shows a significant performance disparity between the CPU and GPU, with the graphics card emerging as the clear driver of system capability, while the processor provides adequate, though not exceptional, support for demanding tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U is a mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, a configuration well-suited for modern multitasking and threaded workloads. The base clock is 2.90 GHz, which can boost up to 4.55 GHz for single-threaded performance, while operating within a 28 W TDP. This 6 nm chip from TSMC includes 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, providing a solid foundation for gaming and productivity.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 8591 points in multi-core and 1414 points in single-core tests. This multi-core result positions the chip at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors in the database. However, its nearest rivals show a tightly contested field. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X scores a nearly identical average of 22823, just 0.1% higher, while the Intel Core i5-12500H is only 0.7% behind. This suggests the 7535U offers performance on par with a previous-generation desktop chip, which is commendable for a 28 W mobile part. The Geekbench multi-core score of 6466 further reinforces this, showing strong scaling from the 6-core/12-thread design.

Single-thread performance is more modest. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1414 and Geekbench single-core score of 1602 reflect the efficiency-oriented design and a boost clock that is not extreme. This means day-to-day responsiveness and lightly-threaded tasks will feel snappy, but it will not lead the pack in applications that rely heavily on a single core. PassMark tests show a balanced profile: an integer math score of 62109 and a floating-point math score of 33971 indicate solid number-crunching ability, while the data compression score of 200252 suggests strong performance in archival and compression workloads. The data encryption score of 12706 also highlights competence in security-related tasks. The processor includes the Radeon 660M integrated graphics, which offers a fallback display output but is entirely secondary to the discrete GPU in this configuration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7535U is built for the AMD Socket FP7, a mobile-specific platform. This socket is not interchangeable with desktop AM4 or AM5 sockets, meaning the upgrade path is limited to other mobile processors within the same generation and platform family. The system supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and includes ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation-class hardware. This memory bandwidth is sufficient for feeding the 6-core CPU and does not present an obvious bottleneck for the processor's capabilities.

For expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, enabling fast connectivity for NVMe SSDs and the discrete GPU. The RTX 4070 Mobile connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which provides ample bandwidth for its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU's 28 W TDP is remarkably low, meaning a laptop cooler capable of handling a standard ultrabook processor will suffice for the CPU itself. The primary thermal and power challenge in this system is the GPU, which has a 115 W TDP. The absence of a suggested PSU value for the GPU and its "IGP" slot width classification indicate this is a soldered, non-replaceable component. Therefore, a sensible next upgrade for a user of this platform would be increasing memory capacity or storage speed, as the CPU and GPU are effectively fixed. The platform is not designed for component-level upgrades, but for a laptop, the existing configuration is well-balanced for its intended lifespan.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the dominant component in this pairing. Built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD106 chip, it is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC and contains 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The GPU features 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. It is equipped with 36 dedicated ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores, making it fully capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS technologies. The boost clock is rated at 1695 MHz, with a base clock of 1395 MHz.

Memory specifications are strong for a mobile part. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high texture settings, though the 128-bit bus width is narrower than some desktop counterparts, which can limit performance at very high resolutions. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, or 16 Gbps effective. Compute capabilities are impressive: FP32 performance is rated at 15.62 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate performance for rasterization.

In benchmark results, the RTX 4070 Mobile achieves a PassMark G3D score of 19587, placing it at the 73rd percentile among all GPUs. This is a very strong result, putting it in the upper quarter of all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals are desktop-class cards: the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT scores 27425 (0% difference), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27565 (0.5% higher). This indicates the mobile 4070 performs nearly identically to a desktop RTX 3090 in the average benchmark score, which reflects the efficiency of the Ada Lovelace architecture. The Geekbench scores further support this, with an OpenCL score of 109197 and a Vulkan score of 108367, showing strong compute and graphics API performance. DirectX 12 testing via PassMark yields a score of 85, while DirectX 11 scores 179, indicating modern API performance is optimized and will handle current titles well.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU is stark and defines the character of this build. The CPU sits at the 76th percentile, while the GPU is at the 73rd percentile, which appears balanced. However, the nature of their workloads differs. In gaming, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and detail settings, as the RTX 4070 Mobile's raw graphics power far exceeds what the CPU needs to feed it frames. The CPU's multi-core score of 8591 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to handle game logic and physics, but its single-core score of 1414 might struggle to keep up in very CPU-intensive esports titles at extremely high frame rates, where the GPU is not the bottleneck.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's average benchmark score of 22791 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, a desktop chip from an older generation. This means in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, or heavy multitasking, the 7535U will perform adequately but will not provide the headroom of a higher-core-count processor. The GPU, with its 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, will accelerate rendering tasks, but the CPU may become the limiting factor in physics simulations or single-threaded code. The data suggests a system where the GPU is the star performer, capable of high-end gaming and GPU-accelerated creative work, while the CPU is a competent but not exceptional partner that handles standard productivity without complaint. In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the 6-core/12-thread CPU is adequate for encoding, but users should expect some CPU overhead that could affect frame pacing in the most demanding scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4070 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 19587 places it on par with the desktop RTX 3090, indicating it is more than capable of driving high refresh rate 1080p and 1440p monitors in most titles. The CPU's single-core performance is sufficient for high frame rates, though the 1414 Cinebench R23 single-core score may limit the absolute maximum FPS in less demanding games.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU provides a solid foundation for software encoding, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 17039 indicating good parallel processing capability. The GPU's 144 tensor cores and support for modern APIs enable hardware encoding, which can offload the streaming workload from the CPU, preserving gaming performance.

Video editing: The GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will accelerate timeline rendering and effects. The CPU's multi-core score of 8591 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for 1080p editing, but 4K timelines with heavy effects may cause the CPU to be a bottleneck during export.

3D rendering: This is a strong scenario for this build. The GPU's 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores provide substantial acceleration for ray-traced renders in applications that support them. The 8 GB of VRAM is a limitation for very large scenes, but for most projects, the GPU will dramatically outperform CPU-only rendering.

Software development: The CPU's balanced performance, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 6466, handles code compilation efficiently. The 16 MB of L3 cache reduces latency, and the 12 threads allow for parallel builds. The GPU is not a primary factor here, but its compute power can accelerate testing and simulation tasks.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity. The CPU's single-core performance is more than sufficient for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated Radeon 660M can handle these tasks, allowing the discrete GPU to remain idle and save power, extending battery life.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who demand high-end graphics performance in a portable chassis. The primary audience is gamers who want to play the latest titles at 1080p or 1440p with high settings, as evidenced by the GPU's performance parity with the desktop RTX 3090. It is also well-suited for content creators, such as video editors and 3D artists, who need CUDA acceleration and ray tracing capabilities for their software. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most creative workloads, but professionals working with massive textures or complex 3D scenes may find it limiting.

Software developers who work with large codebases and run virtual machines will benefit from the 6-core/12-thread CPU, though they are not the primary target. Students in engineering or graphic design programs will find the performance more than adequate for their coursework, including CAD software and Adobe Creative Suite. Small business workstations that require GPU acceleration for tasks like data visualization or video conferencing with virtual backgrounds would also benefit, but the high-performance GPU is more than what is typically needed for standard office tasks. This is a build for power users who prioritize graphics performance and are willing to accept the power consumption and heat of the 115 W GPU in a laptop form factor.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing shows a clear hierarchy. The CPU's average benchmark score is 22791, placing it at the 76th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, which scores 22823, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 7535U is statistically tied with this older desktop chip. It also edges out the Intel Core i5-12500H by 0.7%. In specific tests, the CPU achieves 8591 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1414 in single-core, with corresponding Geekbench scores of 6466 and 1602.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 27435, placing it at the 73rd percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, with a delta of 0%, and it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by only 0.5%. The PassMark G3D score of 19587 is the headline figure, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 109197 and 108367, respectively. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from these benchmark scores. The combined percentile for this build is 75, indicating that this system outperforms three-quarters of all configurations in the database. The picture is one of a high-performing GPU driving the system's reputation, with a competent CPU providing support without being a bottleneck for GPU-bound tasks.

Build Overview

This build class is a laptop, combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile graphics card. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3+ part with a 28 W TDP, designed for efficiency, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 4608 shading units and a 115 W TDP, designed for high-performance graphics. The pairing creates a system that is, on average, at the 75th percentile of all builds, driven largely by the GPU's strong 73rd percentile standing. This is a high-tier mobile configuration aimed at users who need desktop-class graphics performance in a portable form factor. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking ensures it does not hold back the GPU in most scenarios, making this a well-rounded, performance-oriented laptop for gaming and creative work.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7535U compare to the Intel Core i5-12500H in CPU performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535U has an average benchmark score of 22791, which is 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i5-12500H's score of 22625. This indicates they are effectively tied in overall CPU performance.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Mobile faster than a desktop RTX 3090?

A: No, it is very close but slightly slower. The RTX 4070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 27435, which is 0.5% lower than the RTX 3090's score of 27565. They are considered near-equals in performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU and does it support modern APIs?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile has 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically associated with workstation-class processors and can be important for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU respectively?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, making it very power-efficient. The GPU has a TDP of 115 W, which is the primary consumer of power in this laptop configuration.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data available for this exact pairing. All discussions of gaming performance are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

Q: What is the performance percentile of this entire build?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 75, meaning it performs better than 75% of all configurations in the benchmark database.