SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

19,047 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

43,667 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

This is an unconventional pairing: a 35W six-core CPU built for efficiency alongside a flagship 120W mobile GPU. The data shows a combined percentile of 79, with the CPU sitting at the 73rd percentile against all CPUs and the GPU at the 84th percentile against all GPUs. The benchmark results indicate a system that is heavily GPU-dominant in most workloads, but the CPU's modest multi-threaded throughput creates a distinct ceiling in certain tasks. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data—so all FPS discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these two components is lopsided. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 27212 places it in the 84th percentile, while the CPU's average benchmark score of 19047 lands it at the 73rd percentile. This gap suggests that in GPU-bound scenarios—most modern games at high resolutions, 3D rendering, and compute workloads—the RTX 4090 Mobile will be the primary driver of performance, with the CPU rarely limiting frame rates.

However, the CPU's single-thread performance tells a different story. The 3DMark single-thread score of 872 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1445 are modest by current standards. In esports titles or older games that rely heavily on single-core performance, the Ryzen 5 7535HS could become the limiting factor, preventing the RTX 4090 Mobile from reaching its full potential. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1684 reinforces this: the CPU's dual-core performance is not exceptional, which could hamper frame pacing in lightly-threaded game engines.

Multi-threaded workloads show a similar pattern. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8613 is respectable for a 35W part, but it is far below what a desktop-class CPU would deliver. The nearest rivals—Intel Core i5-12400F (avg score 19039) and Intel Core 3 201E (avg score 19056)—match the Ryzen 5 7535HS almost exactly, with deltaPct values of 0. This means the CPU performs like a mid-range desktop chip from a previous generation, which is fine for gaming but not for heavy productivity. The GPU, by contrast, outperforms the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301 avg, deltaPct 0.8) and the RTX 5050 Mobile (43268 avg, deltaPct 0.9), while trailing the RTX A6000 (44075 avg, deltaPct -0.9) by less than 1%. In pure compute, the GPU is in professional-class territory.

The practical bottleneck analysis: at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, expect the CPU to limit FPS in CPU-intensive scenes. At 4K or with ray tracing enabled, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the CPU's limitations fade into the background. The PassMark physics score of 844 and find prime numbers score of 49 indicate that the CPU is not designed for heavy simulation or physics-heavy workloads, which could show up in games with complex destructible environments or large-scale strategy titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable in a traditional sense—a laptop buyer is locked into this processor for the life of the machine. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, delivering 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for the CPU's needs but not exceptional; the GPU has its own dedicated 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, so system memory bandwidth is not a concern for graphics performance.

PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This is a modern, capable setup that does not bottleneck the RTX 4090 Mobile's data transfer needs. The lack of ECC memory support is worth noting for professionals who require error-correcting memory for long compute jobs—this platform does not offer that.

The GPU's TDP is 120 W, and the CPU's TDP is 35 W, totaling 155 W for the core components. The suggestedPsu field is null, so no PSU headroom figure is available, but the power connectors are listed as "None" and the slot width is "IGP," indicating this is an integrated laptop solution where the power delivery is designed by the OEM. A sensible next upgrade path for this platform is not about swapping components—it is about external peripherals. The display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the laptop's ports determine external monitor support. Given the GPU's capability, pairing this with a high-refresh 1440p or 4K external display would be the logical next step to leverage the RTX 4090 Mobile's power.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture at a 5 nm process node from TSMC. It packs 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, which are substantial numbers that explain its high rasterization throughput. The pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 515.3 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering.

Memory is a key strength: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for 4K textures and large datasets, and it puts the GPU in a position where memory capacity is unlikely to be a limiting factor in most games or professional applications. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. The base clock is 1335 MHz with a boost of 1695 MHz, which is relatively conservative for a flagship mobile GPU, likely to manage thermals within a laptop chassis.

Ray tracing and AI acceleration are handled by 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 32.98 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning the GPU does not sacrifice half-precision throughput for speed. This is significant for machine learning inference and certain scientific workloads that use FP16. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 180831 and Vulkan score of 170774 are strong, indicating solid compute performance across different APIs. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 12347 is lower relative to the G3D score of 27212, which suggests the GPU is more optimized for graphics rendering than raw compute—a typical trait for gaming-focused cards.

The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with the latest game engines and professional software. The predecessor is GeForce 30 Mobile and the successor is GeForce 50 Mobile, placing this GPU as a high-end last-gen part that remains competitive in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Compared to rivals, it edges out the RTX 5050 Mobile by 0.9% and the Quadro M6000 by 0.8%, while trailing the RTX A6000 by 0.9%—all within a narrow performance band.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 872 (3DMark) may limit frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's raw power will push extremely high FPS in most games. At 1440p and above, the RTX 4090 Mobile's 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 and 576 GB/s bandwidth will dominate, making this a strong choice for high-refresh 1440p or smooth 4K gaming. Expect the GPU to be the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The 304 tensor cores and NVENC hardware (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) provide dedicated encoding capabilities. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 17914, can handle game capture plus encoding overhead, though the 35W TDP means sustained multi-threaded loads may cause thermal throttling in thin laptops. The GPU's compute power will also help with real-time effects.

Video editing: The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8613 on the CPU is sufficient for 4K proxy editing, but the GPU will carry most of the load in export tasks using hardware encoders. The PassMark data compression score of 221668 indicates strong performance in compression-heavy tasks like video codecs.

3D rendering: The RTX 4090 Mobile excels here. The 76 RT cores and 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will accelerate both ray-traced and rasterized rendering in tools like Blender or Maya. The CPU's 16 MB L3 cache and 12 threads will handle scene preparation, but the GPU is the star. The PassMark extended instructions score of 15411 shows good SIMD performance for physics simulations.

Software development: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate for compilation tasks, with a PassMark integer math score of 62372 indicating solid integer throughput. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5292 shows the CPU can scale reasonably across cores. However, the 35W TDP means sustained compile times may be slower than a higher-wattage CPU. The GPU is irrelevant for most dev tasks unless doing game development or CUDA-based work.

Student and office work: This is overkill. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3123 handles office productivity easily, and the integrated Radeon 660M graphics (which the FACT PACK lists) could drive basic displays without the dedicated GPU. The 35W CPU TDP contributes to battery life, but the 120W GPU TDP means the laptop will drain quickly under load. For document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets, this system is vastly more powerful than needed.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process with a 208 mm² die size. It belongs to the 7000 series and was released on 2023-01-03. The base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost of 4.55 GHz, and it has a 35W TDP, positioning it as an efficiency-focused mobile chip.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. This is modest by modern standards—the L3 is half of what some desktop chips offer—which can impact performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, yielding 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. This is adequate for the CPU's needs but not exceptional.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a mid-range mobile CPU. The Geekbench multicore score of 7354 and single-core of 1654 are respectable for a 35W part. The Cinebench R23 scores of 8613 multicore and 1445 singlecore show that the CPU can handle everyday multitasking and moderately threaded workloads, but it is not a performance leader. The 3DMark scores—872 single-thread, 1684 2-thread, 3164 4-thread, 4537 8-thread, and 5292 max-thread—demonstrate linear scaling up to 8 threads but diminishing returns beyond that, typical of a 6-core design.

The PassMark suite offers deeper insights. The multithread score of 17914 is solid, but the physics score of 844 and find prime numbers score of 49 are low, indicating weak performance in scientific and simulation workloads. The floating point math score of 35540 and integer math score of 62372 are moderate. Data encryption (13656) and compression (221668) are decent, suggesting the CPU is adequate for file archiving and some security tasks. The extended instructions score of 15411 shows AVX2/AVX-512-like capabilities (though Zen 3+ does not support AVX-512) that help in media encoding.

The nearest rivals are telling: the Intel Core i5-12400F (deltaPct 0), Intel Core 3 201E (deltaPct 0), Intel Core i5-1335U (deltaPct 0.3), and AMD EPYC 7773X (deltaPct 0.4) all score within 0.4% of this CPU. This means the Ryzen 5 7535HS delivers performance equivalent to a desktop i5-12400F, which is a solid mid-range part, but it does so at a 35W TDP, making it efficient rather than fast.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data—so all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 4090 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 27212 and the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 872 provide a basis for these projections.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this system should deliver very high frame rates in most titles. The GPU's 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 and 112 ROPs are more than enough for 1080p, and the CPU's boost clock of 4.55 GHz should keep frame rates above 100 FPS in most games, though CPU-heavy titles may see drops to 80-90 FPS in crowded scenes. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant would likely run at 200+ FPS, but the CPU's single-thread score of 872 in 3DMark suggests the ceiling is lower than a high-end desktop CPU.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. Expect 100-144 FPS in most AAA titles, with the 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth preventing any memory-related stutters at high texture settings. The RTX 4090 Mobile's 76 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates—likely 60-80 FPS with DLSS enabled in supported titles. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 107 is low, which is odd, but the DirectX 11 score of 262 and DirectX 10 score of 173 are more typical, suggesting the DX12 score may be a driver or benchmark anomaly.

At 4K ultra, the GPU's pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 515.3 GTexel/s will handle 4K rendering, but frame rates will drop to 50-70 FPS in demanding titles without upscaling. With DLSS (implied by the tensor cores), 4K at 80-100 FPS is plausible. The CPU's 35W TDP means it will not throttle significantly, but it also means it cannot push frame rates higher in CPU-bound scenes at lower resolutions.

The bottleneck pattern is consistent: at 1080p, the CPU limits performance; at 1440p and above, the GPU takes over. For a laptop with this pairing, a 1440p high-refresh display is the sweet spot—it balances the CPU's capabilities with the GPU's strengths.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who want flagship GPU performance in a laptop without needing a top-tier CPU. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K with ray tracing enabled will benefit most, as the RTX 4090 Mobile's 16 GB VRAM and 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 will handle those workloads without CPU interference. Esports players at 1080p should look elsewhere—the CPU's single-thread score of 872 will bottleneck high-refresh monitors.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or machine learning will find the GPU's 304 tensor cores and 16 GB VRAM invaluable. The CPU's 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache are sufficient for managing large projects, though not ideal for heavy multi-tasking. The PassMark data compression score of 221668 suggests strong performance in codec-heavy workflows.

Software developers who work with CUDA or OpenCL will appreciate the GPU's compute capabilities, but the CPU's 35W TDP limits sustained compilation speed. Students and office workers should avoid this system—it is overkill for productivity tasks, and the 120W GPU TDP will drain batteries quickly. Small business workstations that require GPU acceleration for CAD or data visualization could use this, but the lack of ECC memory support is a caveat.

The combined percentile of 79 indicates this system outperforms 79% of all recorded configurations. For users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU speed, this is a viable choice, provided they accept the CPU's mid-range limitations in single-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 4090 Mobile overkill for this CPU?

A: Yes, in some scenarios. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 27212 far exceeds the CPU's capabilities in single-threaded tasks (3DMark single-thread score of 872). At 1080p, the CPU will bottleneck; at 1440p and above, the GPU is the clear driver.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it enough?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is ample for 4K textures and professional workloads, and unlikely to be a limiting factor.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535HS uses Zen 3+ architecture (codenamed Rembrandt-R) on a 6 nm TSMC process with a 208 mm² die size. It is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 35W TDP.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: Yes. The GPU has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, with FP32 performance of 32.98 TFLOPS. Ray-traced games at 1440p or 4K with DLSS should run at playable frame rates.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the system RAM?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU's dedicated memory bandwidth is 576.0 GB/s, which is separate.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535HS scores within 0.4% of the Intel Core i5-12400F, Intel Core 3 201E, Intel Core i5-1335U, and AMD EPYC 7773X, with deltaPct values of 0 to 0.4.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No. It uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be replaced.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 19047, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-12400F (avg score 19039, deltaPct 0), Intel Core 3 201E (avg score 19056, deltaPct 0), Intel Core i5-1335U (avg score 18982, deltaPct 0.3), and AMD EPYC 7773X (avg score 18979, deltaPct 0.4). This means the Ryzen 5 7535HS is statistically tied with these chips, offering mid-range desktop-level performance at a 35W TDP.

Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 8613 and singlecore at 1445, Geekbench multicore at 7354 and singlecore at 1654, and 3DMark 16-thread at 5292 with single-thread at 872. PassMark results show multithread at 17914, single-thread at 3123, integer math at 62372, and floating point math at 35540.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 43667, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (avg score 43301, deltaPct 0.8), RTX 5050 Mobile (avg score 43268, deltaPct 0.9), Quadro M6000 24 GB (avg score 43262, deltaPct 0.9), and RTX A6000 (avg score 44075, deltaPct -0.9). The GPU outperforms the M6000 and RTX 5050 Mobile by less than 1%, and trails the RTX A6000 by 0.9%, placing it in professional-class territory.

Key GPU scores include Geekbench OpenCL at 180831 and Vulkan at 170774, PassMark G3D at 27212, and PassMark GPU Compute at 12347. The combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pair is 79, indicating it outperforms 79% of all configurations in the database. The data shows a system that is GPU-dominant, with the CPU performing at a mid-range level that complements but does not fully unlock the RTX 4090 Mobile's potential. For users demanding maximum graphics performance in a laptop, this pairing delivers, with the caveat that CPU-bound tasks will not see the same level of performance.