SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

19,047 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile represents a striking combination of a 6-core efficiency-focused processor with a flagship-tier laptop GPU. This pairing targets a specific niche in the mobile market, where the CPU is designed for balanced power consumption while the GPU is built for maximum graphical throughput. The data shows a system that is heavily skewed toward GPU-bound workloads, with the processor serving as a capable but not dominant partner. This analysis will dissect the benchmark scores, platform characteristics, and performance implications to determine where this build excels and where its limitations become apparent.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It operates on a 6 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm². The base clock is 3.30 GHz, boosting up to 4.55 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP envelope. This is a mobile-first design, evidenced by its AMD Socket FP7 and the 76.8 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 pool.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 73rd percentile overall. The multi-threaded performance is solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8613 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 7354. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5292 nearly matches the max-thread score of 5285, indicating that the 12 threads are fully utilized without significant scaling overhead beyond that point. Single-thread performance is more modest, such as the 3DMark single-thread score of 872 and Geekbench single-core score of 1654, which places it in line with typical 6-core mobile chips. The PassMark data shows strong integer math (62372) and floating-point math (35540) capabilities, suggesting it can handle complex calculations, but the physics score of 844 is a relative weak point.

The nearest rival comparisons are telling. The Intel Core i5-12400F has an average score of 19039, a 0% delta, meaning the Ryzen 5 7535HS is functionally equivalent in overall processing power. The Intel Core 3 201E is also at a 0% delta. The Intel Core i5-1335U trails by 0.3%, and the AMD EPYC 7773X trails by 0.4%. This suggests that despite being a 6-core mobile part, the 7535HS punches at the level of desktop-class 6-core processors from a generation prior. The implication for real workloads is that this CPU can handle moderate multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or software compilation without being the primary bottleneck, but it will not excel in heavily threaded workstation scenarios compared to higher-core-count rivals.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates inferred from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay testing.

The gaming potential of this build is primarily dictated by the GPU, but the CPU plays a critical supporting role. The Ryzen 5 7535HS has a single-thread score of 872 in 3DMark, which is adequate for maintaining frame pacing in most titles. However, in CPU-intensive games that rely heavily on a few cores, this processor may limit the RTX 4080 Mobile from reaching its full potential, especially at lower resolutions.

Given the GPU’s benchmark scores, the expected performance in high-refresh-rate scenarios is strong. At 1080p, the system would likely be capable of pushing well over 100 FPS in most esports titles, such as competitive shooters, where the GPU’s raw power can easily max out settings. The 3DMark single-thread score of 872 suggests the CPU can keep up with the frame generation demands at these settings. Moving to 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a factor, and the system should still deliver very high frame rates in AAA titles. At 4K, the load shifts almost entirely to the GPU, and the CPU bottleneck diminishes significantly. The data indicates that this is a system built for high-refresh 1440p gaming and capable 4K gaming, with the caveat that the CPU may cause minor stutters or frame drops in poorly optimized, CPU-bound titles. The estimates are based on the GPU’s 81st percentile position and the CPU’s 73rd percentile, which suggests a balanced enough pairing for most gaming scenarios, though not a perfectly optimized one.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a flagship mobile GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, utilizing the AD104 chip on a 5 nm process. It packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The memory subsystem is substantial: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is paired with 7424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The GPU also features 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, enabling dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-driven tasks.

The compute capabilities are impressive. The FP32 performance is rated at 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio of 24.72 TFLOPS. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s. The clocks are set at a base of 1290 MHz and a boost of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The TDP is 110 W, which is high for a mobile part but necessary to feed the compute units.

In terms of benchmarks, the GPU sits in the 81st percentile. The PassMark G3D score is 24926, which is a strong result, but the G2D score of 929 is relatively lower, indicating that 2D desktop tasks are not the focus. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 159575, and the Vulkan score is 145807, showing excellent raw compute power. The DirectX 12 score of 96 in PassMark is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 244, which might suggest driver overhead or architecture quirks in specific legacy tests. The nearest rivals are interesting: the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 has a 0.4% higher score, and the RTX 5080 Mobile is 0.6% higher. The RTX 4070 trails by 1.3%, and the Tesla P4 also trails by 1.3%. This places the 4080 Mobile in a strange tier where it is nearly identical to a low-end MX570 in average score, which is likely a data anomaly or a result of the specific benchmark suite weighting. For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p texture-heavy scenes and some 4K work, while the RT and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting and DLSS.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, but ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. This is a laptop build, so the upgrade path is fundamentally limited compared to desktop systems. The data suggests that the memory is the most likely upgrade target, as the CPU’s performance is tied to memory bandwidth. There is no launch MSRP available for either component, so the pricing context is absent.

The TDP figures are 35 W for the CPU and 110 W for the GPU. The GPU’s suggested PSU is null, and its power connector is listed as "None", which indicates that this is an integrated part of the laptop chassis, not a user-serviceable component. The power delivery is handled by the laptop’s internal design, which means the PSU headroom is fixed by the manufacturer. A sensible next upgrade within this platform would be maximizing the DDR5 memory capacity and speed, as the system’s memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for the CPU’s 12 threads. The storage is likely NVMe via the Gen 4 lanes, but no specific capacity is mentioned. The upgrade path is essentially forward-looking to a new laptop, as the socket and GPU are not replaceable.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is that of a high-performance laptop, with a combined percentile of 77. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19047, placing it in the 73rd percentile. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 38135, placing it in the 81st percentile. The CPU’s best scores are in multi-threaded tests, such as the PassMark multithread score of 17914 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8613. The single-thread scores are less impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1445 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3123.

The GPU’s scores are consistently high across compute tests, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 96 is a notable outlier, being much lower than the DirectX 11 score of 244. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 38135, which is close to the RTX 4070’s 37648, but the GPU’s percentile is higher. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12400F, has a nearly identical score, which means the 7535HS offers comparable raw processing power to that desktop chip. The GPU’s nearest rival, the MX570, is anomalous, but the RTX 4070 comparison is more relevant for real-world expectations. The combined data suggests a system that is GPU-dominant, with the CPU performing at a level that supports the GPU without being a severe bottleneck in most scenarios, but the CPU’s single-thread performance is the weaker link.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 81st percentile performance and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput enable high frame rates at 1440p. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 872 is sufficient for most titles, but the system is best suited for GPU-bound games where the RTX 4080 Mobile can stretch its legs.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores and NVENC hardware (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) provide dedicated encoding capabilities. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 17914, can handle the encoding overhead, but the single-thread score of 3123 may cause issues in games that are already CPU-heavy.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8613 and Geekbench multi-core score of 7354 are adequate for 4K timeline scrubbing and export, but not exceptional. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and rendering, making this a capable system for casual to semi-professional video work.

3D rendering: The GPU is the star here, with 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11191 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 indicate strong performance in GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane. The CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache and 12 threads will handle scene preparation, but the final render will be GPU-bound.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 221668 and integer math score of 62372 are strong for compilation tasks. The 12 threads allow for parallel builds, but the single-thread score of 3123 may slow down incremental builds that are single-threaded. The 35 W TDP suggests good battery life for coding on the go.

Student and office work: This is overkill for standard tasks. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and the GPU’s 81st percentile are far beyond what is needed for word processing or spreadsheets. The Radeon 660M integrated graphics could handle these tasks while the discrete GPU remains idle, potentially saving power.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize gaming and GPU-accelerated creative work over pure CPU compute. Gamers at 1440p with high-refresh monitors will benefit the most, as the GPU’s 81st percentile position ensures high detail settings and frame rates. Content creators working with 4K video or 3D rendering will find the 12 GB VRAM and 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 performance useful for GPU-accelerated workflows. Software developers who need to compile large codebases and also game on the side will appreciate the CPU’s multithreaded scores, but they should be aware of its single-thread limitations. Students in engineering or design programs that require CAD or 3D modeling software would see significant benefits from the GPU’s capabilities. Small business workstations that need to handle data analysis or visualization tasks, but also require portability, would find this a powerful, if expensive, option. The data indicates that this is not a CPU-centric workstation; it is a GPU-first machine that offers a balanced enough CPU to avoid severe bottlenecks in most real-world applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance rank of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile of this build is 77.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS compare to the Intel Core i5-12400F?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F has an average score of 19039, which is a 0% delta from the Ryzen 5 7535HS, indicating they are essentially equal in overall performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Ryzen 5 7535HS?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the VRAM capacity and type of the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to the RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4070 has an average score of 37648, which is 1.3% lower than the RTX 4080 Mobile’s score.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory support is listed as false for the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 110 W.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 7535HS and the RTX 4080 Mobile is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The GPU’s 81st percentile is eight points higher than the CPU’s 73rd percentile, indicating that the GPU is the stronger component. In gaming, this means the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates, but the CPU’s single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 872) can become a limiting factor in CPU-bound games, particularly at 1080p where the GPU has headroom to render more frames than the CPU can process. The FPS scaling, estimated from the scores, would show diminishing returns when moving from 1440p to 1080p, as the CPU struggles to keep up with the GPU’s output. In productivity tasks, the CPU’s 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache are adequate, but the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth will accelerate tasks like rendering and video effects, shifting the bottleneck back to the CPU in scene setup or physics calculations. The PassMark physics score of 844 is a specific weak point, suggesting that game physics or simulation-heavy workloads may stutter. The data implies that for a perfectly balanced system, a higher-end CPU with more cores would be needed, but for the GPU-bound tasks this build is designed for, the current CPU is sufficient.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on Zen 3+ architecture, while the GPU is a top-tier mobile part from the GeForce 40-series, based on Ada Lovelace. The combined percentile of 77 places this system in the upper tier of laptop performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 19047 and the GPU’s average score of 38135 indicate a strong overall system. The build is characterized by a significant performance disparity between the components, with the GPU being the dominant force. This is a high-performance laptop designed for gamers and creators who need desktop-class graphics performance in a portable form factor, but it is not a workstation-class CPU performer. The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is a mid-range efficiency part, while the GPU is a flagship, suggesting that the system is optimized for GPU-accelerated workloads and high-refresh gaming rather than multi-threaded CPU rendering or heavy computational tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds