SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

19,047 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with the AMD Radeon 860M in a laptop-class configuration. The CPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, the GPU at the 72nd percentile, and the combined percentile is 73. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows — so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with a die size of 208 mm². It uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and runs at a base clock of 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.55 GHz inside a 35 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 at 76.8 GB/s, and ECC is not supported. The processor has a locked multiplier and communicates over PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

The average benchmark score is 19,047, which lands at the 73rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-12400F scores 19,039 and is effectively tied; the Intel Core 3 201E scores 19,056 and is also tied; the Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18,982 and is 0.3% behind; the AMD EPYC 7773X scores 18,979 and is 0.4% behind. This places the 7535HS in a performance band where a single-digit percent difference separates it from several desktop and mobile parts.

Thread scaling from 3DMark is revealing. The chip scores 1,684 at 2 threads, 3,164 at 4 threads, 4,537 at 8 threads, and 5,292 at 16 threads. The jump from 8 to 16 threads is small, and the max-threads score of 5,285 is actually slightly below the 16-thread result — a sign that the 6 cores / 12 threads are fully saturated by the 8-thread workload. This is typical of a 6-core mobile part with limited power headroom.

Cinebench R23 multi-core of 8,613 and single-core of 1,445 show a strong multi-core advantage for a 35 W part. Geekbench multi-core of 7,354 and single-core of 1,654 corroborate the same balance. PassMark integer math of 62,372 and floating-point math of 35,540 indicate that integer-heavy workloads such as code compilation benefit more from the Zen 3+ cores than floating-point workloads. The data-compression score of 221,668 and encryption score of 13,656 suggest the AES-capable cores handle encryption well.

For real workloads, the 16 MB shared L3 and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for a laptop processor. The 35 W TDP means sustained all-core loads will be power-limited, but short bursts will reach the 4.55 GHz boost.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7535HS uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile BGA package — the CPU is not a user-replaceable part in the traditional sense. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and there is no ECC support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the integrated Radeon 660M is present on the die, although this build pairs the CPU with the discrete Radeon 860M GPU.

The TDP is 35 W for the CPU and 15 W for the GPU, so the combined power draw is modest for a laptop chassis. The GPU has no external power connectors, meaning it is a system-integrated part drawing power from the motherboard. The suggested PSU field is absent in the data, so no power-supply recommendation is available.

For a sensible next upgrade within the same platform, the primary lever is system memory. Because the GPU uses System Shared memory, increasing the amount of installed DDR5 directly increases the memory pool available to the GPU. However, the memory bus width and bandwidth remain fixed at 76.8 GB/s, so adding memory improves capacity but not bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535HS is at the 73rd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 19,047.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile?

A: The Radeon 860M is at the 72nd percentile, with an average score of 26,401.

Q: What architecture does the GPU use?

A: The Radeon 860M uses RDNA 3.5 on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost of 3000 MHz.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: 76.8 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 bus.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP?

A: The GPU is rated at 15 W, while the CPU is rated at 35 W.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who need a balanced laptop that can handle a mix of productivity and light gaming. The CPU’s 73rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking place the system in the mid-range of the laptop spectrum. Gamers who play esports at 1080p with moderate settings will find the CPU’s 4.55 GHz boost and the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS sufficient. Content creators working with 1080p video timelines will appreciate the CPU’s 8,613 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Software developers who compile code benefit from the 12 threads and the 62,372 integer-math score. Students and office users get a 35 W CPU and a 15 W GPU, which is a power-efficient combination for daily tasks. Small business workstations that need a balanced CPU and GPU for spreadsheets, web apps, and occasional graphics work would also fit.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19,047, placing it at the 73rd percentile. The GPU’s average score is 26,401, placing it at the 72nd percentile. The combined percentile of the system is 73. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12400F, is essentially tied at 19,039, and the Intel Core 3 201E is also tied at 19,056. The Intel Core i5-1335U is 0.3% behind, and the AMD EPYC 7773X is 0.4% behind. This shows the 7535HS is not a leader in its class; it is a mid-pack performer.

The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, is 0.1% higher in score, meaning the 860M is slightly behind that part. The NVIDIA RTX 5060 is 0.3% lower, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.6% lower, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 is 1.1% lower. The 860M thus sits in a tight cluster where the best rival is only 1.1% away.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU built on the Krackan Point chip using RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process. It has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 raster output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 600 MHz and the boost clock is 3000 MHz. Memory is System Shared — there is no dedicated VRAM, and the bandwidth is system-dependent. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS. FP16 is the same 3.072 TFLOPS, a 1:1 ratio that is unusual for a GPU.

The Geekbench OpenCL score is 22,759 and the Vulkan score is 30,043 — a substantial advantage for Vulkan over OpenCL. This suggests the RDNA 3.5 architecture is more efficient with Vulkan workloads, which is relevant for gaming and compute applications that use Vulkan. The GPU’s nearest rival, the MX550, is 0.1% higher; the RTX 5060 is 0.3% lower; the RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.6% lower; and the RTX A4000 is 1.1% lower.

For rendering, the 8 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 3.072 TFLOPS throughput and the shared memory system will limit complex scenes. The 512 shading units at 3000 MHz boost is a good ratio for an integrated part, but the 15 W TDP means sustained loads will be throttled. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile — 73rd and 72nd, respectively. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,445 in Cinebench R23 and 1,654 in Geekbench show it can feed the GPU at lower resolutions. However, the GPU’s System Shared memory means the CPU and GPU compete for the same 76.8 GB/s DDR5 bandwidth. In gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings, because it has only 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs and a shared memory pool. At lower resolutions and in CPU-bound games, the CPU’s 4.55 GHz boost and 6 cores will be the limiting factor.

The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 872 is modest, but the 8-thread score of 4,537 shows that the CPU scales well with multi-threaded game logic. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 30,043 suggests that Vulkan-based games will perform better than OpenGL-based ones. Overall, the system is balanced in terms of percentile but limited by the shared memory bandwidth.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system that pairs a 6-core Zen 3+ CPU with an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU. The combined percentile is 73. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 19,047, and the GPU has an average of 26,401. The CPU is a 2023 release, while the GPU is a 2025 release, so the GPU is two generations newer than the CPU. The GPU is an integrated part with a 15 W TDP, making this a low-power, thin-and-light laptop combination.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and the CPU’s 4.55 GHz boost are enough for esports at 1080p, but the shared memory limits the GPU at higher settings. The CPU’s single-thread performance will not hold back frame rates.

Streaming: The 12-thread CPU can handle streaming encoding. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 30,043 and OpenCL of 22,759 suggest it can assist with encode, but the 15 W TDP will limit sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8,613 is sufficient for 1080p timeline editing. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS can accelerate effects, but the 15 W TDP will throttle long exports.

3D rendering: The 8 RT cores support ray tracing, but the 3.072 TFLOPS and shared memory are constraints. For short scenes, the CPU’s 12 threads provide adequate CPU-based rendering.

Software development: The 12 threads and 62,372 integer-math score handle compilation. The 76.8 GB/s bandwidth reduces I/O wait, and the CPU’s multi-threaded scores are strong for a 35 W part.

Student and office work: The 35 W CPU plus 15 W GPU is a light package for a laptop. The 6 cores and 12 threads handle spreadsheets and web apps, and the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS is enough for video playback and casual graphics.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

At 1080p with medium settings, the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 16 ROPs should deliver playable frame rates in esports and older titles, but the shared memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s will limit the GPU when the CPU is also active. At 1080p with higher settings, the GPU will be the constraint, with its 32 TMUs and 16 ROPs struggling with modern AAA games. The CPU’s 4.55 GHz boost ensures that the CPU is not the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. For the best experience, lower resolutions and reduced settings are recommended, and Vulkan-based games will perform better than OpenGL-based ones due to the GPU’s Vulkan advantage.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds