SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

19,364 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop-class pairing built around AMD’s 6-core Zen 3+ processor and NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 mobile GPU. The data shows a combined percentile of 74, placing it above most current systems, but the absence of measured FPS rows means all gaming projections are estimates derived from synthetic benchmarks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R) using TSMC’s 6 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP. The cache layout consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a mobile-focused part on AMD Socket FP7, with dual-channel DDR5 memory support and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Benchmark results place the CPU at the 73rd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 19364. In Cinebench R23, it scores 12342 in multi-core and 1742 in single-core. The multi-core figure is substantial for a 35 W part, reflecting the efficiency of the 6 nm node and Zen 3+ design. The single-core score of 1742 is modest but adequate for daily responsiveness and lightly threaded tasks.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the CPU is effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (deltaPct 0), while sitting 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-1345U and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-8700K. The Intel Core i7-10700F is 0.7% faster on average, but that desktop part draws far more power. The PassMark multi-thread score of 14520 reinforces the multi-core strength, while the single-thread score of 2740 confirms that this is not a top-tier single-thread performer but is competitive with mid-range mobile parts.

Real-world workload implications are clear. The 6-core/12-thread configuration handles compilation, rendering, and encoding tasks with reasonable throughput, but the 16 MB L3 cache and 35 W power envelope limit peak performance compared to higher-end desktop or HX-series mobile chips. For sustained loads, the boost clock of 4.40 GHz helps, but thermal constraints in a laptop chassis will likely keep it below that in extended multi-threaded runs. The data suggests this CPU is well-suited for balanced productivity rather than extreme compute tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20355 places it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, which is strong for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1742 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to feed most GPUs at 1080p, but frame rates above 144 Hz may see CPU limitations in esports titles where single-thread performance dominates. Expect playable triple-A performance, with competitive titles likely exceeding 60 FPS.

Streaming: The GPU includes 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores, providing hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-based features. The 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for game capture alongside rendering. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 12342 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle encoding overhead, though software encoding at high bitrates may strain it in demanding titles.

Video editing: The PassMark data compression score of 168692 and floating-point math score of 27800 indicate solid performance for media codecs and effects processing. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 122238 accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks. For 1080p and light 4K editing, this pairing is capable; heavier 4K multi-stream work will likely bottleneck on the 6-core CPU.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342 is respectable for a laptop CPU, but dedicated rendering workloads favor higher core counts. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 13.13 TFLOPS aids GPU-accelerated renderers, and the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most scenes. Expect moderate render times, with CPU-bound engines slower than high-core desktop alternatives.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 50800 and extended instructions score of 11219 indicate strong compile and script execution performance. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 16 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses in large codebases. The data supports this as a capable development machine for most non-monolithic projects.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 2740 in PassMark and the 35 W TDP make this efficient for document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet workloads. The Radeon 660M integrated graphics provide a fallback for display output, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory ensures smooth multitasking. This scenario benefits from the low power draw and adequate responsiveness, though the 6-core CPU is overkill for basic tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile BGA socket, meaning the processor is soldered and not user-replaceable. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, so upgrading RAM capacity is possible but limited by the laptop’s design. ECC memory is not supported.

PCIe connectivity includes Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a dedicated GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The GPU itself uses PCIe 5.0 x16, though in a laptop this is typically a direct connection rather than a user-accessible slot. The CPU’s TDP of 35 W and GPU TDP of 50 W combine for a modest total power draw, which means the system’s power supply is not likely a limiting factor for upgrades. There is no suggested PSU listed, but the combined 85 W of CPU and GPU TDP is low for laptop standards.

A sensible next upgrade path is limited by the mobile form factor. The GPU is also soldered (as is typical for laptops), so neither component can be swapped. Upgrades would focus on RAM capacity or storage, with the PCIe Gen 4 lanes supporting high-speed SSDs. For users seeking more performance, the only realistic path is a new laptop with a higher-tier CPU and GPU combination. The data shows this pairing is balanced enough that neither component is drastically over- or under-powered relative to the other.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a portable system with solid gaming and productivity performance. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and GPU’s 75th percentile place it above a majority of existing systems, making it suitable for gamers at 1080p resolution with high settings. The 8 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth support modern titles at medium-to-high presets, while the 36 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates, though the FP32 throughput of 13.13 TFLOPS is modest for heavy RT workloads.

Content creators working with 1080p video or 3D scenes will find the multi-thread score of 12342 (Cinebench R23) and GPU compute score of 8279 (PassMark) adequate for hobbyist or semi-professional work. Developers can leverage the 12 threads for faster builds, with the PassMark integer math score of 50800 indicating strong logic throughput. Students and office workers benefit from the low TDP and adequate single-thread performance, though the discrete GPU is unnecessary for their workloads.

Small business workstations that require occasional GPU acceleration (e.g., CAD, light rendering) would find this pairing capable, but the 8 GB VRAM and 50 W GPU TDP limit sustained professional workloads. The data supports a general-purpose laptop for mixed use rather than a specialized workstation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile terms, with the CPU at 73 and GPU at 75. This near parity suggests that in most gaming scenarios, neither component will be a severe bottleneck at 1080p. However, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1742 (Cinebench R23) is modest compared to high-end desktop parts, so in CPU-bound titles (e.g., simulation or strategy games), the processor may limit frame rates.

The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20355 is strong relative to its rivals, sitting 0.1% behind the RTX 3070 Ti and 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti. This indicates the GPU is the dominant component for gaming performance. Conversely, the CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, has an identical average score, meaning CPU performance is not exceptional but is competitive.

For multi-threaded workloads like rendering or video encoding, the CPU will likely be the limiting factor, as its 6 cores are fewer than typical desktop alternatives. The PassMark multi-thread score of 14520 is about 75% of a high-end 8-core desktop CPU, so heavy tasks will see CPU saturation. In mixed workloads, the balance is favorable: the GPU accelerates compute-heavy tasks while the CPU handles logic and I/O. The 35 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP mean thermal headroom is shared, so sustained loads may cause both to throttle slightly, but neither is drastically over-provisioned.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture (GB206 chip) using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. It features 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The GPU is equipped with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed. Base clock is 907 MHz with a boost clock of 1425 MHz. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 13.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), and a pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.2 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 20355, placing it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29928. The OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance. The nearest rival is the RTX 3070 Ti, which is 0.1% faster, while the RTX 2080 Ti is 0.5% slower. AMD’s RX 6800 is 0.6% faster, and the RX 6700 is 1.7% faster.

The 8 GB VRAM is a potential limitation for future titles at high textures, but the high bandwidth (384.0 GB/s) mitigates some of that pressure. The 36 RT cores allow ray tracing at playable settings, but the 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 means RT-heavy scenes will require DLSS or reduced settings. The 144 tensor cores support DLSS 4 (if available), which can boost frame rates significantly. For 1080p gaming, this GPU is well-suited, and it can handle 1440p in less demanding titles, but 4K is beyond its intended scope.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19364, placing it at the 73rd percentile. Its multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 12342 is 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i7-8700K and 0.7% lower than the Intel Core i7-10700F, while matching the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V. The single-core score of 1742 is lower than typical desktop parts, but the PassMark single-thread score of 2740 shows it is competitive with mid-range mobile CPUs.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29928, at the 75th percentile. Its PassMark G3D score of 20355 is slightly behind the RTX 3070 Ti (deltaPct -0.1) and ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti (deltaPct 0.5), but behind the RX 6800 (deltaPct -0.6) and RX 6700 (deltaPct -1.7). The combined percentile for the pairing is 74, indicating that this system outperforms roughly three-quarters of all benchmarked systems.

The data shows a balanced pairing: the GPU is marginally stronger in percentile terms, but the CPU is not a weak link in most gaming scenarios. For productivity, the CPU’s multi-thread performance (12342 in R23) is adequate but not exceptional, while the GPU’s compute score of 8279 (PassMark) supports accelerated workflows. The absence of measured FPS data means these are synthetic scores, but the percentile positions provide a reliable relative ranking.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with a 6 nm process.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and memory support?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19364, matching the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (deltaPct 0), 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-1345U, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-8700K, and 0.7% behind the Intel Core i7-10700F.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The GPU is at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29928 and a PassMark G3D score of 20355.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI features, with DirectX 12 Ultimate support.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile BGA socket, meaning it is soldered and not user-replaceable.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate figures below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20355 suggests strong performance in most titles. The GPU is 0.1% behind the RTX 3070 Ti, which historically delivers 60–100 FPS in triple-A games at 1080p ultra. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, frame rates are likely to exceed 144 FPS due to the CPU’s single-thread score of 1742 (Cinebench R23). The 8 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p ultra textures, but 1440p may require reduced settings in VRAM-heavy titles.

The CPU’s multi-thread score of 12342 (Cinebench R23) is not a bottleneck for most games, but in CPU-bound scenarios (e.g., large multiplayer battles), frame rates may drop below 60 FPS. The GPU’s 36 RT cores enable ray tracing at 1080p with DLSS enabled, but without DLSS, RT performance will be modest due to the 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. For competitive gaming, the pairing is well-suited; for 4K, it is not recommended. The combined percentile of 74 supports the expectation of a smooth 1080p gaming experience at high settings.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing (buildClass: laptop) combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3+ part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 chip with 8 GB GDDR7 memory and a 50 W TDP. The combined percentile is 74, placing it above the majority of systems in the database.

The CPU’s 73rd percentile and GPU’s 75th percentile indicate a balanced configuration where neither component is drastically mismatched. The CPU’s nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (deltaPct 0), while the GPU’s nearest rival is the RTX 3070 Ti (deltaPct -0.1). This pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming, content creation, and general productivity in a mobile form factor, with the data suggesting it outperforms most existing laptops but falls short of high-end desktop or HX-series mobile alternatives. The overall tier is mid-to-upper range, with the GPU providing the stronger performance contribution in gaming and the CPU handling multi-threaded tasks efficiently within its power envelope.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds