SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

81 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
68%
VS
GPU
95%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U

2,046 Benchmark Score
Top 32% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a low-power, efficiency-focused AMD mobile processor with NVIDIA’s flagship-class laptop GPU. The result is a system with a stark performance imbalance, where the graphics card vastly outclasses the CPU in raw compute capability. The data indicates a laptop designed for GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming and 3D rendering, but one where the processor will consistently be the limiting factor in CPU-light scenarios. This analysis relies solely on the benchmark scores and specifications provided.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, which uses the AMD Socket FT6. This is a mobile-focused socket, meaning the upgrade path is essentially non-existent in the traditional desktop sense; the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. The processor supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a total bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. For storage and expansion, the CPU provides a PCIe Gen 3 interface with 4 lanes, which is a modest allocation for a modern laptop, potentially limiting the speed of the fastest NVMe SSDs available.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, in contrast, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. This high-bandwidth connection is standard for a top-tier GPU, but the CPU's limited Gen 3 lanes mean any data passing through the CPU is bottlenecked. The GPU has a TDP of 110 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 15 W. The combined power envelope of roughly 125 W means a laptop with this configuration requires a substantial cooling solution and a high-capacity power adapter, but the FACT PACK does not specify a suggested PSU wattage. A sensible next upgrade for a user of this system would be an external GPU enclosure, but the CPU's PCIe Gen 3 x4 link would severely constrain the RTX 4080 Mobile's performance, making that path impractical. Realistically, the entire laptop is the upgrade; the platform offers no meaningful component-level improvements beyond perhaps swapping the SSD for a larger Gen 3 model.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a fundamental performance gulf between the two core components. The AMD Ryzen 5 7520U has an average benchmark score of 2046, placing it in the 45th percentile of all CPUs. This places it in the mid-range tier for processors. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Intel Core i7-7820HK, both with an average score of 2048. The deltaPct for these rivals is -0.1%, meaning the Ryzen 5 is essentially tied with them, performing 0.1% below their scores. It is also 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-7700T. This is a tight cluster of performance, indicating the CPU is competitive with older, higher-power desktop and mobile parts but sits firmly in the mid-range.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, on the other hand, has an average benchmark score of 38135, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. This is a high-end position. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 with an average score of 38299, a deltaPct of -0.4%, meaning the RTX 4080 Mobile is 0.4% slower than this rival in this aggregate metric. It is also 0.6% slower than the RTX 5080 Mobile (score 38349) and 1.3% faster than both the desktop RTX 4070 (score 37648) and the Tesla P4 (score 37628). The combined percentile for this system is 63, which is pulled down significantly by the CPU's lower standing. The data shows a system with a top-tier GPU paired with a mid-tier CPU, leading to a combined profile that is better than average but not elite.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Mendocino. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 100 mm². The base clock is 2.80 GHz, and it boosts up to 4.30 GHz. It has a 4 MB shared L3 cache, with 512 KB of L2 and 64 KB of L1 per core. The CPU's benchmark scores are consistent with its mid-range positioning. In Cinebench R23, it scores 5149 in multi-core and 1171 in single-core. The multi-core score of 5149 translates to a performance level that is adequate for everyday productivity and light multi-threaded work, but it is far from class-leading. The single-core score of 1171 is modest, indicating that lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing or office applications will run fine, but the CPU will struggle to keep up with higher-end processors in such tasks.

In Geekbench, the CPU scores 3766 in multi-core and 1185 in single-core. The 45th percentile ranking confirms this positioning: it is neither a high-performance part nor a low-end one. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-7820HK, is a 45W mobile chip from a previous generation, and the Ryzen 5 7520U matches it at a 15W TDP. This highlights the efficiency of the Zen 2 architecture on the 6nm node, but it also underscores the performance ceiling. For real workloads, this CPU is best suited for compiling small projects, running multiple productivity applications simultaneously, and handling light video encoding, but it will be a significant bottleneck for tasks that scale with core count, such as high-fidelity 3D rendering or complex data analysis.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data is available for this specific CPU+GPU combination. The database contains no rows for `measuredFpsUltraByGame` for this build. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the relative benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct measurement.

Based on the GPU's high benchmark scores and the CPU's mid-range scores, this system is expected to be an excellent high-resolution gaming machine. The RTX 4080 Mobile's performance, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, suggests it can handle demanding titles at 1440p and 4K with high or ultra settings. However, the Ryzen 5 7520U's 45th percentile standing will be the limiting factor. In games that are heavily reliant on single-core CPU performance, the frame rate will be capped by the CPU's ability to process game logic and physics. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1171 is a clear indicator that it will not be able to feed the GPU enough data in fast-paced, CPU-intensive games like esports titles. In such scenarios, players may see lower frame rates than the GPU is capable of producing, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck. At 4K, the GPU workload is much higher, so the CPU bottleneck will be less pronounced, and the system will deliver a more consistent experience. The estimates suggest a system that is superb for visually rich, single-player AAA games at high resolutions, but one that underperforms in high-refresh-rate competitive gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies a severe bottleneck imbalance in this system. The GPU's average benchmark score of 38135 is over 18 times higher than the CPU's average score of 2046. This is a massive disparity. The GPU is in the 81st percentile, while the CPU is in the 45th percentile. In any workload, the CPU will be the limiting component.

This is most evident in gaming. The RTX 4080 Mobile can render frames far faster than the Ryzen 5 7520U can issue draw calls and process game state. The FPS scaling will be non-linear: at 1080p, the CPU bottleneck will severely limit FPS, making the high-end GPU wasteful. As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU's rendering time increases, giving the CPU more time to catch up, so the bottleneck shifts and the system becomes more balanced. The performance will still be GPU-bound at 4K, but the CPU will prevent the system from ever reaching its full potential. In productivity applications, the same logic applies. For tasks like video editing, the GPU can accelerate effects and rendering, but the CPU will be the primary processor for the timeline and codecs, limiting overall throughput. The 63rd combined percentile is a direct result of the CPU dragging down the GPU's high standing. This is a build where the GPU is the clear star, but the CPU is a significant performance anchor.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 5 7520U?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7520U has an average benchmark score of 2046, placing it in the 45th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-7820HK?

A: The Ryzen 5 7520U and the Intel Core i7-7820HK have nearly identical average scores (2046 vs. 2048 respectively). The Ryzen 5's deltaPct is -0.1%, meaning it performs 0.1% below the Intel part.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38135.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 Mobile faster than the desktop RTX 4070?

A: Yes. The RTX 4080 Mobile has an average score of 38135, which is 1.3% higher than the desktop RTX 4070's average score of 37648.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, using 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 63.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 5 7520U does not support ECC memory.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets a very specific user: one who prioritizes GPU compute and high-resolution graphics above all else, while accepting a mid-tier CPU. It is ideal for gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolution with settings set to high or ultra, as the RTX 4080 Mobile's 81st percentile performance will shine in these scenarios. The 12 GB of VRAM is well-suited for high-resolution textures. For content creators, the system is a strong fit for 3D rendering in applications that leverage the GPU's CUDA cores and RT cores, where the render time will be dominated by the GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. Video editors working with 4K footage will benefit from the GPU's hardware encoders and decoders.

However, the Ryzen 5 7520U's 45th percentile CPU performance makes this a poor choice for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running complex simulations, or anyone doing heavy multi-threaded CPU work. The 4-core, 8-thread processor with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5149 will be a bottleneck. Students who need a machine for general coursework, web browsing, and light productivity will find the CPU adequate, but the high-end GPU is unnecessary for such tasks. Small business workstations that rely on single-threaded application performance will not see a benefit from this pairing. This is a system for users who know their primary workload is GPU-bound and are willing to tolerate a CPU that is several tiers below the GPU in performance.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7520U with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. It represents a maximal imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The GPU is a high-end mobile part, ranking in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is a mid-range, low-power part in the 45th percentile. The overall system percentile is 63, reflecting the CPU's drag on the GPU's capabilities. This is not a balanced workstation or a high-refresh-rate gaming machine; it is a specialized tool for GPU-intensive workloads where the CPU is not the primary execution engine. The architecture is a mix of AMD's efficiency-focused Zen 2 (Mendocino) and NVIDIA's high-performance Ada Lovelace, creating a system that is either overkill for CPU tasks or underpowered for GPU tasks, depending on the workload.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the dominant component. It is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 294 mm² and 35,800 million transistors. The GPU has 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. It features 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The boost clock is 1665 MHz, and the memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a formidable rendering engine. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 159575, and the Vulkan score is 145807. In the Passmark suite, the G3D score is 24926, while the G2D score is 929. The GPU's compute performance is highlighted by a Passmark GPU Compute score of 11191. The FP32 performance is 24.72 TFLOPS, and the pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s. These figures indicate the GPU is capable of handling complex 3D scenes and high-resolution textures. The 81st percentile ranking places it above the vast majority of GPUs. Its 1.3% performance advantage over the desktop RTX 4070 is notable, showing it is a top-tier part. This is a GPU that can handle demanding 4K gaming and professional 3D rendering, though its performance will be capped by the CPU in many real-world applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is a poor fit. The RTX 4080 Mobile can generate very high frame rates, but the Ryzen 5 7520U's 45th percentile CPU performance and single-core score of 1171 in Cinebench R23 will limit FPS in most titles. The system will be CPU-bound at lower resolutions, preventing the GPU from reaching its potential.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder can handle the video encoding side of streaming with minimal performance impact, but the CPU will struggle to handle the game logic and the streaming software simultaneously. The 4-core CPU will likely cause dropped frames or stuttering in CPU-intensive games while streaming.

Video Editing: This is a viable scenario. The RTX 4080 Mobile's 12 GB VRAM and high compute throughput will accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering. However, the Ryzen 5 7520U will be the bottleneck when applying CPU-based effects or exporting timelines, making the process slower than it would be with a better CPU.

3D Rendering: This is the system's strongest use case. GPU-accelerated renderers will utilize the RTX 4080 Mobile's 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 power and 58 RT cores to produce final frames quickly. The CPU's slower multi-core score of 5149 in Cinebench R23 will have minimal impact on GPU-based render times.

Software Development: This is a poor fit. Compiling code is a multi-threaded CPU workload, and the Ryzen 5 7520U's 4 cores will result in long build times. The GPU offers no benefit for standard coding tasks.

Student and Office Work: This scenario is adequate but wasteful. The CPU is sufficient for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets, as evidenced by its 1185 Geekbench single-core score. The high-end GPU provides no benefit for these tasks, making the system an inefficient use of resources.