SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7520C + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

81 Score

Top 19% Ranking

81 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

68%

GPU

93%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7520C

2,127 Benchmark Score

Top 32% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile represent a highly unusual pairing in the laptop market: a low-power, efficiency-focused CPU paired with a high-performance discrete GPU. The benchmark data shows a severe performance imbalance, with the GPU operating in a completely different performance tier than the CPU. This combination results in a system where the CPU is the definitive bottleneck in nearly all graphically intensive tasks, making it a niche configuration suited for specific workloads rather than a balanced gaming machine. The data clearly indicates that the RTX 4070 Mobile’s capabilities are substantially held back by the Ryzen 5 7520C’s limited processing power, particularly in CPU-bound scenarios.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the dominant component in this pairing, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, but the 128-bit bus width and 8 GB capacity may limit performance in heavy 4K texture scenarios. The GPU’s clock speeds are listed with a base of 1395 MHz and a boost of 1695 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). While these clocks are not the highest in the mobile 40-series lineup, the architecture’s efficiency compensates to a degree.

The RTX 4070 Mobile contains 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. More critically for modern workloads, it features 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, which are the dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. The FP32 compute performance is rated at 15.62 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). This level of compute power positions the GPU well for 3D rendering and creative workloads, but the benchmark scores provide the clearest picture of its real-world capabilities.

The benchmark results show the GPU’s Passmark G3D score is 19587, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (average score 27425, deltaPct 0%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (average score 27565, deltaPct -0.5%). This indicates that the RTX 4070 Mobile delivers desktop-class rasterization performance in a laptop form factor, rivaling some of the best GPUs from the previous generation. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 8399 shows strong compute capability, which is relevant for tasks beyond gaming, such as video encoding or scientific simulations.

For rendering, the GPU’s scores in Geekbench OpenCL (109197) and Vulkan (108367) are exceptionally high, suggesting that the RTX 4070 Mobile excels in API-agnostic compute tasks. The presence of 36 RT cores means ray-traced workloads will see a significant acceleration compared to non-RT GPUs, though the exact frame rates cannot be quantified from the provided data. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with the latest gaming features, including hardware ray tracing and variable rate shading. The texture rate of 244.1 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 81.36 GPixel/s are strong figures that support high-resolution texture filtering and fill rates, beneficial for both gaming and 3D rendering applications.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmark scores are modest, reflecting its low-power design. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 5 7520C scores 7355 in multi-core and 1038 in single-core. These scores place the CPU in the 46th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2127. For context, the CPU is virtually tied with the Intel Core i7-1160G7 (average score 2124, deltaPct 0.2%) and the Intel Atom C5125 (average score 2122, deltaPct 0.3%). It is slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (average score 2135, deltaPct -0.4%) and Intel Core i5-9400T (average score 2136, deltaPct -0.4%). This indicates that the CPU is competitive with mid-range mobile processors from a few generations ago, but it lacks the multi-core muscle of modern high-end laptop chips.

The GPU, in stark contrast, sits in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27435. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (average score 27425, deltaPct 0%), which is a desktop GPU known for excellent 1440p performance. The RTX 4070 Mobile also slightly outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (average score 27565, deltaPct -0.5%) in this average score metric, though the delta is within noise. This places the GPU in the top quarter of all GPUs, making it a high-end component suitable for demanding gaming and rendering workloads.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU is in the 46th percentile, a mid-range result, while the GPU is in the 73rd percentile, a high-end result. The combined percentile for the system is 60, which reflects the overall performance level but masks the significant gap between the two components. In practical terms, the RTX 4070 Mobile is capable of pushing high frame rates at 1440p in most games, but the Ryzen 5 7520C will struggle to feed it data in CPU-intensive titles, leading to inconsistent performance. The data shows that this is not a balanced pairing; the GPU is severely underutilized in many scenarios due to the CPU’s limitations. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all FPS discussion must be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What are the key specifications of the AMD Ryzen 5 7520C CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture (codename Mendocino). It has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a TDP of 15 W. It features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the RTX 4070 Mobile’s performance relative to desktop GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 27435, which is essentially identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct 0%) and slightly higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (deltaPct -0.5%). This indicates it delivers desktop-class performance from a previous generation.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 Mobile support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and includes 36 dedicated RT cores. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware ray tracing features. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 and Vulkan score of 108367 suggest strong compute performance for these workloads.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile and what does that mean?

A: The Ryzen 5 7520C is in the 46th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2127. This places it in the middle of the pack, meaning it is outperformed by a majority of CPUs but is not a low-end part. It is comparable to the Intel Core i7-1160G7, which has a deltaPct of 0.2%.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile has a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with an effective data rate of 16 Gbps.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The Ryzen 5 7520C has 4 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a relatively modest amount for a modern CPU, which contributes to its mid-range benchmark scores.

Q: What is the socket and platform for this CPU?

A: The Ryzen 5 7520C uses the AMD Socket FT6 and supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s. It also has an integrated Radeon 610M GPU, though the system relies primarily on the discrete RTX 4070 Mobile.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance data clearly identifies the CPU as the primary bottleneck in this system. The Ryzen 5 7520C’s 46th percentile ranking, with an average score of 2127, is drastically lower than the GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking, with an average score of 27435. This 27-percentage-point gap in percentiles indicates a fundamental mismatch in processing capability. In GPU-bound workloads, such as high-resolution gaming with maxed-out settings, the RTX 4070 Mobile will operate at near-full capacity, and the CPU may be able to keep up in less demanding scenarios. However, in CPU-bound workloads, such as competitive shooters at lower resolutions or games with heavy physics simulation, the CPU will be the limiting factor, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential.

The benchmark scores support this analysis. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7355 for the CPU is modest compared to modern high-end laptop processors, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19587 is exceptional. In a balanced system, one would expect the CPU percentile to be closer to the GPU percentile. Here, the gap is severe. For example, in a game that relies heavily on single-threaded performance, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1038 may cause frame rate dips, even if the GPU could theoretically render more frames. The estimated FPS scaling from the scores suggests that the GPU will be underutilized in many scenarios, with the CPU capping performance at a level far below what the GPU can deliver.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination reinforces the idea that this pairing is unusual and not optimized for gaming. The combined percentile of 60 is a weighted average that obscures the imbalance. For workloads like 3D rendering, where the GPU does most of the heavy lifting, the system will perform admirably, as the RTX 4070 Mobile’s compute power (15.62 TFLOPS) will dominate. For general productivity or gaming, the CPU will be the bottleneck, leading to stutter and lower average frame rates than the GPU alone could achieve. The data suggests that any workload that requires significant CPU processing alongside GPU acceleration will be limited by the Ryzen 5 7520C.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 2 architecture with the Mendocino codename. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 100 mm². The base clock is 2.80 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.30 GHz, which are reasonable for a 15 W TDP part. The CPU supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s, which is adequate for its class. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores for the CPU are modest but consistent with its specifications. In Cinebench R15, it scores 741 in multi-core and 104 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 3089 multi-core and 435 single-core. In Cinebench R23, the scores are 7355 multi-core and 1038 single-core. These numbers indicate that the CPU is capable of handling everyday tasks and light productivity work, but it is not designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The average benchmark score of 2127 places it in the 46th percentile, meaning it is a mid-range processor that performs comparably to the Intel Core i7-1160G7 (deltaPct 0.2%) and slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (deltaPct -0.4%).

For real workloads, this CPU is best suited for office applications, web browsing, and light coding. The 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for basic multitasking, but they will struggle with demanding applications that scale across many cores. The single-core performance, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 score of 1038, is adequate for general use but not exceptional for gaming. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 610M GPU is present, but it is far less powerful than the discrete RTX 4070 Mobile, and the system will rely on the latter for graphics. The low TDP of 15 W is a double-edged sword: it allows for efficient operation and longer battery life, but it also limits sustained performance under load, as the CPU may throttle to maintain thermal and power limits.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The upgrade path for this system is constrained by the laptop form factor and the specific platform choices. The CPU uses the AMD Socket FT6, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is likely soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. The memory support is limited to dual-channel LPDDR5 with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s, and since it is LPDDR5, it is also likely soldered, preventing user upgrades. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 4 lanes, which is a significant limitation for connecting high-speed storage or external GPUs, but the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is a separate connection from the CPU’s PCIe lanes.

The RTX 4070 Mobile has a TDP of 115 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 15 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 130 W. The FACT PACK does not specify a suggested PSU for this mobile configuration, but a laptop power adapter must supply at least this amount, plus overhead for other components. The GPU uses no external power connectors, as it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) in terms of slot width, meaning it is soldered to the board. This makes upgrading the GPU impossible.

Given these constraints, a sensible next upgrade is not about swapping components but rather about maximizing the existing hardware. The most impactful upgrade would be to ensure the system has sufficient RAM, though the LPDDR5 memory is likely fixed. Users could consider external storage via the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface available to the GPU, but this is not a standard upgrade path. For a user looking to improve performance, the only practical option is to upgrade the entire laptop, as neither the CPU nor GPU can be replaced. The platform’s lack of upgradeability means that prospective buyers should consider their long-term needs carefully, as this configuration is a sealed unit.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 4070 Mobile is capable of high-refresh gaming, but the CPU will limit frame rates. The GPU’s 73rd percentile score suggests it can handle 1080p and 1440p at high settings, but the CPU’s 46th percentile and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1038 indicate that frame rates will be inconsistent in CPU-intensive titles. Estimated FPS would be high in GPU-bound games but lower in e-sports titles that depend on single-thread performance.

Streaming: Streaming requires both CPU and GPU resources. The CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for encoding at moderate bitrates, but the GPU’s NVENC encoder (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) can offload this task. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19587 ensures that gaming performance remains solid while streaming, but the CPU may cause encoding hiccups if the game is also CPU-bound.

Video Editing: Video editing benefits from GPU acceleration, and the RTX 4070 Mobile excels here. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 and Vulkan score of 108367 indicate strong compute performance for effects and rendering. However, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7355 is low for timeline scrubbing and export tasks, making 4K editing a challenge. The system is suitable for 1080p editing but not for professional 4K workflows.

3D Rendering: This is the strongest scenario for this pairing. The GPU’s 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 36 RT cores make it a capable renderer for both rasterization and ray tracing. The CPU’s low multi-core score means that CPU-based rendering (e.g., in Blender’s Cycles) will be slow, but GPU-based renderers will be fast. This is a viable system for 3D artists who rely on GPU-accelerated render engines.

Software Development: The CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads are adequate for compiling small to medium projects, but large codebases will see slowdowns. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 3089 indicates that compilation times will be moderate. The GPU is not a factor in most development tasks, but it helps with GPU-accelerated compute, such as running local machine learning models, due to its tensor cores.

Student and Office Work: This is a comfortable scenario for the CPU. The Ryzen 5 7520C’s 15 W TDP ensures long battery life, and its single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 1038) is sufficient for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but it does not hinder office productivity. The system is more than capable of handling everyday tasks with ease.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a low-power, efficiency-focused CPU with a high-performance discrete GPU. The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C is a 4-core, 8-thread processor with a 15 W TDP, designed for thin-and-light notebooks where battery life is a priority. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a high-end mobile GPU with a 115 W TDP, designed for gaming and creative work. The combination is unusual because the CPU is from the budget/mid-range segment, while the GPU is from the high-end segment.

The overall tier of this system is defined by the combined percentile of 60. This places the system in the upper-middle range of all laptop configurations, but the individual components are far apart. The GPU’s 73rd percentile makes it a top-tier component, capable of rivaling desktop GPUs like the RTX 3090. The CPU’s 46th percentile is a mid-range result, comparable to older ultrabook processors. This means the system is not a top-tier gaming laptop because the CPU holds it back, but it is also not a budget system because the GPU is so powerful. It occupies a strange niche: a laptop with gaming-grade graphics but an entry-level processor.

The build’s performance is heavily skewed toward GPU-accelerated workloads. For tasks like 3D rendering or machine learning, the system will perform exceptionally well. For traditional gaming, the experience will be inconsistent. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination highlights that this is not a mainstream configuration, and potential buyers should be aware of the imbalance. The system is best described as a "GPU-first" laptop, where the graphics card is the star and the CPU is a supporting actor that may not always keep up.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This configuration is not recommended for gamers seeking a balanced high-refresh experience. The CPU’s 46th percentile and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1038 will bottleneck the GPU in many titles, leading to frame rates well below what the RTX 4070 Mobile can deliver. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who play GPU-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing will see good performance, but those who play competitive shooters like Counter-Strike will be disappointed. This is a system for gamers who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rates.

Content creators and 3D artists are the primary target users. The GPU’s 73rd percentile and high compute scores (OpenCL 109197, Vulkan 108367) make it a powerful tool for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or DaVinci Resolve. The 8 GB of VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p projects. The CPU’s low multi-core score (Cinebench R23 7355) means CPU-based tasks will be slower, but GPU-centric workflows will benefit greatly.

Software developers who work with GPU-accelerated computing, such as training small machine learning models or running CUDA workloads, will find value in the RTX 4070 Mobile’s tensor cores and 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 performance. However, developers who compile large codebases will be hindered by the CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads. Students and office workers will not need this much GPU power, but the system will handle their tasks without issue, thanks to the CPU’s adequate single-core performance and low 15 W TDP, which promotes battery life. Small business workstations that need high-end graphics for tasks like CAD or video editing could benefit, provided the software is GPU-accelerated. Overall, this is a niche product for users who need serious GPU power but can tolerate a modest CPU.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7520C + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7520C

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds