SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D

44,573 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines AMD’s 6-core Ryzen 5 7500X3D with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 3070, a desktop configuration that lands in the 75th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations. The processor is built on the 5 nm Zen 4 Raphael architecture, while the graphics card uses the 8 nm Ampere GA104 chip. Together, they deliver a balanced 1080p and 1440p gaming experience, with the 96 MB of L3 cache on the CPU providing a strong foundation for frame pacing. The data shows a measured average of 132.4 FPS across the tested game suite, placing this build 1609th out of 3732 pairs. The RTX 3070, with its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, is the primary driver for high-resolution workloads, while the CPU’s 65 W TDP keeps power demands modest. This is a system that prioritizes frame rate consistency over raw multi-core throughput, making it a practical choice for gamers who favor esports titles and mainstream AAA releases.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The build ranks in the 75th percentile of all CPU+GPU pairs, with an average measured FPS of 132.4 across the tested games, placing it 1609th out of 3732 pairs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500X3D compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44573, which is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (score 44466) and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13950HX (score 44342). It trails the Intel Core i5-14600 by 0.7% (score 44889).

Q: What is the RTX 3070’s standing relative to other GPUs?

A: The GPU holds the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17208. It is 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (score 17083) and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (score 17037), but 1.5% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (score 17468).

Q: What memory type and capacity does the RTX 3070 use?

A: The GPU comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, which is a key factor for its 1440p and 4K performance in the measured titles.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7500X3D supports ECC memory and offers dual-channel DDR5 support with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, which is relevant for workstation-style tasks.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for each component?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a launch MSRP of $269, and the RTX 3070 has a launch MSRP of 499 USD. These are the only pricing details available in the data.

Q: Is the measured FPS data for games real or estimated?

A: The data is measured, not estimated. The `dataIsMeasured` field is true, meaning the FPS figures for the listed games at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions are based on actual benchmark runs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU present a split personality in synthetic benchmarks. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D achieves an average benchmark score of 44573, sitting at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, placing it just 0.2% above the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and 0.5% above the Intel Core i9-13950HX, while being 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385. The Intel Core i5-14600 edges it out by 0.7%, but the margin is negligible in real-world terms. For the GPU, the RTX 3070’s average score of 17208 places it at the 61st percentile, which is notably lower than the CPU’s standing. The gap is small against rivals—0.7% ahead of the RX 7600 XT and 1% ahead of the GTX 690—but the 1.5% deficit to the Tesla K40c shows that the GPU is not a top-tier part by current standards.

Looking at specific CPU benchmarks, the 7500X3D shows its strengths. The single-thread score of 3494 is respectable, while the multithread score of 25047 indicates solid parallel performance for a 6-core part. The floating-point math score of 43594 and integer math score of 70774 are consistent with a modern Zen 4 design. The data encryption score of 15797 and extended instructions score of 20455 suggest adequate throughput for security-focused tasks. The passmark physics score of 2779 is on the lower end, which may reflect the lower clock speeds typical of X3D parts. The GPU’s synthetic scores tell a different story: the Passmark G3D score of 22214 and G2D score of 1001 are moderate, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 is strong. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 85 indicate that the RTX 3070 is capable but not current-generation in the latest API workloads.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart in relative standing. The CPU’s 89th percentile versus the GPU’s 61st percentile means that in CPU-bound scenarios—like esports at low resolutions—the system will shine, but in GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions or with demanding graphics, the RTX 3070 will be the limiting factor. The average FPS of 132.4 across games supports this: it is high enough for smooth gameplay, but the variance between titles shows where the bottlenecks lie.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the 5 nm TSMC process with the Raphael codename. It has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, which is modest compared to non-X3D parts, but the key differentiator is the cache: 96 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core. This large L3 pool is designed to reduce memory latency in gaming workloads, and the benchmark scores reflect that focus. The passmark data compression score of 271649 and random string sorting score of 32999 show strong cache-sensitive performance, which often translates to smoother frame times in games.

The processor’s TDP is 65 W, making it an efficient part that does not require exotic cooling. It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC support, which is a bonus for small workstations. The integrated Radeon Graphics are present, but they are not intended for gaming; the RTX 3070 handles that. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes is future-proof for storage and other add-in cards. However, the multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not an option, which is typical for X3D parts to maintain thermal stability.

The nearest rival data puts the 7500X3D in a tight cluster. Being 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and 0.5% ahead of the i9-13950HX suggests that for multi-core productivity, it trades blows with high-end laptop-class chips, while the 0.7% deficit to the i5-14600 shows it is not the absolute leader in its segment. The real-world implication is that the CPU will not bottleneck a mid-range GPU like the RTX 3070 in most scenarios. For tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the multithread score of 25047 indicates it can handle concurrent workloads, though it will not match higher-core-count parts. The single-thread score of 3494 is enough for snappy system responsiveness and older game engines that rely on single-core performance.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data paints a clear picture of this system’s gaming capabilities. At 1920x1080, the build excels in esports and lighter titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 461 FPS, Valorant reaches 439 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege posts 248 FPS. These numbers are far beyond the 144 Hz refresh rate of most monitors, making the system ideal for competitive play. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 209 FPS, and Roblox runs at 270 FPS. Even demanding titles like Call of Duty: Warzone manage 136 FPS, which is comfortably playable at high refresh rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the GPU’s influence. Valorant drops to 408 FPS, and CS:GO falls to 317 FPS, still excellent. Warzone holds at 121 FPS, and Overpower posts 75 FPS. More graphically intensive games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 46 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 42 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth play. The 1440p results indicate that the RTX 3070 is the limiting factor in AAA titles, but for competitive shooters, the CPU’s cache keeps frame rates high.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles with modern AAA games. Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2 both drop to 30 FPS and 28 FPS respectively, which is playable but not ideal. Warzone is a standout at 103 FPS, and Valorant still manages 326 FPS, showing that lighter titles scale well. However, Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 10 FPS, and The Medium is at 29 FPS, indicating that 4K is only viable for less demanding games or with reduced settings. The average FPS of 132.4 across all games and resolutions suggests that the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a bonus for esports titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the processor. The CPU’s 89th percentile versus the GPU’s 61st percentile means that the RTX 3070 is the bottleneck in most GPU-intensive workloads. Evidence from the FPS scaling supports this: in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 62 FPS at 1080p to 46 FPS at 1440p and 30 FPS at 4K, a clear sign that the GPU is running out of memory bandwidth and compute power. Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 goes from 56 FPS at 1080p to 28 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU’s limits.

Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios, the system shows its strength. In Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 209 FPS at 1080p to 77 FPS at 4K, but the 1080p result is high enough that the GPU is not the primary limiter. The same applies to Valorant, where the 439 FPS at 1080p and 326 FPS at 4K are both far above what the GPU would produce in a CPU-limited system. The CPU’s 96 MB L3 cache helps in titles like Rust and Fivem, where the 1080p scores of 80 FPS and 105 FPS respectively are respectable, but the drop to 32 FPS and 38 FPS at 4K shows the GPU taking over as the limiting factor.

The practical bottleneck analysis is simple: at 1080p, the CPU enables high frame rates in esports, but in AAA games, the GPU caps performance at around 60-90 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU is almost always the limiting factor, and at 4K, the GPU is severely strained. For users who want to push high refresh rates in competitive titles, the CPU is more than sufficient. For those who prefer visually demanding single-player games, the GPU will need to be upgraded first to see significant gains.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p and 1440p high-refresh-rate play. The measured 461 FPS in CS:GO and 439 FPS in Valorant at 1080p make it an excellent choice for esports enthusiasts who need every frame advantage. At 1440p, the system still delivers 317 FPS in CS:GO and 408 FPS in Valorant, ensuring that a 240 Hz monitor is fully utilized. For casual gamers, the 100 FPS in Fortnite and 97 FPS in Palworld at 1080p are smooth, and the 64 FPS in both at 1440p is acceptable.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s multithread score of 25047 and floating-point score of 43594 sufficient for occasional workloads, but the 6-core limit means longer render times compared to higher-core parts. Small business workstations that run office applications, web development, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU’s single-thread score of 3494 and ECC memory support, making it a stable platform for long-running tasks. Students building a versatile machine for gaming and coursework will find the balance adequate, with the CPU excelling in compilation tasks and the GPU handling video playback and light editing. However, for professional 4K video editing or complex 3D simulations, the GPU’s 8 GB memory and the CPU’s core count will be limiting.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this system delivers over 200 FPS in CS:GO, Valorant, and Roblox, making it ideal for competitive shooters. The 136 FPS in Warzone and 124 FPS in Assetto Corsa also provide a smooth experience on 144 Hz monitors.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and multithread score of 25047 can handle encoding at moderate bitrates, while the GPU’s NVENC (inferred from the Ampere architecture) offloads the work. The 461 FPS headroom in CS:GO means streaming won’t push frame rates below playable levels.

Video Editing: The CPU’s integer math score of 70774 and floating-point score of 43594 support timeline editing and effects, but the 8 GB GPU memory may limit 4K previews. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large files, but export times will be moderate.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s passmark physics score of 2779 is low, and the multithread score of 25047 is not high enough for professional rendering. The GPU’s 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate CUDA-based renderers, but the 8 GB memory limits scene complexity.

Software Development: The single-thread score of 3494 and data compression score of 271649 make code compilation and database tasks responsive. The 96 MB L3 cache reduces latency in repeated builds, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 65 W TDP keeps power costs low, and the integrated graphics provide a fallback if the GPU fails. The 439 FPS in Valorant and 270 FPS in Roblox mean students can game without compromising productivity software performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The CPU is a 7000-series part on the AM5 socket, using the Zen 4 architecture and 5 nm process. The GPU is from the 30-series Ampere lineup, built on an 8 nm Samsung process. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all builds, with the CPU’s 89th percentile being the standout feature. The RTX 3070’s 61st percentile is average by current standards, but the pair works well together for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

The CPU’s 96 MB L3 cache is the defining characteristic, providing a significant boost in cache-sensitive games. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but it is a limiting factor at 4K. The build’s average FPS of 132.4 across the tested games is strong, but the range from 10 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended to 461 FPS in CS:GO shows that expectations must be set by the game in question. This is not a high-end enthusiast build, but it is a competent mid-range system that excels in specific workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path. The CPU supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, so newer storage and graphics cards will work without changing the motherboard. The 65 W TDP means that the current power delivery is sufficient, and the 550 W suggested PSU for the GPU leaves headroom for most upgrades. However, the CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option; users must rely on the stock performance.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the primary candidate. The RTX 3070’s 8 GB memory is the limiting factor in modern AAA titles, and moving to a GPU with more memory would improve 1440p and 4K performance. The CPU has room to grow with a higher-core-count AM5 processor, but the 7500X3D is not a bottleneck in most games, so a CPU upgrade would only benefit heavy multi-threaded workloads. The platform’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is adequate, but users could consider faster DDR5 kits if the motherboard supports them. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that future GPUs and NVMe drives will not be bottlenecked by the interface. Overall, the upgrade path is straightforward: replace the GPU first, then consider a CPU upgrade if productivity needs increase.