SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that sits at the 86th percentile overall, combining a mid-range Zen 4 processor with a high-end workstation GPU. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark scores provided, with no measured frame-rate data available for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from synthetic test results.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU features 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. Clock speeds range from a 1500 MHz base to a 2175 MHz boost, delivering 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and an identical 26.73 TFLOPS for FP16 with 1:1 ratio. The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s.

For ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. These hardware units are directly relevant to rendering tasks: the RT cores handle ray-traced geometry and lighting calculations, while the tensor cores accelerate denoising and DLSS-style upscaling. The benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842. The OpenCL figure, which is 8.3% higher than the Vulkan score, suggests strong general compute throughput that benefits OpenCL-based rendering engines. The Vulkan score indicates solid real-time graphics performance, though slightly lower than the compute-oriented OpenCL result.

The GPU's 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the top tier of available hardware. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230 with a deltaPct of 0, meaning the two are statistically identical in average benchmark score. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 trails by 0.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is 0.4% behind. This near-parity with the A10M suggests the RTX 4000 Ada Generation delivers workstation-class compute performance, but the 20 GB VRAM capacity is the distinguishing feature for large scene rendering, texture-heavy workloads, and multi-GPU offload scenarios.

The 360.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, while modest compared to higher-end cards, is sufficient for the 160-bit bus width. For rendering, the combination of 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores means ray-traced renders and AI-accelerated denoising tasks will execute efficiently. The single-slot design with a 245 mm length and 112 mm height makes it suitable for dense workstation builds, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups common in professional environments.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks reveal a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks while holding its own in multi-threaded workloads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F achieves a Geekbench single-core score of 2,374 and a multi-core score of 12,362. In Cinebench R23, it scores 3,218 single-core and 22,799 multi-core. The 3DMark tests show a progression from 974 single-thread to 6,376 with 16 threads and 6,379 at max threads, indicating effective scaling across its 6 cores and 12 threads. The Passmark suite shows 3,841 single-thread and 26,825 multithread scores, with notable sub-scores including 79,108 for integer math, 47,176 for floating point math, and 305,925 for data compression.

The CPU's 77th percentile among all CPUs places it in the upper-midrange tier. Its average benchmark score of 24,964 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-11850H at 24,935 (0.1% deltaPct), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F at 25,005 (-0.2% deltaPct), and the Intel Core i7-13620H at 24,911 (0.2% deltaPct). This clustering indicates the 7500F performs within a tight band of comparable processors, with no single rival having a meaningful advantage. The Intel Core 5 210H trails by 0.4% at 24,872.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 135,218 places it at the 95th percentile. Combined with the CPU's 77th percentile, the pairing achieves an 86th percentile overall rank. The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is the dominant performance component, with the CPU providing sufficient compute headroom to avoid becoming a severe bottleneck in most scenarios. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,218 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even lightly-threaded workloads will not lag behind the GPU's capabilities.

The deltaPct values between the CPU and its rivals are all within 0.4%, meaning the 7500F offers no meaningful performance difference versus its closest competitors. This is a mature, well-balanced mid-range processor that complements the high-end GPU without introducing a significant imbalance.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and the CPU's 77th percentile suggest this system can drive high-refresh monitors in most titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,218 in Cinebench R23 and 974 in 3DMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for high-FPS gaming. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 compute provides ample rasterization headroom for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh scenarios, though exact frame rates depend on the title.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a multi-thread score of 22,799 in Cinebench R23, provide enough parallel throughput for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The GPU's 192 tensor cores can offload encoding tasks via NVENC-class acceleration, though the exact streaming performance depends on encoder implementation. The 20 GB VRAM ensures no memory pressure when running game plus streaming software.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 305,925 and integer math score of 79,108 indicate strong performance for codec-heavy tasks like video transcoding and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP16 compute accelerates effects rendering and color grading. The 20 GB VRAM allows for large preview buffers and multi-layer compositing without spilling to system memory.

3D rendering: This is where the pairing shines. The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced renders and AI denoising. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 suggests excellent compute throughput for GPU renderers. The 20 GB VRAM accommodates complex scenes with high-resolution textures, and the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth keeps texture streaming efficient. The CPU's 22,799 multi-core score handles scene preparation and physics simulations adequately.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread performance (3,218 Cinebench R23) ensures fast compilation of single translation units, while the 12 threads (6,379 3DMark max threads) handle parallel builds. The Passmark extended instructions score of 22,776 indicates good SIMD throughput for vectorized code. The GPU's compute capability enables local CUDA-based testing and prototyping.

Student and office work: The CPU's 77th percentile ranking and the GPU's 95th percentile are overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the system handles them effortlessly. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,841 in Passmark ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the 20 GB VRAM is irrelevant for office workloads but harmless. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption modest during light use.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct frame-rate measurements.

Based on the GPU's 95th percentile ranking and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842, this system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The CPU's 77th percentile with a 3DMark single-thread score of 974 suggests it can keep up with the GPU's frame output in CPU-bound scenarios. At 4K, the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth become more relevant, and the system should maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles, though the 160-bit memory bus may limit ultra-high-resolution texture streaming.

The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, has an identical average score (0% deltaPct), so gaming performance should be comparable to that card. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 trails by 0.1%, meaning the RTX 4000 Ada Generation holds a slight edge. For esports titles with light GPU requirements, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,218 Cinebench R23) will be the limiting factor, likely capping frame rates well above 144 FPS. For AAA titles, the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 compute should provide high settings at 1440p with frame rates in the triple digits, though exact numbers cannot be stated without measured data.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system exhibits a clear GPU-heavy balance, with the GPU at the 95th percentile versus the CPU's 77th percentile. This 18-percentile-point gap indicates the GPU is the stronger component and will be the performance ceiling in GPU-bound workloads. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will limit frame rates in graphically intensive titles, while the CPU will limit in CPU-bound scenarios like physics-heavy games or high-FPS esports at low resolutions.

The CPU's multi-thread scaling shows diminishing returns after 8 threads: 3DMark scores are 5,372 at 8 threads and 6,376 at 16 threads, a 18.7% improvement. This suggests the 6-core/12-thread configuration is well-suited for gaming, where 8 threads are typically sufficient. The CPU's single-thread score of 974 (3DMark) and 3,218 (Cinebench R23) indicates it can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios, but in extreme low-resolution high-FPS situations, the CPU may become the bottleneck.

For rendering and compute workloads, the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 and 146,593 OpenCL score will dominate, making the CPU's role secondary. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 26,825 handles scene setup and data preparation, but the GPU will be the primary execution engine. The 20 GB VRAM ensures the GPU rarely needs to spill to system memory, reducing potential CPU-GPU data transfer bottlenecks.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s (DDR5 dual-channel) is sufficient for its 6-core design, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes (CPU only) provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 bus. No significant I/O bottleneck is evident from the data.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing targets users who need workstation-class GPU compute without sacrificing CPU responsiveness. Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit from the GPU's 95th percentile performance, with the CPU's 77th percentile ensuring no severe frame pacing issues. The 20 GB VRAM future-proofs for high-resolution textures and large game worlds.

Content creators working in 3D rendering, video editing, and AI-accelerated workflows are the primary audience. The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and denoising, while the 26.73 TFLOPS FP16 compute handles effects-heavy video editing. The CPU's 22,799 Cinebench R23 multi-core score supports parallel rendering pipelines.

Software developers, particularly those working with CUDA-based applications, will find the GPU's compute capability essential. The CPU's Passmark extended instructions score of 22,776 indicates strong SIMD performance for vectorized code, and the 6 cores handle typical build parallelism. Students in engineering and computer science fields benefit from the combination of CPU single-thread speed (3,218 Cinebench R23) and GPU compute for coursework.

Small business workstations requiring CAD, simulation, or data analysis capabilities will find the system adequate. The GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 supports professional applications, and the CPU's data compression score of 305,925 aids in database and file-heavy workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP keep the system manageable in office environments.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It operates at a 3.70 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The socket is AMD AM5, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only). The processor is unlocked for overclocking and has been in production since July 2023.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor with exceptional single-thread performance for its class. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,218 places it among the top-tier desktop CPUs, and the Passmark single-thread score of 3,841 confirms this. The 3DMark single-thread score of 974 is strong, indicating excellent per-core IPC from the Zen 4 architecture.

Multi-threaded performance scales well: the 3DMark scores increase from 1,902 at 2 threads to 6,376 at 16 threads, showing a 3.35x improvement from 2 to 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,799 represents a 7.09x scaling from the single-core score, which is reasonable for 6 cores with SMT. The Passmark multithread score of 26,825 is 6.98x the single-thread score, confirming consistent scaling.

For real workloads, the strong single-thread performance means snappy application launches, responsive UI interactions, and fast compilation of single-file code changes. The 12 threads handle parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D scene preprocessing, and multi-tasking without significant degradation. The 32 MB L3 cache is adequate for the 6-core design, reducing memory latency for frequently accessed data.

The nearest rival comparisons show the 7500F is statistically tied with the Intel Core i7-11850H, AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, Intel Core i7-13620H, and Intel Core 5 210H, with deltaPct values all within 0.4%. This means the 7500F offers no meaningful advantage or disadvantage versus these competitors in average benchmark scores, making the choice between them a matter of platform preference rather than performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,218 and a multi-core score of 22,799, representing a 7.09x scaling from single to multi-threaded workloads. The Passmark scores show 3,841 single-thread and 26,825 multithread, a 6.98x scaling.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 135,218. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230 with a 0% deltaPct, making them statistically identical. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 trails by 0.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is 0.4% behind.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC capability. It does not have integrated graphics.

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile is 86, with the CPU at the 77th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 95th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The GPU also uses a 5 nm TSMC process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core configuration?

A: The GPU includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, which accelerate ray-traced rendering and AI-based denoising respectively. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The build class is explicitly "desktop," confirming it is intended for stationary workstation or gaming use rather than mobile deployment. The overall tier is high, driven by the GPU's 95th percentile ranking and the CPU's 77th percentile, resulting in an 86th combined percentile.

The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 65 W TDP, representing a mainstream desktop offering. The GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace card with 20 GB VRAM, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores, representing a professional-grade compute solution. The pairing creates an asymmetric system where the GPU outperforms the CPU by 18 percentile points, making this a GPU-first build.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 24,964, and the GPU's average is 135,218. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, is within 0.1%, and the GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, is within 0%, indicating both components are well-positioned within their respective markets. This build sits at the 86th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms 86% of all systems in the benchmark database.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU operates at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 lanes. A future GPU upgrade to a PCIe 5.0 card would be supported by the CPU's lanes, though the current GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface does not require the extra bandwidth.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP combine for a total of 195 W of component power draw. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, which provides 105 W of headroom over the GPU's TDP alone. Combined with the CPU's 65 W, a 300 W PSU would have 105 W of remaining capacity for other components, which is tight but workable for a minimal system. A more sensible PSU would provide additional headroom for drives, fans, and future upgrades.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU is the limiting factor in this system. Upgrading to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU would improve multi-threaded performance, as the current 6-core/12-thread configuration scores 22,799 in Cinebench R23. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 95th percentile ranking mean it has substantial longevity, so the CPU is the more logical upgrade target. Alternatively, adding more system memory beyond the dual-channel DDR5 configuration would help memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads, though the current 83.2 GB/s is adequate for the CPU's 6-core design.

The platform's AM5 socket and PCIe Gen 5 support ensure that a future CPU upgrade would not require a motherboard change. The GPU's single-slot design and 245 mm length leave room for additional expansion cards. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support up to four monitors, and the 1x 16-pin power connector is standard for modern GPUs. The production status for both components is "Active," meaning they remain available for new builds and replacements.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds