SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename) using TSMC's 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, backed by a 65 W TDP. The chip carries 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache hierarchy, combined with the high boost clock, makes the processor particularly responsive in latency-sensitive workloads.

Benchmark data places this CPU at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964. In multi-threaded tests, the Ryzen 5 7500F delivers strong results: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 22799, while Cinebench R20 multicore reaches 9575 and Cinebench R15 multicore hits 2298. The 3DMark 16-thread test scores 6376, and the max-thread test scores 6379, showing near-linear scaling from 8 threads (5372) to 16 threads. This indicates the 12 threads are efficiently utilized, though the gains taper off after 8 threads due to the physical core count.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive. The 3DMark single-thread score of 974, Geekbench single-core score of 2374, and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218 all point to a processor that excels in lightly-threaded tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 3841 confirms this trend. For real-world workloads, this translates to snappy application launches, responsive spreadsheet calculations, and strong performance in games that rely on one or two primary threads.

The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths. Integer math scores 79108, floating-point math scores 47176, and extended instructions score 22776. Data compression scores 305925, while data encryption scores 17510. These numbers indicate solid performance in compression tools, encryption/decryption tasks, and scientific computing that leverages SIMD instructions. The find prime numbers test scores 199, and random string sorting scores 36191, both showing consistent throughput across varied task types.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7500F sits within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-13620H (deltaPct 0.2), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core 5 210H, and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F by only 0.2%. This clustering means the 7500F delivers performance essentially identical to these competitors in aggregate benchmarks, though the specific mix of single-thread and multi-thread scores may favor it in different scenarios. The processor's 5 nm process node and 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die indicate high efficiency per watt, a trait that shows in the 65 W TDP.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7500F uses AMD Socket AM5, the current mainstream desktop platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and the processor includes ECC memory support. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, offering substantial bandwidth for modern storage devices and expansion cards. This connectivity makes the AM5 platform future-ready for high-speed NVMe SSDs and next-generation GPUs.

With a 65 W TDP, the Ryzen 5 7500F is remarkably power-efficient, which gives builders flexibility in cooler selection and power supply sizing. The processor's modest thermal envelope means a capable air cooler suffices for stock operation, and even modest cooling solutions can handle the boost clocks. This efficiency also means the CPU places minimal strain on the power delivery system of the motherboard, allowing budget-friendly AM5 boards to run it without concern.

The GPU paired in this build, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, has a 160 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 450 W. Combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP, the total system power draw remains moderate, making a 450 W power supply adequate for the entire build. This headroom is comfortable for the stock configuration, though users adding multiple drives or many USB devices should consider a slightly larger unit. The Quadro RTX 4000 requires a single 8-pin power connector, simplifying cable management.

For future upgrades, the AM5 platform offers a clear path. The Ryzen 5 7500F's multiplier is unlocked, so enthusiasts can overclock to extract additional performance without changing hardware. More significantly, the platform supports newer Ryzen processors on the same socket, allowing a drop-in upgrade to higher-core-count chips when workloads demand more parallelism. The DDR5 memory support ensures the platform remains current, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for future GPUs and storage devices.

The sensible next upgrade for this build would be a higher-core-count AM5 processor for CPU-bound workloads, or a more powerful GPU for graphics-intensive tasks. The 450 W suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 4000 means a GPU upgrade would likely require a power supply upgrade as well, but the CPU socket and memory platform will remain relevant for several generations. The ECC memory support also makes this platform suitable for entry-level workstations where data integrity is critical.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pairing presents an interesting balance. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This 16-percentage-point gap suggests the processor is comparatively stronger than the graphics card, meaning the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads. The combined percentile for this pairing is 69, reflecting the overall system tier.

In CPU-bound tasks such as compilation, data processing, and productivity applications, the Ryzen 5 7500F will lead the system. Its 22799 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 26825 PassMark multithread score indicate strong throughput for parallel workloads. The GPU's 15117 PassMark G3D score and 6176 PassMark GPU compute score show it can handle compute tasks, but the CPU will generally finish CPU-centric jobs faster relative to its class.

In GPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and gaming at high resolutions, the Quadro RTX 4000 becomes the bottleneck. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking means it trails the CPU's 77th percentile, so graphics performance will cap the system's overall output in these scenarios. The GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are respectable but not class-leading, and the 8 GB GDDR6 memory may limit texture-heavy workloads.

FPS scaling in games would follow this pattern: at lower resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3218 Cinebench R23 single-core) would keep frame rates high, but the GPU would still constrain maximum FPS. At higher resolutions, the GPU's workload increases disproportionately, making the Quadro RTX 4000 the clear limiting factor. The CPU's 974 3DMark single-thread score and 3841 PassMark single-thread score suggest it can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU's 61st percentile means it cannot fully exploit the CPU's capabilities in graphics-heavy scenarios.

For mixed workloads, the balance shifts depending on the task. Data encryption (17510 PassMark), integer math (79108), and floating-point math (47176) are CPU-dominated and will perform at the 77th percentile level. GPU compute tasks like OpenCL (74540 Geekbench) and Vulkan (78844 Geekbench) will perform at the 61st percentile level. Users should match their primary workload to the stronger component: CPU-heavy tasks will shine, while GPU-heavy tasks will be adequate but not exceptional.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong CPU performance with professional-grade GPU features in a desktop form factor. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will benefit from the CPU's excellent single-thread performance, which delivers high frame rates in most titles, though the Quadro RTX 4000's 61st percentile ranking means ultra settings at 4K may strain the GPU. The 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for current games at mainstream resolutions, and the GPU's 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS capabilities.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, and graphic design will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance valuable. The 22799 Cinebench R23 multicore score accelerates rendering tasks, while the 305925 PassMark data compression score speeds up file archiving and project packaging. The GPU's professional Quadro drivers and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs plus USB Type-C support make it suitable for multi-monitor creative workstations. The GPU's 14.24 TFLOPS FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) supports AI-assisted creative tools.

Developers compiling code, running virtual machines, and working with containers will appreciate the 6 cores and 12 threads. The 12362 Geekbench multicore score and 26825 PassMark multithread score handle parallel build processes efficiently. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compilation jobs where memory errors could corrupt outputs. The 65 W TDP also means the system stays cool and quiet during extended development sessions.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the balance of CPU and GPU capabilities. The system handles office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and presentation creation with ease, while the GPU's compute capabilities support CAD, data visualization, and light rendering tasks. The single-slot GPU design and 241 mm length fit in compact workstation cases, and the 450 W suggested PSU keeps power requirements modest for office environments.

# Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 7500F achieves an average benchmark score of 24964, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, scores 24935 with a deltaPct of 0.1, making the two effectively identical in aggregate performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005 with a deltaPct of -0.2, meaning the 7500F trails by a negligible margin. The Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911 with a deltaPct of 0.2, and the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872 with a deltaPct of 0.4, both slightly behind.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 achieves an average benchmark score of 17789, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666 with a deltaPct of 0.7, putting the Quadro slightly ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17639 with a deltaPct of 0.9, and the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 with a deltaPct of 1.1. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 with a deltaPct of 1.4. This clustering shows the Quadro RTX 4000 performs within 1.4% of these rivals, though its professional feature set differentiates it from consumer cards.

Individual GPU benchmarks show specific strengths. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 indicates solid DirectX 12 gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL scores 74540 and Vulkan scores 78844, demonstrating strong compute throughput across APIs. PassMark G3D scores 15117, while GPU compute scores 6176. The DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 12 score of 52 in PassMark are lower, but the G2D score of 846 shows competent 2D performance.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The 77th percentile CPU paired with the 61st percentile GPU yields a combined percentile of 69. This means the system is well above average overall, with the CPU providing the stronger foundation. For users upgrading from older systems, this build represents a significant step up in both CPU and GPU performance, with the CPU delivering the more substantial improvement.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7500F support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to adjust clock speeds beyond the 5.00 GHz boost clock for additional performance.

Q: What memory type does this build use?

A: The system uses DDR5 memory with dual-channel support and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported by the CPU.

Q: How much VRAM does the Quadro RTX 4000 have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The GPU has a suggested PSU of 450 W, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP. A 450 W power supply is sufficient for the stock configuration.

Q: Which component is stronger relative to its class?

A: The CPU is stronger, sitting at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Quadro RTX 4000 is end-of-life. Its predecessor is Quadro Volta, and its successor is Workstation Ampere.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Based on the CPU's 77th percentile ranking and the GPU's 61st percentile ranking, gaming performance at 1080p should be strong. The CPU's 974 3DMark single-thread score and 3218 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicate excellent frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 1873 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score suggests it can handle modern DirectX 12 titles at mainstream settings. At 1080p with high settings, most games should achieve smooth frame rates, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor in demanding titles.

At 1440p, the GPU's workload increases, and the 8 GB VRAM may become a constraint in texture-heavy games. The 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for most titles, but the 61st percentile GPU ranking means frame rates will be lower than a higher-tier graphics card. The CPU's strong single-thread performance will keep minimum frame rates stable, but the GPU will cap maximum FPS. Expect playable performance at high settings in most games, with reduced settings needed for the most demanding titles.

At 4K, the Quadro RTX 4000 will struggle. The 8 GB VRAM is below the 10-12 GB typically recommended for 4K gaming, and the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for 4K rendering. The GPU's 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores provide ray tracing and DLSS support, which can help maintain playable frame rates in supported titles. However, without measured data, these are estimates: users should expect to lower settings to medium or high at 4K, and DLSS will be essential for ray-traced games.

The CPU's 77th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution. Even at 1080p where CPU load is highest, the 5.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread scores (2374 Geekbench single-core, 3841 PassMark single-thread) ensure the processor can feed frames to the GPU efficiently. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking is the primary constraint on gaming performance, so users prioritizing high-refresh-rate gaming should consider a stronger GPU in this otherwise capable system.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F processor with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 graphics card. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part on the AM5 socket, while the GPU is a Turing-architecture professional card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The system sits at the 69th combined percentile, indicating above-average overall performance compared to other builds.

The CPU's 77th percentile ranking places it in the upper tier of processors, delivering strong single-thread and multi-thread performance for a wide range of tasks. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking places it in the mid-to-upper tier of graphics cards, providing competent gaming and professional graphics performance. The pairing is well-balanced for a general-purpose desktop, with the CPU providing the stronger foundation.

This build is best suited for users who need strong CPU performance for productivity, development, and content creation, with professional GPU features for workstation tasks. The Quadro RTX 4000's 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and USB Type-C support make it ideal for multi-monitor setups, while the single-slot design keeps the system compact. The 450 W suggested PSU and 65 W CPU TDP mean the system runs efficiently and quietly.

The build class is desktop, confirming it is intended for stationary use. The combination of a high-percentile CPU and mid-upper-percentile GPU creates a system that handles most workloads competently, though users with extreme graphics demands may want a stronger GPU. The AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path, making this a sensible foundation for future improvements.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Turing architecture, built on TSMC's 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, delivering 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 14.24 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory runs at 1625 MHz with 13 Gbps effective speed. This bandwidth is sufficient for professional workloads like 3D rendering, CAD, and video editing, though the 8 GB capacity may limit very large datasets or high-resolution textures. The pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s indicate solid rasterization throughput.

The GPU includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. These capabilities make the Quadro RTX 4000 suitable for real-time ray-traced visualization in professional applications and for AI-accelerated workflows. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 1873 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 74540 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 78844 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark G3D scores 15117, while GPU compute scores 6176. These results place the GPU at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17789. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666 with a deltaPct of 0.7, making the Quadro RTX 4000 slightly faster in aggregate.

The GPU's 160 W TDP requires a single 8-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. The single-slot design measures 241 mm in length and 111 mm in height, fitting in most desktop cases. Display outputs include 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C, supporting multi-monitor professional setups. The GPU is end-of-life, having been succeeded by Workstation Ampere, but its benchmark scores show it remains competitive with current mid-range cards.