SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a desktop pairing built around a 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA’s flagship GeForce RTX 5090 D. The data shows a system with a combined percentile of 85, placing it well above most tested configurations, yet the CPU’s average benchmark score of 24,964 puts it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 77,712 puts it in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. The result is a machine that is heavily GPU-bound in most scenarios, delivering exceptional frame rates at 4K but leaving performance on the table in CPU-limited titles. This analysis uses only measured scores and specifications from the provided data to explain what this pairing does well and where it falls short.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It runs with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and its 65 W TDP marks it as a highly efficient part for a desktop socket. The cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache, which is standard for a mainstream Zen 4 chip. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support, a feature that adds reliability for workstation tasks.

Benchmark results show a single-thread 3DMark score of 974, which is modest compared to the multi-thread score of 6,379, indicating that the chip’s strength lies in scaling across its cores rather than raw single-core dominance. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 22,799 against a single-core score of 3,218 reveals a roughly 7x scaling factor, which is typical for a 6-core part. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,841 and multi-thread score of 26,825 confirm this pattern: the CPU is competent in lightly threaded tasks but its real value appears in applications that can use all 12 threads. The Geekbench scores of 2,374 single-core and 12,362 multi-core align with this, showing a 5.2x multi-thread advantage over single-thread performance.

The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, has an average score of 24,935, which is just 0.1% lower than the 7500F’s 24,964. This means the 7500F effectively trades blows with a mobile H-series chip from an older generation, though the desktop part benefits from a much higher boost clock and lower TDP. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25,005, a 0.2% advantage, while the Intel Core i7-13620H and Core 5 210H are 0.2% and 0.4% behind, respectively. The 7500F’s 6-core configuration is a limiting factor in heavily threaded workloads like video rendering, where a 12-core chip would pull ahead, but for gaming and general productivity, the per-core performance is sufficient.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,575 indicates that the CPU can handle moderate rendering tasks without stalling, while the PassMark data compression score of 305,925 and encryption score of 17,510 show strong throughput for file archiving and security tasks. The physics score of 1,788 in PassMark is low, suggesting that game physics simulations may be a bottleneck in CPU-heavy titles. Overall, the 7500F is a capable mid-range desktop CPU that pairs well with high-end GPUs for gaming, but its 6-core limit means it is not the best choice for professional 8K video editing or complex 3D scene rendering.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture is defined by a stark contrast between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24,964 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 77,712 places it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. This 15-point percentile gap indicates that the GPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is, making the system an imbalanced pairing on paper.

Looking at specific GPU scores, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 14,326 is a strong indicator of modern DirectX 12 gaming performance, and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 310,674 shows robust compute capability for non-gaming workloads. The Vulkan score of 376,915 is even higher, suggesting excellent cross-API performance. The PassMark G3D score of 44,065 and GPU compute score of 28,396 reinforce the GPU’s dominance, though the DirectX 9 score of 434 and DirectX 10 score of 231 are lower, indicating that older APIs are not the primary strength of this architecture.

The combined percentile for the build is 85, and the average FPS across all measured games at ultra settings is 225.7. This places the pair at rank 59 out of 3,732 pairs, meaning it outperforms roughly 98.4% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations. However, the CPU’s percentile of 77 versus the GPU’s 92 shows that the GPU is doing most of the heavy lifting in achieving that rank. In games like Counter-Strike 2, the FPS at 1080p is 392, dropping to 260 at 1440p and 145 at 4K, which shows that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions but the GPU becomes the limiter as resolution increases. For Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops from 98 at 1080p to 86 at 1440p and 57 at 4K, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint even at 1080p in this demanding title.

The combined picture shows a system that excels at high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated compute, but the CPU’s lower percentile relative to the GPU means that in CPU-bound scenarios—like esports titles at 1080p—the system will not reach its theoretical maximum. For example, Valorant at 1080p hits 480 FPS, which is high, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 974 suggests that a faster CPU could push this higher. The data supports a verdict that this is a GPU-first build for 4K gaming and heavy graphics workloads, not a balanced all-rounder.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a dual-slot card based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. It has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s, which is among the highest available. The base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. The card has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features.

The GPU’s pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS and FP16 performance at the same 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1). These numbers indicate that the card is designed for massive parallel compute, far exceeding what any game requires at current resolutions. The 32 GB VRAM is particularly notable, as it allows for large texture packs and AI model training without spilling to system memory. The power draw is 575 W TDP, requiring a 950 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector, which is a substantial power requirement for any build.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 14,326 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a strong result for modern titles. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 310,674 and Vulkan score of 376,915 demonstrate that the card excels in both compute and gaming APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 44,065 is high, but the DirectX 9 score of 434 and DirectX 10 score of 231 are surprisingly low, suggesting that the architecture is optimized for newer APIs like DirectX 12 and Vulkan. The GPU compute score of 28,396 on PassMark is solid but not class-leading, which may reflect the test’s specific workload rather than the card’s true compute power.

The GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT, has an average score of 76,904, which is 1.1% lower than the 5090 D’s 77,712. This is an unusual comparison, as the 6650M XT is a mobile GPU, but the data shows that in aggregate benchmarks, the 5090 D is barely ahead. The RX 6850M XT scores 78,940, which is 1.6% higher, meaning the 5090 D is not the top performer in every benchmark. However, these comparisons are based on average scores across many tests, and in gaming-specific metrics like the Steel Nomad result, the 5090 D is clearly a high-end part. For rendering, the 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth make it suitable for 8K video editing and large 3D scenes, though the CPU may bottleneck in such workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 7500F and RTX 5090 D is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The CPU’s 77th percentile versus the GPU’s 92nd percentile creates a situation where the GPU is often waiting for the CPU to feed it data, especially at lower resolutions. Measured FPS data shows this clearly: in Counter-Strike 2, the FPS drops from 392 at 1080p to 260 at 1440p, a 33.7% decrease, which indicates that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p. At 4K, the FPS is 145, showing that the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. This pattern repeats across many titles: in Valorant, the FPS is 480 at 1080p, 455 at 1440p, and 422 at 4K, with only a 12% drop from 1080p to 4K, suggesting the CPU is the primary constraint even at 4K in this less demanding game.

In more GPU-heavy titles, the bottleneck shifts. Cyberpunk 2077 sees FPS of 98 at 1080p, 86 at 1440p, and 57 at 4K, with a 41.8% drop from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor. Red Dead Redemption 2 shows a similar trend: 105 FPS at 1080p, 79 at 1440p, and 52 at 4K, a 50.5% drop. The average FPS across all games is 225.7, but this number is skewed by esports titles like CS:GO (866 FPS at 1080p) and Roblox (507 FPS at 1080p), which are CPU-bound. For AAA games, the average is much lower, as seen in Ark: Survival Ascended (57 FPS at 1080p) and The Medium (82 FPS at 1080p).

The data shows that the CPU limits performance in fast-paced, low-complexity games, while the GPU limits performance in visually intense titles. For a balanced build, the CPU would need a higher single-thread score to match the GPU’s capabilities. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1,788 is particularly low, suggesting that game physics calculations may stutter in titles that rely heavily on CPU physics. The upgrade path would be to replace the 7500F with a higher-core-count or higher-clocked AM5 chip, as the socket supports it, but the current pairing is best suited for 4K gaming where the GPU is the primary driver.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize GPU performance above all else, specifically those gaming at 4K resolution or running GPU-accelerated workloads. The data shows that at 4K, the system delivers 56 FPS in Allods Online, 57 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077, and 52 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2, which are playable but not high-refresh rates. For 1440p gaming, the system excels, with 132 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 162 FPS in Assetto Corsa, making it ideal for high-refresh 1440p monitors. At 1080p, the CPU bottleneck becomes apparent, with only 98 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 105 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2, so esports players at 1080p would be better served by a faster CPU.

Content creators who work with large video files or 3D scenes will benefit from the 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, which allows for smooth editing of 8K footage or rendering complex scenes without memory constraints. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS makes it suitable for AI model training and scientific computing, though the CPU’s 6 cores may limit preprocessing tasks. Software developers who use GPU compute for machine learning will find the tensor cores valuable, but they would need to ensure their code is optimized for CUDA to take full advantage.

Students and small business workstations are less ideal fits, as the CPU’s 6 cores are sufficient for office tasks but the GPU’s power draw of 575 W and the need for a 950 W PSU make this an expensive and power-hungry system for basic productivity. The build is best suited for enthusiasts with a clear use case for high-end GPU performance, whether in gaming at 1440p or 4K, or in professional graphics work. The CPU’s low TDP of 65 W means the system can be cooled with a capable air cooler, but the GPU requires significant airflow, so a well-ventilated case is necessary.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1440p is the sweet spot for this pairing, with measured FPS of 392 in Counter-Strike 2, 480 in Valorant, and 306 in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at that resolution. These numbers indicate that the system can drive 240Hz or 360Hz monitors in esports titles, though the CPU’s single-thread score of 974 suggests that frame rates could be higher with a faster chip. For AAA games at 1440p, the system delivers 132 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 124 FPS in Control, which is smooth for most displays.

Streaming is a mixed scenario, as the CPU’s 6 cores can handle encoding at moderate bitrates, but the PassMark multi-thread score of 26,825 is lower than high-end CPUs, so simultaneous gaming and encoding may cause frame drops. The GPU’s NVENC capabilities are not listed in the data, so the analysis is limited to the CPU’s performance. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro would rely on the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is excellent for effects and color grading, but the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,799 may slow down timeline scrubbing and export times.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software would be GPU-accelerated, and the 5090 D’s 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores suggest strong ray tracing performance, though no specific render scores are in the data. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14,326 indicates that it handles complex scenes well. Software development that involves compiling large codebases would be limited by the CPU’s 6 cores, as the PassMark integer math score of 79,108 is decent but not exceptional. Student and office work is overkill for this system, as the CPU’s single-thread performance is adequate for web browsing and document editing, but the GPU’s power requirements make it impractical for a typical office environment.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, placing it above most tested configurations, with an average FPS of 225.7 across all games.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average score of 24,964, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-11850H’s 24,935, and 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F’s 25,005.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: At what resolution does the system show the most balanced performance?

A: At 1440p, the system delivers high frame rates in most games, such as 132 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 162 FPS in Assetto Corsa, indicating a better balance than at 1080p where the CPU limits performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it affect cooling?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a desktop part, meaning a capable air cooler is sufficient for cooling.

Q: What is the GPU’s suggested power supply requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 575 W and a suggested PSU of 950 W, with a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the GPU perform in DirectX 12 versus older APIs?

A: The GPU scores 14,326 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, but only 231 in PassMark DirectX 10 and 219 in DirectX 12, indicating that the architecture is optimized for modern APIs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, classified as a desktop system. The combined percentile of 85 and rank of 59 out of 3,732 pairs places it in the top 2% of all tested configurations, making it a high-end enthusiast system. The CPU’s 77th percentile and GPU’s 92nd percentile show that the GPU is the dominant component, and the average FPS of 225.7 across all games reflects this GPU-centric design. The build is best described as a GPU-first system for 4K gaming or professional graphics work, where the CPU’s 6 cores are sufficient but not the main attraction.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, so the platform is current and future-proof for the next generation of components. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W means there is significant headroom for a higher-end AM5 chip, such as a 12-core or 16-core Ryzen 7000-series processor, which would better match the GPU’s performance in CPU-bound workloads. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 950 W, so any upgrade should maintain this power budget. The GPU is a dual-slot card with dimensions of 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, so case compatibility is important. The next sensible upgrade would be a CPU with more cores to reduce the bottleneck at 1080p, as the current 6-core chip cannot fully feed the GPU in esports titles. The platform supports this upgrade without changing the motherboard or memory, making it a straightforward path for users who want to balance the system.