SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

49,957 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti in a desktop configuration. The build sits at the 82nd combined percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings, with measured ultra-settings frame rates spanning from 306 FPS in esports titles to 42.4 FPS in the most demanding simulation games. The data indicates a high-performance desktop aimed at 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the GPU providing the vast majority of the rendering muscle while the CPU delivers solid multi-threaded throughput for productivity tasks.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5070 Ti is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a die size of 378 mm² containing 45,600 million transistors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s. The GPU has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. For ray tracing and AI workloads, it includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The compute capabilities are substantial: 43.94 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s.

The benchmark data confirms this is a high-tier GPU. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 6604 points, which places it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The average benchmark score across all tests is 49957. The nearest rivals show interesting clustering: the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001 (a 0.1% delta), the Intel Arc A550M scores 49737 (0.4% ahead of the RTX card), the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951 (2% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48477 (3.1% lower). This means the RTX 5070 Ti trades blows with older flagship cards, sitting roughly 3.1% ahead of the RX 6800 XT but 2% behind the RX 6900 XT in aggregate benchmark scores.

The 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is the key differentiator for 4K workloads and high-resolution texture streaming. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for modern game assets at ultra settings, as evidenced by the measured frame rates at 3840x2160 across the game list. For rendering and compute tasks, the 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the 280 tensor cores make this a capable GPU for AI-accelerated workloads, though the data does not include specific AI benchmark scores. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 API coverage ensure compatibility with current and near-future titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24964, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. In the nearest rival comparisons, the Ryzen 5 7500F sits within a tight margin: it is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core 5 210H (24872), and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005). This indicates the 7500F is right at the edge of a performance cluster where a few percentage points separate a full tier of processors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49957, which is roughly double the CPU’s average score. This gap is expected in a gaming-focused build, but the combined percentile of 82 shows the pair works well together. The pair’s rank by FPS is 359 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all measured games of 191.5 at ultra settings. That average is skewed by esports titles hitting 300+ FPS, but it still places this build in the top 10% of all recorded pairings in the database.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is the dominant component for gaming, as evidenced by the 86th GPU percentile versus the 77th CPU percentile. The CPU’s single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark single-thread and 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate it can feed the GPU in most scenarios, but in CPU-bound titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (42.4 FPS at 1080p), the processor may become a limiting factor. The measured FPS data confirms this: at 1080p, the average FPS across all games is 191.5, but at 4K, it drops to a much lower range, with the GPU becoming the bottleneck.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael), manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in single-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads but shows its 6-core limitation in heavily parallel tasks. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 22799, while the single-core score is 3218. The ratio between these (roughly 7:1) is typical for a 6-core/12-thread chip. In Geekbench, the multi-core score is 12362 versus 2374 single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score is 26825, with single-thread at 3841. The 3DMark threaded tests show scaling from 1902 (2 threads) to 6379 (max threads), indicating good scaling up to 6 cores but diminishing returns beyond that.

The data shows the 7500F is a strong mid-range CPU that sits at the 77th percentile. Its nearest rivals include laptop processors (i7-11850H, i7-13620H) and a desktop chip (Ryzen 5 8400F), which suggests it competes well against both mobile and desktop parts. The 5.00 GHz boost clock and 32 MB L3 cache are important for gaming, as evidenced by the high FPS in esports titles. The PassMark data encryption score of 17510 and data compression score of 305925 indicate solid performance for productivity tasks, though the integer math score of 79108 and floating-point math score of 47176 show the ceiling for compute-heavy workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance in this pairing: the GPU is at the 86th percentile while the CPU is at the 77th percentile. This means the CPU is the weaker link in most scenarios, but the extent of the bottleneck depends heavily on resolution and game type. At 1080p, the CPU’s 6 cores can be a limiting factor in CPU-intensive titles. For example, Ark: Survival Ascended runs at 42.4 FPS at 1080p, which is below the 60 FPS target, and the CPU is likely the constraint. Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 82 FPS at 1080p shows the CPU handling the load, but the 40 FPS at 4K shows the GPU taking over as the primary bottleneck.

The FPS scaling across resolutions is the strongest evidence for where the bottleneck lies. In Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 306 FPS at 1080p to 202 FPS at 1440p and 113 FPS at 4K. This scaling is steeper than GPU-bound scaling would suggest, indicating the CPU is limiting at 1080p but the GPU becomes the constraint at 4K. Conversely, Cyberpunk 2077 shows 93.4 FPS at 1080p, 68.4 FPS at 1440p, and 44.6 FPS at 4K — a more gradual drop that suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck even at 1080p.

The CPU’s 3DMark max-threads score of 6379 versus the single-thread score of 974 indicates that the processor cannot fully saturate the GPU in multi-threaded workloads. For games that use fewer than 6 cores, the 7500F’s high boost clock (5.00 GHz) helps, but in games that scale beyond 6 threads, the 12-thread limit becomes apparent. The pair’s average FPS of 191.5 across all games is high, but the range (from 17.5 FPS in Ark at 4K to 676 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p) shows that specific game optimization matters more than raw hardware capability.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and want high refresh rates. The measured data shows 306 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p and 202 FPS at 1440p, which supports 240 Hz and 165 Hz monitors respectively. At 4K, the system still delivers playable frame rates in most titles, with 44.6 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 40 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2, though 60 FPS is not consistently achievable at ultra settings.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 adequate for moderate workloads, while the GPU’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates rendering tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video editing timelines and complex 3D scenes. Software developers benefit from the 12 threads and 32 MB L3 cache, with the PassMark data compression score of 305925 indicating fast build times for large codebases.

Students and small business users will find this overkill for office productivity, but the 65 W TDP CPU and 300 W GPU mean the system runs efficiently for a high-performance desktop. The 86th GPU percentile ensures the system remains relevant for several years, making it a long-term investment for users who want to avoid upgrades. The 82nd combined percentile confirms this is a top-tier build, suitable for enthusiasts who prioritize gaming performance without sacrificing productivity capability.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured: true) provides exact performance figures at ultra settings across three resolutions. At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional frame rates in esports titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 676 FPS, Valorant hits 480.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 369.6 FPS. For AAA games at 1080p, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 93.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 82 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 149 FPS. The most demanding title at 1080p is Ark: Survival Ascended at 42.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target.

At 1440p, the system remains highly capable. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 202 FPS, Valorant to 457.6 FPS, and Warzone to 132 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 68.4 FPS, which is playable, while Red Dead Redemption 2 averages 61 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 29.8 FPS, making it borderline unplayable at 1440p ultra. The 4K results show the GPU’s limits: Warzone maintains 112 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 44.6 FPS, and Ark falls to 17.5 FPS. Most titles at 4K stay above 40 FPS, but only lighter games like Valorant (422.2 FPS) and Roblox (148.4 FPS) hit high refresh rates.

The pair’s average FPS across all games is 191.5, but this is heavily skewed by esports titles. For a realistic gaming assessment, consider the median title: games like Assetto Corsa (181 FPS at 1080p), Fortnite (150.7 FPS), and Grand Theft Auto V (140 FPS) show the system’s strength in mainstream titles. The data indicates this build is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming, very good at 1440p, and acceptable at 4K for non-competitive play.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The 1080p results show this build is exceptional for competitive shooters, with 676 FPS in CS:GO, 480.5 FPS in Valorant, and 306 FPS in Counter-Strike 2. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and 32 MB L3 cache ensure minimal input lag, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM prevents texture pop-in. At 1440p, the frame rates (202 FPS in CS2, 457.6 FPS in Valorant) still exceed the refresh rates of most gaming monitors.

Streaming: The 12 threads handle encoding overhead, but the GPU’s 280 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for streaming software. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 suggests the CPU can handle game plus stream simultaneously, though the 6-core limit may cause frame drops in CPU-bound titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (42.4 FPS at 1080p).

Video editing: The GPU’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates render and export times, while the 16 GB VRAM handles 4K timelines. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 305925 indicates fast file handling. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for multi-stream editing, though the 6-core CPU will slow down complex effects stacks.

3D rendering: The 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 280 tensor cores make this GPU a strong choice for real-time rendering, while the CPU’s 22799 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles scene preparation. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large scenes, but the 6-core CPU will bottleneck final frame renders compared to higher-core parts.

Software development: The 12 threads and 32 MB L3 cache provide good performance for compilation and testing. The PassMark integer math score of 79108 indicates strong performance for code execution, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock reduces wait times for single-threaded tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw low for long coding sessions.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but the 86th GPU percentile ensures it handles any future software requirements. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM provide headroom for virtual machines and data analysis. The dual-channel DDR5 support and ECC memory option are useful for research applications, though the 300 W GPU TDP makes this an inefficient choice for basic office tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, placing this build in the top 18% of all recorded pairings in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 49957, which is 2% lower than the RX 6900 XT’s 50951 score.

Q: What is the maximum FPS recorded for this build at 1080p?

A: The highest measured FPS at 1080p is 676 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with Valorant close behind at 480.5 FPS.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7500F support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the RTX 5070 Ti uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface for the GPU connection.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The GPU has 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to the Intel Core i7-13620H?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-13620H’s 24911 score.

Q: What is the lowest measured FPS at 4K ultra settings?

A: The lowest 4K result is 17.5 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended, followed by 35.3 FPS in Revolution Idle.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 300 W TDP suggest a total system power draw that the recommended 700 W PSU handles with headroom. The PCIe Gen 5 support on both the CPU (24 lanes) and GPU (PCIe 5.0 x16) ensures the system is ready for next-generation storage and peripherals.

For CPU upgrades, the AM5 socket supports newer Ryzen processors with higher core counts. The 7500F’s 77th percentile means there is significant headroom for improvement, and the platform’s longevity means a future CPU swap is possible without changing the motherboard or memory. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for higher-core CPUs, but the dual-channel DDR5 support allows for faster memory kits.

For GPU upgrades, the PCIe 5.0 x16 slot is future-proof, and the 700 W PSU has enough capacity for a more power-hungry GPU. The 16 GB VRAM is currently sufficient, but if future games require more, the slot is ready for a card with more memory. The 300 W GPU TDP is at the higher end for this platform, so a more powerful GPU would require a PSU upgrade.

The most sensible next upgrade is a CPU with more cores, as the 6-core 7500F is the weaker component. The 77th CPU percentile versus 86th GPU percentile means the CPU is the bottleneck in CPU-bound games (e.g., Ark at 42.4 FPS at 1080p). A 12-core or 16-core AM5 CPU would balance the system and improve minimum frame rates in multi-threaded titles, while the existing GPU and memory configuration would remain viable.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor on the AM5 socket, with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 32 MB L3 cache. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 16 GB GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The combined percentile of 82 indicates this is a high-tier build, though the CPU is the weaker component (77th percentile) relative to the GPU (86th percentile).

The pair’s rank of 359 out of 3732 pairs (top 9.6%) confirms this is a strong gaming system, with an average FPS of 191.5 across all measured titles at ultra settings. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24964 and the GPU’s 49957 show a 2:1 performance ratio, which is typical for gaming-focused builds. The system excels at 1080p and 1440p gaming, delivers playable 4K performance in most titles, and provides solid productivity capability for content creation and development tasks.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 300 W GPU TDP make this a power-efficient high-performance build, with the 700 W suggested PSU providing adequate headroom. The AM5 platform offers a clear upgrade path, and the 16 GB VRAM ensures the system remains relevant for several years. For gamers seeking high refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p, this pairing delivers measured frame rates that exceed most monitor refresh rates in competitive titles, while maintaining playable performance in demanding AAA games at 4K.