SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F sits on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket for AMD's 7000 series and later processors. This is a DDR5-only platform with a dual-channel memory bus, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a useful feature for workstation builds that prioritize data integrity. The memory bandwidth is rated at 83.2 GB/s, which is the figure the CPU can feed to the rest of the system. For storage and expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU itself, which means the platform is ready for the fastest current NVMe SSDs and graphics cards that can take advantage of that bandwidth, though the GPU in this pairing uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is remarkably low for a six-core desktop processor in the 7000 series. This low power envelope means that the platform does not require an elaborate cooling solution or a high-end motherboard with massive VRM cooling; a capable air cooler is more than sufficient. The GPU, however, is a different story. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has a 450 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for that card is 850 W. This is the single most important number for anyone upgrading an existing system: if the current power supply is below that 850 W figure, it needs to be replaced before the GPU is installed. The RTX 4090 uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a triple-slot width, so case clearance and PSU cable compatibility are also physical constraints to check.

The upgrade path here is interesting because the CPU and GPU are at very different points in their lifecycles. The Ryzen 5 7500F is an active production part, released in July 2023 with a launch MSRP of $179. The RTX 4090, released in September 2022, is marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series already on the market. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the RTX 4090 is the component that will need replacing first, as it is end-of-life. The CPU, being active and on a current socket, has a clear upgrade path within the same platform: users can later swap the Ryzen 5 7500F for a higher-core-count AM5 processor without changing the motherboard or memory, making the platform investment more durable. The 65 W TDP of the current CPU means that the motherboard and cooling are likely overbuilt for a future, higher-TDP chip, which is a positive sign for that upgrade path.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a pairing where the GPU is the dominant performer, but the CPU is not a slouch. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24964, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are a tight cluster: the Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872 (0.4% behind). This means the 7500F is essentially performance-equivalent to those four parts, with the differences being within the noise of benchmarking. In real-world work, the 7500F will trade blows with those chips, depending on the workload.

Looking at the specific CPU benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 7500F shows strong scaling from 2 threads to 8 threads. It scores 1902 in the 2-thread test, 3621 in the 4-thread test, 5372 in the 8-thread test, and 6376 in the 16-thread test, with a max-thread score of 6379. This indicates that the six cores and twelve threads are being fully utilized by the time the 8-thread workload hits, and the 16-thread score is barely higher than the 8-thread score, which is expected for a 12-thread part. The single-thread score is 974. In Cinebench, the multicore scores are 2298 (R15), 9575 (R20), and 22799 (R23), while the single-core scores are 324 (R15), 1351 (R20), and 3218 (R23). The R23 multicore score of 22799 is a solid figure for a 65 W part, showing that the low TDP does not cripple sustained all-core loads. Geekbench scores are 12362 multicore and 2374 single-core.

The GPU is in a different league entirely. The RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60347, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are again a cluster: the Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60326 (0.0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60140 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896 (2.5% ahead). The RTX 4090 is 2.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V710, which scores 58657. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 9223. In compute-oriented benchmarks, the GPU scores 255416 in Geekbench OpenCL and 271631 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 38194, and the PassMark GPU Compute score is 26613. The combined picture is that this pairing has a combined percentile of 83, which means it outperforms 83% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The data shows that the CPU is a mid-to-upper-midrange part (77th percentile) while the GPU is a top-tier part (88th percentile). The 11-point gap in percentiles is significant, and it suggests that in many workloads, the GPU will be waiting on the CPU. However, the pair rank by FPS is 121 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 215.9, which puts this pairing in the top 3.2% of all tested pairs for gaming performance. That is an exceptional ranking that shows the pairing is very effective in games, despite the CPU being the weaker link.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is extensive, covering 54 games at three resolutions. This is measured data, not estimates, so the figures are reliable for comparison. The most striking results come from esports and lighter titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 792.3 FPS at 1080p, 549 FPS at 1440p, and 325.2 FPS at 4K. Valorant is similarly extreme, with 482.1 FPS at 1080p, 456.3 FPS at 1440p, and 420.5 FPS at 4K. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 427 FPS at 1080p, 280 FPS at 1440p, and 154 FPS at 4K. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor in esports titles, as the FPS is far above what any current display can show, and the scaling from 1440p to 4K is minimal in Valorant, suggesting a CPU bottleneck.

In triple-A titles, the picture is more balanced. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 98 FPS at 1080p, 79 FPS at 1440p, and 52 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 is similar, with 96 FPS at 1080p, 72 FPS at 1440p, and 48 FPS at 4K. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 151.9 FPS at 1080p, 134.7 FPS at 1440p, and 115 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 4K in these titles shows the GPU is being utilized more heavily, as the FPS drops by roughly half from 1080p to 4K. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 130 FPS at 1080p, 105 FPS at 1440p, and 77 FPS at 4K, which is a strong result for a notoriously demanding title.

Some games show that the GPU is absolutely necessary. Ark: Survival Ascended is the most demanding title in the list, with 53.3 FPS at 1080p, 35.3 FPS at 1440p, and 15.6 FPS at 4K. The Medium is also heavy, with 75 FPS at 1080p, 63 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K. These figures show that even the most powerful GPU available can struggle with the most demanding titles at 4K. The average FPS across all games is 215.9, which is a very high figure, but it is skewed upward by the esports titles. The median gamer will likely see far lower FPS in their preferred titles.

For high-refresh gaming, the data shows that 1080p and 1440p are the sweet spots. At 1080p, most games exceed 144 FPS, with many exceeding 200 FPS. At 1440p, the majority of games still exceed 100 FPS, with many esports titles exceeding 200 FPS. At 4K, the FPS drops significantly, with many triple-A titles falling into the 50-80 FPS range. This means that for 4K gaming, a high-refresh monitor is not fully utilized, as the FPS is often below 144 Hz. For 1440p, a 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitor is well-matched. For 1080p, a 240 Hz or higher monitor can be used in esports titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear bottleneck structure. The CPU is in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 88th percentile. This 11-point gap indicates that the CPU is the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios, which is most visible in gaming at 1080p. The evidence is in the FPS scaling. In Valorant, the FPS goes from 482.1 at 1080p to 456.3 at 1440p, a drop of only 5.4%, and then to 420.5 at 4K, a drop of 8.5% from 1440p. This minimal scaling shows that the CPU is the bottleneck; the GPU is not being fully utilized because the CPU cannot feed it more frames. In Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the same pattern is visible: 792.3 FPS at 1080p, 549 FPS at 1440p (a 30.7% drop), and 325.2 FPS at 4K (a 40.8% drop from 1440p). The larger drop from 1080p to 1440p suggests that the GPU is starting to become more involved, but the CPU is still limiting the maximum frame rate.

In contrast, in GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the scaling is more linear: 98 FPS at 1080p, 79 FPS at 1440p (a 19.4% drop), and 52 FPS at 4K (a 34.2% drop from 1440p). This shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as expected for a demanding title. The CPU is able to keep up with the GPU's frame output in these scenarios.

In compute workloads, the balance is different. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799 is respectable for a six-core part, but it is far below what a high-core-count CPU would achieve. The GPU's compute scores (255416 in OpenCL, 271631 in Vulkan) are massive, and the GPU will dominate any parallel compute task. In a 3D rendering workload that uses the GPU, the CPU will be waiting for the GPU to finish. In a CPU-bound physics simulation, the GPU will be idle. The PassMark physics score for the CPU is 1788, which is low, indicating that the CPU is not ideal for physics-heavy simulations. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 26613 shows that the GPU is a compute monster.

The bottleneck analysis comes down to this: in gaming at 1080p, the CPU is the bottleneck in most titles, and upgrading the CPU would yield higher FPS. At 1440p, the bottleneck is more balanced, with the GPU becoming the limiter in demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU is almost always the bottleneck, and the CPU is sufficient. In compute workloads, the GPU is so much faster than the CPU that the CPU's performance is almost irrelevant for GPU-accelerated tasks. The CPU is the bottleneck for CPU-bound tasks like data compression, where it scores 305925 in PassMark, and encryption, where it scores 17510.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a six-core, twelve-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is low for a desktop processor with these clocks. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The multiplier is unlocked, so the CPU can be overclocked, though the low TDP may limit the headroom for manual overclocking without increasing power limits.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that is strong in single-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads, but falls behind in heavily-threaded workloads. The single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and 3218 in Cinebench R23 are excellent figures, placing it near the top of the single-thread charts. This makes the CPU responsive for everyday tasks, gaming, and applications that rely on a few fast cores. The multicore scores, however, show the limits of six cores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799 is less than what an eight-core or twelve-core part would achieve, but it is still a strong result for a 65 W part. The PassMark multithread score is 26825, and the PassMark single-thread score is 3841.

For real workloads, this means the CPU is well-suited for software development, where compilation often uses multiple threads but not an extreme number, and for office productivity, where single-thread performance is key. It is also adequate for content creation, such as video editing, but it will not be the fastest option for rendering long videos, as that workload scales with core count. The data compression score of 305925 and the integer math score of 79108 show that the CPU is capable in these areas, but the floating-point math score of 47176 is lower relative to its rivals. The extended instructions score is 22776, which is relevant for workloads that use AVX-512 or other modern instruction sets.

The CPU's closest rivals are all mobile or lower-power desktop parts. The Intel Core i7-11850H is a mobile processor, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a lower-power desktop part. The fact that the 7500F trades blows with these parts suggests that its performance per watt is excellent, but its absolute performance is not in the top tier for desktop CPUs. The 77th percentile ranking confirms this: it is a solid mid-to-upper-midrange CPU, not a flagship.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is for users who want the absolute best gaming performance at high resolutions, but are willing to pair it with a more modest CPU to save on cost. The data shows that the GPU is the star of the show, and the CPU is sufficient to feed it in most scenarios. Gamers at 1440p will see exceptional FPS in almost all titles, with many exceeding 100 FPS. Gamers at 4K will see playable FPS in most titles, but will need to lower settings in the most demanding games like Ark: Survival Ascended, which drops to 15.6 FPS at 4K. The pairing is also suitable for content creators who use GPU-accelerated rendering, as the RTX 4090's compute performance is massive. Video editors using GPU-accelerated effects will benefit, though the CPU may be a bottleneck for CPU-based effects.

Software developers will appreciate the strong single-thread performance and the platform's ECC memory support, which is useful for long-running builds and server-like workloads. The 65 W TDP makes this a power-efficient build for a developer workstation, and the AM5 platform offers a clear upgrade path to higher-core-count CPUs. Students and small business users will find this to be an overpowered build for their needs, but the high FPS in esports titles and the ability to handle any productivity task make it a future-proof option. The 24 GB of VRAM on the GPU is useful for machine learning and large dataset processing, and the CPU's 32 MB of L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads.

The build is also suitable for users who want a high-refresh gaming experience at 1080p. The CPU is the bottleneck in this scenario, but the FPS is so high that it does not matter. The pair rank of 121 out of 3732 pairs places it in the top 3.2% of all tested pairings, which is a strong recommendation for gaming.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream desktop socket for AMD's 7000 series processors.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR4 memory?

A: No, the CPU supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel memory bus and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 450 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 850 W.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU had a launch MSRP of $179, and the GPU had a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 still in production?

A: No, the RTX 4090 is marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The CPU is in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile compared to all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60347.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing an AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The CPU is a six-core, twelve-thread part from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture, with a 65 W TDP. The GPU is the top-tier Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4090, with a 450 W TDP and 24 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of this pairing is 83, meaning it outperforms 83% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's individual percentile is 77, and the GPU's is 88, showing a slight imbalance. The pair rank by FPS is 121 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 215.9. This is a high-performance desktop build that is heavily skewed toward gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, with the CPU serving as a capable but not class-leading partner.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is high, as evidenced by the 88th percentile GPU and the top 3.2% pair rank by FPS. This is not a budget build; it is a performance-focused machine for users who prioritize gaming FPS and GPU compute over CPU multi-threaded performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the pairing delivers exceptional frame rates in esports titles, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 792.3 FPS and Valorant at 482.1 FPS. At 1440p, these titles still exceed 200 FPS, and most triple-A games exceed 100 FPS. This makes the build ideal for a 240 Hz or 360 Hz monitor at 1080p, and a 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitor at 1440p.

Streaming: The GPU's encoder is part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, and the CPU's 12 threads are sufficient to handle the encoding overhead of streaming while gaming. The high FPS in games leaves headroom for streaming software, and the 24 GB of VRAM can handle multiple encoding sessions.

Video editing: The GPU's compute scores (255416 in OpenCL, 271631 in Vulkan) provide massive acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799 is adequate for timeline editing, but long renders may be faster on a higher-core-count CPU. For editors using GPU-accelerated workflows, this is a strong build.

3D rendering: The RTX 4090 is a rendering powerhouse, with an FP32 performance of 82.58 TFLOPS and 128 RT cores. The CPU's 6 cores will be the bottleneck for physics simulations and CPU-based rendering, but GPU-based renderers like Octane or Blender Cycles will see exceptional performance.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 3218 in Cinebench R23 is excellent for code compilation and IDE responsiveness. The 32 MB of L3 cache and 6 cores are sufficient for most build tasks, and the ECC memory support is a plus for long-running builds.

Student and office work: This build is massively overpowered for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance makes everyday applications feel instant, and the GPU's power is wasted on spreadsheets and web browsing. However, the build is future-proof and can handle any demanding task that may arise, such as running large datasets or machine learning models.