SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that positions it as an efficient mainstream part. The chip carries 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, and its cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 via a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects through AMD Socket AM5 with PCIe Gen 5, offering 24 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24,964. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (average score 24,935, delta 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (average score 25,005, delta -0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-13620H (average score 24,911, delta 0.2%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the 7500F sits in a tightly contested performance band where single-digit score differences separate competitors.

In single-threaded workloads, the 7500F achieves a 3DMark single-thread score of 974, a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,218, and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,374. These numbers reflect strong per-core performance, which is critical for lightly threaded applications like everyday desktop use, web browsing, and legacy software. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,902 and 4-thread score of 3,621 show that scaling from one to four threads is near-linear, suggesting the architecture efficiently utilizes available cores at lower thread counts.

Multi-threaded scores reveal the processor's ceiling: 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,376, Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,799, and Geekbench multi-core score of 12,362. The 3DMark max-thread score of 6,379 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, indicating that beyond 12 threads, there is minimal additional headroom—a natural consequence of the 6-core/12-thread configuration. PassMark multi-thread score of 26,825, integer math score of 79,108, and floating-point math score of 47,176 provide further evidence of solid computational throughput for productivity tasks.

The data suggests that while the 7500F is not a high-core-count workstation part, its combination of strong single-thread performance and respectable multi-thread scaling makes it well suited for gaming and mainstream productivity. The 77th percentile rank confirms it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database, and the near-tie with its listed rivals means users will see virtually identical performance among these options. The 5 nm process contributes to efficiency, but the benchmark scores are the primary indicator of real-world capability.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion here is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores rather than empirical testing. The data is explicitly marked as not measured, and this must be kept in mind when interpreting gaming expectations.

The CPU's single-thread performance—Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,218 and 3DMark single-thread score of 974—indicates strong per-core capability that typically drives high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, sits in the 95th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 131,938. In gaming, this GPU is capable of producing very high frame rates at most resolutions, but the exact numbers depend on the title and settings.

For 1080p gaming, where CPUs often become the limiting factor at high frame rates, the 7500F's strong single-thread scores suggest it can keep pace with the RTX 3090 Ti in many esports and older titles. The 3DMark 4-thread score of 3,621 and 8-thread score of 5,372 indicate that the processor handles moderate thread counts well, which is typical for modern game engines that utilize 4-8 threads. However, the 6-core/12-thread limit means that heavily threaded games or those with many background tasks could see the CPU reach its ceiling before the GPU does.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes increasingly dominant in determining frame rates, and the RTX 3090 Ti's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and effects. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 215,633 indicate strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, which aligns with modern game API requirements. In this scenario, the 7500F is less likely to bottleneck, as the GPU's rendering workload per frame increases at higher resolutions.

The absence of measured FPS data means these estimates rely on the benchmark scores' correlation with gaming performance. The CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 95th percentile suggest that this pairing is heavily GPU-skewed in terms of overall capability, which typically favors higher resolutions and graphics-intensive settings. For competitive gamers seeking maximum refresh rates at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread scores are adequate but not exceptional; for immersive 4K gaming, the GPU's raw power dominates.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks show a processor that performs consistently across various test suites. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,298 and single-core score of 324 illustrate the scaling from one to all cores, with a ratio of roughly 7:1, which is reasonable for a 6-core/12-thread part. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,575 and single-core score of 1,351 follow a similar pattern, while the R23 multi-core score of 22,799 and single-core score of 3,218 show the expected generational uplift in the newer test version. PassMark scores add another dimension: data compression at 305,925, data encryption at 17,510, extended instructions at 22,776, and random string sorting at 36,191. The find prime numbers score of 199 is notably low, but this is a specialized test that does not reflect typical workloads.

The GPU benchmarks are limited to three tests: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741, Geekbench OpenCL score of 174,441, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 215,633. The average benchmark score of 131,938 places the RTX 3090 Ti in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA L4 (average score 131,072, delta 0.7%), NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation (average score 135,218, delta -2.4%), NVIDIA A10M (average score 135,230, delta -2.4%), and AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (average score 135,396, delta -2.6%). The positive delta for the L4 means the 3090 Ti is 0.7% ahead of it, while the negative deltas for the other three mean they are 2.4-2.6% ahead of the 3090 Ti. These are small margins, indicating the 3090 Ti competes closely with professional workstation GPUs despite being a consumer part.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 86, which reflects a system that outperforms the vast majority of configurations in the database. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile create an imbalance where the GPU is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU is. Combined with the CPU's average score of 24,964 and the GPU's average score of 131,938, the data shows a system where the GPU contributes disproportionately to the overall performance tier. The pair rank by FPS is null, reinforcing that no measured gaming data exists for this combination.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 95th percentile—an 18-point gap that indicates the GPU is substantially stronger relative to its category. In practical terms, this means the RTX 3090 Ti is likely to outpace the Ryzen 5 7500F in workloads that scale with GPU compute, such as high-resolution rendering or graphics-intensive gaming.

The CPU's multi-thread ceiling is evident in the 3DMark scores: the 16-thread score of 6,376 barely differs from the max-thread score of 6,379, showing that the processor cannot utilize more than 12 threads effectively. In gaming, this could manifest as a bottleneck in titles that spawn many background threads or in scenarios where the CPU must feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. The single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and 3,218 in Cinebench R23 suggests that the CPU can handle per-core tasks well, but the 6-core limit means that heavily threaded games could see frame rates capped by the CPU.

The GPU's FPS scaling, while not measured, can be inferred from its benchmark scores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 215,633 indicate strong API-level performance. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's per-core strength becomes more relevant, and the 7500F's scores suggest it can drive high frame rates in less demanding titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the RTX 3090 Ti's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth allow it to shine, potentially making the CPU less of a limiting factor.

The data implies that this pairing is best suited for GPU-bound scenarios. For users prioritizing maximum frame rates at 1080p in competitive shooters, the CPU might hold back the GPU slightly. For 4K gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 3090 Ti can operate closer to its full potential, and the CPU's role diminishes. The 65 W TDP of the CPU versus the 450 W TDP of the GPU further emphasizes that the GPU is the dominant component in terms of power and performance envelope.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The GPU clock speeds are 1560 MHz base and 1860 MHz boost, with memory running at 1313 MHz or 21 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem includes 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth—a figure that positions this card for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The GPU has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores.

Compute performance is substantial: FP32 and FP16 both rate at 40.00 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 ratio that simplifies mixed-precision workloads. Pixel rate is 208.3 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 625.0 GTexel/s. These numbers translate to strong performance in rasterization and compute-heavy tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific simulations. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 reflects DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 174,441 and Vulkan score of 215,633 show cross-API versatility.

The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 131,938 place it above the vast majority of GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA L4, scores 131,072 (delta 0.7%), meaning the 3090 Ti is 0.7% ahead. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 135,218 (delta -2.4%), the NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230 (delta -2.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (delta -2.6%), meaning all three are 2.4-2.6% ahead of the 3090 Ti. These small deltas show that the 3090 Ti competes directly with professional workstation cards, despite being a consumer GeForce product.

The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads, respectively. The 40.00 TFLOPS FP16 performance is notable for machine learning inference and training, while the 24 GB VRAM allows large model loading without spilling to system memory. The GPU's end-of-life production status and 450 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 850 W, indicate that this is a power-hungry component requiring robust cooling and power delivery.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU-GPU pairing targets users who need strong GPU compute and are willing to accept a mid-range CPU. The 86th combined percentile indicates the system is well above average, but the CPU's 77th percentile versus the GPU's 95th percentile suggests a GPU-first build philosophy. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit most, as the RTX 3090 Ti's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures and ray tracing without VRAM constraints. The CPU's single-thread scores are adequate for these resolutions, where the GPU does the heavy lifting.

Content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, or machine learning will find the GPU's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32/FP16 performance and 336 tensor cores valuable for acceleration. The 24 GB VRAM allows rendering large scenes or training larger models than 12 GB or 16 GB cards. The CPU's multi-thread scores, such as Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22,799 and PassMark multi-thread of 26,825, are sufficient for non-GPU tasks like code compilation or asset processing, but the GPU will dominate compute-heavy workflows.

Software developers targeting GPU-accelerated applications can leverage the CUDA-like compute capabilities (via the tensor cores and 40.00 TFLOPS FP16), while the CPU's 6 cores handle typical development tasks like compiling and debugging. Students in engineering or data science fields might use this for coursework involving deep learning or simulation, where the GPU's 24 GB VRAM is a practical advantage. Small business workstations running GPU-intensive applications like CAD or video editing could benefit, though the 450 W GPU TDP requires adequate power and cooling infrastructure.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,218 in Cinebench R23 and 974 in 3DMark single-thread can drive high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU's 95th percentile power may be wasted if the CPU becomes the limiting factor. At 1440p or 4K, the RTX 3090 Ti's 40.00 TFLOPS and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth take over, delivering smooth performance in graphically intense games.

Streaming: The GPU's tensor cores and 40.00 TFLOPS FP16 performance can assist with encoding and AI-based features, while the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads handle streaming software overhead. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26,825 suggests adequate headroom for encoding alongside gaming, though the CPU's 65 W TDP indicates efficiency rather than brute-force multi-tasking.

Video editing: The GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline rendering and effects, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,799 handles export tasks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which benefits modern editing software.

3D rendering: The GPU's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and 84 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 24 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes. The CPU's multi-thread scores are secondary here, as rendering offloads to the GPU.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,218 in Cinebench R23 provides responsive compilation for smaller projects, while the multi-thread score of 22,799 handles parallel builds. The GPU is largely unused unless the developer targets GPU compute, where the 336 tensor cores and 40.00 TFLOPS FP16 shine.

Student and office work: The CPU's 77th percentile and 65 W TDP make this a capable machine for everyday tasks, though the GPU's 450 W TDP and triple-slot size are overkill for basic productivity. The 24 GB VRAM is unused in office workloads, but the system handles multitasking well given the CPU's 6 cores and PassMark multi-thread score of 26,825.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile relative to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F ranks in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24,964.

Q: How does the RTX 3090 Ti compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA L4?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti has an average benchmark score of 131,938, which is 0.7% higher than the NVIDIA L4's score of 131,072.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and a TDP of 65 W.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3090 Ti have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 5 7500F and RTX 3090 Ti is 86, indicating the system outperforms 86% of configurations.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7500F supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's production status and release date?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti is end-of-life and was released on 2022-01-26, with a launch MSRP of 1,999 USD.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7500F uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage. The socket's AM5 platform is designed for the 7000 series and future generations, though the FACT PACK does not specify compatibility with newer CPUs. The 65 W TDP of the CPU is modest, leaving thermal headroom for a more powerful processor if the user upgrades later.

The RTX 3090 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at the GPU's native Gen 4 speed. The GPU's 450 W TDP and suggested PSU of 850 W mean that a power supply upgrade is necessary if the current unit is below this threshold. The GPU is end-of-life, so any upgrade would involve moving to a newer generation, such as the GeForce 40 series, which is listed as its successor.

A sensible next upgrade path would start with the CPU, as the 6-core/12-thread configuration is the system's weakest link relative to the GPU's 95th percentile. Upgrading to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU would better balance the system, though the FACT PACK does not list specific alternatives. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster storage could improve overall responsiveness, but the CPU's 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is already a fixed platform characteristic. The GPU, being end-of-life, offers no upgrade within its generation; users would need to move to a newer architecture for better performance per watt.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 processor from the 7000 series, and the GPU is an Ampere-based card from the GeForce 30-series. The combined percentile of 86 places this system in the upper tier of configurations, though the CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile reveal a GPU-heavy imbalance.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 24,964 and the GPU's average score of 131,938 indicate that the GPU is roughly five times more powerful in raw benchmark terms. This is a system built around GPU performance, whether for high-resolution gaming, rendering, or compute workloads. The CPU handles system-level tasks adequately, but the GPU is the star of the show, delivering 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 24 GB of VRAM. As a desktop build, it requires a robust power supply (850 W suggested) and a large case to accommodate the GPU's 336 mm length and triple-slot width. Overall, this pairing is for users who prioritize GPU horsepower over CPU core counts, accepting the 18-point percentile gap as a trade-off for the GPU's 95th-percentile capability.