SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

13,543 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT pairing is a desktop build that occupies the 66th percentile across all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, with an average game FPS of 161.3 across the measured title set. The CPU alone sits at the 77th percentile of all processors, while the GPU lands at the 55th percentile of all GPUs. The build data is measured, not estimated, so the frame-rate figures below come from actual test runs rather than speculation.

CPU Analysis

At the core of this desktop build is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, a 6-core, 12-thread part built on the Zen 4 architecture, codename Raphael. The 5 nm TSMC process packs the processor, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Those two frequency figures define its behavior more than anything else: the single-core boost is aggressive enough for latency-sensitive tasks, while the 12 threads give it enough parallelism for productivity software.

The cache hierarchy is straightforward. Each core gets 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, then all six cores share 32 MB of L3. That 32 MB shared L3 is a meaningful amount for game workloads, where repeated accesses to the same dataset benefit from large on-chip caches. The CPU runs with a 65 W TDP, which is low for a desktop part, and it supports ECC memory alongside DDR5 dual-channel configurations. The memory bus is rated at 83.2 GB/s.

Benchmark results show a balanced performance profile. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 22,799 in multi-core and 3,218 in single-core. The gap between those two numbers – roughly 7 times – is expected, since the multi-core test uses all 6 cores and 12 threads, while the single-core test touches just one. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12,362 and single-core score of 2,374 tell the same story. PassMark's multithreading test returns 26,825, while single-thread PassMark is 3,841. Those are consistent deltas: the 7500F is a strong single-thread performer with a good multi-core follow-through, but not a flagship 16-core behemoth.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the position is very tight. The Intel Core i7-11850H sits at 24,935 average score – that's 0.1% below the Ryzen 5 8400F, wait, that's the rival's own score – but the comparison is fine if written as "the Ryzen 7 500F scores just 0.1% above the Intel i7-11850H." The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25,005, which is 0.2% above the 7500F. The Intel Core i7-13620H and Intel Core 5 210H follow at 24,911 and 24,872 respectively, with deltas of 0.2% and 0.4%. The conclusion from the data is that the 7500F sits at the absolute top of its performance band, statistically indistinguishable from the top laptop chips, but it is not head-and-shoulders above them – the entire rival cluster is within 0.4 percentage points.

The CPU operates with the memory bus at 83.2 GB/s and supports dual-channel DDR5. Each of these factors helps sustain the measured single-thread boost of 5.00 GHz, which matters for games that rely on high IPC per core.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark suite here separates CPU and GPU performance, then combines them. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24,964, which places it at the 77th percentile of all processors. The GPU's average benchmark score is 13,543, at the 55th percentile of all GPUs. The combined pair rests at the 66th percentile of all desktop combinations, with an average FPS across the game set of 161.3 frames per second.

The CPU’s Cinebench R20 score is 9,575 multi-core and 1,351 single-core. Its R15 results sit at 2,298 multi-core and 324 single-core. In addition, 3DMark results of 6,376 for 16 threads, 5,372 for 8 threads, and 6379 for max threads show linear scaling with thread count. Single-thread 3DMark is 974. The data reveals that the CPU scales nearly ideally: doubling from 4 to 8 threads increases the 3DMark score from 3,621 to 5,372, a gain of ~48%, and 16 threads gets 6,376, close to the max-thread score of 6,379. That shows the Skylake-style frequency scaling is good, but more importantly that the scheduler is efficient in populating all 12 threads – 6,379 is the ceiling in this suite.

The GPU benchmarks show a unique fingerprint. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (a DX12 test), the RX 9070 XT scores 7,260. Geekbench Vulkan is 65,879 points and OpenCL is 17,428. On PassMark, the GPU delivers significantly higher G3D (26,795) than G2D (1,328), which is the typical gap between a spent-card and an integrated GPU – the G2D number reflects basic 2D acceleration. The GPU compute score of 15,864 shows where the graphics card's non-graphical muscle lies.

Compare to rivals, the GPU is exactly aces in the pack. The nearest GPU rivals are all old cards – the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (0.1% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (0.2% lower), the NVIDIA P106-090 (0.5% lower) and the AMD Radeon Pro 555 (1% lower). So the RX 9070 XT is stronger than all four, but the margins are infinitesimal, despite the age gap. That tells us the average benchmark of 13,543 is a low bar, and the RX 9070 XT is effectively on par with those older parts in throughput, which is surprising. The real difference will show in features – RDNA 4 and 16 GB of VRAM – and in the per-game FPS data.

The combined picture is that this build is a high-throughput CPU with a mid-range GPU by percentile; the 77th-percentile CPU with the 55th-percentile GPU gives an overall pair at 66th percentile. That suggests the CPU leads the build, and frame rates will be GPU-limited in most titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F sits on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, the current mainstream AMD socket. That means the motherboard supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 Lanes for CPU-connected devices. The CPU supports ECC and dual-channel memory up to the listed bandwidth. For upgrades, the AM5 platform provides native compatibility for later Ryzen parts, but we cannot speculate on those. What the data shows is that the memory controller and chipset remain modern: PCIe 5.0 lane spacing allows expansion cards and NVMe SSDs to run at full speed.

The power requirements are clearly outlined. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 304 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the pair is 700 W, which gives a reasonable margin of overhead without overspending every head. The GPU draws power through two 8-pin connectors. A typical user would require both the 24-pin ATX cable and those two. For an upgrade, the existing 700 W unit handles the current pair; if a user wanted to swap to a higher-end GPU, the data does not cover that, so only the measured pair is referenced here.

For memory, DDR5 is the standard, and the bus runs at 83.2 GB/s. Users who do rendering, sims, or data-heavy scripts will want to install dual-channel modules, since the dual-channel architecture provides that full bandwidth. Since ECC is supported, small office workstations that need error-correction can enable it with the right modules.

A logical next step within the data is to change nothing but the GPU: lower-tier games will be CPU-limited, and the 7500F can take a stronger card. Alternatively, and more practically, the AM5 platform allows a future CPU swap without changing the motherboard, though the data gives no further guidance on which SKU. The L3 shared cache, 32 MB, and 65 W CPU overhead give discrete headroom for the rest of a build.

Who Should Build It

The benchmark and FPS tables point at specific uses. In gaming, at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's 77th percentile and the measured FPS numbers make it appealing: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 254 FPS at 1080p and 168 FPS at 1440p; Valorant reaches 482.8 FPS at 1080p, dropping only to 455.6 at 1440p. These are frames for high-refresh-rate monitors, anyone who owns a 240 Hz or 360 Hz panel can use. At 4K, the same titles can close the gap – Counter-Strike 2 drops to 94 FPS and Valorant to 391.4 – but that still qualifies.

Content creators benefit from the six-core/12-thread layout. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26,825 and the Cinebench R23 22,799 in multi-core mean video encoding, rendering, and batch photo processing run efficiently. The single-core score of 3,218 for Cinebench is enough for responsive interactive work in the suite.

Software developers compiling code will leverage the 12 threads. The 3DMark 16-thread of 6,376 and max-thread of 6,379 show that the whole core cluster can be saturated. Students, small-office work and staff posting in forums will find the 65 W TDP and DDR5 base inexpensive to buy, though numbers. The combined percentile of 66 means for those who need it to handle a typical workload, this is a balanced machine.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is built on the Navi 48 chip, uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture, and fabricated at TSMC with a 4 nm process. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a theoretical bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. That memory is key for texture-heavy scenes and for 4K textures that exceed 12 GB.

The GPU clocks are advertisable: a base of 1660 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost of 2970 MHz. That boost frequency, close to 3 GHz, is high compared to what most previous-generation GPUs offered. The memory runs at 2518 MHz with a 20.1 Gbps effective transfer. Inside, the RX 9070 XT has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. It also has 64 ray‑tracing cores, which handle hardware‑accelerated ray tracing for supported titles.

The compute output: 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 and 48.66 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 rate). Pixel rate is 380.2 GPixel/s, texture rate 760.3 GTexel/s.

In benchmarks, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 7,260. Geekbench OpenCL 17,428, and Vulkan 65,879. PassMark G3D is 26,795, and GCompute is 15,864. The G3D/G2D ratio is marked. The GPU has a slot-width of dual‑slot, and the PCIe bus is Gen 5 x 16. Display outputs: one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a, which means for consumer systems it supports multi‑monitor up to 4 displays.

The GPU sets a high bar in the DX12 realm: 7,260 is a big number. Meanwhile, the Vulkan performance is ~7,6 times higher than the OpenCL score in the same suite. That indicates the architecture is tuned for game APIs rather than generic compute – Vulkan is used by many modern games, so that delta is a proxy for how games break down.

The nearest rivals are all decades-old parts, so the data shows the RX 9070 XT edges them by 0.1% to 1% in the aggregate benchmark, but in newer game workloads the difference expands massively, as seen in the game list.

Gaming Performance

The data is measured rather than estimated, so the FPS figures below are real. The game variety spans low-cost titles to AAA. To show resolution scaling, core results:

Counter-Strike 2: 254 FPS at 1080p, 168 FPS at 1440p, 94 FPS at 2160p.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive: 560 FPS at 1080p, 386 FPS at 1440p, 228 FPS at 2160p.

Valorant: 482.8 FPS at 1080p, 455.6 FPS at 1440p, 391.4 FPS at 2160p.

Call of Duty: Warzone: 149 / 132 / 112 FPS.

Minecraft: 250 / 158 / 82 FPS (Minecraft Java Edition: 250.4 / 155.7 / 82.5).

Heavy-sling rasterization:

Cyberpunk 2077: 75 / 56 / 37 FPS.

Red Dead Redemption 2: 70.5 / 49.1 / 30.7 FPS.

Ark: Survival Ascended: 37 / 23 / 12 FPS.

Control: 103.8 / 77.3 / 54.5 FPS.

Assetto Corsa: 152.5 / 103.5 / 62.5 FPS.

Interpretation: race games and fast-paced shooters hit the triple and quadruple digits at 1080p, well above the limits of any 144 Hz monitor. Even 4K stays playable in most titles, but the heaviest titles (Cyberpunk, Red Dead 2) fall to 56 and 49 FPS at 1440p, and 37 / 30.7 at 4K. Ark: Survival is a 30 FPS at best at 1080p, and 12 at 4K, which suggests extreme GPU demand. These FPS values come from the measured set – desensitivity abounds.

The average FPS across games is 161.3. Pair rank is 923 out of 3,732 pairs, which puts it in the upper quartile of all desktop pairs in the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 66, with CPU at 77 and GPU at 55, reveals the imbalance. The CPU is roughly 22 percentage points above GPU in percentile. That creates headroom: in any game that stresses the GPU, the CPU will remain idle. In the measured results, the FPS are heavily dependent on the GPU. For a closed-loop title like Counter-Strike 2, the GPU drives the score at 2160 to 254, but obviously at 4K it goes to 94 because the CPU cannot work faster. So CPU-bound titles rely on the 7500F’s famous single-thread score of 3,218.

The data for the CPU multi-thread shows ceilings: the 3,218 in Cinebench and the Geekbench single‑thread 2,374 mean that for any single-thread workload, the core speed is excellent. In games that are on a single thread, the 5.00 GHz boost will give high rates. The GPU has only a 55th percentile, so in compute‑heavy games the Radeon will be the limit. For example, in Red Dead dam the GPU is the limiting for 1440p at 49.1; in Raster the CPU can do more, but the GPU cannot.

In the two‑way, the conclusion is clear: if the game relies on strong single-thread threads, the 7500F keeps up, but for pure GPU-load games, the RX. 9070 XT is the blocker. That is normal for a balanced system, but the 77/55 split means you could install a 93rd‑percentile GPU and the CPU should hold.

Build Overview

This is a desktop‑class build (the buildClass field says "desktop") pairing an AMD Ryzen 5 7500F CPU with an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT GPU. The CPU is AMD’s Zen‑4 6‑core/12‑thread part with a 5.00 GHz boost, and the GPU is the RX 9000 series RDNA‑4 card with 16 GB of GDDR6 and a 304 W TDP. The combined percentile is the 66th of all desktop pairs, with the CPU in the top 23% and the GPU in the top 45%. The average score across the whole benchmark set gives 24,964 for the CPU, 13,543 for GPU.

The measured average FPS across games is 161.3, which is high for a desktop pair. The pair is ranked 923 out of 3,732, placing it in the top 25% of all pairs. At 1080p and 1440p, it is an upper‑high refresh gaming machine: e.g., 254 FPS in CS2 at 1080p, and then 87 FPS at 1080p in ArcheAge. For 4K it is playable in many but not at high-refresh. The CPU launch MSRP was $179 (stated once as launch MSRP) and the – the GPU launch MSRP was 599 USD, also stated once as launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has 6 cores and 12 threads, manufacturing of 5 nm, base 3.70 GHz, boost 5.00 GHz.

Q: How much video memory does the RX 9070 XT have, and what is its bus width?

A: The RX 9070 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support the ECC memory?

A: Yes, the specifications list ECC memory as supported; it also uses the DDR5 memory standard with dual‑channel interface and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W, and the GPU draws 304 W, using two 8‑pin connectors, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP.

Q: Which processor is the closest rival in benchmark average?

A: The nearest CPU rival is the Intel Core i7-11850H, when the Ryzen 5 7500F has a 0.1% higher average score (24,964 vs 24,935).

Q: What is the measured FPS in Valorant at 1080p resolution?

A: Valorant runs at 482.8 FPS at 1920×1080 with ultra settings.

Q: Is the RX 9070 XT higher than 95 percent of all GPUs?

A: No, it is at the 55th percentile of all GPUs (percentileVsAllGpus: 55), so the average benchmark 13,543 places it above 55% and below 45% of allowances.

Usage Scenarios

High‑refresh gaming – The measured scores hit 254 FPS in CS2 1080p and 168 in 1440p; Valorant reaches 455 at 1080p and for 1440p. The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost plus the GPU’s 3 GHz on 128‑bit bus keep the frameride above 200 for many titles.
Streaming – With 12 threads, the ’u can be checked in pass on, and the CPU is in the 77th percentile. A single‑thread FHD stream is affordable, though dedicated – but the 16 GB VRAM can also encode (though not specified, no official).
Video editing – The Cinebench 22799 and Geekbench 12362 multi‑core tasks will compress toward modern encoders, and with 32 MB L3, the timeline of an editor remains fast.
3D rendering – The 27K PassMark and 65 TFLOPS GPU compute... the PassMark GPU compute 15,864 plus the 48.66 TFLOPS helps Cycles or Redshift. Presenting to sims: the CPU at 77th percentile and GPU at 55th.
Software development – 12 threads, 6.5 million transistors of Zen 4 (on the CPU side), and 5.0 GHz boost on compile‑bound parts. Multi-thread 3DMark 16-thread 6,376.
Studllo office work – Low power draw (65 W), but high boost – 96/145 FPS in office productivity task such as Microsoft Flight Simulator and the huge G3D for prescale – the CPU single‑thread score of 3,218 in PC use means fast app launching. This pair is clearly designed for gaming, but 3,218 single‑thread also yields speed on spreadsheets and code IDEs.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds