SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 pairing is a desktop configuration that places in the 73rd percentile against all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The data set shows an average frame rate of 155.9 FPS across the measured game library, ranking 1041st out of 3732 pairs. This is a balanced mid-to-high-tier build that excels at high-refresh 1080p gaming and remains capable at 1440p, with 4K available for less demanding titles.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename) using TSMC's 5 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip packs 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

Multi-threaded performance is solid for a 6-core part. Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 22799, which is 29.3% higher than the single-core score of 3218 would suggest for scaling efficiency. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6376 nearly matches the max-thread score of 6379, indicating that the processor's thread scheduling is efficient and that adding more threads beyond 16 yields negligible gains. This is typical for a 6-core/12-thread design where the operating system sees 12 logical processors.

Single-thread performance is a strong suit. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218 and Geekbench single-core score of 2374 place this chip well for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The 3DMark single-thread score of 974 reinforces this. The processor sits in the 77th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964. Its nearest rivals show how tight the competition is: the Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872 (0.4% behind). The 7500F is effectively in a dead heat with these parts, with deltas under half a percent.

The passmark integer math score of 79108 and floating point score of 47176 indicate strong general computation. Data compression hits 305925, while encryption scores 17510. Extended instructions (SIMD) score 22776. These numbers suggest the CPU handles everyday productivity tasks with ease, though it is not a workstation monster.

The 65 W TDP is a defining characteristic. This allows for modest cooling requirements and keeps power draw low, which is reflected in the suggested PSU of 550 W for the entire build. The unlocked multiplier means overclocking is possible, though the boost clock of 5.00 GHz already provides high peak frequency. For real workloads, this CPU is best suited for gaming and mixed-use productivity where single-thread performance and moderate multi-thread capacity are needed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7500F uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is a plus for workstation-adjacent tasks. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage.

The platform's longevity is a key consideration. AM5 is an active socket, and the 7000 series is part of the current generation. A sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU within the same architecture family, though the data does not specify which specific models are available. The motherboard would likely support such an upgrade with a BIOS update, though this is not explicitly stated in the data.

The GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which matches the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. This ensures no bandwidth bottleneck between the processor and graphics card. The suggested PSU for the entire build is 550 W, which is modest given the GPU's 220 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP. This leaves headroom for typical system components like drives and fans without requiring an oversized power supply.

Memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is standard for dual-channel DDR5. The platform does not support DDR4, so any upgrade from an older system would require new memory. The ECC support is worth noting for users who prioritize data integrity in compute tasks. The 24 PCIe lanes from the CPU provide flexibility for multi-GPU setups or high-speed storage, though the data does not specify how those lanes are divided.

For a future-proof build, the AM5 socket and DDR5 memory support put this platform in a good position. The PCIe Gen 5 interface is forward-looking. The 550 W PSU suggestion is a baseline; the data does not indicate what happens with overclocking or additional peripherals. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU suggests enthusiast potential, but the modest TDP indicates that the stock configuration is the intended use case.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The measured FPS data shows this build excels at 1080p and 1440p. Counter-Strike 2 hits 237.3 FPS at 1080p and 158.3 FPS at 1440p. Valorant reaches 477.6 FPS at 1080p and 453.4 FPS at 1440p. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege scores 285 FPS at 1080p and 187 FPS at 1440p. These numbers easily support 144Hz or 240Hz monitors at 1080p, with 144Hz achievable at 1440p in esports titles.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread configuration provides enough parallelism for game capture and encode. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 indicates sufficient CPU headroom for software encoding at moderate bitrates, though the data does not specify encode performance. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and modern architecture would handle hardware encoding, but the fact pack does not list encoder specifications. The 3DMark max-thread score of 6379 suggests the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads without significant frame drops, though the data does not measure this directly.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded score of 22799 in Cinebench R23 and Geekbench multi-core of 12362 provide adequate performance for 1080p and light 4K editing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth help with effects and timeline rendering. The passmark GPU compute score of 14737 indicates the GPU accelerates compute tasks. However, the CPU's 6-core limit means export times will be longer than higher-core-count alternatives.

3D rendering: The GPU is the primary renderer here. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and the passmark G3D score of 25381 show strong rasterization performance. The 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute is substantial for GPU rendering. The CPU's role is scene preparation and physics, where its passmark physics score of 1788 and 3DMark max-thread score of 6379 are adequate but not class-leading. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with geometry data.

Software development: The single-thread performance is strong for compilation and IDE responsiveness. The Geekbench single-core score of 2374 and passmark single-thread score of 3841 indicate snappy code editing. Multi-threaded builds benefit from the 12 threads, and the passmark integer math score of 79108 shows solid arithmetic throughput. The 65 W TDP means sustained compilation runs won't cause thermal throttling in typical desktop cases.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic office tasks, but the data supports it. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1902 and passmark data compression score of 305925 show fast application loading and file handling. The low 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw reasonable for a machine that might run all day. The 16 GB GPU VRAM is irrelevant for office work but doesn't hurt. The 550 W PSU suggestion indicates the entire system draws modest power, which is fine for a dorm room or small office.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a well-balanced pairing with the CPU and GPU complementing each other across resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3218) prevents it from holding back the GPU in most titles. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6290 and the pair's average FPS of 155.9 indicate that neither component is dramatically outclassing the other.

The bottleneck shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in esports titles where frame rates exceed 200 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 hits 237.3 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant reaches 477.6 FPS. These numbers are CPU-bound in many cases, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 69th percentile suggests the CPU has slightly more headroom relative to its peers.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The frame rates drop as resolution increases, with Cyberpunk 2077 going from 71 FPS at 1080p to 53 FPS at 1440p. This is a GPU-limited scenario, as the CPU has more headroom at these settings. The GPU's 69th percentile and the CPU's 77th percentile mean the CPU is the stronger component relative to its class, so it can feed the GPU adequately.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 35 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 30.4 FPS. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient, but the raw compute of 36.13 TFLOPS is not enough for 60 FPS in demanding titles at this resolution. The CPU's role diminishes, as frame rates are low enough that the processor is never the constraint.

The FPS scaling across resolutions shows this pattern clearly. For example, Counter-Strike 2 drops from 237.3 FPS at 1080p to 158.3 FPS at 1440p (a 33% drop) and then to 86.5 FPS at 4K (a 45% drop from 1440p). This suggests a smooth scaling curve where the GPU handles the resolution increase predictably. In contrast, Valorant drops only 5% from 1080p to 1440p (477.6 to 453.4 FPS) but then 18% to 4K (369.4 FPS), indicating the CPU holds frame rates high even as resolution scales.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 24964, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F at 25005, which is 0.2% faster. The Intel Core i7-11850H is 0.1% slower at 24935, and the Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.2% slower at 24911. These deltas are within noise, meaning the 7500F performs identically to these parts in aggregate.

Specific CPU benchmarks show: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22799 and single-core of 3218. Geekbench multi-core of 12362 and single-core of 2374. 3DMark single-thread of 974, 2-thread of 1902, 4-thread of 3621, 8-thread of 5372, 16-thread of 6376, and max-thread of 6379. Passmark scores include multithread of 26825, single-thread of 3841, integer math of 79108, floating point of 47176, and extended instructions of 22776.

The GPU delivers an average benchmark score of 23877, placing it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z at 23736 (0.6% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S at 24063 (0.8% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile at 23628 (1.1% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER at 24170 (1.2% faster). The GPU performs within 1.2% of these parts, showing it sits in a tightly contested performance band.

Specific GPU benchmarks show: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 of 6290, Geekbench OpenCL of 131539, Geekbench Vulkan of 58705, passmark G3D of 25381, passmark GPU compute of 14737, and passmark G2D of 1280. The passmark DirectX scores are 141 for DX10, 281 for DX11, 74 for DX12, and 343 for DX9. These scores indicate the GPU handles older APIs well but the DX12 score of 74 is notably lower, which may reflect the specific workload of that test.

The combined picture shows a CPU and GPU that are both mid-pack performers in their respective categories. The CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers (77th vs 69th percentile), and the pair's combined percentile of 73 reflects this balance. The average FPS across games of 155.9 at the tested settings (which appear to be a mix of resolutions, though the data shows individual game performance) indicates solid overall gaming capability.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p are the primary audience. The measured FPS shows this build delivers over 100 FPS in most titles at 1080p, including Call of Duty: Warzone at 147.8 FPS, Fortnite at 117.5 FPS, and Grand Theft Auto V at 109 FPS. At 1440p, the build maintains over 60 FPS in many titles, with Counter-Strike 2 at 158.3 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 135.5 FPS. Competitive gamers will appreciate the high frame rates in esports titles like Valorant (477.6 FPS at 1080p) and Rainbow Six Siege (285 FPS at 1080p).

Content creators who work with 1080p or light 4K video will find this build capable. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 supports rendering timelines, and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM handles effects and color grading. The 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-accelerated effects. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds reliability for long render sessions.

Software developers will benefit from the strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core of 2374) for fast compiles and the 12 threads for parallel builds. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code. The 65 W CPU TDP means the system runs cool and quiet during long coding sessions.

Students and office workers who also game will find this a versatile machine. The 77th percentile CPU handles productivity tasks with ease, and the GPU provides entertainment value. The 550 W PSU suggestion means the system won't require a heavy power bill. The 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office work but future-proofs the system for any graphics-adjacent tasks.

Small business workstations that need occasional 3D rendering or CAD work will benefit from the GPU's compute capability (passmark GPU compute of 14737). The CPU's passmark integer math score of 79108 indicates strong spreadsheet and database performance. The platform's ECC support is a plus for data integrity in business applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F sits in the 77th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964. This means it outperforms roughly 77% of tested processors, putting it in the upper-mid range.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 7500F is within 0.4% of its four closest competitors. It is 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i7-11850H, 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i7-13620H, 0.4% faster than the Intel Core 5 210H, and 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 sits in the 69th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23877. It outperforms roughly 69% of tested graphics cards, placing it in the mid-to-upper range.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 9070 is within 1.2% of its four closest competitors. It is 0.6% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z, 1.1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, 0.8% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6800S, and 1.2% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER.

Q: What is the combined performance of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The pair ranks in the 73rd percentile of all tested combinations. The average FPS across the measured game library is 155.9, and the pair ranks 1041st out of 3732 total pairs.

Q: What resolution is this build best suited for?

A: The data shows strong performance at 1080p and 1440p. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 147.8 FPS at 1080p and 135.5 FPS at 1440p, while Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 71 FPS at 1080p and 53 FPS at 1440p. 4K is playable in less demanding titles but drops below 60 FPS in AAA games.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 220 W TDP, leaving headroom for other components within the 550 W suggestion.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class configuration combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GPU. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 processor on the AM5 socket, and the GPU is a RDNA 4.0 architecture card with 16 GB GDDR6 memory. The pair achieves a combined percentile of 73 against all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The average frame rate across the measured game library is 155.9 FPS, with the pair ranking 1041st out of 3732 pairs. This places the build in the upper-mid tier of desktop configurations, suitable for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K capability in less demanding titles.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 48 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 151.0 million per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 1330 MHz, a boost clock of 2520 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. Memory runs at 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. This is ample for 1440p gaming and provides headroom for 4K textures. The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. It includes 56 ray tracing cores, though the tensor core count is not specified in the data. The FP32 compute rating is 36.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 36.13 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 322.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 564.5 GTexel/s.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 69th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 indicates strong DirectX 12 rasterization performance. Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539 and Vulkan score of 58705 show compute capability. The passmark G3D score of 25381 and GPU compute score of 14737 provide additional performance metrics. The nearest rival comparisons show the GPU is within 1.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, which was a high-end card in its generation.

For rendering, the 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute is substantial for GPU-accelerated workloads. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for large scenes and high-resolution textures. The 56 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the data does not include specific RT benchmark scores. The 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio means the GPU does not have a dedicated FP16 boost, which is common in consumer cards.

The memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s is a key strength. This supports high-resolution gaming and compute tasks that require large data transfers. The 256-bit bus width is standard for this performance class. The GPU's TDP is 220 W, which is moderate for the performance level, and the dual-slot cooler with 2x 8-pin power connectors is typical for this class. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a, supporting modern high-refresh monitors and multi-display setups.