SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT creates a desktop configuration that is defined by a striking asymmetry. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part that sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a massive 20 GB RDNA 3 flagship that, based on the benchmark database's scoring, lands at just the 55th percentile among all GPUs. This inverted relationship—a high-tier processor with a mid-tier GPU percentile—immediately raises questions about how the components complement or limit each other in real-world workloads. The combined percentile of this build is 66, positioning it as a mainstream high-performance machine, but the data suggests the bottleneck dynamics are not straightforward. The measured FPS figures across numerous games, with an average of 170 FPS across the tested titles, indicate that this system is built for high refresh rates, yet the specific performance distribution between the CPU and GPU demands a closer look at which component is actually driving the experience in various scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The core question of which component limits this build is answered by the benchmark scores themselves. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s 3DMark thread scaling shows a clear progression: 1902 in the 2-thread test, 3621 in 4-thread, 5372 in 8-thread, and 6376 in the 16-thread test. This near-linear scaling from 2 to 8 threads, followed by a plateau from 8 to 16 threads (6376 to 6379), reveals that the CPU has strong single-core performance but its multi-threaded headroom is capped by its 6-core/12-thread design. The single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core are respectable, but the multi-core score of 22799 in Cinebench R23 shows that the CPU can handle moderate parallel workloads. However, the GPU’s raw compute power is far higher in absolute terms, with 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which dwarfs the CPU’s capabilities for parallel floating-point math.

The bottleneck analysis is revealed by the FPS scaling across resolutions. In games like Cyberpunk 2077, the system delivers 81 FPS at 1920x1080, 60 FPS at 2560x1440, and 40 FPS at 3840x2160. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 26%, and from 1440p to 4K is another 33%. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter at higher resolutions, as the workload shifts to the graphics card. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (974 in 3DMark single-thread) becomes more relevant, and the fact that the system only reaches 81 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p—a game known for its CPU demands—suggests the CPU is holding back the GPU at lower resolutions. In contrast, esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 show 274 FPS at 1080p, which drops to 181 FPS at 1440p and 101 FPS at 4K. The 1080p result is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU has ample headroom, but the 4K result is clearly GPU-bound.

The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3841 is high, but its multi-thread score of 26825 is comparatively modest. This means that in lightly-threaded tasks, the CPU can keep up with the GPU, but in heavily-threaded scenarios, the GPU’s compute advantage (51.48 TFLOPS vs. the CPU’s 47176 in PassMark floating-point math) becomes the bottleneck. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 29009 is its strongest benchmark, but its average score of 13745 is dragged down by weaker results in other tests, such as PassMark DirectX 10 (158) and DirectX 9 (322). This suggests that the GPU is optimized for modern APIs (DirectX 12, Vulkan) but struggles with legacy workloads, which could create odd bottleneck patterns in older games.

The data shows that the bottleneck shifts based on workload. For CPU-intensive tasks like physics (PassMark physics score of 1788), the CPU is the limiter. For GPU-intensive tasks like 4K gaming, the GPU is clearly the limiter. The FPS data supports this: at 1080p in CPU-bound games like Valorant (480 FPS), the GPU is not the constraint, but at 4K in GPU-bound games like Red Dead Redemption 2 (38.2 FPS), the CPU is not the constraint. The build is balanced for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as evidenced by the average FPS dropping from 170 across all games to below 60 in many AAA titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores establish it as a solid mid-range performer. The Ryzen 5 7500F achieves a 3DMark max-thread score of 6379, which is nearly identical to its 16-thread score of 6376, confirming that the 12 threads are fully utilized. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 is strong for a 6-core part, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its single-core scores are also respectable: 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2374 in Geekbench single-core. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12362 shows that the CPU handles multi-threaded productivity tasks well, but it is not a workstation powerhouse. The average benchmark score of 24964 places it just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, indicating that it is competitive with older mobile and newer budget desktop parts.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more complex. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is a strong result for modern gaming, but the overall average benchmark score of 13745 places the RX 7900 XT at just the 55th percentile of all GPUs. This is a surprising position for a card with 20 GB of VRAM and 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 is excellent, but the OpenCL score of 12756 is comparatively low, suggesting that the GPU’s compute performance in cross-platform APIs is not its strength. The PassMark G3D score of 29009 is the GPU’s best result, but its DirectX 10 (158) and DirectX 12 (110) scores are low, which is unusual for a modern card. The nearest rivals paint a confusing picture: the AMD Radeon 660M (an integrated GPU) is just 0.5% behind, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is 1.5% ahead. This suggests that the RX 7900 XT’s benchmark scores are not representative of its gaming performance, which is likely much higher given its specifications.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that punches slightly above its weight class and a GPU that appears to underperform its specs in synthetic benchmarks. The CPU’s 77th percentile and the GPU’s 55th percentile create a system that should be CPU-bound in most non-gaming tasks but GPU-bound in gaming, especially at higher resolutions. The combined percentile of 66 is a reasonable indicator of overall performance, but the individual scores suggest that the GPU is the more capable component for gaming, despite its lower percentile ranking.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured (dataIsMeasured is true), provides a comprehensive look at gaming performance. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 605 FPS, Valorant reaches 480 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 325 FPS. These are clearly CPU-bound scenarios, as the RX 7900 XT is not the limiting factor. The system also handles less demanding titles at 1080p with ease: Roblox runs at 353 FPS, Minecraft at 270 FPS, and Dave The Diver at 228.2 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert itself. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 181 FPS, which is still excellent for high-refresh gaming, but the drop from 274 FPS at 1080p shows the GPU is now more involved. Assetto Corsa runs at 114.6 FPS at 1440p, while Call of Duty: Warzone maintains a solid 132 FPS. The more demanding titles show the GPU’s limits: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 60 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 57.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 23.6 FPS, which is unplayable. The 1440p results show that the system is best suited for high-refresh gaming in less demanding titles, but struggles with the most graphics-intensive games at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 101 FPS, which is still playable, but most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 40 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 38.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 13.7 FPS. The system can handle 4K gaming in older or less demanding titles—Doom runs at 71 FPS, The Medium at 39.2 FPS, and Valorant at 422 FPS—but it is not a reliable 4K gaming platform for modern AAA games. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 170, but this is skewed by the very high esports results at 1080p. The pair rank by FPS is 752 out of 3732 pairs, placing this build in the top 20% of tested configurations for average frame rate.

Who Should Build It

This build is designed for gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS data shows that the system can deliver over 200 FPS in esports titles at 1080p and over 100 FPS in many games at 1440p. Gamers who play competitive shooters like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and Rainbow Six Siege will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and the GPU’s ability to push high frame rates at lower resolutions. The system is also suitable for gamers who play a mix of titles and are willing to adjust settings to maintain high frame rates at 1440p.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 6-core/12-thread configuration adequate for moderate workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 12362 indicate that the CPU can handle 1080p video editing and light 3D rendering, but it is not a workstation-class part. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage for rendering large scenes or working with high-resolution textures, and its 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power can accelerate GPU-accelerated rendering.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s fast single-thread performance for compilation tasks, and the GPU’s compute capabilities can be used for machine learning or scientific computing. Students and small business users who need a general-purpose desktop for office work, web browsing, and light multitasking will find this build more than sufficient, though it is likely overkill for their needs. The system is not well-suited for 4K gaming, as the FPS data shows that most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS at that resolution, so gamers who prioritize 4K should look elsewhere.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is notably low for a desktop part, and it supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation parts, and it has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The benchmark scores show that the CPU has strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 974 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3841. These scores place it in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs for single-threaded tasks, which is critical for gaming and general responsiveness. The multi-threaded performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 26825. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.2% behind), which shows that it is competitive with both older and newer parts in its price class.

The CPU’s cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache hierarchy is well-suited for gaming, as it provides fast access to frequently used data. The CPU’s 5 nm process node and 65 W TDP make it an efficient part that runs cool, which is a benefit for system builders who want a quiet or compact build. The lack of integrated graphics means a dedicated GPU is required, but this is not an issue for this build.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system excels at 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. Measured FPS shows 274 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p and 181 FPS at 1440p, while Valorant reaches 480 FPS at 1080p and 455 FPS at 1440p. The CPU’s single-thread performance (3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that the GPU is not held back in esports titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads can handle game streaming at 1080p, but the GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power can be used for hardware encoding. The system’s 20 GB of VRAM provides ample headroom for streaming software and game capture. The measured FPS in games like Fortnite (131 FPS at 1080p) shows that there is enough performance headroom for streaming overhead.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance (22799 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) is adequate for 1080p video editing, and the GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM can handle large projects. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12362 indicates that the system can handle timeline scrubbing and export tasks, but it is not a professional-grade workstation. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 12756 suggests that GPU-accelerated effects will work, but the performance may not be as strong as NVIDIA alternatives.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 6-core/12-thread configuration is limited for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power can accelerate GPU-based renderers. The 20 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage for rendering large scenes. The PassMark GPU compute score of 16828 shows that the GPU is capable of compute workloads, but it is not in the top tier for this task.

Software development: The CPU’s fast single-thread performance (974 in 3DMark single-thread) is ideal for compilation tasks, which are often single-threaded. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide fast I/O for NVMe storage, which speeds up build times. The system can handle development environments, virtual machines, and containerized workloads with ease.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic office work, web browsing, and document editing. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads handle multitasking effortlessly, and the GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM is more than enough for any office application. The system is quiet and efficient, with a 65 W CPU TDP and a 300 W GPU TDP, making it suitable for a dorm room or small office.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the Navi 31 chip, codenamed Plum Bonito. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node, with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The GPU has 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units. It features 84 ray tracing cores, which are used for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The base clock is 1387 MHz, with a boost clock of 2394 MHz and a game clock of 2025 MHz. The memory clock is 2500 MHz, with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are mixed. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is strong, indicating good performance in modern DirectX 12 games. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 is excellent, showing that the GPU is well-optimized for Vulkan. However, the PassMark G3D score of 29009 is its best overall benchmark, while the PassMark DirectX 10 score of 158 and DirectX 9 score of 322 are very low, suggesting that the GPU is not well-suited for older games. The PassMark GPU compute score of 16828 is moderate, indicating that the GPU’s compute performance is not its primary strength.

The GPU’s 84 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for ray tracing, but the benchmark data does not include specific ray tracing tests. The 20 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage for high-resolution textures and large rendering workloads, and the 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth ensures that the GPU can feed its 5376 shading units. The GPU’s pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s are high, indicating that it can handle high-resolution rendering. The GPU’s TDP is 300 W, which requires a 700 W power supply and two 8-pin power connectors. The GPU is a dual-slot card, measuring 276 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M (0.5% behind), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (0.5% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (1.5% ahead). These rival scores are puzzling, as the RX 7900 XT is a high-end desktop GPU, while the 660M is an integrated GPU. This suggests that the benchmark database’s scoring methodology may not accurately reflect the GPU’s gaming performance, which is likely much higher than its percentile ranking of 55 suggests.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a 6-core, 12-thread AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with a 20 GB AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The CPU is a Zen 4 (Raphael) part on the AM5 socket, with a 65 W TDP and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 (Navi 31) part with 84 ray tracing cores and 800.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The combined percentile of this build is 66, which places it in the upper-midrange tier of desktop systems.

The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs is higher than the GPU’s 55th percentile ranking among all GPUs, which indicates that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. However, the GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM and 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power make it a formidable graphics card for gaming. The measured FPS data shows that the system is best suited for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with an average of 170 FPS across all tested games. The system’s pair rank by FPS is 752 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 20% of tested configurations.

This build is a high-performance desktop that is well-suited for gamers who prioritize frame rate over resolution. It is also capable of handling content creation and productivity tasks, but it is not a workstation-class system. The CPU and GPU are both from AMD, which ensures good compatibility and driver support. The build is designed for users who want a fast, responsive system for gaming and general use, with the option to upgrade the CPU or GPU in the future.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F ranks in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The measured FPS data shows that at 3840x2160, most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 at 40 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 38.2 FPS), so it is not recommended for 4K gaming.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested power supply?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 300 W, and the suggested power supply is 700 W. It requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and socket?

A: The CPU is based on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael) and uses the AMD Socket AM5.

Q: What is the GPU’s DirectX support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build is based on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop platform from AMD. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which provides fast I/O for NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The motherboard should support PCIe Gen 5 for the primary graphics card slot, although the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 300 W TDP, for a combined maximum power draw of 365 W. The suggested power supply is 700 W, which provides ample headroom for the system. The power supply should have two 8-pin connectors for the GPU, and the CPU will require an AM5-compatible cooler, though a capable air cooler is sufficient given the 65 W TDP.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the CPU’s core count, as the AM5 platform supports higher-core-count Ryzen 7000 series processors. The GPU has already reached its end-of-life production status, so a future upgrade would likely involve replacing it with a newer RDNA 4 or rival NVIDIA card. The 20 GB of VRAM is generous, so users who do not need more memory can wait for a GPU with better ray tracing performance or higher efficiency. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs and NVMe drives will be compatible, and the DDR5 memory can be upgraded to higher-capacity kits if needed.