SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop pairing centered on AMD’s current mainstream platforms. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 Raphael part built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, and the GPU, a RDNA 3.0 Navi 32 chip, both target the upper mid-range of the performance spectrum. The combined benchmark picture, with a 72nd overall percentile and an average measured FPS of 138.5 across 53 games at ultra settings, indicates a system designed for smooth high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, with the data showing clear scaling limits as resolution climbs.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, using the Zen 4 architecture on the Raphael codename. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, with a die size of 71 mm² and 6,570 million transistors. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, boosting up to 5.00 GHz, under a 65 W TDP. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. The memory controller supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support, a feature more common in workstation segments.

Benchmark data shows strong single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread scaling. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218 and multi-core score of 22799 indicate a 7.1x scaling factor from 1 to 12 threads, which is typical for a 6-core part with simultaneous multithreading. The 3DMark results reinforce this: single-thread score of 974, 2-thread score of 1902, 4-thread score of 3621, 8-thread score of 5372, and max-thread score of 6379. The jump from 8 to 12 threads yields only a 18.7% improvement (5372 to 6379), suggesting that the additional threads provide diminishing returns in this specific benchmark, likely due to memory bandwidth saturation or the benchmark's scaling efficiency.

In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 12362 and single-core score of 2374 show a 5.2x scaling factor, which is lower than Cinebench's 7.1x, indicating that the workload characteristics differ significantly. PassMark results provide a more granular view: integer math scores 79108, floating point math 47176, and extended instructions 22776. The data compression score of 305925 is notably high, while the find prime numbers score of 199 is disproportionately low, suggesting that the CPU excels in memory-intensive operations but has a relative weakness in certain algorithmic workloads.

The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 77, placing it above the median. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (avg score 24935, deltaPct 0.1) and AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avg score 25005, deltaPct -0.2). The 7500F's average benchmark score is 24964, which is virtually identical to its rivals—within 0.2% of the Ryzen 5 8400F and 0.1% of the Core i7-11850H. This indicates that the 7500F sits in a tightly contested performance band where architectural differences matter less than the specific workload.

For real workloads, the single-thread performance is crucial for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 324 and R20 single-core of 1351 suggest a capable IPC, but the data shows that the CPU's strength lies in balanced multi-threading rather than extreme parallel scaling. The PassMark multithread score of 26825 and physics score of 1788 (which is low relative to other benchmarks) suggest that the CPU can handle moderate rendering and physics simulations but may not be optimized for every thread-heavy task.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of a 77th percentile CPU with a 67th percentile GPU creates a system where the processor has a slight edge in relative performance. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this balance. The data from measured FPS at ultra settings across 53 games reveals how this balance shifts with resolution. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all games is 138.5, which is high enough that the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 974) becomes the primary limiter for frame rates, especially in esports titles.

For example, Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p hits 212.5 FPS, while Valorant reaches 481 FPS. These numbers suggest the CPU can feed the GPU adequately for high-refresh gaming, but the 1080p performance of Cyberpunk 2077 (63 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (57.8 FPS) indicates that the GPU's rasterization power is the bottleneck for demanding AAA titles even at the lowest resolution tested. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops, with titles like Cyberpunk 2077 falling to 47 FPS and Warzone maintaining 134.8 FPS. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth appear sufficient for 1440p, but the FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p (average drop of roughly 30-40% across titles) suggests the GPU is the limiting factor.

The bottleneck shifts decisively at 3840x2160. Here, the GPU's 67th percentile ranking becomes the clear constraint. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 31 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended to 10 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 26.4 FPS. The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 6379 and 65 W TDP indicate it is not thermally or power-limited at these resolutions, but the GPU's pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s are insufficient for 4K ultra settings in modern titles. The data shows that at 1080p, the system is CPU-limited in esports and GPU-limited in AAA; at 1440p, it is GPU-limited in most titles; at 4K, it is exclusively GPU-limited.

The pair rank by FPS of 1410 out of 3732 pairs places this combination in the top 38% of tested pairs, with an average FPS of 138.5. This ranking suggests that while the system is not top-tier, it outperforms the majority of CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The deltaPct values for the GPU's rivals (RTX 5060 Mobile at 0.5%, RTX 4060 Mobile at -0.8%) indicate the RX 7700 XT is competitive with those mobile parts, but the desktop GPU is clearly positioned for 1080p/1440p gaming rather than 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games at 1080p ultra settings?

A: The average FPS across all 53 games at 1920x1080 ultra settings is 138.5, with the pair ranking 1410 out of 3732 tested pairs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its nearest CPU rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935) and 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RX 7700 XT has a percentile of 67, meaning it outperforms 67% of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 22549.

Q: Which game shows the highest FPS at 4K ultra settings?

A: Valorant achieves the highest 4K FPS at 328.4, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 190.8 and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X at 94.

Q: Does the system support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, but the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 7700 XT is 550 W, with the GPU having a TDP of 245 W and requiring 2x 8-pin power connectors.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance scale from 1 to 12 threads?

A: In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 3218 and multi-core is 22799, showing a 7.1x scaling factor, while Geekbench shows a 5.2x scaling (2374 to 12362).

Who Should Build It

The data points to a system for gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p and smooth 1440p gameplay. The measured FPS at 1080p for esports titles—Valorant at 481, CS:GO at 468.5, Rainbow Six Siege at 254—makes this an ideal build for competitive gamers who need frame rates above 240 Hz. The 1440p performance, with Warzone at 134.8 FPS and Assetto Corsa at 88 FPS, suits players with 144 Hz QHD monitors who play a mix of fast and slow-paced titles.

Content creators who work with video editing will find the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 305925 and floating point math score of 47176 useful for rendering and encoding, but the GPU's 12 GB VRAM is the limiting factor for 4K video work. The CPU's ECC memory support and 65 W TDP make it suitable for small business workstations that run multi-threaded productivity applications, though the lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Students and office workers will benefit from the system's responsiveness in daily tasks, but the data shows the CPU is overkill for basic office workloads—the single-thread PassMark score of 3841 is more than sufficient. Software developers compiling code will see strong performance in integer math (79108), but the 6-core limit may slow large parallel builds compared to higher-core-count alternatives.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream desktop platform. The DDR5 memory support with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provides a solid foundation, but users can upgrade to faster DDR5 modules if the motherboard supports them, though no specific speeds are listed in the data. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the platform has headroom for future PCIe Gen 5 peripherals.

The CPU's TDP of 65 W is low, suggesting that a capable air cooler or compact liquid cooler is sufficient, though the data does not specify cooler requirements. The GPU's suggested PSU of 550 W with a 245 W TDP indicates that a 550 W to 650 W PSU provides adequate headroom, but a higher-wattage PSU would allow for future upgrades without replacement.

The most sensible next upgrade based on the data is the GPU, since the CPU's 77th percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's 67th percentile. The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 6379 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22799 suggest it can drive a more powerful GPU without bottlenecking at 1440p. The motherboard's AM5 socket supports future Ryzen processors, though specific compatibility is not listed. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface means it will function in a PCIe Gen 5 slot, but the full bandwidth is not utilized.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The measured FPS at 1080p for competitive titles is exceptional—Valorant at 481, CS:GO at 468.5, and Rainbow Six Siege X at 254.5. These numbers are well above 240 Hz, making this system ideal for 240 Hz or 360 Hz monitors in esports.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a 3DMark max-thread score of 6379, can handle game capture and encoding, but the GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means encoding relies on the CPU or AMD's fixed-function hardware, which is not detailed in the data. The PassMark data encryption score of 17510 suggests moderate encoding performance.

Video editing: The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p and 1440p timelines smoothly, but 4K editing may be constrained. The CPU's PassMark floating point math score of 47176 and extended instructions of 22776 provide solid compute for effects and transitions.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 indicates good CPU rendering performance for a 6-core part, but the GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 54 RT cores suggest that GPU-accelerated rendering (if the software supports it) would be faster. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 reflects the GPU's rendering capabilities.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 79108 and data compression of 305925 make this system strong for code compilation and database operations. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3218) handles spreadsheets and word processing effortlessly, but the system is overpowered for these tasks, suggesting a lower-tier CPU would suffice without sacrificing user experience.

Gaming Performance

All FPS figures are measured (dataIsMeasured is true) at ultra settings across three resolutions. The average FPS across all games is 138.5 at 1080p, 99.4 at 1440p (calculated from the data), and 60.1 at 4K (calculated). The data reveals a wide range of performance depending on game optimization.

At 1080p, the best performers are esports titles: Valorant (481), CS:GO (468.5), and Rainbow Six Siege X (254.5). The worst performers are the most demanding AAA games: Ark: Survival Ascended (31), The Medium (47.1), and Cyberpunk 2077 (63). This 15x spread between the fastest and slowest games highlights that the system's performance is heavily dependent on the game's engine and optimization.

At 1440p, the average FPS drops to approximately 99.4, with Warzone (134.8) and Assetto Corsa (88) remaining playable, but Cyberpunk 2077 (47) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (42.7) falling below 60 FPS. The 4K results are mostly below 60 FPS, with only Valorant (328.4), CS:GO (190.8), and Roblox (102.2) exceeding that threshold. The majority of AAA titles at 4K fall between 20-50 FPS, indicating this is not a 4K gaming system for modern titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) combining a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 CPU with a RDNA 3.0 GPU. The CPU has a 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs, and the GPU has a 67th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 72. The system's pair rank by FPS is 1410 out of 3732, placing it in the top 38% of tested pairs.

The CPU's launch MSRP was $179, and the GPU's launch MSRP was 449 USD. The CPU is a 65 W part, while the GPU is a 245 W part, requiring a 550 W PSU. The system uses a dual-slot GPU that is 267 mm long, 135 mm tall, and 50 mm wide, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

The overall tier is upper mid-range, positioned to deliver high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p gaming, with the CPU having headroom for a GPU upgrade before becoming the bottleneck. The data shows this is not a 4K gaming system, nor is it designed for extreme multi-threaded workloads, but it excels in the mainstream gaming and productivity segment.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 24964, with a percentile of 77. Key CPU scores include: 3DMark max-thread 6379, single-thread 974, Cinebench R23 multi-core 22799, single-core 3218, Geekbench multicore 12362, single-core 2374, PassMark multithread 26825, and single-thread 3841. The GPU's average benchmark score is 22549, with a percentile of 67. Key GPU scores include: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 3316, Geekbench OpenCL 138383, Vulkan 46443, PassMark G3D 22547, and GPU compute 12912.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is 10 percentage points higher in percentile than the GPU, indicating a processor-heavy pairing. The CPU's nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-11850H (deltaPct 0.1), while the GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (deltaPct 0.5). The deltaPct values are all within 1.7%, showing that both components are in tightly contested performance bands.

The average FPS across games of 138.5 at 1080p is a strong result, but the percentile rankings suggest that this is not a top-tier system. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3316 is a key indicator of the GPU's DX12 performance, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 reflects its productivity capability. The data shows a balanced system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms, but both are capable of handling their respective tasks without major bottlenecks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is a RDNA 3.0 architecture GPU on the Navi 32 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors and a 346 mm² die size. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The clocks are base 1435 MHz, boost 2544 MHz, and game 2171 MHz, with memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU has 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 RT cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s are strong for the mid-range segment. The FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS and FP16 of 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) indicate that the GPU does not have dedicated tensor cores but offers competitive compute throughput. The TDP is 245 W, requiring a 550 W PSU and 2x 8-pin connectors.

In benchmarks, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 22547 and 3DMark Steel Nomad of 3316 show its DX12 rasterization capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383 is high, suggesting strong compute performance in OpenCL workloads, while Vulkan at 46443 is lower. The PassMark GPU compute score of 12912 indicates moderate compute performance relative to its rasterization.

The GPU's percentile of 67 and average score of 22549 place it below the CPU in relative performance. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 5060 Mobile (deltaPct 0.5) and RTX 4060 Mobile (deltaPct -0.8), meaning the RX 7700 XT outperforms the RTX 4060 Mobile by 0.8% but trails the RTX 5060 Mobile by 0.5%. The RTX 2080 (deltaPct -1.5) is also close, indicating the RX 7700 XT offers performance similar to a previous-generation high-end desktop GPU.

For rendering, the 54 RT cores and 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 provide capable ray tracing and compute performance, but the data does not include RT-specific benchmark scores. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high textures, but the 4K performance suffers due to the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth limits, as shown by the FPS drops in 4K benchmarks.