SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE form a desktop pairing that lands in the 80th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations, indicating a system positioned for solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming alongside capable productivity work. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 part on the AM5 platform, delivers strong single-threaded performance, while the GPU, based on RDNA 3.0 with 8 GB of VRAM, offers competitive rasterization and ray tracing features for its class. This analysis walks through the benchmark data to show what this pairing does well, where its limits are, and who should consider building it.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) using a 5 nm TSMC process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which contributes to its robust single-threaded showing in the benchmark suite. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, making it a power-efficient option for a desktop build, and it supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 pool, which is ample for feeding the six cores in latency-sensitive workloads.

Benchmark results for the 7500F show a balanced profile that favors single-threaded and lightly-threaded tasks. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 974 in single-thread, 1902 in 2-thread, 3621 in 4-thread, 5372 in 8-thread, and 6376 in 16-thread, with a max-thread score of 6379. This scaling pattern shows that the processor gains ground as more threads are utilized, but the jump from 8-thread to 16-thread is modest, reflecting the 6-core/12-thread design. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore is 2298 and single-core is 324; R20 multicore is 9575 and single-core is 1351; R23 multicore is 22799 and single-core is 3218. The R23 multicore figure of 22799 is particularly strong for a 65 W part, indicating that the Zen 4 architecture extracts high throughput per watt.

Geekbench scores for the 7500F are 12362 in multicore and 2374 in single-core. These numbers place the CPU in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors tracked in the database. The average benchmark score of 24964 puts it in close competition with several mobile and desktop parts. The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-11850H (avg score 24935, delta 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avg score 25005, delta -0.2%), the Intel Core i7-13620H (avg score 24911, delta 0.2%), and the Intel Core 5 210H (avg score 24872, delta 0.4%). All of these deltas are within 0.4%, indicating that the 7500F sits in a tightly contested performance tier where no single part has a decisive edge in aggregate scores.

PassMark tests add color to the workload profile. The CPU scores 3841 in single-thread, 26825 in multithread, 79108 in integer math, 47176 in floating-point math, 305925 in data compression, 17510 in data encryption, 22776 in extended instructions, and 1788 in physics. The high integer and floating-point scores suggest strong general-purpose compute, while the data compression figure indicates solid memory subsystem performance. The physics score of 1788 is lower in absolute terms but still respectable for a 6-core part, implying that gaming physics workloads will run smoothly without becoming a bottleneck at typical frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 7500F and the Radeon RX 7650 GRE is best understood through the percentiles and benchmark scores rather than measured FPS, since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The CPU sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 80, which shows that the pairing is well-matched: the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is, but the gap is not large enough to create a severe bottleneck in most scenarios.

In gaming workloads, the data suggests that the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and with ray tracing enabled, while the CPU will hold up well in CPU-bound scenarios like competitive shooters at low settings or high-refresh 1080p. The CPU’s single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates strong per-core performance, which is critical for games that rely on a few threads. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for modern titles that use multiple cores, as evidenced by the 3DMark 8-thread score of 5372, which shows that the CPU can handle eight threads effectively without significant scaling drop-off.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multicore scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 22799, Geekbench multicore 12362) are competitive for a 6-core part, but the GPU’s compute capabilities, such as 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 345.0 GTexel/s texture rate, will accelerate tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering previews. In these mixed workloads, the system is unlikely to have a single bottleneck; instead, the CPU and GPU will alternate as the limiting factor depending on the specific task. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a potential constraint in large datasets or high-resolution textures, but for mainstream workloads, the pairing is balanced enough to avoid stalling either component.

Benchmark Performance

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers an average benchmark score of 42723, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (avg score 43223, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (avg score 43262, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (avg score 43268, delta -1.3%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (avg score 43301, delta -1.3%). The negative deltas indicate that the RX 7650 GRE trails these parts by slightly more than 1%, which is a narrow margin. This positions the GPU as a high-end mainstream option that punches above its class, though it does not quite reach the top tier of desktop GPUs.

In specific benchmark tests, the RX 7650 GRE scores 2336 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 83109 in Geekbench OpenCL. The Steel Nomad score of 2336 shows strong DX12 rasterization performance, while the OpenCL score of 83109 indicates robust general-purpose compute, which is useful for tasks like rendering and scientific workloads. The CPU’s scores, as detailed in the previous section, are also strong, and the combined picture is a system that performs well in both gaming and productivity. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24964 and the GPU’s average of 42723 together yield a combined percentile of 80, meaning this build outperforms 80% of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations.

The percentile positions are telling. The CPU at 77th percentile is a solid mid-range performer, while the GPU at 83rd percentile is a step above. This creates a system where the GPU is the stronger component, but the CPU is not holding it back meaningfully. In real workloads, this means the system can handle modern games at high settings and 1440p with some adjustments, while also serving as a capable workstation for content creation and development tasks.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a gamer who wants high-refresh 1080p performance or entry-level 1440p gaming without stepping into the top-tier GPU price brackets. The CPU’s 77th percentile and the GPU’s 83rd percentile mean that this system will handle most AAA titles at high settings with smooth frame rates, as estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured FPS. The 6-core/12-thread CPU is also well-suited for streamers who game and encode simultaneously, as the multicore scores (Cinebench R23 22799) provide enough headroom for background tasks.

Content creators will find this build useful for video editing and 3D rendering. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Geekbench 2374) accelerates timeline scrubbing and effects previews, while the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB VRAM handle GPU-accelerated rendering and previews. The system is not a professional-grade workstation, but it is adequate for freelance creators and hobbyists who work with 1080p or 1440p footage and moderate 3D scenes.

Software developers and students will appreciate the platform’s features. The AM5 socket supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 (24 lanes from the CPU), which provides future-proofing for storage and expansion. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity in long-running compute tasks. The 65 W TDP keeps the system cool and quiet, making it suitable for dorm rooms or small offices where noise and heat are considerations. Small business workstations that run office applications, spreadsheets, and light database work will find the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 26825 more than sufficient.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate that it can push high frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, where the GPU is rarely the limit. The GPU’s 83rd percentile suggests it can handle 144Hz 1080p in most titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Streaming while gaming is feasible due to the CPU’s 12 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799 shows that the processor has enough headroom to encode video while maintaining game performance, though streamers may want to use the GPU’s hardware encoders to offload work from the CPU.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 12362 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 83109. Timeline performance will be smooth, and exports will be reasonably fast for a mid-range system, with the GPU accelerating effects and color grading.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software will leverage the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 2048 shading units. The CPU’s multithread score of 26825 in PassMark also helps with CPU-based rendering, making this a balanced choice for small projects.

Software development, including compiling and running virtual machines, is well-served by the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 79108 indicates strong throughput for code compilation, and the 32 MB L3 cache helps with repeated build tasks.

Student and office work is a low-stress scenario for this hardware. The CPU’s single-thread performance and the GPU’s capabilities are overkill for word processing and web browsing, but the system will handle multitasking with dozens of browser tabs and office documents without breaking a sweat.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is based on the Navi 33 chip using the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost clock of 2695 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are substantial for its class. It delivers 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.08 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio), which supports both traditional rendering and compute workloads. The pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for high-resolution textures. The 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the performance impact will be more pronounced than on higher-tier GPUs due to the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus.

The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 42723 place it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (delta -1.2%), which is a notable achievement for a mid-range part. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 suggests strong performance in modern DirectX 12 titles, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 indicates that compute-heavy applications will run well. The 170 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 450 W makes this GPU manageable for most desktop power supplies, and the dual-slot design with a single 8-pin connector simplifies installation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame field and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not direct measurements.

Based on the CPU’s 77th percentile and the GPU’s 83rd percentile, this system is estimated to deliver high-refresh 1080p gaming in most titles. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p ultra settings in most games, though some titles with high-resolution texture packs may approach the VRAM limit. At 1440p, the system should handle high settings in most games, but ultra settings may require adjustments in demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, with minimal stutter in CPU-bound scenarios.

Ray tracing performance is expected to be moderate. The GPU’s 32 RT cores provide hardware support, but the 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM may limit performance in ray-traced titles at higher resolutions. For competitive gamers who prioritize frame rates over visual fidelity, this system is well-suited, as the CPU can push high FPS in esports titles and the GPU can keep up at lower settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. This provides a clear upgrade path to newer Zen 4 or future Zen 5 processors, as well as high-speed NVMe storage. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 170 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves headroom for upgrades, but users who plan to install a higher-tier GPU should consider a more powerful power supply.

Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a consideration for users who run critical workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 interface is future-proofed for next-generation graphics cards and storage, though the RX 7650 GRE itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same AM5 socket, such as a Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9 part, which would improve multicore performance for content creation and productivity. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier Radeon RX 7000 series or a competing NVIDIA card would boost gaming performance at higher resolutions, provided the power supply is upgraded accordingly. The platform’s longevity is a key advantage, as AM5 is expected to support future AMD processors.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, meaning this build outperforms 80% of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, while the Intel Core i7-11850H has an average score of 24935, a delta of 0.1%, meaning the AMD part is essentially tied with a negligible lead.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 32 ray tracing cores based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, which provides hardware-accelerated ray tracing support.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, the GPU has a TDP of 170 W, and the suggested power supply is 450 W.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $179, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 279 USD.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Build Overview

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop build that combines a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 processor with an RDNA 3.0-based GPU featuring 8 GB of VRAM. The CPU sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU sits in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, yielding a combined percentile of 80. This places the system in the upper-midrange tier of desktop builds, capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p gaming, along with solid productivity performance for content creation and development.

The pairing is well-balanced, with the GPU slightly outperforming the CPU relative to their respective peer groups. The platform offers a clear upgrade path through the AM5 socket, supporting DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5. This build is a sensible choice for gamers and creators who want strong performance without reaching for the highest-tier components, and its 65 W CPU TDP and 170 W GPU TDP keep power requirements manageable.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds