SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT forms a highly capable desktop foundation, targeting 1080p and 1440p gaming with strong efficiency. The CPU outperforms its direct peers in multi-threaded work, while the GPU provides a substantial 16 GB frame buffer that gives it unusual staying power for a mid-range card. The combined benchmark data shows a system that is well-balanced for its class, though its performance ceiling is defined by the GPU at higher resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) using TSMC’s 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and its 65 W TDP makes it an exceptionally power-efficient choice for a modern desktop platform. The chip features a 32 MB shared L3 cache alongside 1 MB of L2 per core, which is a configuration well-suited for gaming and general productivity. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support, a feature that adds value for workstation use.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 7500F demonstrates a strong balance between single-thread and multi-thread performance. Its single-thread score in Cinebench R23 is 3218, while its multi-core score reaches 22799. The Geekbench results show a similar trend with a single-core score of 2374 and a multi-core score of 12362. The 3DMark results reveal how the chip scales with thread count: it scores 1902 with 2 threads, 3621 with 4 threads, 5372 with 8 threads, and 6376 with 16 threads, essentially maxing out at 6379 with all threads. This scaling indicates that the processor handles lightly-threaded tasks very well and does not suffer from major diminishing returns until the 8-thread mark.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24964 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, making it a solid upper-mid-range part. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a dead heat. It is only 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H (avg score 24935) and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H (avg score 24911), while being 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avg score 25005). For real workloads, this means the 7500F offers essentially identical performance to these alternatives in mixed-use scenarios, but its efficiency and platform advantages (AM5) give it a distinct position. The Passmark integer math score of 79108 and floating-point math score of 47176 indicate robust performance for code compilation and scientific calculations, while the data encryption score of 17510 shows it can handle cryptography tasks without issue.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture reveals a system that excels in gaming but remains a mid-range contender in raw compute. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking is strong, but the GPU’s 60th percentile ranking is more modest. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17083 places it in a tight race with its nearest rivals. It is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (avg score 17037) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (avg score 17019), but 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (avg score 17208). This puts the RX 7600 XT in a performance class that is competitive with older high-end cards but slightly behind a modern mid-range NVIDIA offering.

The GPU’s individual benchmark scores show its strengths and weaknesses. It scores 2348 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern test that stresses ray tracing and DX12 features. In Geekbench, it scores 92426 in OpenCL and 48366 in Vulkan, indicating strong compute capability for its class. The Passmark G3D score of 17132 is the primary gaming metric, while the Passmark GPU Compute score of 8987 shows it can handle some compute workloads but is not a dedicated workstation card. The Passmark DirectX scores are varied: 228 for DX9, 167 for DX11, 85 for DX10, and 65 for DX12. This suggests that while the card handles older APIs well, its DX12 performance is not its strongest attribute in synthetic tests, though real-world gaming may differ.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 69, which reflects the GPU holding the system back from the CPU’s higher tier. The pair’s rank by FPS is 2498 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 104.9 across all tested games. This average is skewed by older or less demanding titles, but it gives a general sense that the system is comfortably above the median for gaming performance.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (confirmed as measured, not estimated) shows a clear pattern: this system is a 1080p champion, a strong 1440p performer, and a marginal 4K option. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in most titles. For competitive shooters, it excels: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 163 FPS, Valorant at 367.2 FPS, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 194 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 151.3 FPS. Even demanding single-player titles are playable, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 50 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 59.3 FPS. The average FPS across all games at this resolution is well above the 60 FPS target for most titles, making this an excellent 1080p setup.

At 2560x1440, the system remains capable but the GPU starts to show its limits. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 108 FPS, Valorant to 316.1 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone to 134.3 FPS, which are still excellent for competitive play. However, more demanding games show strain: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 35.9 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 31.3 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator to 46.5 FPS. These are playable but not ideal for a smooth experience. Lighter titles like Minecraft (101 FPS) and Roblox (137.8 FPS) remain very smooth. The average FPS at this resolution is still decent, but the user must be willing to lower settings for the most demanding AAA games.

At 3840x2160, the system is generally not suitable for modern AAA gaming. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 24.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a nearly unplayable 6.5 FPS. Even less demanding titles struggle: Fortnite drops to 24.4 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone, while better at 114.1 FPS, is an outlier due to its optimization. The system is only viable at 4K for older or lighter games like Valorant (251.1 FPS), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (147.1 FPS), and Roblox (77.2 FPS). The data clearly shows that 4K is not the intended resolution for this pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for this system, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking far exceeds the GPU’s 60th percentile, creating a significant gap. This means that in most gaming scenarios, the RX 7600 XT will be the limiting factor, while the Ryzen 5 7500F will have headroom to spare. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p supports this conclusion. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops from 50 to 35.9, a 28% reduction, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation. The CPU is not the constraint because the single-thread performance (974 in 3DMark single-thread) is strong enough to keep up with the GPU’s output.

However, there are exceptions where the CPU can become the bottleneck. In esports titles with very high frame rates, like Valorant at 367.2 FPS at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance is crucial to maintaining those high numbers. If the GPU were faster, the CPU might struggle to feed it frames. But in this pairing, the GPU is the limiting factor even in these titles, as shown by the FPS scaling to 316.1 at 1440p and 251.1 at 4K, which is a less dramatic drop than in AAA titles, suggesting the CPU is still keeping pace.

The multi-threaded performance of the CPU is also not fully utilized in gaming. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6376 shows that the CPU has significant multi-core capability, but most games use fewer threads. The Passmark multithread score of 26825 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 indicate that for productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the more dominant component, while the GPU will provide acceleration for specific tasks. In a balanced workload, the system is well-matched for gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but for pure compute, the CPU outshines the GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the expected frame rate for Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p with ultra settings?

A: The measured FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 at 2560x1440 is 35.9 FPS, which is playable but may require lowering settings for a smoother experience.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to the Intel Core i7-13620H?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H’s score of 24911, indicating virtually identical performance.

Q: Is the RX 7600 XT suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that 4K gaming is not viable for most modern titles, with examples like Red Dead Redemption 2 running at 21.3 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 at 24.7 FPS, making it only suitable for older or less demanding games.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and does it matter?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 16 GB capacity is a strong asset for texture-heavy games.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what does it mean for cooling?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which means it is very power-efficient and can be cooled by a capable air cooler without requiring a high-end liquid cooling solution.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms that require higher data integrity.

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all tested games is 104.9, with the pair ranking 2498 out of 3732 pairs, indicating it is above the median for gaming performance.

Who Should Build It

This system is an excellent choice for a gamer targeting 1080p or 1440p resolution with high to ultra settings. The data shows it delivers over 60 FPS in most modern titles at 1080p and remains playable at 1440p, making it ideal for competitive gamers who need high refresh rates in esports titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2. It is also a strong option for content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering, as the CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799) is robust, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM can handle larger textures and projects.

The system is less suitable for users who demand 4K gaming, as the GPU is not powerful enough for modern AAA titles at that resolution. However, it can serve as a capable workstation for programmers and developers, given the CPU’s strong integer math score (79108) and data encryption performance (17510). For students, the system offers a balanced platform for both coursework and casual gaming. Small business workstations that require ECC memory support and efficient operation would also benefit from this pairing. The 65 W CPU TDP and the GPU’s 190 W TDP make it a manageable system for a standard desktop case, though the suggested PSU is 450 W.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture (codenamed Hotpink Bonefish) and utilizes the Navi 33 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost clock of 2755 MHz. Its memory subsystem is a 16 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This large VRAM capacity is a key differentiator, allowing the card to handle high-resolution textures and large datasets better than cards with less memory.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are reflected in its 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 performance and matching FP16 throughput, which is useful for AI inference and some rendering tasks. The texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s are solid for its class. In benchmarks, the GPU scores 92426 in Geekbench OpenCL and 48366 in Vulkan, indicating respectable compute performance. However, its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 65 is notably low, which may indicate that the card’s driver or hardware is not optimized for the synthetic DX12 workload in that specific test, despite real-world DX12 games like Call of Duty: Warzone performing well (151.3 FPS at 1080p).

The GPU’s 60th percentile ranking places it behind the CPU in overall performance tier. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, is 0.7% faster on average, which means the RX 7600 XT is essentially in the same performance class as a previous-generation high-end card. The 16 GB VRAM gives it an advantage over the RTX 3070 in memory capacity, but the RTX 3070’s higher bandwidth and better DX12 synthetic scores suggest it may be faster in certain workloads. For rendering, the 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the performance is modest compared to higher-tier cards, as evidenced by the Cyberpunk 2077 frame rates. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, making it compatible with all modern game APIs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (class: desktop) that pairs a high-efficiency 6-core CPU with a mid-range GPU. The combined percentile of 69 places it in the upper-mid-range tier of systems, meaning it is better than the majority of builds but not a top-tier enthusiast setup. The CPU is a modern AM5 platform processor with strong single-thread and multi-thread performance, while the GPU is a 1080p/1440p focused card with a large memory buffer. The pairing is well-balanced for its intended purpose, though the GPU is the clear limiting factor for higher resolutions.

The build is characterized by its efficiency: the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 190 W TDP mean that the system can be powered by a 450 W PSU, which is modest for a gaming rig. This makes it a good candidate for a compact or office-friendly desktop. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, while the GPU’s dual-slot design and single 8-pin power connector make installation straightforward. Overall, this is a practical, capable system that prioritizes value in the mainstream segment, delivering excellent performance for its power draw.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM5, which is a modern socket with support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the system can support the latest NVMe SSDs and other expansion cards. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5, and the CPU’s ECC support adds reliability for workstation tasks.

The upgrade path is clear and favorable. The CPU can be upgraded to a higher-core-count Ryzen 7000 series processor without changing the motherboard, as the socket is currently active. The GPU can also be upgraded to a more powerful Radeon RX 7000 series card, though the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface may slightly bottleneck a faster card. The suggested PSU of 450 W provides some headroom, but a more powerful GPU would likely require a PSU upgrade. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means that the cooling solution can be kept simple, but if a user upgrades to a higher-TDP CPU, a better cooler would be necessary. The system is well-positioned for a sensible next upgrade: either adding more DDR5 memory or moving to a higher-tier GPU for 4K gaming, provided the PSU is also upgraded.