SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F pairs with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 in a desktop build that sits at the 47th percentile overall among all tested combinations. This pairing combines a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 43 W entry-level RDNA 3.0 GPU, creating a system where the CPU delivers strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance while the GPU anchors the lower end of the graphics spectrum. The data indicates a significant performance imbalance, with the processor ranking in the 77th percentile among all CPUs and the graphics card in the 17th percentile among all GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node. It contains 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The processor’s TDP is rated at 65 W, and it supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and supports ECC memory.

Benchmark data shows strong scaling across thread counts. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 974 in single-thread, 1902 in 2-thread, 3621 in 4-thread, 5372 in 8-thread, 6376 in 16-thread, and 6379 in max-thread tests. The near-identical scores between 16-thread and max-thread (6376 vs 6379) confirm that the 12 threads are fully utilized without hyperthreading overhead penalties. Cinebench results reinforce this: Cinebench R23 multicore score is 22799, while single-core is 3218. The multicore-to-single-core ratio of roughly 7.1 indicates excellent parallel efficiency for a 6-core part.

Geekbench scores show 2374 single-core and 12362 multicore. PassMark results are comprehensive: single-thread 3841, multithread 26825, integer math 79108, floating-point math 47176, extended instructions 22776, data encryption 17510, data compression 305925, physics 1788, random string sorting 36191, and find prime numbers 199. The physics score of 1788 is notably lower relative to other PassMark sub-tests, which may reflect the specific workload characteristics of that benchmark rather than a general weakness.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24964, placing it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-11850H (avg score 24935, delta 0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005, delta -0.2%), Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, delta 0.2%), and Intel Core 5 210H (24872, delta 0.4%). The deltas are all within 0.4%, meaning the 7500F is statistically tied with these competitors in average performance, despite differences in architecture and market positioning.

For real workloads, the 5.00 GHz boost clock and 32 MB L3 cache benefit latency-sensitive tasks like gaming and office applications. The 12 threads handle modern productivity software and moderate multi-threaded workloads such as video encoding or compilation, though the physics score suggests some simulation workloads may not scale as well as expected.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and 3218 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core performance capable of feeding high-refresh displays in less GPU-bound titles. However, the RX 7400’s 17th percentile ranking among GPUs means frame rates will be constrained by the graphics card in most scenarios, making 1080p high-refresh gaming unrealistic for demanding titles.

Streaming: The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 65 W TDP provides enough headroom for software encoding at moderate settings, though the GPU lacks dedicated encoding performance data. The CPU’s multithread score of 26825 in PassMark suggests it can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding loads, but the GPU’s low performance may force lower game settings to maintain stream quality.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799 and Geekbench multicore of 12362 indicate the CPU can handle 1080p video editing timelines with multiple effects. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with scrubbing and preview. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 11897 and compute score of 5152 provide basic acceleration for effects, but complex renders will be slow.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799 is respectable for a 6-core part, placing it in the upper quarter of CPUs. Rendering tasks that are CPU-bound, such as single-frame renders in Blender or mental ray, will complete in reasonable time. GPU rendering is limited by the RX 7400’s 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is far below what dedicated rendering GPUs offer.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 79108 and random string sorting score of 36191 indicate strong performance for compilation and code processing. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 3841 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interaction. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking supports a smooth development experience for most projects.

Student and office work: The single-thread 3DMark score of 974 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 3218 provide snappy performance for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day use, and the 8 GB GPU memory is more than sufficient for office applications and display output.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24964, which places it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, scores 25005 with a delta of -0.2%, meaning the 7500F is effectively identical in performance. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935 with a delta of 0.1%, again a statistical tie. The Intel Core i7-13620H and Intel Core 5 210H are similarly close at 24911 (0.2%) and 24872 (0.4%) respectively.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 2467, placing it in the 17th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S (avg 2440, delta 1.1%), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2433, delta 1.4%), Intel HD Graphics 610 (2425, delta 1.8%), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (2422, delta 1.9%). These deltas indicate the RX 7400 is just slightly faster than these low-end parts, but all are clustered in the very bottom tier of GPU performance.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 1103. PassMark results show DirectX 9 score of 176, DirectX 10 of 59, DirectX 11 of 97, and DirectX 12 of 44. These scores are extremely low, indicating the GPU struggles with modern graphics APIs. The G2D score of 1209 and G3D score of 11897 show a wide gap between 2D and 3D performance, typical of entry-level GPUs. GPU compute score is 5152.

The combined percentile of 47 places this build in the middle of all CPU+GPU pairings, but this is misleading. The CPU’s high percentile (77) and GPU’s low percentile (17) pull the average down, creating a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but underperforms in graphics-intensive workloads.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability. Gamers at 1080p with low settings or esports titles may find the RX 7400 sufficient, but the 17th percentile GPU ranking means most modern games will require reduced resolutions or graphical presets. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks such as video encoding, batch photo processing, or software compilation will benefit from the 77th percentile CPU performance. Software developers, particularly those working on large codebases, will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 79108 and multithread score of 26825. Students and small business workstations handling office tasks, spreadsheets, and web applications will find the single-thread performance of 3841 in PassMark more than adequate. The 65 W CPU TDP and 43 W GPU TDP make this a low-power system suitable for quiet, energy-efficient builds.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance suggests it will not bottleneck in most games, but the GPU’s low percentile ranking limits overall frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for future storage and expansion cards. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though at reduced bandwidth compared to the CPU’s native Gen 5 capability.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 43 W, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. This leaves significant headroom for future upgrades. The platform supports higher-TDP CPUs, and the PSU headroom can accommodate a more powerful GPU without requiring a new power supply. The GPU uses a single 6-pin power connector and is dual-slot wide, so most cases will fit it without issue.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking means it has substantial headroom to drive higher-end graphics cards. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and 12 threads will not bottleneck mid-range GPUs in most workloads. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or faster storage would improve overall system responsiveness, though the existing memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is already respectable.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all gaming performance figures are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

The CPU’s single-thread 3DMark score of 974 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 3218 indicate strong per-core performance for gaming. The 32 MB L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide low latency and high frequency, which are beneficial for game logic and physics. However, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 11897 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 place it in the 17th percentile, meaning it will be the limiting factor in most games.

At 1080p with low to medium settings, the RX 7400 may achieve playable frame rates in esports titles and older games. For modern AAA games, expect frame rates below 60 FPS at 1080p, with significant reductions required for playable performance. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but the low bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and only 64 ROPs will limit fill-rate-bound scenarios. The 1792 shading units and 112 TMUs provide moderate texture throughput, but the 28 ray tracing cores are too few for meaningful RT performance in most titles.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. Memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. It contains 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The 28 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated RT, though their low count makes RT performance minimal. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 16.49 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 2467 places it in the 17th percentile, with nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon 8040S (2440), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2433), Intel HD Graphics 610 (2425), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (2422). The deltas of 1.1% to 1.9% indicate the RX 7400 is only marginally faster than these older or integrated parts.

The TDP is rated at 43 W, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. The GPU uses a single 6-pin power connector and is dual-slot wide. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

In rendering workloads, the 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for basic GPU compute tasks but far below the requirements for professional 3D rendering or machine learning workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5152 reflects this modest compute capability. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but may limit higher resolutions or texture-heavy scenes.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F scores 974 in 3DMark single-thread and 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core. Its average benchmark score of 24964 is within 0.4% of its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-11850H and AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest competitors?

A: The RX 7400 has an average benchmark score of 2467, placing it in the 17th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 8040S, scores 2440 with a delta of 1.1%, meaning the RX 7400 is about 1% faster than the closest competitor.

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU’s 17th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM make 4K gaming impractical. Even at 1080p, the GPU will likely struggle with modern titles at high settings, based on its low benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s power consumption?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. The GPU has a TDP of 43 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. This leaves considerable headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz and boost clock is 5.00 GHz, with the 65 W TDP providing thermal headroom for manual tuning.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance between the CPU and GPU is stark. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 17th percentile creates a significant bottleneck, with the GPU limiting overall system performance in graphics-intensive workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data compression (PassMark score 305925), or integer math (79108), the CPU performs at a high level. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming or 3D rendering, the GPU’s low performance constrains results.

The FPS scaling, estimated from benchmark scores, shows that the CPU can feed frames at a rate far exceeding what the GPU can render. The CPU’s single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark suggests it can handle high-refresh gaming, but the GPU’s G3D score of 11897 and DirectX 12 score of 44 indicate it will drop frame rates to sub-60 territory in demanding titles. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in gaming; the GPU will be.

For productivity workloads, the CPU’s multithread score of 26825 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 multicore of 22799 provide solid performance. The GPU’s compute score of 5152 may accelerate some tasks, but for most CPU-bound productivity, the GPU is irrelevant. In mixed workloads that use both CPU and GPU, the GPU’s low performance will be the bottleneck.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the AMD Radeon RX 7400. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 65 W TDP, ranking in the 77th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 part with 8 GB GDDR6 memory, 1792 shading units, and 43 W TDP, ranking in the 17th percentile among all GPUs.

The combined percentile of 47 places this system in the middle of all CPU+GPU pairings, but this average masks the extreme disparity between the two components. The CPU is a capable mid-range processor suitable for productivity and moderate gaming, while the GPU is an entry-level part suitable for basic display output and light gaming. This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads and need minimal graphics capability. The platform’s upgrade path is excellent, with the AM5 socket and 200 W PSU headroom allowing for a much more powerful GPU without other system changes. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming, but the low compute and shading performance limit the GPU to esports titles and older games at playable settings.