SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance envelope: high-refresh 1080p gaming with strong headroom for 1440p. The CPU’s single-thread score of 974 in 3dmark and the GPU’s 71st percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate a system built for responsiveness and solid frame rates rather than extreme 4K compute. This analysis interprets the measured FPS data and benchmark scores to define exactly who this build serves and where its limits lie.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is exceptional at 1080p. Measured FPS at 1920x1080 shows Counter-Strike 2 at 193.9 FPS, Valorant at 448 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS. These figures clearly exceed the 144Hz refresh rate threshold that many competitive monitors use, and even the 240Hz barrier is surpassed by Valorant and CS:GO (432 FPS). The CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score of 974 supports this, as high frame rates in esports titles are heavily dependent on single-core performance.

Streaming is a mixed bag but generally viable. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads produce a passmark_multithread score of 26825, which is competitive with the Intel Core i7-11850H (deltaPct 0.1). However, the GPU’s passmark_gpu_compute score of 9550 suggests that using the GPU for encoding may be more efficient. At 1080p, games like Call of Duty: Warzone run at 149 FPS, so there is sufficient headroom to encode a stream while maintaining playable frame rates, though the 12-thread limit means heavy multitasking during streaming could cause drops in CPU-bound titles.

Video editing benefits from the CPU’s multi-core capabilities. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799 positions it well for rendering timelines, while the passmark_data_compression score of 305925 indicates strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks common in editing workflows. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and preview rendering, making 1080p and 1440p editing smooth. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 6379, nearly identical to the 16-thread score of 6376, shows that the CPU scales well up to its full thread count.

3D rendering is a viable workload but with caveats. The CPU’s cinebench_r20_multicore score of 9575 and passmark_find_prime_numbers score of 199 place it in the mid-range for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s fp32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS and its 40 rt cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced scenes in compatible software. However, the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2548 is modest, indicating that this is not a top-tier rendering workstation. It will handle small to medium projects but will lag behind higher-end GPUs in complex scenes.

Software development sees a balanced workload. The CPU’s passmark_integer_math score of 79108 and passmark_extended_instructions score of 22776 support code compilation and execution of instruction-heavy binaries. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache (from the cache section) helps with frequently accessed data, while the 5 nm process node ensures efficient power draw (TDP of 65 W) during long build sessions. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 98089 indicates strong support for graphics programming and debugging.

Student and office work is more than adequately served. The CPU’s passmark_single_thread score of 3841 ensures snappy application launches, while the 12 threads handle multitasking between browsers, office suites, and communication tools. The GPU’s passmark_g2d score of 972 covers 2D acceleration needs, and the entire system’s combined percentile of 74 places it above the majority of systems, so it will not feel sluggish in any standard productivity task. The 65 W CPU TDP also means lower heat output in compact office chassis.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24964, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-11850H (avg score 24935, deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avg score 25005, deltaPct -0.2), and Intel Core i7-13620H (avg score 24911, deltaPct 0.2). These deltas are negligible, meaning the Ryzen 5 7500F is effectively tied with these alternatives in overall CPU performance. The single-core 3dmark score of 974 is a particular strength, while the cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799 shows solid multi-threaded performance for a 6-core chip.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26011, placing it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (avg score 25740, deltaPct 1.1), which is surprising given that the RX 6750 XT is a desktop card; this suggests the benchmark database groups mobile and desktop parts together. The GPU’s passmark_g3d score of 20700 is the primary driver of this percentile, while the geekbench_vulkan score of 98089 shows strong compute performance.

Combined, the system has a combined percentile of 74 and a pairRankByFps of 1713 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 127.1. This means the pairing outperforms roughly 54% of all CPU-GPU combinations in gaming (when calculating the rank position), but the average FPS of 127.1 indicates that it is squarely in the mid-to-high performance tier. The CPU’s percentile is higher than the GPU’s, suggesting the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F good for gaming?

A: Yes. The CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score of 974 and its 77th percentile ranking support high frame rates in games. Measured performance at 1080p shows esports titles exceeding 190 FPS, and the CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6750 XT have, and is it enough?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at ultra settings, as shown by the measured FPS data, though 4K gaming at ultra settings will stress this memory capacity in some titles.

Q: What is the difference between the CPU’s base and boost clocks?

A: The base clock is 3.70 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz. The boost clock is what the CPU achieves under load for single or lightly-threaded tasks, which contributes to strong single-thread benchmark scores like the 3dmark_single_thread score of 974.

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 40 rt cores, and the architecture is RDNA 2.0. However, the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2548 suggests that ray tracing performance is modest, so users should expect lower frame rates when enabling ray tracing in demanding titles.

Q: What is the power consumption of this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested PSU is 600 W, which provides sufficient headroom for the combined power draw of 315 W plus other system components.

Q: Is the CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplierUnlocked field is true. This means users can adjust the multiplier to increase clock speeds beyond the 5.00 GHz boost clock, potentially improving benchmark scores like the cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799.

Q: What is the memory support for this CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported, which is useful for workstation tasks that require data integrity.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in competitive titles: Valorant achieves 448 FPS, CS:GO hits 432 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege reaches 232 FPS. These numbers indicate the system is overkill for 1080p esports, as even the most demanding esports monitors at 360Hz would be saturated by Valorant’s performance.

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance is strong but not universally maxed. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 60 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 50.2 FPS, and Control at 83.3 FPS. These are playable but not high-refresh rates. Call of Duty: Warzone at 149 FPS is a highlight, showing the system can handle fast-paced shooters at high settings.

At 2560x1440, the system remains capable but the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Esports titles still perform well: Valorant at 382 FPS, CS:GO at 297 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 152 FPS. However, AAA titles drop significantly: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 41.9 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 36.9 FPS, and Control to 61.3 FPS. The average FPS across all games at this resolution would be lower than the 127.1 average, but the system remains viable for 1440p gaming if settings are adjusted.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles with demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 29.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 29 FPS, and Control at 42.1 FPS. Esports titles are still playable: Valorant at 305 FPS and CS:GO at 175 FPS, but the overall experience is below the 60 FPS threshold for most AAA games. This resolution is not recommended for this build.

Who Should Build It

This build is for gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and are willing to drop to 1440p for less demanding titles. The measured FPS data shows that esports and competitive shooters hit 150-450 FPS at 1080p, making this an ideal system for players of Valorant, CS:GO, and Rainbow Six Siege. The 12 GB VRAM ensures future-proofing for 1080p ultra settings.

Content creators who work with 1080p or 1440p video will find this system capable. The CPU’s cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799 and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM support editing timelines and rendering effects. The passmark_data_compression score of 305925 speeds up file transfers and backups, which is useful for managing large video projects.

Software developers benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (974 in 3dmark) and multi-thread capabilities (26825 in passmark_multithread). The support for ECC memory (eccMemory is true) provides stability for long compilation runs, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface (from the pcie field) allows for fast NVMe storage for build caches.

Students and office workers will find this system overkill for their needs, but the performance headroom means it will remain fast for years. The CPU’s 65 W TDP keeps electricity costs low, and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM handles any graphics-accelerated tasks in productivity software. The system’s combined percentile of 74 ensures it will not feel outdated quickly.

Small business workstations that run accounting software, database management, or light CAD will benefit from the CPU’s data encryption score of 17510 and the overall system responsiveness. The GPU’s OpenGL 4.6 support (from the apis field) ensures compatibility with legacy business applications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the Navi 22 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture on a 7 nm TSMC process. It has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, which produce a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s. The fp32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS and fp16 of 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1) indicate strong compute capability for its class.

The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as evidenced by the measured FPS data, but the 192-bit bus may limit performance in memory-heavy scenarios at 4K. The 40 rt cores provide ray tracing support, though the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2548 suggests this is not a strength.

The GPU’s benchmark scores show a mixed profile. The passmark_g3d score of 20700 and geekbench_vulkan score of 98089 are strong, but the passmark_directx_12 score of 80 is notably low, which may indicate driver or benchmark quirks rather than real-world performance. The geekbench_metal score of 137249 is high, but this is less relevant for Windows gaming. The 71st percentile ranking and avgBenchmarkScore of 26011 place it above the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (deltaPct 1.1), which is an unexpected comparison.

For rendering, the GPU’s 13.31 TFLOPS fp32 performance is adequate for real-time previews and light rendering tasks. The 12 GB VRAM allows for larger textures and scenes, but the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth may bottleneck when working with high-resolution textures. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (from the apis field) ensures compatibility with the latest rendering APIs.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename) on a 5 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3, which is typical for a mid-range desktop chip.

The benchmark data reveals a processor with strong single-thread performance. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 974 is high for a 6-core chip, and the cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 3218 confirms this. The passmark_single_thread score of 3841 further validates that this CPU excels at tasks that rely on one core, such as gaming physics and day-to-day application responsiveness.

Multi-threaded performance is solid but not exceptional. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799 and passmark_multithread score of 26825 are competitive with the Intel Core i7-13620H (deltaPct 0.2), but the 6-core limit means it will fall behind higher-core-count processors in heavily threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 6376 and max_threads score of 6379 are nearly identical, confirming that the CPU has no additional threads to leverage beyond its 12.

The CPU’s memory support for DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability makes it suitable for workstation tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The 5 nm process node and 65 W TDP result in efficient power consumption, which is beneficial for both performance-per-watt and thermal management in smaller cases.

The 77th percentile ranking and avgBenchmarkScore of 24964 place it in the upper mid-range of CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, is only 0.2% behind in average score, suggesting that the 7500F is not the best value in its segment but is a capable performer.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass is desktop) that pairs a 6-core Zen 4 CPU with an RDNA 2 GPU. The CPU is from the 7000 series and is currently in active production, while the GPU is from the RX 6000 series and is end-of-life. The combination has a combined percentile of 74, meaning it outperforms 74% of all CPU-GPU pairs in the database.

The CPU’s 77th percentile and the GPU’s 71st percentile are closely matched, indicating a balanced pairing. The pairRankByFps of 1713 out of 3732 pairs shows that this combination performs better than the majority of pairs in gaming, with an average FPS of 127.1 across all tested games. This places the build firmly in the mid-to-high performance tier, suitable for most gaming and productivity tasks.

The build is characterized by its efficiency: the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 250 W TDP combine for 315 W of component power draw, which is manageable with a 600 W PSU. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 267 mm length make it compatible with most mid-tower cases, while the CPU’s AM5 socket provides a modern platform for future upgrades.

Overall, this is a well-rounded desktop build that excels at 1080p gaming and handles 1440p gaming with reduced settings. It is not a top-tier enthusiast system, but it provides strong performance for its class, as evidenced by its ability to exceed 60 FPS in most AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a slight CPU advantage over the GPU. The CPU’s 77th percentile is higher than the GPU’s 71st percentile, and the CPU’s nearest rival deltas are all positive (0.1, 0.2, 0.4), while the GPU’s nearest rival delta is also positive (1.1). This suggests that the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, meaning the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (974 in 3dmark) ensures it can feed the GPU adequately, but the FPS scaling shows that the GPU is still the primary constraint. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 60 FPS at 1080p to 41.9 FPS at 1440p, a 30% decrease, which is consistent with GPU-bound performance. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29.3 FPS.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck. The passmark_data_encryption score of 17510 and passmark_find_prime_numbers score of 199 are modest, indicating that the CPU will limit performance in encryption or prime-number-finding tasks. However, for most office and development tasks, the CPU’s 12 threads and high single-thread score are sufficient, and the GPU’s compute capabilities (passmark_gpu_compute score of 9550) can offload some work.

The average FPS across games of 127.1 suggests that the pairing is well-balanced for gaming, as neither component is drastically underpowered relative to the other. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p (a 50% increase in resolution) shows a roughly 30-40% decrease in FPS across most titles, which is typical for a GPU-bound system.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a modern socket that supports DDR5 memory. The memory support is dual-channel with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which provides ample bandwidth for the GPU (PCIe 4.0 x16) and future PCIe 5.0 devices.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU is end-of-life, so a sensible upgrade would be to a newer GPU when available, but the current 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth should remain sufficient for several years at 1080p and 1440p.

The CPU is currently in active production and has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible to extend its lifespan. The 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for overclocking, but the stock cooler (not specified) may need to be upgraded for sustained high clocks. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $179, which was a competitive price for its performance class at release.

For a meaningful upgrade path, the AM5 platform allows for a future CPU upgrade without changing the motherboard. A higher-core-count Ryzen 7000 series CPU would provide better multi-threaded performance, as the current 6-core limit is the main CPU constraint. The suggested PSU of 600 W provides headroom for a GPU upgrade to a model with higher power draw, though the current 250 W GPU TDP is well within this limit.

The GPU’s power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) and dual-slot design are standard, so replacing it with a new GPU is straightforward. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is backwards compatible with PCIe 3.0, ensuring the GPU will work in older systems if moved to a different build. The system’s overall upgrade path is solid, with the motherboard supporting both CPU and GPU upgrades without requiring a full rebuild.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds