SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process node. It belongs to the 7000 series family and operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The chip packs 6,570 million transistors into a 71 mm² die, reflecting the density advantage of the 5 nm node. The processor is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted for overclocking, and it carries a 65 W TDP, positioning it as an efficient mainstream part within AMD's desktop lineup.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB shared L3 pool. This configuration is typical of AMD's chiplet-based Zen 4 design, where the CCD communicates with the I/O die over the Infinity Fabric. For memory, the CPU supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, delivering a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, which is notable for workstation or server-adjacent use cases where data integrity matters. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 24 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed storage and graphics expansion.

Benchmark scores highlight the CPU's multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 22,799 points in multi-core and 3,218 points in single-core. The multi-core result is strong for a 6-core part, indicating that the Zen 4 architecture extracts substantial instruction-level parallelism from each core. The single-core score of 3,218 is competitive, reflecting a high boost clock and efficient IPC improvements over prior generations. In Geekbench, the processor achieves 12,362 in multi-core and 2,374 in single-core, corroborating the Cinebench results. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a progression from 1,902 for 2 threads to 6,376 for 16 threads, with max threads hitting 6,379. This scaling indicates that the processor maintains efficiency as thread count increases, though the jump from 8 to 16 threads is modest, which is expected for a 6-core/12-thread design. PassMark scores further detail the workload profile: integer math at 79,108, floating-point math at 47,176, and extended instructions at 22,776. Data compression hits 305,925, while encryption reaches 17,510. The processor's average benchmark score is 24,964, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24,935 (0.1% slower), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25,005 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24,911 (0.2% slower). These deltas are negligible, meaning the Ryzen 5 7500F sits at parity with these mid-range parts, but its desktop platform and 65 W TDP give it a distinct efficiency advantage.

# Benchmark Performance

The overall benchmark picture for this CPU-GPU pairing is defined by the processor's 77th percentile standing and the GPU's 75th percentile among all graphics cards. The combined percentile for the build is 76, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24,964, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 30,433, suggesting that in raw compute terms, the graphics card carries a heavier load in mixed workloads.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,014. In Geekbench, it achieves 122,223 in Metal, 97,841 in OpenCL, and 83,974 in Vulkan. These numbers indicate robust compute performance across different API environments, with Metal performance notably high for a non-NVIDIA part. PassMark results show a G3D score of 18,931 and a GPU compute score of 8,240. The DirectX 11 score of 166 and DirectX 12 score of 71 reflect legacy and modern API workloads, respectively. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 70HX at 30,476 (0.1% faster), the NVIDIA Tesla M60 at 30,490 (0.2% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30,095 (1.1% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti at 29,945 (1.6% slower). The RX 6700 sits in a tight cluster, with only a 1.6% difference separating it from a higher-tier card like the RTX 3070 Ti. This indicates that the RX 6700 punches above its expected weight in synthetic benchmarks.

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance of 974 in 3DMark single-thread and 3,218 in Cinebench R23 single-core suggest strong frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's compute scores, particularly the 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, indicate a capable rasterizer. Together, the 76th combined percentile positions this build as a solid mid-range desktop configuration.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The die size is 71 mm² with 6,570 million transistors.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in multi-threaded performance?

A: In average benchmark score, the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24,964, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935), 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25,005), and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 6700 features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 6700 includes 36 ray tracing cores as part of its RDNA 2.0 architecture. However, the FACT PACK does not include ray tracing-specific benchmark scores, so performance in that area cannot be quantified here.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F scores 3,218 points in Cinebench R23 single-core, which places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong per-core performance for gaming and lightly threaded tasks.

Q: What kind of memory does the CPU support?

A: The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported, which is uncommon for mainstream desktop CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The RX 6700 ranks in the 75th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 30,433. This places it slightly below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, which scores 29,945 (1.6% slower), and slightly above the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30,095 (1.1% faster).

# Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, all frame rate figures presented here are estimates based on benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance of 974 in 3DMark and 3,218 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates strong per-core throughput, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in games that rely on a few threads. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 11.29 TFLOPS and texture rate of 352.8 GTexel/s suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p and 1440p with high settings.

At 1080p, the combination of a 77th percentile CPU and a 75th percentile GPU should deliver smooth performance in esports titles, where the CPU's single-thread advantage (3,218 in Cinebench R23) minimizes bottlenecking. In AAA games, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-detail textures, though the 160-bit bus may limit performance at higher resolutions. At 1440p, the GPU's pixel rate of 156.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.8 GTexel/s will become more saturated, and the CPU's multi-threaded score of 22,799 in Cinebench R23 ensures that background tasks or game logic threads do not starve the rendering pipeline.

The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 71 in PassMark suggests moderate performance in modern APIs, which are standard in recent titles. The Vulkan score of 83,974 in Geekbench indicates better performance in Vulkan-based games, which are common in cross-platform engines. For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 77th percentile standing should keep frame times consistent. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, but the 75th percentile ranking still positions it for playable frame rates in most titles at high settings. The absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the underlying scores suggest a balanced 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming machine.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7500F is built for the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a forward-looking upgrade path within the current desktop ecosystem. The socket supports DDR5 memory, and this CPU specifically uses a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support is present, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor, allowing for the latest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards to run at full bandwidth. This is a significant advantage over older platforms that are limited to PCIe Gen 4.

Memory support is exclusively DDR5, so any upgrade requires moving away from older DDR4 platforms. The dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most gaming and productivity tasks, but users with memory-intensive workloads might consider higher-capacity kits. The ECC support adds a layer of reliability for data-sensitive applications, though it requires ECC-compatible memory modules.

For the GPU, the Radeon RX 6700 has a TDP of 175 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves substantial headroom for a future CPU upgrade within the same socket. For instance, moving to a higher-core-count Zen 4 part would increase CPU power draw, but the 65 W TDP of the current chip means the 450 W PSU recommendation accounts for the GPU's needs plus a reasonable CPU load. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard for mid-range cards. The dual-slot design and 267 mm length (10.5 inches) mean it fits in most mid-tower cases, but users with compact builds should verify clearance.

The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface on the GPU is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so there is no bandwidth bottleneck. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier AM5 CPU, such as one with more cores, to improve multi-threaded workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support also future-proofs for next-generation SSDs that can exceed PCIe Gen 4 speeds. The 450 W PSU suggestion is modest, indicating that the system is not power-hungry, leaving room for peripheral upgrades or a more powerful GPU, provided the PSU is of good quality.

# Who Should Build It

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Radeon RX 6700 targets users who need a well-rounded desktop for both productivity and gaming. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking and the GPU's 75th percentile ranking make this a balanced mid-range build. Gamers at 1080p will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,218 in Cinebench R23 single-core), which ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game textures, though the 160-bit bus may impose some limitations at extreme settings.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's multi-threaded score of 22,799 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput useful for accelerating tasks like encoding and rendering. The GPU's OpenCL score of 97,841 in Geekbench indicates solid compute performance for applications that leverage GPU acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 12 threads and high integer math score of 79,108 in PassMark, which speeds up build times. Students and small business users who run office applications, web browsing, and light content creation will find this build more than adequate, with the 65 W CPU TDP keeping electricity costs low.

The build's 76th combined percentile places it in the upper mid-range of desktop systems. For users who want to play modern games without breaking the bank, this pairing delivers a smooth experience at 1080p and playable performance at 1440p. The GPU's end-of-life production status means it is still available but will not receive new variants, so buyers should consider availability. The CPU's active production status ensures a steady supply and compatibility with future BIOS updates on AM5 motherboards.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is based on the Navi 22 chip, built on TSMC's 7 nm process node with RDNA 2.0 architecture. The chip contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 51.3M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 1941 MHz, a game clock of 2174 MHz, and a boost clock of 2450 MHz. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is somewhat unusual, as most modern GPUs use a 192-bit or 256-bit bus, but the 10 GB capacity is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high texture settings. The pixel rate is 156.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 352.8 GTexel/s, which are respectable figures for a mid-range card. The FP32 throughput is 11.29 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput reaches 22.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, which is beneficial for AI-adjacent workloads that use reduced precision.

The GPU includes 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 36 ray tracing cores. The ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, a feature that was previously exclusive to higher-end cards. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest game APIs. The DirectX 12 score of 71 in PassMark is modest, but the Geekbench Vulkan score of 83,974 indicates better performance in Vulkan-based titles.

In terms of benchmark performance, the RX 6700's average score of 30,433 places it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 70HX, scores 30,476 (0.1% faster), while the NVIDIA Tesla M60 scores 30,490 (0.2% faster). More notably, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 scores 30,095 (1.1% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 29,945 (1.6% slower). This means the RX 6700 outperforms a higher-tier card like the RTX 3070 Ti in synthetic benchmarks, which is surprising given their market positioning. However, synthetic scores do not always translate directly to gaming performance, where driver optimization and memory bandwidth play larger roles. The GPU's TDP of 175 W and single 8-pin power connector make it power-efficient and easy to install in most systems.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the AMD Radeon RX 6700, forming a desktop-class system with a combined percentile rank of 76. The CPU, with a 77th percentile ranking, and the GPU, with a 75th percentile ranking, are closely matched in performance tier, indicating that neither component will consistently bottleneck the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 24,964 and the GPU's average score of 30,433 suggest that the GPU has higher raw compute throughput, but the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures it can keep up in gaming workloads.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with a dedicated monitor and peripherals. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 175 W TDP combine for a total power draw that is manageable with a 450 W PSU, as suggested. The system is not overly power-hungry, making it suitable for environments where energy efficiency is a concern. The GPU's end-of-life status means it is a mature product with stable drivers, though no new features will be added. The CPU's active status ensures long-term availability and support.

The overall tier of this build is upper mid-range, as indicated by the 76th combined percentile. This places it above entry-level systems but below high-end enthusiast configurations. For users coming from older hardware, this build represents a significant upgrade in both CPU and GPU performance. The AM5 platform provides a modern foundation with DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 support, ensuring that the system is not immediately obsolete. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for current games, and the CPU's 12 threads handle multitasking and streaming without issue.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is critical for determining which component limits performance in various workloads. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking and the GPU's 75th percentile ranking are close, suggesting a well-matched pairing. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3,218 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is likely sufficient to drive high frame rates, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor as resolution increases. At 1440p, the GPU's 160-bit memory bus and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth may constrain performance, while the CPU has headroom to spare.

In productivity workloads, the CPU's multi-threaded score of 22,799 in Cinebench R23 will be the primary driver for tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering. The GPU's compute performance (11.29 TFLOPS FP32) can accelerate certain tasks, but the CPU will still be the bottleneck for heavily threaded applications. Data compression scores of 305,925 in PassMark indicate strong performance in file archiving, which is CPU-bound. The GPU's PassMark compute score of 8,240 is lower than its G3D score of 18,931, suggesting that the GPU is more optimized for graphics than general compute.

The FPS scaling, while not measured, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 3DMark thread scaling shows a 2.8x improvement from 2 threads (1,902) to 8 threads (5,372), but only a 1.19x improvement from 8 to 16 threads (6,376). This indicates that the CPU scales well up to 8 threads, which aligns with its 6-core/12-thread design. In games that use fewer than 8 threads, the CPU will perform strongly. The GPU's Vulkan score of 83,974 suggests good performance in Vulkan-based games, which often scale better with multi-core CPUs. Overall, the build is balanced, with the CPU leading in lightly threaded and productivity tasks, and the GPU leading in graphics-intensive workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 974 single-thread score in 3DMark should maintain high frame rates in competitive titles. The GPU's 75th percentile ranking ensures it can keep up with the CPU's output, making this build suitable for 144 Hz monitors.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and multi-threaded score of 22,799 in Cinebench R23 provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's hardware encoding, implied by its modern architecture, can offload the stream encoding task, though specific encoder performance is not in the FACT PACK.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance (12,362 in Geekbench multi-core) and the GPU's OpenCL score of 97,841 accelerate timeline rendering and effects. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing projects with multiple tracks.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the 6-core/12-thread configuration delivers 22,799 points in Cinebench R23, which is adequate for moderate workloads. GPU-accelerated renderers will leverage the 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 22.58 TFLOPS FP16 for faster iterations.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 79,108 in PassMark speeds up code compilation, and the 32 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequent access patterns. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes support fast NVMe drives for quicker build times.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and inexpensive to run, while the CPU's single-thread performance ensures responsive web browsing and office applications. The GPU is overkill for this use case but provides headroom for occasional gaming or media creation.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

AMD Radeon RX 6700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds