SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

This pairing combines AMD's 6-core Zen 4 desktop processor with NVIDIA's top-tier workstation GPU, creating a desktop build that sits at the 91st combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU, launched in January 2025, is a 65W part on the AM5 platform, while the GPU, released in August 2023, is a 250W dual-slot workstation card based on the AD102 chip. The benchmark data reveals a system with exceptional compute muscle, though the CPU's mainstream core count creates an interesting dynamic with the GPU's professional-grade capabilities.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename) using TSMC's 5 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boosts to 4.70 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The chip features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the CPU supports ECC memory. The processor includes 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21,765 in multi-core and 3,072 in single-core. These figures place it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The multi-core score of 21,765 indicates strong threaded performance for a 6-core part, driven by the high boost clock and Zen 4's IPC improvements. The single-core score of 3,072 is particularly notable, suggesting excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software.

The PassMark suite provides additional context. The multi-thread score of 25,645 and single-thread score of 3,689 align with the Cinebench results, confirming balanced performance across different benchmark methodologies. The integer math score of 74,745 and floating-point math score of 45,799 show strong arithmetic throughput, while the data compression score of 289,999 indicates efficient memory subsystem utilization. The extended instructions score of 21,747 suggests good SIMD performance for workloads that leverage AVX or similar instruction sets.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 7400F is virtually tied with the Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (0.3% ahead). This clustering shows that the 7400F delivers performance squarely in the upper-midrange desktop and mobile segment, with no significant advantage or deficit against these comparable parts.

For real workloads, the 6-core/12-thread configuration handles modern productivity suites, software compilation, and content creation applications with competence. The high single-thread score means day-to-day tasks feel snappy, while the multi-thread score supports moderate parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D scene rendering, though users with heavily threaded workloads would benefit from higher-core-count alternatives.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket from AMD. This socket supports DDR5 memory exclusively, and the CPU's dual-channel memory controller provides 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The 65W TDP means the CPU is power-efficient, requiring only a modest cooling solution.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation GPU has a 250W TDP and requires a 600W suggested power supply, according to the FACT PACK. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes (backward compatible). The GPU is a dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin power connector, measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height, making it suitable for most mid-tower and full-tower cases.

For a sensible next upgrade on this platform, users could consider moving to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU if their workloads demand more threaded performance, since the socket is shared across the Ryzen 7000 series and beyond. The 65W TDP of the current CPU means the platform has thermal headroom for more powerful processors. On the GPU side, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is already near the top of the performance stack, so upgrades would primarily be for future generations with higher VRAM or newer features. The 600W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom for the current configuration, though users adding more drives or expansion cards should verify their power budget.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 3,072 in Cinebench R23 and 3,689 in PassMark single-thread suggest strong gaming performance at high refresh rates. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it can drive demanding titles at high frame rates, though the CPU's 6-core configuration may limit performance in heavily-threaded games. At 1440p and 4K resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, allowing the CPU to keep pace with most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-thread score of 25,645 in PassMark provides enough headroom for software encoding while gaming, though users may prefer the GPU's NVENC encoder for lower system impact. The GPU's 400 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture support advanced encoding features. The 32 GB VRAM on the GPU can handle multiple streams or high-bitrate encoding without memory pressure.

Video Editing: The PassMark data compression score of 289,999 and integer math score of 74,745 indicate strong performance in codec-heavy workloads. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM allow for smooth scrubbing and rendering timeline previews. Multi-core video exports will utilize the CPU's 12 threads effectively, while GPU-accelerated effects leverage the RTX 5000's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 provides solid performance for CPU-based rendering, though it will trail higher-core-count parts. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS and 100 RT cores make it exceptional for GPU-accelerated renderers like those using OptiX or similar APIs. The 32 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes and high-resolution textures.

Software Development: The CPU's single-thread performance (3,072 in R23 single-core) ensures fast compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the multi-thread score supports parallel builds. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking and 91st combined percentile indicate a system that handles IDEs, containers, and local testing efficiently. The 32 GB GPU memory can be used for local AI model inference during development.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the system's 91st combined percentile make this overkill for typical student workloads, but the high single-thread performance ensures snappy response in office suites, spreadsheets, and web applications. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power consumption low for dorm-room or small-office environments, though the GPU's 250W TDP increases overall system power draw.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience for this pairing is professionals in engineering, scientific computing, and content creation who need GPU compute power but also require a capable desktop CPU for daily tasks. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 32 GB VRAM make it suitable for AI training, large-scale data visualization, and high-resolution rendering workflows. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures that system responsiveness and moderate multi-threading are not bottlenecks.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution who also use their system for professional work would find this build viable, as the GPU's performance is far beyond gaming needs, and the CPU's single-thread capabilities handle most gaming scenarios. However, gamers building exclusively for high-refresh competitive titles might find the CPU a limiting factor in CPU-bound games. Students in engineering or computer science programs who run simulations, compile code, or work with machine learning frameworks would benefit from the GPU's compute capabilities, while the CPU handles general coursework efficiently.

Small business workstations requiring reliable performance for CAD, video production, or data analysis would be well-served by this combination. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds data integrity for long-running computations. The 65W CPU TDP and 600W suggested PSU indicate a system that is power-manageable for office environments, though the GPU's dual-slot form factor and 267 mm length require adequate case space.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,750, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T (32,707, 0.1% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32,697, 0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32,812, 0.2% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32,662, 0.3% behind). These tight margins indicate that the 7400F is competitively positioned within its performance class.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725, 0.5% ahead), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147, 1.3% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109, 1.4% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050, 3.7% behind). The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 demonstrate strong compute performance across different API frameworks.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 91, indicating that the system outperforms the vast majority of CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU and GPU are both in the top quartile of their respective categories, though the GPU's 98th percentile is notably higher than the CPU's 83rd percentile, suggesting that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is based on the AD102 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. It features 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation pipelines. The GPU includes 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz. The GPU delivers 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate, 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The FP16 performance matches FP32 at a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for compute workloads.

The 98th percentile ranking places this GPU among the top 2% of all GPUs in the benchmark database. Its average score of 184,664 is slightly above the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB and slightly below the A100 SXM4 40 GB, showing that it competes with data-center-class accelerators. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and RTX 4090 D are close competitors, with the RTX 5000 Ada leading them by 1.4% and 3.7% respectively.

For rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM is a significant advantage over consumer GPUs, allowing large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and complex simulations to reside entirely in GPU memory. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data flows efficiently between memory and compute units. The 100 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, while the 400 tensor cores support AI-based denoising and upscaling.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU rank among all CPUs?

A: The CPU is in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,750.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 91, placing it in the top 9% of all pairings.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7400F supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested power supply?

A: The GPU has a 250W TDP and the suggested power supply is 600W.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is a dual-slot workstation card with a 250W TDP. The combined percentile of 91 indicates that this system outperforms 91% of all CPU-GPU pairings in the benchmark database.

The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 98th percentile create a system where the GPU is the dominant component in terms of relative performance. The CPU is a solid mid-high-range desktop processor, while the GPU is a top-tier professional workstation card. This pairing is best suited for users who need the GPU's compute capabilities and VRAM capacity but do not require the highest-core-count CPUs.

The build class is desktop, confirming that this is a stationary system rather than a laptop configuration. The 65W CPU and 250W GPU TDPs, combined with the 600W suggested PSU, indicate a system that requires a standard desktop power supply and adequate case airflow.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in terms of their percentile rankings. The GPU's 98th percentile is significantly higher than the CPU's 83rd percentile, meaning the CPU is the more likely bottleneck in most workloads. In GPU-bound scenarios like 3D rendering or compute-intensive tasks, the CPU may struggle to feed the GPU with data fast enough, though the CPU's 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth helps mitigate this.

In gaming workloads, the CPU's 6-core/12-thread configuration and high single-thread performance (3,072 in Cinebench R23 single-core) are generally sufficient for maintaining high frame rates, but the GPU's immense power means the CPU could become the limiting factor in CPU-bound games or at lower resolutions. The FPS scaling would likely show diminishing returns from the GPU's capabilities when paired with this CPU, as the CPU cannot always produce frames fast enough to utilize the GPU fully.

For professional workloads, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. In pure GPU compute tasks like AI training or ray tracing, the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS and 100 RT cores dominate, and the CPU's role is primarily data preparation and feeding. In CPU-bound tasks like code compilation or physics simulation, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads may limit performance, though the 25,645 PassMark multi-thread score indicates decent throughput. The 0.1-0.3% differences to nearest CPU rivals suggest that swapping to a similar-tier CPU would not significantly change the balance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile rankings, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 98th percentile ranking and the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking, this system should deliver exceptional gaming performance at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle high-resolution textures and demanding graphics settings without memory constraints. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,072 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can keep up with the GPU in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU may become a limiting factor in games with heavy physics or AI calculations, as the 6-core/12-thread configuration is not as strong as higher-core-count alternatives. However, the high boost clock of 4.70 GHz helps mitigate this in many titles. At 4K resolution, the GPU's performance will dominate, and the CPU's role diminishes, making this pairing well-suited for ultra-high-resolution gaming.

The absence of measured FPS data means these estimates should be treated as approximations. The combined 91st percentile ranking indicates that this system is firmly in the high-performance tier, and users can expect smooth gameplay at high settings in most modern titles, with the GPU providing headroom for future games and higher refresh rates.